Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:33:13.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accuracy and consistency of prediction of pig carcass lean concentration from P2 fat thickness and sample joint dissection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Planella  and
G. L. Cook
J. Planella
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Winterhill House, Snowdon Drive, Milton Keynes MK6 1AX
G. L. Cook
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Winterhill House, Snowdon Drive, Milton Keynes MK6 1AX
Get access

Abstract

Commercial carcass grading measurements and sample joint dissection were evaluated as predictors of carcass lean concentration using a data set of 1320 pig carcasses from four breeding companies. Entire males, castrated males and gilts from White-type and Meat-type populations were reared on ad libitum or restricted feeding regimens and slaughtered to achieve a carcass weight of either 52·5 kg or 72·5 kg. A model was fitted which examined the accuracy and stability of regression equations for different populations, sexes and feeding regimens, and different values of P2 and carcass weight. The regression slope of lean concentration on P2 differed by sex and population. Lean concentration decreased faster with increases in P2 among gilts than among entire or castrated males. At the same level of P2 and carcass weight, pigs fed ad libitum contained 5 g/kg less lean in the carcass than pigs fed at a restricted level. Biases among populations, sexes and feeding regimens were also found when carcass lean concentration was predicted from additional measurements: muscle depth at P2, fat thickness and muscle depth at 3/4 last ribs, and eye-muscle area. The regression slope of lean concentration on sample joints showed little evidence of variation among populations (except for the hand joint), sexes or feeding regimens. There were important differences in the intercept for different populations. The ham was the most accurate (residual s.d. = 11 g/kg) and least biased joint.

Keywords

carcass compositiondissectionfat thicknesspigsprediction
Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , December 1991 , pp. 345 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cook, G. L., Chadwick, J. P. and Kempster, A. J. 1989. An assessment of carcass probes for use in Great Britain for the EC Pig Carcass Grading Scheme. Animal Production 48: 427–434.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. 1968. PIDA dissection techniques. Proceedings of the symposium on methods of carcass evaluation. European Association for Animal Production, Dublin. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Diestre, A. and Kempster, A. J. 1985. The estimation of pig carcass composition from different measurements with special reference to classification and grading. Animal Production 41: 383–391.Google Scholar
Evans, D. G. and Kempster, A. J. 1979. A comparison of different predictors of the lean content of pig carcasses. 2. Predictors for use in population studies and experiments. Animal Production 28: 97–108.Google Scholar
Fortin, A., Wood, J. D. and Whelehan, O. P. 1987. Breed and sex effects on the development and distribution of muscle, fat and bone, and the partition of fat in pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108:141–153.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Cook, G. L. 1989. Errors in carcass lean prediction with special reference to the EC Grading Scheme. In New techniques in pig carcass evaluation, pp. 28–36. Centre for Agricultural Publication and Documentation, Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Evans, D. G. 1979. The effects of genotype, sex and feeding regimen on pig carcass development. 2. Tissue weight distribution and fat partition between depots. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 349–358.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Evans, D. G. 1981. The value of shape as a predictor of carcass composition in pigs from different breeding companies. Animal Production 33:315–324.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1989. Stotfold pig development unit, first trial results. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1990. Pig yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D. and Robinson, J. M. 1989. Prediction of carcass lean content from fat and muscle thickness measurements in Large White and Pietrain pigs. Livestock Production Science 21: 325–332.Google Scholar