Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:21:47.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the antibiotic treatment for infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: an update

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

J. N. Cullen ,
C. Yuan ,
S. Totton ,
R. Dzikamunhenga ,
J. F. Coetzee ,
N. da Silva ,
C. Wang  and
A. M. O'Connor
J. N. Cullen
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 500010, USA
C. Yuan
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
R. Dzikamunhenga
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 500010, USA
J. F. Coetzee
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 500010, USA
N. da Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
C. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 500010, USA Department of Statistics, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
A. M. O'Connor*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 500010, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK) is a common and important disease of calves. Without effective vaccines, antibiotic therapy is often implemented to minimize the impact of IBK. This review updates a previously published systematic review regarding comparative efficacy for antibiotic treatments of IBK. Available years of Centre for Biosciences and Agriculture International and MEDLINE databases were searched, including non-English results. Also searched were the American Association of Bovine Practitioners and World Buiatrics Congress conference proceedings from 1996 to 2016, reviews since 2013, reference lists from relevant trials, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration New Animal Drug Application summaries. Eligible studies assessed antibiotic treatment of naturally-occurring IBK in calves randomly allocated to group at the individual level. Outcomes of interest were clinical score, healing time, unhealed ulcer risk, and ulcer surface area. A mixed-effects model comparing active drug with placebo was employed for all outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed visually and using Cochran's Q-test. Thirteen trials assessing nine treatments were included. Compared with placebo, most antibiotic treatments were effective. There was evidence that the treatment effect differed by day of outcome measurement. Visually, the largest differences were observed 7–14 days post-treatment. These results indicate improved IBK healing with many antibiotics and suggest the need for randomized trials comparing different antibiotic treatments.

Keywords

antibioticsinfectious bovine keratoconjunctivitismeta-analysispinkeyesystematic review
Type
Review Article
Information
Animal Health Research Reviews , Volume 17 , Special Issue 1: Systematic Reviews , June 2016 , pp. 60 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdala, AA, Canavesio, VR, Zimmermann, G, Abramovich, G and Calvinho, LF (2002). Two treatments for bovine infections keratoconjunctivitis Evaluacion de dos regimenes de tratamiento antibiotico topico, para Queratoconjuntivitis Infecciosa Bovina. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria (Buenos Aires) 83: 100–102.Google Scholar
Alexander, D (2010). Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: a review of cases in clinical practice. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 26: 487–503.Google Scholar
Allen, LJ, George, LW and Willits, NH (1995). Effect of penicillin or penicillin and dexamethasone in cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 206: 1200–1203.Google Scholar
Angelos, JA, Dueger, EL, George, LW, Carrier, TK, Mihalyi, JE, Cosgrove, SB and Johnson, JC (2000). Efficacy of orfenicol for treatment of naturally occurring infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 216: 62–64.Google Scholar
Angelos, JA, Spinks, PQ, Ball, LM and George, LW (2007). Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov., isolated from calves with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 57 (Pt 4): 789–795.Google Scholar
Brown, MH, Brightman, AH, Fenwick, BW and Rider, MA (1998). Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: a review. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 12: 259–266.Google Scholar
Chadli, M (1992). Clinical evaluation of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis after treatment with long acting oxytetracycline La keratoconjonctivite infectieuse bovine: evaluation clinique apres traitement a l'oxytetracycline longue action. Maghreb Veterinaire 7: 34–36.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, SB, Simmons, RD, Johnson, JC and Varma, KJ (1998). In vivo and in vitro efficacy of Nuor (orfenicol) in the treatment of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Schering-plough Animal Health Nuor: new therapeutic applications. In: Proceedings of a Symposium Held in Conjunction with the XX World Buiatrics Congress, p. 514.Google Scholar
Cullen, JN, Engelken, TJ, Cooper, VS and OConnor, AM (in press). A randomized, controlled, blinded trial assessing the association between infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis incidence and a commercial Moraxella bovis vaccine in beef calves. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.Google Scholar
Dueger, EL, George, LW, Angelos, JA, Tankersley, NS, Luiz, KM, Meyer, JA, Portis, ES and Lucas, MJ (2004). Efficacy of a long-acting formulation of ceftiofur crystalline-free acid for the treatment of naturally occurring infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65: 1185–1188.Google Scholar
Eastman, TG, George, LW, Hird, DW and Thurmond, MC (1998). Combined parenteral and oral administration of oxytetracycline for control of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212: 560–563.Google Scholar
Edmondson, AJ, George, LW and Farver, TB (1989). Survival analysis for evaluation of corneal ulcer healing times in calves with naturally acquired infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 50: 838–844.Google ScholarPubMed
Emarcora, M, Morassi, R, Soriolo, A, Piva, R, Bregoli, M and Schiavon, E (2010). Efficacy of tulathromycin in a outbreak of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Large Animal Review 16: 163–165.Google Scholar
Freedom of Information Summary (2007). NADA 141-244 – DRAXXIN Injectable Solution. [Available online at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/animalveterinary/products/approvedanimaldrugproducts/foiadrugsummaries/ucm051495.pdf].Google Scholar
Funk, L, O'Connor, AM, Maroney, M, Engelken, T, Cooper, VL, Kinyon, J and Plummer, P (2009). A randomized and blinded field trial to assess the efficacy of an autogenous vaccine to prevent naturally occurring infectious bovine keratoconjunctivis (IBK) in beef calves. Vaccine 27: 4585–4590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funk, LD, Reecy, JM, Wang, C, Tait, RG Jr., O'Connor, AM (2014). Associations between infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis at weaning and ultrasongraphically measured body composition traits in yearling cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 244: 100–106.Google Scholar
George, L, Mihalyi, J, Edmondson, A, Daigneault, J, Kagonyera, G, Willits, N and Lucas, M (1988). Topically applied furazolidone or parenterally administered oxytetracycline for the treatment of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 192: 1415–1422.Google Scholar
George, LW, Wilson, WD, Baggot, JD and Mihalyi, JE (1984). Antibiotic treatment of Moraxella bovis infection in cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 185: 1206–1209.Google Scholar
George, LW, Keefe, T and Daigneault, J (1989). Effectiveness of two benzathine cloxacillin formulations for treatment of naturally occuring infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 50: 1170–1174.Google Scholar
Gokce, HI, Citil, M, Genc, O, Erdogan, HM, Gunes, V and Kankavi, O (2002). A comparison of the efficacy of orfenicol and oxytetracycline in the treatment of naturally occurring infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Irish Veterinary Journal 55: 573–576.Google Scholar
Gotelli, NJ, Hart, EM and Ellison, AM (2015). EcoSimR: Null model analysis for ecological data – version 0.1.0. [Available online at http://github.com/gotellilab/EcoSimR].Google Scholar
Gould, S, Dewell, R, Tofflemire, K, Whitley, RD, Millman, ST, Opriessnig, T, Rosenbusch, R, Trujillo, J and O'Connor, AM (2013). Randomized blinded challenge study to assess association between Moraxella bovoculi and Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis in dairy calves. Veterinary Microbiology 164: 108–115.Google Scholar
Higgins, J, Green, S and Cochrane Collaboration (2008). Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Julian, PT and Green, S (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Vol. 5. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, JP and Whitehead, A (1996). Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 15: 2733–2749.Google Scholar
Hoaglin, DC (2016). Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran's Q test’ in meta analysis. Statistics in Medicine 35: 485–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, JP, Crawford, B, Bergman, G and Stam, W (2008). Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons. Value Health 11: 956–964.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, E and Pedersen, AR (1998). How to obtain those nasty standard errors from transformed data-and why they should not be used. [Available online at http://gbi.agrsci.dk/~ejo/publications/dinapig/intrep7.pdf].Google Scholar
Lane, VM, George, LW and Cleaver, DM (2006). Efficacy of tulathromycin for treatment of cattle with acute ocular Moraxella bovis infections. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 229: 557–561.Google Scholar
Lu, G and Ades, AE (2004). Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine 23: 3105–3124.Google Scholar
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG and Prisma Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6: 1–6.Google Scholar
O'Connor, AM, Wellman, NG, Evans, RB and Roth, DR (2006). A review of randomized clinical trials reporting antibiotic treatment of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis in cattle. Animal Health Research Reviews 7: 119–127.Google Scholar
O'Connor, AM, Sargeant, JM, Gardner, IA, Dickson, JS, Torrence, ME, Dewey, CE, Dohoo, IR, Evans, RB, Gray, JT, Greiner, M, Keefe, G, Lefebvre, SL, Morley, PS, Ramirez, A, Sischo, W, Smith, DR, Snedeker, K, Sofos, J, Ward, MP and Wills, R (2010). The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 93: 11–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, AM, Brace, S, Gould, S, Dewell, R and Engelken, T (2011). A randomized clinical trial evaluating a farm-of-origin autogenous Moraxella bovis vaccine to control infectious bovine keratoconjunctivis (pinkeye) in beef cattle. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 25: 1447–1453.Google Scholar
Pfizer Animal Health (2008). Efficacy of DRAXXIN (tulathromycin) Injectable solution for treatment of naturally occurring infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis associated with Moraxella bovis in beef and airy calves. [Available online at https://www.zoetisus.com/\_locale-assets/myresources/drx08001-pinkeye-tb.pdf].Google Scholar
Quesada, MAZ, Jeny, Aguilar A and Lopez, HS (2010). Clinical efficacy of parenteral vs ophthalmic orfenicol for the treatment of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Veterinaria Mexico 41: 219–225.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Roeder, BL, Skogerboe, TL, Clark, FD and Kelly, EJ (1995). Effect of early treatment with parenteral long-acting oxytetracycline on performance of beef calves with acute eye lesions. Agri-Practice 16: 6–11.Google Scholar
Salanti, G, Kavvoura, FK and Ioannidis, JP (2008). Exploring the geometry of treatment networks. Annals of Internal Medicine 148: 544–553.Google Scholar
Senturk, S, Cetin, C, Temizel, M and Ozel, E (2007). Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of subconjunctival injection of clindamycin in the treatment of naturally occurring infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Veterinary Ophthalmology 10: 186–189.Google Scholar
Starke, A, Eule, C, Meyer, H, Im Winkel, C, Verspohl, J and Rehage, J (2007). Efficacy of intrapalpebral and intramuscular application of oxytetracycline in a natural outbreak of infectious bovine kertoconjunctivitis (IBK) in calves. DTW. Deutsche tierarztliche Wochenschrift 114: 219–224.Google Scholar
Sterne, JAC, Sutton, AJ, Ioannidis, J, Terrin, N, Jones, DR, Lau, J, Carpenter, J, Rücker, G, Harbord, RM, Schmid, CH, Tetzlaff, J, Deeks, JJ, Peters, J, Macaskill, P, Schwarzer, G, Duval, S, Altman, DG, Moher, D and Higgins, JP (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343: 1–8.Google Scholar
Tate, MW and Brown, SM (1970). Note on the Cochran Q test. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65: 155–160.Google Scholar
Thrift, FA and Overfield, JR (1974). Impact of pinkeye (infectious bovine kerato conjunctivitis) on weaning and postweaning performance of Hereford calves. Journal of Animal Science 38: 1179–1184.Google Scholar
Viechtbauer, W (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 36: 1–48.Google Scholar
Zielinski, GC, Piscitelli, HG, Perez-Monti, H, Stobbs, LA and Zimmermann, AG (2002). Efficacy of different dosage levels and administration routes of tilmicosin in a natural outbreak of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (pinkeye). Veterinary Therapeutics 3: 196–205.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cullen supplementary material

Cullen supplementary material 1

Download Cullen supplementary material(File)
File 130.1 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Cullen supplementary material

Cullen supplementary material 2

Download Cullen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 334.5 KB