Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:37:39.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of birth status on the level and efficiency of wool production by new zealand corriedale two-tooth rams and ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

L. G. Butler
L. G. Butler
Affiliation:
Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand†
Get access

Abstract

Forty-four single- and twin-born New Zealand Corriedale two-tooth ewes and rams aged 14 months were fed individually, in pens, a pelleted ration adjusted to maintain body weight after allowing for wool growth. The sheep were fed for a 3-month settling period, followed by a 3-month experimental period, during which wool growth, fibre diameter, fibre length and net efficiency of wool growth were measured.

Since the wool-growth cycles of the two sexes were found to be out of phase, a valid comparison of the sex data was not possible. Such phase differences may be important in some experimental designs. Significant sex by birth status interactions were identified for all wool production parameters except fibre length, confirming that care must be taken in assigning correction factors during selection of rams and ewes. The general trend was for single-born ewes to produce more and coarser wool more efficiently than twin-born ewes, while the differences between single- and twin-born rams were much smaller. Single-born animals were heavier than twin-born (P<0·01).

Individual values for wool growth and net efficiency varied by a factor of three within sex groups, indicating a considerable scope for selection

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , December 1982 , pp. 309 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkins, K. D. and Robards, G. E. 1976. Efficiency of growth and wool production of young Merino ewes from a flock selected for fertility. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Hush. 16: 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, L. G. 1978. Some aspects of the comparative efficiency of wool production of Corriedale sheep unselected for fleece weight. M. Agric. Sci. Thesis, Lincoln Coll., Univ. Canterbury.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. E. 1960. Measurement of wool samples. In The Biology of the Fleece (ed. Fraser, A. S. and Short, B. F.), Tech. Pap. Anim. Res. Labs C.S.I.R.O. Aust., No. 3, Appendix III, pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
Dawe, S. T. 1972. Twins or singles? A. Semin. Live Stk Offr (Sheep Wool), pp. 51–60. Wagga Agricultural College, New South Wales.Google Scholar
Drinan, J. P. 1968. The relative productivity of single and twin born Merino ewes. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7: 208–211.Google Scholar
Ferguson, K. A., Wallace, A. L. C. and Lindner, H. R. 1965. Hormonal regulation of wool growth. In Biology of the Skin and Hair Growth (ed. Lyne, A. G. and Short, B. F.), pp. 655–677. Angus and Robertson, Sydney.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. R. and Hill, M. K. 1970. Growth and wool production of single and twin-born Merino lambs reared on a high plane of nutrition. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8: 144–148.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. 1961. The effect of light-dark sequences on wool growth. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56: 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, J. and Brown, G. H. 1967. The effects of inbreeding, maternal handicap, and range in age on 10 fleece and body characteristics in Merino rams and ewes. Aust. J. agric. Res. 18: 689–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. and Bent, D. H. 1975. SPSS:Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 2nd ed., p. 399. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Robards, G. E., Williams, A. J. and Hunt, M. H. R. 1974. Selection for crimp frequency in the wool of Merino sheep. 2. Efficiency of conversion of feed to wool. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 14: 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Helen N. 1961. Relationships among clean wool weight and its components. II. The effect of maternal handicap and its influence on selection. Aust. J. agric. Res. 12: 974–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Helen N., Hayman, R. H., Riches, J. H., Roberts, W. F. and Wilson, L. T. 1953. Physical definition of sheep and their fleece for breeding and husbandy studies, with particular reference to Merino sheep. Rep. Div. Anim. Hlth Prod. C.S.I.R.O. Aust., No. 4.Google Scholar