Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:19:44.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of growth, food efficiency and carcass characteristics of single and twin beef calves derived by embryo transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was designed to examine the interaction between birth status and plane of nutrition of calves in relation to postnatal and lifetime performance. The experiment was a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of birth status (single and twin), plane of nutrition from birth to 16 weeks (period 1) and plane of nutrition from 16 weeks to slaughter at a mean live weight of 530·4 (s.e. 0·13) kg (period 2). The planes of nutrition were control and low with metabolizable energy (ME) intakes of 32·1 and 21·4 (s.e. 0·46) MJ/day from birth to 16 weeks, and 73·9 and 64·1 (s.e. 0·95) from 16 weeks until slaughter. The birth weights of the single and twin-born calves were 47·2 and 39·7 (s.e. 0·90) kg respectively. There was no interaction between birth status and plane of nutrition in either main period and by 40 weeks of age the live weights of the twin calves were similar to those of the single-born calves. For period 1 plus period 2 the live-weight gains per unit of ME intake were 12·4 and 13·1 (s.e. 0·28) g/Mf for single and twin-born calves respectively. Although twins had slightly poorer carcass conformation and higher proportion of bone in the carcass, the concentrations of saleable meat and high-priced joints in the carcass were similar. Birth status had no effect on the ultimate pH of muscle. It is concluded that viable twins have similar beef producing potential to single-born calves.

The control and low planes of nutrition imposed during the periods from birth to 16 weeks and 16 weeks to slaughter produced live-weight gains of 822 and 573 (s.e. 31·0) g/day, and 857 and 690 (s.e. 12·6) g/day respectively. Calves which had been on the low plane during the initial period had a compensation index of 0·30 by 64 weeks of age. Carcass measurements were not affected by the plane of nutrition during either period. Steers grew faster than heifers, had lower area o/m. longissimus dorsi but less separable fat and more bone in the forerib joint than heifers at equal carcass weight.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, G. B., Cupps, P. T., Drost, M., Horton, M. B. and Wright, R. W. 1978. Induction of twinning in heifers by bilateral embryo transfer. Journal of Animal Science 46: 449452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. B. and Mears, G. J. 1990. Birth weight in calves and its relation to growth rates from birth to weaning and weaning to slaughter. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 167173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. E. 1989. Use of embryo transfer to produce twinning in beef cattle: postweaning performance of calves. Livestock Production Science 23: 295304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. E., Harvey, W. R., Bishop, M. D. and Gearheart, W. W. 1989. Use of embryo transfer to induce twinning in beef cattle: embryo survival rate, gestation length, birth weight and weaning weight of calves. Journal of Animal Science 67:301310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Rose, E. P. and Wilton, J. W. 1991. Productivity and profitability of twin births in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 69: 30853093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diskin, M. G., McEvoy, T. G. and Sreenan, J. M. 1990. A comparison of the growth rate of single and twin-born beef calves. Animal Production 50:546 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Kay, R. M, Little, W. and Kitchenham, B. A. 1976. A comparison of the growth performance and blood composition of twin and singleton calves. Animal Production 22:1925.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. and Drennan, M. J. 1990. Comparison of growth and carcass composition of heifers in three production systems and steers and effects of implantation with anabolic agents. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 113.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Lewis, M. L., Neilson, D. R., Scott, N. A. and Hunter, E. A. 1991. Complementary influences of exogenous hormone implantation, antibiotic feed addition and supplementary undegradable dietary protein upon the growth, feed intake and carcass characteristics of finishing beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 28: 3752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, K. H., Gordon, I., Gallagher, M. and McGovern, H. 1987. Pregnancy established in cattle by transfer of embryos derived from in vitro fertilisation of oocytes matured in vitro. Veterinary Record 121:259260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCutcheon, G. A., Caffrey, P. J., Kelleher, D. L. and Brophy, P. O. 1991. Twinning in a suckler herd. 1. Effects on performance of cows and their calves. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 30:19.Google Scholar
Matthes, H. D. 1990. Birth weight, parturition and beef production in the dairy cattle population. Archiv fur Experimentelle Veterinarmedizin 44:947953.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and McCaughey, W. J. 1990. An evaluation of the effects of twinning in dairy cows on animal production. Animal Production 50: 545 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Patterson, D. C, Moore, C. A. and Steen, R. W. J. 1993a. The effect of plane of nutrition and slaughter weight on the performance and carcass composition of continental beef bulls given high forage diets. Animal Production In press.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. C. and Steen, R. W. J. 1993. Direct, residual and lifetime effects of plane of nutrition during 1 to 13 and 13 to 25 weeks of age on accretion of major chemical constituents and on the chemical composition of body components in beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge In press.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. C, Steen, R. W. J. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1993b. Direct, residual and lifetime effects of plane of nutrition during 1 to 13 and 13 to 25 weeks of age on components of gain and food efficiency in beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge In press.Google Scholar
Rahnefeld, G. W., Weiss, G. M. and Fredeen, H. T. 1990. Milk yield and composition in beef cows and their effect on cow and calf performance in two environments. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70: 409423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenan, J. M. and Diskin, M. G. 1985. Manipulation of the reproductive rate to increase calf crop and output from the suckler herd. Animal Production 40: 527 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1984. A comparison of two-cut and three-cut systems of silage making for beef cattle using two cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Animal Production 38:171179.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1989. A comparison of soya-bean, sunflower and fish meals as protein supplements for yearling cattle offered grass-silage based diets. Animal Production 48: 8189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1992. The effects of plane of nutrition and slaughter weight on performance and carcass composition of beef cattle. Animal Production 54: 466 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Turman, E. J., Laster, D. B., Renbarger, R. E. and Stephens, D. F. 1971. Multiple birth in beef cows treated with equine gonadotrophin (PMS) and chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Journal of Animal Science 32:962967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, D. O. and Evans, C. 1985. The production of twin calves by non-surgical transfer of two embryos in cows in a spring-calving Hereford × Friesian suckler herd. Animal Production 40: 555 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Osbourn, D. F. 1960. Compensatory growth after undernutrition in mammals and birds. Biological Reviews 35: 324363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed