Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:59:24.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Components of weight loss in pregnant hill ewes during winter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. J. F. Russel
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, 29 Lauder Road, Edinburgh 9
R. G. Gunn
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, 29 Lauder Road, Edinburgh 9
J. M. Doney
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, 29 Lauder Road, Edinburgh 9
Get access

Extract

Live weight of 180 free-grazing Blackface ewes was measured approxim-ately every two weeks throughout a 12-month period. Mean live weight was at a maximum (47 kg) in late autumn prior to mating and declined progressively to 39 kg at about the time of parturition.

Six ewes were slaughtered in November before mating, six at about the 16th week of pregnancy, and a further 11 in April during the final week of pregnancy. The loss of weight of maternal tissues (i.e. live weight less the weight of fleece and contents of the gastrointestinal tract and gravid uterus) during this period was more than 20% (7·5 kg) and comprised 51% of the fat, 14% of the water, and 20% of the protein plus ash present at maximum live weight. During the earlier stages of pregnancy there was an appreciable loss of water from the maternal tissues, but in late pregnancy the rate of water loss decreased and that of fat increased considerably.

The distribution of fat throughout the maternal tissues at different levels of total fat content and the pattern of fat mobilization from various depots are described. The largest single contribution to fat loss during the pregnancy period was that of the subcutaneous reserves, which were depleted by 86%, most of this being lost during the first four months. At the other end of the scale bone fat reserves were reduced by only 25%, almost all of this occurring during the final month.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butterfield, R. M. 1966. The effect of nutritional stress and recovery on the body composition of cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 1: 168179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G. 1967. A note on hill ewe mortality. Anim. Prod. 9: 263264.Google Scholar
Hight, G. K. and Barton, R. A. 1965. The effects of undernutrition and re-alimentation on the Romney ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64: 413424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, B. C. 1961. Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasm. J. Agric. 32: 1921.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H. and Barton, R. A. 1958a. Live weight loss and its components in Romney ewes subjected to 1-thyroxine therapy and a low plane of nutrition. I. Effects on live weight, carcass weight and carcass composition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 51: 265281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H. and Barton, R. A. 1958b. Live weight loss and its components in Romney ewes subjected to 1-thyroxine therapy and a low plane of nutrition. II. Effects on some non-carcass components of live weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 51: 282288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pálsson, H. 1955. Conformation and body composition. In Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals, 2: 430542. Edited by Hammond, J., Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Panaretto, B. A. 1964. Body composition in vivo. VI. The composition of ewes during prolonged undernutrition. Aust. J. agric. Res. 15: 771787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riney, T. 1955. Evaluating condition of free-ranging red deer (Cervus claphus), with special reference to New Zealand. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 36B: 429463.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. F., Currie, D. C. and Peart, J. N. 1961. Feeding hill ewes. Trans. R. Highld. agric. Soc. Scoti., Ser. VI, 6: 3146.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. 1948. The effect of supermaintenance and submaintenance diets on mature Border Leicester-Cheviot ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38: 345350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Reid, R. L. 1967. Energy requirements of the pregnant ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 359363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A., Handler, P. and Smith, E. L. 1964. Principles of Biochemistry. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. and Barton, R. A. 1963. A comparison of the chemical and dissectible carcass composition of New Zealand Romney Marsh ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 60: 285289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar