Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:33:07.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of animal size on the response in the performance of beef cattle to an improvement in silage quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. W. J. Steen  and
W. A. McIlmoyle
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DP
W. A. McIlmoyle
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DP
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments have been carried out to examine the interaction between animal size and the response in animal performance to an increase in the digestibility of grass silage. In experiment 1, grass silages harvested during July and August after regrowth intervals of 43 and 85 days were offered ad libitum both unsupplemented and supplemented with 2 kg of concentrates per head per day to British Friesian steers of (±s.e.) 170±1·9, 300±2·9 and 420±3·6 kg initial live weight. Earlier cutting did not affect silage dry-matter intake or live-weight gain but increased carcass gain by 0·12kg/day (P<0·01).

In experiment 2, early-cut grass silage, made from two regrowths of perennial ryegrass, which were harvested during July and August after regrowth intervals of 43 and 48 days, and late-cut silage, made from a single regrowth, which was harvested in August after a regrowth interval of 90 days, were offered ad libitum to 84 Hereford-cross steers of (±s.e.) 170±3·4, 300±4·4 and 420±5|·2kg initial live weight. Earlier cutting increased silage dry-matter intake by 340 g/kg, live-weight gain by 0·23 kg/day and carcass gain by 0·18 kg/day (P<0·001). It i s concluded that increasing the digestibility of grass silage by cutting grass at an earlier stage of growth is likely to produce a substantial increase in the daily carcass gain of beef cattle and that the response to higher digestibility is as great with mature cattle as with young, growing animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 1982 , pp. 301 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1970. Silage and milk production, a comparison between wilted and unwilted grass silages made with and without formic acid. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 278–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. P., Drennan, M. J. and Flynn, A. V. 1977. Potential of Irish grassland for beef production. Proc. Int. Meet. Anim. Prod. Temperate Grassld, Dublin, pp. 12–19.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1980. The effect of interval between harvests and wilting of herbage for silage on milk production. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.), Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc, No. 11, pp. 379–382.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. E. and Henderson, A. R. 1977. Beef production from additive-treated silages. Anim. Prod. 25: 53–60.Google Scholar
Johnsson, S. 1972. Digestibility experiments with growing bulls and wethers consuming artificially dried grass. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 2: 97–103.Google Scholar
McCarrick, R. B. 1965. Effects of stage of growth and method of herbage conservation on performance of weanling cattle. Ir. J. agric. Res. 4: 161–178.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. 1976. Silage for beef production. Occ. Publ. Agric. Res. Inst. Nth. Ire.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. 1978. Silage for beef production. Rep. agric. Res. Inst. Nth. Ire. 1977–1978, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1980. The effect of wilting grass silage and monensin sodium on th e intake and performance of beef cattle. Ir. Grassld Anim. Prod. Ass. J. 15: 102 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ŝteen, R. W. J. and Gordon, F. J. 1980. The effect of level and system of concentrate allocation to January/Feburary calving cows on total lactation performance. Anim. Prod. 30: 39–51.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and McIlmoyle, W. A. 1982. An evaluation of red clover silage for beef production. Anim. Prod. 34: 95–101.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Aston, K. 1976. Milk production from diets of silage and dried forage. 2. Effect of ensiling ryegrass cut at two levels of digestibility and given ad libitum with supplements of dried grass pellets. Anim. Prod. 23: 211–221.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Gibbs, B. G., Aston, K. and Tayler, J. C. 1980. Some factors influencing the performance of beef cattle given silage. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.), Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc, No. 11, pp. 383–387.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Keys, J. E. Jr, and Gordon, C. H. 1975. Paraformaldehyde compared with formic acid as a direct-cut silage preservative. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 922–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar