Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:45:39.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative study of some carcass characteristics of Sudan Desert sheep and goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. S. E. Gaili ,
Y. S. Ghanem  and
A. M. S. Mukhtar
E. S. E. Gaili
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Khartoum, Sudan
Y. S. Ghanem
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Khartoum, Sudan
A. M. S. Mukhtar
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Khartoum, Sudan
Get access

Summary

Male Sudan desert sheep and goats of three age-groups, young, yearling and mature, were used to compare some of their carcass characteristics when reared under range conditions and in feedlot. Carcass traits studied were the dressing percentage, the percentage of bone in the carcass and wholesale cuts, chemical composition of meat, and muscle fibre thickness. An organoleptic test was carried out on meat from the fattened animals.

The dressing percentage, percentage of edible meat, chemical fat and muscle fibre thickness were increased by fattening in the feedlot. Increases were also observed with advancing age, but the effect was more marked in fattened than unfattened animals. Goats yielded a higher carcass weight per unit live weight than sheep, the stomach content and skin weight relative to live weight being greater in the sheep than in the goats. Goats were shown to possess less chemical fat and thicker fibres than sheep. Taste panel scores revealed a highly significant (P < 0·005) treatment effect on tenderness and a significant (P = 0·5) treatment effect on juiciness in relation to age and species. Taste panel flavour scores were not associated with animal age or species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , June 1972 , pp. 351 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1960. Official Methods of Analysis (9th ed.). Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in Sheep. 2nd ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hassan, M. H. 1969. The use of some concentrates and roughages in fattening indigenous sheep. M.V.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Khartoum.Google Scholar
Helser, , 1923. Farm Meats. New York.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. 1956. An analysis of factors influencing postnatal growth and development of muscle fibre. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47: 59–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levie, A. 1967. The Meat Handbook. The Avia Pub. Co Inc., Westport, Connecticut. MCLEROY, G. B. 1961. Sheep of the Sudan. Sudan J. vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 2: 101–165.Google Scholar
Mare, G. S. and Bossman, V. 1934. Influence of feed on Merino sheep. Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. Anim. Ind. 26: 199–210.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. and Maule, J. P. 1960. The Indigenous Livestock of Eastern and Western Africa. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. Farnham Royal, Bucks.Google Scholar
Miller, J. C., Jones, J. M. and Burt, C. R. 1944. Angora goats produce excellen meat. Sheep Goat Rais. 24: 9–11 and 45.Google Scholar
Osman, A. H. and El Shafie, S. A. 1967. Carcase characteristics of Sudan desert sheep. Sudan J. vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 8: 115–119.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1962. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Tuma, H. J., Henderson, R. L., Odell, G. V. and Stephens, D. F. 1963. Variation in the physical and chemical characteristics of the longissimus dorsi muscle from animals differing in age. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 354–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar