Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T22:47:50.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino rams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. M. Butterfield ,
J. Zamora ,
A. M. James ,
J. M. Thompson  and
Jean Williams
R. M. Butterfield
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
J. Zamora
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
A. M. James
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
J. M. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Jean Williams
Affiliation:
Division of Mathematics and Statistics, CSIRO, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Maturing patterns are established for 93 individual muscles, and nine anatomical groups of muscles, using half carcass dissection data from 39 rams of two strains of Merinos of different mature size (91 and 116 kg). The maturity coefficients of the individual muscles and muscle groups are tabulated. Seventy-eight of the 93 muscles, and eight of the nine anatomical muscle groups, had maturing patterns which were not significantly different for the strains of sheep. In general, the muscles of the limbs and muscles surrounding the spinal column were earlier-maturing than total muscle and the muscles in the cranial end of the trunk were late maturing. The muscles of the abdominal wall matured at the same rate as total muscle.

Differences in the distribution of muscle weight of the two strains of rams, when compared at the same total muscle weight, were reduced when compared at the same proportion' of mature total muscle weight. It was concluded, therefore, that apparent differences in the distribution of muscle weights, when breeds are compared at the same total muscle weight, may be due largely to differences in mature size.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 165 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berg, R. T. and Butterfield, R. M. 1976. New Concepts of Cattle Growth. Sydney University Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Brannang, E. 1971. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XXIII. The effects of castration and age of castration on the development of single muscles, bones and special sex characters. Part II. Swed. J. agric. Res. 1: 69–78.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1963. A study of the musculature of the steer carcase. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966a. A classification of bovine muscles based on their relative growth patterns. Res. vet. Sci. 7: 326–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966b. Relative growth patterns of commercially important muscle groups of cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 7: 389–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966c. A nutritional effect on relative growth of muscles. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. VI: 298–304.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Griffiths, D. A., Thompson, J. M., Zamora, J. and James, A. M. 1983. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 1. Muscle, bone and fat. Anim. Prod. 36: 29–37.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and May, N. D. S. 1966. Muscles of the Ox. University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Charles, D. D. and Johnson, E. R. 1976. Muscle weight distribution in four breeds of cattle with reference to individual muscles, anatomical groups and wholesale cuts. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86; 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. 2nd ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jury, K. E., Fourie, P. D. and Kirton, A. H. 1977. Growth and development of sheep. IV. Growth of the musculature. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 20: 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohse, C. L., Moss, F. P. and Butterfield, R. M. 1971. Growth patterns of muscles of Merino sheep from birth to 517 days. Anim. Prod. 13: 117–126.Google Scholar
Mukhoty, H. and Berg, R. T. 1973. Influence of breed and sex on muscle weight distribution of cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 81: 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. 1978. Historical and general review of growth and development. In Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 2. Patterns of Growth and Development in Cattle. (ed. Boer, H. de and Martin, J.), pp. 3–11. Martinus Nijhoff. The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. 1968. Genetic variation in growth and development of cattle. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 267–290. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S., Mason, M. A. and McClelland, T. H. 1980. Breed and sex differences in muscle distribution in equally mature sheep. Anim. Prod. 30: 125–133.Google Scholar