Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:47:14.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of the micronization process for preparing cereals for the growing pig. 1. Effects on digestibility and nitrogen retention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. L. J. Lawrence
T. L. J. Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Department of Animal Husbandry, Veterinary Field Station, Neston, Wirral, Cheshire, L64 7TE
Get access

Summary

1. In two experiments, each using three groups of six littermate castrated male pigs per group, the effects on cereal composition, apparent digestibility and nitrogen retention of micronizing barley and maize were studied.

2. The process increased the dry matter (DM) content and in vitro starch availability and decreased the nitrogen content of both cereals. When maize was flaked (rolled) subsequent to the process the ether-extract content was markedly decreased.

3. Nitrogen retention was not affected by the process but apparent digestibility of the DM, nitrogen and gross energy was improved. These effects were most marked when the process was followed by flaking, the improvements in such cases in digestible energy content over the unprocessed grain being 4·3% (P>0·05) for barley and 6·6% (P<0·05) for maize.

4. Soaking the unprocessed and micronized and flaked cereals before feeding did not significantly affect the results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 1973 , pp. 99 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aumaitre, A., Henry, Y., Mercier, Christiane, Ivorec-Szylit, Odette and Thivend, P. 1972. Eture preliminaire de l'influence d'un traitment hydrothermique sur la valeur alimentaire du ble et du mais. Annls Zootech. 21: 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1962. Effect of soaking the meal ration for growing pigs in water or skim milk. Anim. Prod. 4: 313–318.Google Scholar
Becker, D. E., Jensen, A. H., Harmon, B. G., Norton, H. W. and Breidenstein, B. C. 1963. Effect of restricted diet on the performance of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 1116.Google Scholar
Burnett, G. S. 1962. The effect of damaged starch, amylolytic enzymes and proteolytic enzymes on the utilization of cereals by chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 3: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, G. S. and Neil, E. L. 1964. The influence of processing and of certain crude enzyme preparations on the utilization of cereals by pigs. Anim. Prod. 6: 237–244.Google Scholar
Gill, D. R. 1965. Effect of barley pretreatment on feeding behaviour rate and efficiency of gains in swine. Diss. Abstr. 25: 6862.Google Scholar
Greenwood, C. T. 1970. Starch and glycogen. In The Carbohydrates (ed. Pigman, W. and Horton, D.), Vol. 2B, 2nd ed., pp. 471–513. Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. E., Matsushima, J. K. and Knox, K. L. 1968. Utilisation of flaked and cracked corn by steers with observations on starch modification. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 1431–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1972. High level cereal diets for the growing/finishing pig. VI. An evaluation of flaked maize, wheat and barley when included at high levels in the diet of the weaned pig grown to cutter weight (160 lb.). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79: 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, Christiane. 1971. Effects of various U.S. grain processes on the alteration and the in vitro digestibility of starch granule. Feedstuffs, Minneap. 43 (No. 50): 33.Google Scholar
Osman, H. F., Theurer, B., Hale, W. H. and Mehen, S. M. 1970. Influence of grain processing on in vitro enzymatic starch digestion of barley and sorghum grain. J. Nutr. 100: 1133–1140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfost, H. B. 1971. Equipment and techniques in starch gelatinisation. Feedstuffs, Minneap. 43 (No. 9): 24.Google Scholar
Sheehy, E. J. and Senior, B. J. 1939. The comparative feeding values for pigs of cereals prepared in flaked and ground forms. J. Dep. Agric. Repub. Ire. 36: 230–245.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. 1925. Digestion trials with swine. II. Comparative determinations of the digestibility of dry fed maize, soaked maize, cooked maize and flaked maize. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 15: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. and Evans, R. E. 1932. The value of degermed maize meal (cooked) in the nutrition of swine. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 22: 670–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar