Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:26:36.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of density on the intake of dried forage pellets by young ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. M. Tetlow
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
R. J. Wilkins
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Summary

Dried grass pellets of high density (1·3 g/ml) were fed ad libitum to British Friesian male calves 5 to 7 mo old (Experiment 1) or 2 to 5 mo old (Experiment 2). All eight animals in Experiment 1 and eight out of 12 in Experiment 2 were fitted with rumen fistulae. In some subperiods of both experiments, pellets were broken down in water and administered as a slurry directly into the rumen at a level equivalent to approximately one-third that of voluntary intake. Intake per os was significantly reduced by this treatment but total intake (per os+per rumen) was not affected.

In Experiment 3 pellets of high (1·24 g/ml) or medium (1·14 g/ml) density were fed ad libitum to 40 9-mo-old Suffolk × Scottish Halfbred wether sheep, either alone or with access limited to 3 hr a day, in which case chopped hay was always available. Pellet density did not affect total intake, but when offered as supplements to hay the consumption of medium-density pellets was higher than that of high-density pellets. In all three experiments animals required 2 or 3 weeks to reach maximum intake of pellets. Over the 42 days of Experiment 3 the proportion of pellets in the feed consumed by animals given pellets as supplements to hay increased from 60 to 80%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis. 10th ed.Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Church, D. C. 1969. Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants. Vol.1. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. and Maynard, L. A. 1938. The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nutr. 15: 383395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagedorn, H. C. and Jensen, B. N. 1923. [The micro-determination of blood sugar by means of ferricyanide.] Biochem. Z. 135: 4658.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H., Weir, W. C., Dobie, J. B. and Hull, J. L. 1959. Influence of the method of preparation on the feeding value of alfalfa hay. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 976982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A., Thomson, E. F. and Campling, R. C. 1972. Value for milk production of artificially dried forages as cobs and pellets. Anim. Prod. 14: 6975.Google Scholar
Moore, L. A. 1964. Symposium on forage utilization: nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. Part 1. General principles involved with ruminants and effect of feeding pelleted or wafered forage to dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 230238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D., Paulsen, G. M. and Raguse, C. A. 1964. Extraction of total available carbo- hydrates from grass and legume tissue. PL Physiol., Lancaster 39: 960962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J. T. 1962. Methods for the analysis of forage plants with particular reference to carbohydrate constituents. United Stated Department of Agriculture, Publ. GN 81–62.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1970. Dried forages and beef production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 180190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlow, R. M. 1974. A method for determining particle size distribution in packages of dried forage. J. agric. Engng Res. 19: 347352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlow, R. M. and Wilkins, R. J. 1972. The influence of package size and density on the intake of dried grass wafers fed to lambs. Anim. Prod. 14: 335341.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, W. C., Meyer, J. H., Garrett, W. N., Lofgreen, G. P. and Ittner, N. R. 1959. Chopped rations compared to similar rations fed chopped or ground for steers and lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 805814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Lonsdale, C. R., Tetlow, R. M. and Forrest, T. J. 1972. The voluntary intake and digestibility by cattle and sheep of dried grass wafers containing particles of different size. Anim. Prod. 14: 177188.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M., Lonsdale, C. R. and Tayler, J. C. 1973. The growth of beef cattle fed on maize silage supplemented with dried lucerne, fishmeal or urea. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 28: 1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar