Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:02:09.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The cellularity of backfat in growing pigs and its relationship with carcass composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. D. Wood
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
M. B. Enser
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
D. J. Restall
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
Get access

Abstract

1. Using 12 castrated Large White pigs, the way in which the size and number of recognizable fat cells (i.e. > 6·0 μm) increases during growth from 26 to 109 kg live weight, and the relationships between fat cellularity and body fat content were determined.

2. Fat biopsy samples were taken at 87, 145 and 188 days of age from the shoulder region. This region grew rapidly in volume but was early maturing since its relative growth during the period of the experiment was low compared with other regions, particularly the mid-back to loin region.

3. The growth of fat that occurred during the experiment was due to increases in both the size and number of recognizable cells. There was no indication that the number of cells had become constant even at 188 days of age.

4. Subcutaneous or total fat expressed as a percentage of total dissectible tissue weight was related quite closely (r = 0·6 to 0·7, residual s.d. about 8% of mean fat percentage) to average fat cell size measured at 145 and 188 days. The number of cells at these times, defined as the number in a cylinder whose depth was known and whose cross-sectional area was 1 mm2 on day 1, was not significantly correlated with whole body fatness.

5. Appetite was strongly linked to the rate of fat deposition and to the weight of fat at 188 days, but not to fat expressed in percentage terms. This was, however, closely related to the corrected food conversion ratio (r = 0·90, residual s.d. 2% of mean total fat percentage).

6. Fat thickness measured by ultrasonics before slaughter was no better as a predictor of percentage fat than average fat cell size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, D. B. 1972. The cellular development of adipose tissues. Proc. 25th Ann. Reciprocal Meat Conf. Am. Meat Sci. Ass., pp. 939.Google Scholar
Björntorp, P. and Sjostrom, L. 1972. Fat cell size and number in adipose tissue in relation to metabolism. Israeli, med. Sci. 8: 320324.Google ScholarPubMed
Enser, M. B., MacFie, H. J., Moody, W. B., Restall, D. J. and Wood, J. D. 1976. The growth and cellularity of pig backfats. Artim. Prod. 22: 151 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Enser, M. B., Wood, J. D., Restall, D. J. and MacFie, H. J. H. 1976. The cellularity of adipose tissue from pigs of different weights. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86: 633638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, V. R. 1966. Prediction of carcase composition of pigs from efficiency of feed utilisation with correction for maintenance requirement. Programme and abstracts of 9th int. Congr. Anim. Prod. Edinburgh, p. 79 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. 1940. Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characters: I. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30: 276343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, C. A. and Fursey, G. A. J. 1974. A note on the velocity of ultrasound in living tissue. Anim. Prod. 18: 9396.Google Scholar
Sjöström, L., Björntorp, P. and Vràna, J. 1971. Microscopic fat cell size measurements on frozen-cut adipose tissue in comparison with automatic determinations of osmium-fixed fat cells. J. Lipid. Res. 12: 521530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. D., Enser, M. B. and Restall, D. J. 1975. Fat cell size in Piètrain and Large White pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 221225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar