Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:03:07.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Copper deficiency: a study of prophylaxis and the interaction with cobalt therapy in lambs on improved hill pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Whitelaw
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
A. J. F. Russel
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
R. H. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
C. C. Evans
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
A. R. Fawcett
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
I. R. White
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted with 84 suckling Scottish Blackface twin lambs on an improved hill pasture with a history of cobalt deficiency and molybdenum/sulphur-induced copper deficiency. The dams of 13 pairs of twins were treated with 90 mg copper at parturition (Cue) and one member of each pair was given a cobalt bullet (Co + ). One member of each of a further 29 pairs was treated periodically with 5 to 15mg copper to maintain plasma copper concentrations >0·6mg/l (Cu+) while their siblings received no supplementary copper (Cu). Fourteen of these pairs also received a cobalt bullet (Co + ). Lambs not treated with cobalt are designated Co−.

The Cue treatment increased milk copper concentrations, but only for a short time, and resulted in transitory increases in lamb plasma copper concentrations and rate of live-weight gain. At the end of the grazing phase, at approximately 20 weeks of age, Cu+ lambs had gained 0-28 kg more weight than Cue lambs and 158 kg more than Cue lambs, and had higher liver copper concentrations. Cu+ and Cue lambs had heavier and fatter empty bodies and carcasses than Cu− lambs. The cobalt treatment produced no effects at this stage.

Fifty-four of the lambs were housed and given dried grass pellets ad libitum. After 83 days liver copper concentrations were higher in Co than Co+ lambs, and in Cu+ than in Cu and Cue lambs. The copper treatments had no effect on rate or efficiency of live-weight gain, but Co lambs gained weight more quickly and more efficiently than Co+ lambs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Britt, R. P., Bolton, F. G., Cull, A. C. and Spray, G. H. 1969. Experience with a simplified method of radio-isotope assay of serum vitamin B12. Br. J. Haemat. 16: 457467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1977. GENSTAT Reference Manual. Statistics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Lee, H. J. 1963. Cobalt deficiency. Animal Health, Production and Pasture (ed. Worden, A. N., Sellers, K. C. and Tribe, D. E.), p. 662680. Longmans, Green, London.Google Scholar
MacPherson, A., Moon, F. E. and Voss, R. C. 1973. Some effects of feeding young steers on a diet deficient in both cobalt and copper. Br. vet. J. 129: 414426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitelaw, A., Armstrong, R. H., Evans, C. C. and Fawcett, A. R. 1979. A study of the effects of copper deficiency in Scottish blackface lambs on improved hill pasture. Vet. Rec. 104: 455460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitelaw, A. and Russel, A. J. F. 1979. Investigations into the prophylaxis of cobalt defiency in sheep. Vet. Rec. 104: 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, W. H., Siebert, B. D. and Kuchel, R. E. 1977. Cobalt deficiency of cattle grazing improved pastures in northern Cape York Peninsula. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 17: 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar