Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-r2nwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T05:43:51.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of anti-Müllerian hormone in different reproductive aspects of female mammals: women, cow and mare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2025

Ana Muñoz-Jurado*
Affiliation:
Maimonides Institute for Research in Biomedicine of Cordoba, (IMIBIC), Cordoba, Spain Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Carretera N-IVa, Cordoba, Spain
Francisco Requena
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Carretera N-IVa, Cordoba, Spain
Estrella I. Agüera
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Carretera N-IVa, Cordoba, Spain
Begoña M. Escribano
Affiliation:
Maimonides Institute for Research in Biomedicine of Cordoba, (IMIBIC), Cordoba, Spain Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Carretera N-IVa, Cordoba, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Ana Muñoz-Jurado; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a dimeric glycoprotein belonging to the superfamily of the transforming growth factor-β. Due to the discovery of AMH functions, relative to the ovarian function, it is being postulated as being a highly important marker in studies on mammalian reproduction. Therefore, the objective of this review was to describe the role of this hormone in different reproductive aspects of female mammals, taking women, cows, and mares as reference species. The relationship between ovarian reserve and AMH was analysed, and it has been verified that there is a relationship between the latter, the antral follicle count, and the number of primary follicles. AMH concentration has been associated with parameters like the age of the individual, fertility, superovulation treatments and embryo production, and to the reproductive hormone concentration. Also, an association between AMH and female reproduction system diseases, and the fact that AMH is a heritable feature in the cow have also been proven. Recent studies have analysed the role of AMH receptor type 2 since it appears that, together with gonadotropin-releasing hormone, it controls the secretion of gonadotropins. Despite the considerable amount of bibliography on AMH, more studies are needed to complete the information that we have on it, in order to reveal the unknown elements in its action mechanisms.

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Introduction

In the field of reproduction, it is necessary to find new biomarkers (Qasemi et al., Reference Qasemi, Mahdian and Amidi2021) that allow increasing knowledge about the different factors that influence it. One of these biomarkers is anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). This hormone has been found to act as an important marker of ovarian function and reserve (Capecce et al., Reference Capecce2016). AMH has attracted considerable interest, in recent years, in female reproduction as an indicator of reproductive aging, predicting the size of follicle populations in the ovaries of women and other mammals, including ruminants and horses (Claes et al., Reference Claes2015; Monniaux et al., Reference Monniaux2014; Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017; Uliani et al., Reference Uliani2019). In addition, different studies suggest that AMH intervenes in other aspects related to female reproduction, including fertility (Sowers et al., Reference Sowers2009). Thus, the use of circulating AMH levels has been explored as a potential fertility predictor and biomarker to assess antral follicle count (AFC), superovulatory response, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome. However, there are variations between species, breeds, age, and parity (Ramesha et al., Reference Ramesha2022). Therefore, the objective of this review has been to describe the role of AMH in different reproductive aspects of female mammals, focusing on three fundamental species: human, equine, and bovine.

Knowing how AMH influences women can be very useful to expand the information on reproduction. This is because the number of women who require fertility treatments, supported by age and other reproductive disorders, is increasing (Showell et al., Reference Showell2020). AMH as an indicator of ovarian reserve and function and due to its role, still unknown in depth, in fertility, it could be useful as a biomarker of reproductive function in women.

Also, it is of interest to study the influence of this hormone in mares and cows, both species of animal production. Reproduction in these animals requires a large investment of time and money within livestock, as both species are of great economic value and usually with a single calf per parturition, just like woman. Optimum reproductive efficiency significantly influences the livestock industry and is an essential factor for livestock management (Widodo et al., Reference Widodo2022). Similarly, in the equine industry, there is considerable interest in inseminating older, more valuable mares (Grady et al., Reference Grady2019). In addition, the reproductive status depends on the photoperiod in the mare (seasonal polyestric) and its nutritional status in the cow (continuous polyestric). Both parameters are very interesting in the human species and in reproduction. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the knowledge of the reproductive physiology of these animals (Hafez and Hafez, Reference Hafez and Hafez2004; Lima et al., Reference Lima2015) and establish biomarkers that are profitable and improve the productivity of farms (Widodo et al., Reference Widodo2022). In this way, optimal management will be achieved, and the use of reproductive biotechnologies will be improved, at the same time that they serve to clarify reproductive behaviours that could be taken into consideration in the human species.

Methodology

A literature search was performed in the PubMed and Scopus databases, without language limitations. The search was limited to articles published between 2000 and 2024. The keywords ‘Anti-Müllerian hormone’, ‘Sex Hormones’, ‘Fertility’, ‘Reproduction’, and ‘Ovarian reserve’ were used. These terms were searched for alone or in combination, for example by combining ‘Anti-Müllerian hormone AND Fertility’. In addition, references of relevant studies, reviews and editorials were also searched from the articles read. Specific references were also sought to write sections that were added throughout the writing of the manuscript, using keywords such as ‘Antral follicle count’ and ‘Polycystic ovary syndrome’. With these searches, a total of 1,435 articles were collected, including original articles, review articles, and abstracts. Articles dealing with the anti-Mullerian in other mammals that were not the woman, the cow and the mare were excluded; therefore, 75 articles were included. After reading these manuscripts, 25 more articles were searched, so that finally 100 scientific productions were included in the review.

Anti-Müllerian hormone

Synthesis and functions

AMH is a dimeric glycoprotein of 144 kDa, composed of two subunits of 72 kDa, belonging to the superfamily of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) (Bedenk et al., Reference Bedenk, Vrtačnik-Bokal and Virant-Klun2019). Bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15) is also part of this family, involved in folliculogenesis; the growth and differentiation 9 factor (GDF9) affects the growth and differentiation of oocytes and interferon-T (IFN-T), with various physiological functions in the mammalian uterus (D’Occhio et al., Reference D’Occhio, Campanile and Baruselli2020). AMH is derived from a precursor that exhibits slight variations between species, from 553 amino acids in rats to 575 amino acids in bovines. The latter being similar to the precursor of equines with 573 amino acids (Josso et al., Reference Josso1993). The AMH precursor starts with a signal sequence of 16–17 amino acids, followed by a prosequence of 7–8 amino acids, which are cleaved from the precursor before secretion (Claes and Ball, Reference Claes and Ball2016). In the cytoplasm, the inactive precursor undergoes an obligatory cleavage (Arouche et al., Reference Arouche2015) and an N-terminal fragment of 110 kDa (pro region) and another C-terminal of 25 kDa (mature or native region) are generated (Capecce et al., Reference Capecce2016). These fragments are linked in a non-covalent complex by two disulphide bonds (Arouche et al., Reference Arouche2015).

The AMH was discovered in 1947 by Alfred Jost (Bedenk et al., Reference Bedenk, Vrtačnik-Bokal and Virant-Klun2019), and since then it has been known to play a vital role in the sexual development of the foetus. AMH expression is strong in foetal testes but absent in ovaries (Scarlet et al., Reference Scarlet2021). It is secreted by the testicular Sertoli cells, producing the degeneration of the Müllerian ducts in male embryological development (Capecce et al., Reference Capecce2016; Josso et al., Reference Josso2006). In women, AMH is not expressed during the time of sexual differentiation, ensuring the normal development of the female genital tract (Almeida et al., Reference Almeida2011; Hirobe et al., Reference Hirobe1992; Taketo et al., Reference Taketo1993). In the last 15 years, the relevance and importance of this hormone as an ovarian function marker has been increasing (Capecce et al., Reference Capecce2016). AMH is produced in female mammals by the granulosa cells. So that, the primary follicle is the first type of follicle expressing this hormone, and as the number of granulosa layers increases, the expression of AMH does so (Claes and Ball, Reference Claes and Ball2016). It has been shown that AMH intervenes in the inhibition of the primordial follicle growth, preventing premature depletion of the ovarian follicle reserve (Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017), and that it triggers a decrease in the responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the antral and preantral follicles, modulating follicular development (Dewailly et al., Reference Dewailly2014; Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017). Consequently, AMH determines which follicles are selected for further growth and which become atretic (Nawaz et al., Reference Nawaz2018). In the absence of AMH, follicles are recruited at a faster rate, which results in a depletion of primordial follicles at a younger age (Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017). Another of its functions is the decrease in aromatase activity, which reduces oestradiol production (Dewailly et al., Reference Dewailly2014; Łebkowska et al., Reference Łebkowska2024), and stimulation of testosterone production by theca cells (Capecce et al., Reference Capecce2016).

Expression of AMH in female mammals

AMH expression in granulosa cells is timely and especially dynamic during follicular development, being inversely related to aromatase expression and oestradiol production (Ireland et al., Reference Ireland2009; Monniaux et al., Reference Monniaux2013; Ribeiro et al., Reference Ribeiro2014). AMH production starts immediately at the time follicles are initially recruited, reaching its highest level in primordial follicles. Subsequently, it decreases at the same time as the FSH-dependent follicle progresses towards the preovulatory stage (Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017). AMH is not produced by atretic follicles, so that it is a reflection of the amount of antral follicles that are healthy and growing (Daly et al., Reference Daly2020). Different research groups have evaluated the concentration of circulating AMH in the mammalian species analysed in this review. In Table 1, we can see the results that they have obtained in their studies.

Table 1. Studies that have analysed the concentration of AMH (Mean ± SD) in women, mare, and cow (dairy and beef cows)

Despite the fact that all studies used ELISA as the analysis method, these results are not comparable. In each study, a different number of samples were collected and the age of the populations used is different.

As can be seen in Table 1, not only the species causes AMH concentrations to differ but also the breed and age produce variations in this hormone.

With respect to dairy cows, it has been confirmed that these present a lower AMH concentration than beef cows (Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017). Also, there is a great phenotypic variation in the circulating AMH concentrations, depending on the breed. Jersey cows have the highest concentration, followed by crossbreds and lastly, Holstein cows (Gobikrushanth et al., Reference Gobikrushanth2019) (Table 2).

Table 2. AMH concentration in different breeds of dairy cows, obtained in the study carried out by Gobikrushanth et al. (Reference Gobikrushanth2019)

Serum AMH concentration from 2,628 dairy cows was analysed using bovine AMH ELISA (Gobikrushanth et al., Reference Gobikrushanth2019).

Although in general, the AMH concentration has been found to remain stable and repeatable over many oestrous cycles (Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017), it has been observed that its concentration is inversely related to age.

In women, serum AMH levels increase until the third decade of life and slowly decrease with age (Gouvea et al., Reference Gouvea, Cota, Souza and Lima2022). Liebenthron et al. (Reference Liebenthron2019), obtained the maximum AMH concentration, of 5.71 ± 6.78 ng/ml in girls between 6 and 10 years of age. This concentration was reduced when the woman’s age was between 41 and 45, obtaining a mean of 1.2 ± 0.85 ng/ml (Liebenthron et al., Reference Liebenthron2019). Similar results are obtained by Ji et al. (Reference Ji2022) in their study, seeing that the concentration of AMH decreased with increasing age, especially after 40 years (Ji et al., Reference Ji2022). AMH was also shown to be the most promising predictive marker for detection of ovarian aging and the time of the menopause (Racoubian et al., Reference Racoubian2020), being used as a support criterion for the classification in the stages of reproductive aging (Gouvea et al., Reference Gouvea, Cota, Souza and Lima2022). Likewise, there are authors who affirm that the concentration of AMH potentially predicts the age of menopause (Broer et al., Reference Broer2011; Eskew et al., Reference Eskew2022). Although, regarding the latter, the usefulness of AMH as a predictive marker does not offer definitive conclusions (Yoon et al., Reference Yoon2020).

The same thing happens in cattle, both in dairy and beef cows. During the first months of life, the AMH concentration is at maximum levels, decreasing at 5 months and remaining stable at 8–9 months, around the time of the first ovulation (Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017). In the study by Lainé et al. (Reference Lainé2019), it was observed that in the ovaries of 3-month-old calves, the population of follicles of 3–5 mm contained high AMH concentrations. In addition, their number was closely related to the plasma concentration of this hormone (Lainé et al., Reference Lainé2019).

In mares, serum AMH concentrations also correlate with age (Nolan et al., Reference Nolan2018). As in the rest of the species mentioned, the lowest AMH concentrations are obtained in older ones (19–27 years). But in this species, the highest AMH concentration is found in middle-aged mares (9–18 years) instead of in young ones (3–8 years) (Claes et al., Reference Claes2015). Similar results are reported in the study carried out by Uliani et al. (Reference Uliani2019), in which they collected data on AMH concentrations throughout the life of 1,101 mares, sampled from birth to an age greater than 33 years. They obtained that the concentrations of AMH were higher in mares of 5–10 years and 10–15 years than in mares of 0–5 years and the lowest in mares of 20 years or more (Uliani et al., Reference Uliani2019).

Despite the fact that in all the aforementioned studies, there is a decrease in AMH with increasing age, these results are not comparable since the same analysis protocol has not been followed.

On the other hand, although it is not the subject of this review, it is also necessary to consider, that there are external factors that can affect both the circulating concentrations of AMH and those of its main receptor, anti-Mullerian hormone receptor 2 (AMHR2). In this sense, the study carried out by Saleh et al. (Reference Saleh2021) shows that exposure to chemicals such as bisphenol A leads to an alteration in the expression of both AMH and its receptor, at the mRNA and protein level in both oocytes and blastocysts (Saleh et al., Reference Saleh2021). This highlights the adverse effects that contact with chemicals, as well as pollution, can have on female reproductive health (Han et al., Reference Han2024).

AMH receptor type 2

Signalling within the TGF-β family is limited to specific combinations of the seven type I receptors, activin-like kinases 1–7 (ALK1–7), and five type II receptors, ActRIIA, ActRIIB, BMPR2, TβR2, and AMHR2 (Hinck et al., Reference Hinck, Mueller and Springer2016; Howard et al., Reference Howard, Hart and Thompson2022). AMH uses type I receptors, specifically ALK2 and ALK3, to send signals. However, the main AMH receptor is AMHR2, which is specific to this hormone (Howard et al., Reference Howard, Hart and Thompson2022). Given the growing interest in AMH, the role of its specific receptor, AMHR2, has begun to be studied (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Human chromosome in which the gene of AMHR2 is found. An image obtained from the NCB1 database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?db=gene&cmd=detailssearch&term=269).

Most of the studies carried out to date have focused on the place in which it is expressed and its relationship with reproduction.

In the adult human brain, it has been shown that, in mature neurons, AMH receptors are expressed both in men and women. AMHR2 is the most expressed receptor in different brain areas and cell types involved in the central control of reproduction, among which the vascular organ of the lamina terminalis is included (Barbotin et al., Reference Barbotin2019).

A previous study by Kereilwe et al. (Reference Kereilwe2018) investigated in postpuberal heifers whether their AMHR2 was expressed in the gonadotrophs to control the secretion of gonadotropins. By carrying out the polymerase chain reaction, they confirmed that the mRNA of this receptor was expressed in the anterior pituitary gland. In this place the gonadotrophs are found. In addition, by immunofluorescence microscopy, they verified that there was a co-localization of the AMHR2 and of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor in the plasmatic membrane of the gonadotrophs (Kereilwe et al., Reference Kereilwe2018). Based on these results, it can be said that AMHR2 controls together with GnRH, gonadotroph secretion and that AMHR2 is also expressed in extragonadal areas. Therefore, Ferdousy et al. (Reference Ferdousy, Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020) conducted a study to find out whether there was any expression of mRNA in oviductal and endometrial samples in Holstein and Wagyu cows. By immunohistochemical, a large expression of AMH and AMHR2 in the ampulla and isthmus mucosa, and in the glandular and luminal epithelium of the endometrium, were revealed (Ferdousy et al., Reference Ferdousy, Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020).

Very recent studies, that continue these investigation lines, have confirmed the action mechanisms of AMH and AMHR2 in extragonadal areas. The gonadotrophs express AMH to exert paracrine and autocrine functions (Kereilwe and Kadokawa, Reference Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020a). AMH stimulates the GnRH neurons through its receptor. Most of the GnRH neurons in the preoptic area, arched nucleus and median eminence present AMH and AMHR2 expressions (Kereilwe and Kadokawa, Reference Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020b). These areas in the brain are relevant for the neuroendocrine control of reproduction (Kereilwe and Kadokawa, Reference Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020a). Ferdousy et al. (Reference Ferdousy, Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020) also found that there is a lower expression of AMH and AMHR2 in the posterior hypothalamus of old cows compared to young cows, finding a correlation between aging and both proteins (Kereilwe and Kadokawa, Reference Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020b). However, despite the information reported, in general, more studies are needed to analyse the action mechanisms of AMH and AMHR2 in the hypothalamus and their influence on the secretion of GnRH and gonadotropins (Kereilwe and Kadokawa, Reference Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020a).

Heritability of AMH

Gobikrushanth et al. (Reference Gobikrushanth2019) studied the genomic heritability of AMH in bovines, obtaining a result of 0.45 ± 0.06 (Gobikrushanth et al., Reference Gobikrushanth2019). Nawaz et al. (Reference Nawaz2018) found a genomic heritability of 0.36 ± 0.03 (Nawaz et al., Reference Nawaz2018). Despite the difference between the results of both studies, these heritability estimates are the highest reported for any trait related to female bovine reproduction (Nawaz et al., Reference Nawaz2018). The higher estimated genomic heritability suggests that AMH is a potential predictor of fertility traits in cattle subjected to assisted reproductive technologies (Torres-Simental et al., Reference Torres-Simental2021; Umer et al., Reference Umer2019).

In both works, the association of AMH with SNP (genetic marker; single-nucleotide polymorphism) in dairy bovines has also been studied. The identification of SNPs associated with the variation in circulating AMH could help to identify and preselect future embryo donors at birth and with a greater fertility for IVF programmes (Gobikrushanth et al., Reference Gobikrushanth2019).

Nawaz et al. (Reference Nawaz2018) obtain a significant association of AMH with SNP in two different regions of the genome, one in chromosome 11 and another in chromosome 20. In chromosome 20, they found only one association. In chromosome 11, they found several, the most significant one being with marker SNP-Hapmap41435-BTA-115556. This marker is located within the intronic section of the gene DENNDIA, associated with the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and diseases of the ovary in women (Nawaz et al., Reference Nawaz2018).

In their study, Gobikrushanth et al. (Reference Gobikrushanth2019) found 68 SNP in autosomes 7 and 11 that were associated with the phenotypic variation in the plasma AMH. Of the 68 SNP, 42 were located in autosome 11, which houses six genes linked to phenotypes related to fertility in dairy cows (NR5A1, HSPA5, CRB2, DENND1A, NDUFA8 and PTGS) (Gobikrushanth et al., Reference Gobikrushanth2019). The study concludes that the phenotypic variation in AMH is important and moderately heritable. In addition, both AMH and its genetic markers could be used to identify cows with the best reproduction qualities (Gobikrushanth et al., Reference Gobikrushanth2019).

Likewise, during the gestation period, different variables that may affect the ovarian reserve and the fertility of descendants have been described. Some of them are maternal nutrition and the environment (Ireland et al., Reference Ireland2011; Lahoz et al., Reference Lahoz2012). The latter refers to the nutritional imbalances and maternal diseases that, during the foetal life, could negatively affect the size of the ovarian reserve, the serum concentrations of AMH and the adult life of female offspring (Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017). It has been found that, if the mother is suffering from malnutrition or overnutrition, their female offspring will have a decreased ovarian reserve and the circulating concentrations of AMH will be low. In Holstein cows, a negative energy balance caused by high concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids in the blood, during early lactation, could alter the circulating concentrations of AMH of their descendants (Nabenishi et al., Reference Nabenishi2017). Similarly, it has been noted that gestating dairy cows with a high somatic cell count have produced offspring with a reduced AMH concentration (Mossa et al., Reference Mossa2017).

Based on this information, AMH could be used as a genetic biomarker to improve the reproduction potential in farm animals (Nawaz et al., Reference Nawaz2018).

Relationship of AMH with other hormones

Gonadotropins

The FSH and the luteinizing hormone (LH) are two gonadotropins secreted by the pituitary gland that control the function of the gonads, both the male and female ones. In women, the granulosa cells of all the growing follicles present receptors for FSH, and theca cells have receptors for LH (Lainé et al., Reference Lainé2019).

Khodavirdilou et al. (Reference Khodavirdilou2022) show that AMH levels differ between follicular and luteal phase, which could be due to ovarian response to gonadotropins (Khodavirdilou et al., Reference Khodavirdilou2022). Based on studies performed up to date, it appears that the expression of the AMH is reduced in the FSH-dependent stages of follicle development (Ball et al., Reference Ball2008). A high FSH concentration suppresses the expression of AMH directly or indirectly through oocyte-specific growth factors, triggering a marked decrease in AMH levels (Robertson et al., Reference Robertson, Lee and Baerwald2020).

In women, there is an inverse correlation between FSH and AMH, but the interaction between FSH, AMH, AFC, and the follicle growth dynamics has not been completely understood (Robertson et al., Reference Robertson, Lee and Baerwald2020). In the absence of AMH, the FSH-dependent phases’ folliculogenesis become more sensitive to FSH, and more follicles grow to be dominant ones. So that, it could be said that AMH exerts a paracrine role in the regulation of the sensitivity to FSH and the recruitment of follicles (Robertson et al., Reference Robertson, Lee and Baerwald2020). In this sense, AMH would act by repressing the recruitment, selection, and maturation of follicles, by inhibiting the action of FSH (Baarends et al., Reference Baarends1995; Durlinger et al., Reference Durlinger2002; Gouvea et al., Reference Gouvea, Cota, Souza and Lima2022; Gruijters et al., Reference Gruijters2003).

In ruminants, preantral and antral follicles can secrete AMH to control gonadotropins secretion in the gonadotrophs (Kereilwe et al., Reference Kereilwe2018). In the study carried out by Lainé et al. (Reference Lainé2019), they determined that, before 3 months of age, two out of every six calves showed a clear peak of postnatal FSH in plasma. However, they did not find any relationship between the FSH concentration and AMH (Lainé et al., Reference Lainé2019). Similarly, Krause et al. (Reference Krause2022) did not find a correlation between plasma FSH concentrations and AMH in prepubertal calves (Krause et al., Reference Krause2022). The relationship of the FSH concentration to ovarian follicle dynamics is not yet understood in young calves. This is because they experience different patterns of FSH secretion, and the postnatal activation of the follicle growth up to the antral phase seems to be independent of the FSH levels (Lainé et al., Reference Lainé2019).

In mares, no relationship has been established between the AMH and the FSH concentrations (Ball et al., Reference Ball2019).

With regard to LH, there are not many studies that relate its concentration to that of AMH. Kereilwe et al. (Reference Kereilwe2018) were able to confirm that AMH stimulated, though weakly, basal LH secretion in heifers (Kereilwe et al., Reference Kereilwe2018). A recent study made by that same author on Japanese black cows found that AMH stimulates LH secretion in bovine gonadotrophs (Kereilwe and Kadokawa, Reference Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020b).

Steroid hormones

Within the steroid hormone group, oestradiol (E2) is one of those most studied in relation to AMH because it is the hormone responsible for the growth and development of reproduction organs, as well as of the ovarian follicles (Steel et al., Reference Steel, Athorn and Grupen2018). This hormone is associated with the reproductive qualities in cows and humans. It marks the antral follicle populations in the animals and the pregnancy results in women after gonadotropin treatment (Steel et al., Reference Steel, Athorn and Grupen2018).

In women, low AMH levels have been associated with the increase in E2 concentrations (Ishii et al., Reference Ishii2019). However, in cows, the production of E2 and AMH was positively related, since the cow granulosa cells with a high AFC produce larger amounts of both hormones (Sakaguchi et al., Reference Sakaguchi2019).

With respect to progesterone (P4), it is known that its levels have an influence on fertilization rates and on the embryo parameter quality. Also, some studies report that intrafollicular P4 and AMH affect women’s fertility (Daly et al., Reference Daly2020). A recent study performed on humans demonstrated that AMH inhibits the P4 synthesis (Robertson et al., Reference Robertson, Lee and Baerwald2020). However, Ball et al. (Reference Ball2019) report that, in cows, a decrease in AFC related to low levels of AMH causes perturbations in the follicular and also in the luteal functions which gives rise to a decline in P4 concentration (Ball et al., Reference Ball2019).

There is not much bibliography relating AMH and P4, so that it is difficult to arrive at any conclusion on the influence one might have on the other. More studies are needed that supply more information on this subject.

Relationship between AMH and fertility in female mammals

Due to the increasing importance of AMH as a marker of ovarian function, the possibility of using AMH as a parameter to make an early prediction of the end of the reproductive stage and finally the fertility of female mammals has been proposed (Sowers et al., Reference Sowers2009). However, the degree to which AMH reflects ovarian reserve and fertility must be carefully defined for each species, since, for example, studies in reproductively seasonal species demonstrate that AMH is far from a perfect index of fertility and subject to considerable individual variability (Roosa et al., Reference Roosa, Zysling and Place2015; Uliani et al., Reference Uliani2019). In fact, in the recent study published by Şükür et al. (Reference Şükür2024), an average variation in serum AMH levels of 43% was observed between consecutive menstrual cycles (Şükür et al., Reference Şükür2024).

In young animals, the follicle population present in the ovaries seems to have a great impact on their adult reproductive life, demonstrating that a low count of antral follicles is related to suboptimal fertility (Lahoz et al., Reference Lahoz2012). Liu et al. (Reference Liu2022), in their study, find that the early spontaneous abortion rate was significantly lower in the group with a medium concentration of AMH than in the group with a high concentration of this hormone, in young women (less than 35 years) (Liu et al., Reference Liu2022). These results coincide with those obtained by Tarasconi et al. (Reference Tarasconi2017), who reported that spontaneous abortion rates were significantly higher among women with low levels of AMH (0.08–1.60 ng/ml) in serum, than among those with medium levels (1.61–5.59 ng/ml) or high (5.60–35 ng/ml), regardless of age (Tarasconi et al., Reference Tarasconi2017). In the study carried out by Ribeiro et al. (Reference Ribeiro2014), it was found that cows with a low AMH plasmatic concentration (≤140 pg/ml) had a higher foetal mortality after artificial insemination and lower pregnancy rates. Daly et al. (Reference Daly2020), in their review article, point out that the fertility of dairy cows with a low AMH concentration seemed to be diminished and they had a shorter useful life (Daly et al., Reference Daly2020). Likewise, Jimenez-Krassel et al. (Reference Jimenez-Krassel2015) affirm that a single determination of AMH concentrations in young adult Holstein heifers predicts the longevity of their useful life (Jimenez-Krassel et al., Reference Jimenez-Krassel2015; Succu et al., Reference Succu2020). Despite this, the possible impact of AMH on the gestation rate in cows needs more investigation. Although the AFC is indicative of fertility in heifers and this parameter is related to AMH concentration, it has not yet been possible to see the correlation between this hormone and fertility (Daly et al., Reference Daly2020). Also, the synchronization of the ovulations in cattle farms might reverse the positive association between AMH and fertility (Ribeiro et al., Reference Ribeiro2014).

Similar results have been reported in mares, in which low AMH concentrations are related to a lower fertility in comparison with those with higher concentrations. Ball et al. (Reference Ball2019) show that the relationship between AMH and fertility in mares was reduced when the concentration of AMH was low. Notwithstanding, the purebred mare presents a 95% variation in its conception rate (Ball et al., Reference Ball2019) with respect to other breeds.

This information is of great importance, especially for cattle farms. A successful mating in the animal’s first year of life signifies a reduction in the replacement price, an increase in the farm’s productivity and a lesser risk of sacrifice (Lahoz et al., Reference Lahoz2012). It is therefore very important to find out the reproduction capacity of the females on the farm.

However, more studies are needed to analyse the relationship between AMH and fertility of female mammals as the physiological mechanisms underlying the effect of AMH on fertility are unknown (Kereilwe and Kadokawa, Reference Kereilwe and Kadokawa2020a).

Relationship of AMH with the ovarian reserve

Effect of age on ovarian reserve

The development of the ovaries and the follicles occurs during the foetal period (Akbarinejad et al., Reference Akbarinejad2018). So that, at birth, mammals present a limited number of ovary germinal cells that drastically decrease with age and are also highly variable between individuals (Lahoz et al., Reference Lahoz2012) (Table 3). In the first days of life, oocytes are housed in the primordial follicles at rest and at an early growth which constitutes the so-called ovarian follicular reserve (Lahoz et al., Reference Lahoz2012; McNatty et al., Reference McNatty1995) AMH is a significant determinant of reproductive aging, which is the age-related depletion of the ovarian follicular reserve (Ramesha et al., Reference Ramesha2022).

Table 3. Variation in the ovarian reserve. Differences in the woman’s, cow’s, and mare’s ovarian reserve at birth and as from 1 year

As can be observed in Table 3, in all the species a diminution is produced of the ovarian follicular reserve with the increase in age. In cows, for example, it has been reported that at 1 year they lose 80% of their original ‘stock’ of oocytes (Ireland et al., Reference Ireland2011). In women, age is considered to be the main factor related to oocyte quality (Massarotti et al., Reference Massarotti2020). It has also been seen that as they get older, the levels of AMH decline. This process is related to the decrease of the ovarian reserve, represented by the quality of the oocytes and the amount of follicles, which results in a decline in the reproductive function of women (Lahoz et al., Reference Lahoz2012; Te Velde and Pearson, Reference Te Velde and Pearson2002). Women have a larger ovarian reserve in comparison with other species (Steel et al., Reference Steel, Athorn and Grupen2018).

With reference to mares, despite their having a longer reproductive life than other species, they have a smaller and more variable ovarian reserve. This might become a clinical problem since a depletion of the ovarian reserve might be produced before the end of their reproductive life (Ball et al., Reference Ball2019). AMH can reflect ovarian senescence in mares after 20 years of age, but is too variable to do so in the first two decades of life (Uliani et al., Reference Uliani2019).

Relationship between AMH and AFC

The ovarian follicular reserve has a direct impact on the ovarian function and on fertility (Lahoz et al., Reference Lahoz2012). In humans, precise information on the ovarian reserve since childhood up to the end of the reproductive stage is of great clinical importance as it may turn out to be useful in cases of IVF (Liebenthron et al., Reference Liebenthron2019). Since AMH was perceived to be involved in the regulation of follicle growth, it has begun to be used for the study of the ovarian reserve and ovarian response. It was discovered that there is a relationship between the concentration of circulating AMH, AFC and the number of primary follicles in women (Capecce et al., Reference Capecce2016; Claes and Ball, Reference Claes and Ball2016). Regarding bovines, this can be phenotyped in terms of the number of antral follicles that grow during the follicular waves. During the latter, AFC is highly variable between individuals but very repeatable in each one (Mossa and Ireland, Reference Mossa and Ireland2019). Heifers with a low AFC show less than 15 follicles of over 3 mm and those with a high AFC have over 25 follicles of over 3 mm (Mossa and Ireland, Reference Mossa and Ireland2019). Furthermore, it has been possible to verify that the young-adult bovines with a low AFC have smaller gonads (Ireland et al., Reference Ireland2011), a thinner endometrium, a decrease in granulosa, thecal, and luteal cell response to FSH and LH, a poor response to superovulation (Mossa and Ireland, Reference Mossa and Ireland2019) and a markedly diminished ovarian reserve. These phenotypic characteristics normally correlate with aging or ovarian infertility (Ireland et al., Reference Ireland2011). Related to the above, Widodo et al. (Reference Widodo2022) hypothesized that ovarian size increased concomitantly with increased AFC in cattle, resulting in an association between ovarian size and blood AMH levels (Widodo et al., Reference Widodo2022). It should be noted that those animals that have a high AFC show a higher reproductive performance (Sakaguchi et al., Reference Sakaguchi2019). In cows, the AMH concentration in serum seems to reflect the follicle population and is also correlated with AFC (Ball et al., Reference Ball2019) detectable by vaginal ultrasound (Arouche et al., Reference Arouche2015). In the study made by Sakaguchi et al. (Reference Sakaguchi2019), it was confirmed that the granulosa cells in cows with a high AFC were capable of producing large amounts of AMH (Sakaguchi et al., Reference Sakaguchi2019). Likewise, Krause et al. (Reference Krause2022) obtained a positive correlation between AFC and plasma concentrations of AMH at the moment of the appearance of the follicular wave, in heifers (Krause et al., Reference Krause2022). Similarly, various studies have reported the existence of a positive and significant correlation between AMH and AFC in Holstein dairy heifers and in Zebu beef cattle (Baldrighi et al., Reference Baldrighi2014; Carter et al., Reference Carter2016; Torres-Simental et al., Reference Torres-Simental2021).

In mares, the circulating concentration of AMH is positively correlated with the number of small growing follicles (Joonè et al., Reference Joonè2018, Reference Joonè2019). Likewise, the determination of the concentration of AMH at a prepubertal age allows to predict the levels of AMH and AFC that will be after puberty (Scarlet et al., Reference Scarlet2018). AMH and AFC concentrations show a high repeatability in different oestral cycles. According to the work done by Ball et al. (Reference Ball2019), there is a strong relationship between both parameters in old mares, a moderate one in middle-aged ones and a non-significant one in young mares. In this sense, Traversari et al. (Reference Traversari2019) show a high interindividual variability in the concentration of AFC and AMH and a positive correlation between both parameters, this correlation being stronger in mares older than 18 years (Traversari et al., Reference Traversari2019). These results are opposite to those reported by Scarlet et al. (Reference Scarlet2018) that show a highly positive correlation between AMH and AFC in young mares (Scarlet et al., Reference Scarlet2018). These contradictory results could be due to the fact that the evaluation of follicle populations together with AMH concentrations is a complex process in mares, given their size, shape and organization of the ovary (Uliani et al., Reference Uliani2019).

Relationship of AMH with superovulation and embryo production treatments

In the same way as to fertility, it has been attempted to relate the AMH concentration to the response to superovulation and embryo production in different species. In women, AMH concentration seems to be a predictor of live births regardless of age. This concentration has also been related to the response of ovarian stimulation protocols, embryo production and implantation (Ball et al., Reference Ball2019). Women with a low or very low AMH concentration are expected to have a worse response to ovarian stimulation (Massarotti et al., Reference Massarotti2020). The study made by Ishii et al. (Reference Ishii2019) makes an emphasis on the fact that the number of ovules obtained by ovarian stimulation depends on the value of the AMH (Ishii et al., Reference Ishii2019). Even so, the relation of the AMH to gestation and the number of live births in women still remain issues for debate (Massarotti et al., Reference Massarotti2020).

In bovines, it has been affirmed that, through circulating AMH concentrations, the ovarian response to treatment with FSH can be predicted (Monniaux et al., Reference Monniaux2011). Furthermore, the measurement of AMH in cows that are potential embryo donors could determine their ability to produce the maximum number of embryos to be collected and transferred to receptor females (Arouche et al., Reference Arouche2015). This also allows an estimation of the quality of the embryos in this species (Arouche et al., Reference Arouche2015). One study by Nabenishi et al. (Reference Nabenishi2017) on Japanese black cows found that the AMH concentration in plasma during the rearing period can be used to predict subsequent productions of embryos after superovulation treatment (Nabenishi et al., Reference Nabenishi2017). Likewise, Guerreiro et al. (Reference Guerreiro2014) found a higher number of transferable embryos in Holstein and Nelore cows with high AMH concentrations (3.0 ± 0.7, 7.0 ± 1.7, respectively) compared to donor cows with lower AMH plasma levels (1.2 ± 0.3, 2.2 ± 0.5, respectively) (Guerreiro et al., Reference Guerreiro2014). Similarly, Fushimi et al. (Reference Fushimi2020) show that heifers with high AMH concentrations, measured at 7–10 months of age, will produce a higher number of embryos after superovulation treatments. They conclude that a single measurement of AMH in blood can accelerate intensive farming in cattle (Fushimi et al., Reference Fushimi2020). However, the analysis of AMH as a predictor of embryo production should be performed with caution, since Torres-Simental et al. (Reference Torres-Simental2021), show that the predictive capacity of AMH for embryo production increases in cold climates and decreases in hot climates. In this study, they only obtained associations between superovulatory responses, embryo production, and AMH, in the absence of heat stress (Torres-Simental et al., Reference Torres-Simental2021). Furthermore, it is important to note that AMH predicts the number but not the functionality of ovulatory-sized follicles, which may also affect oocyte quality (Karl et al., Reference Karl2022). In this study, they conclude that both AMH and AFC, used as biomarkers of ovarian reserve, are unlikely to be useful in improving IVF or embryo transfer outcomes in heifers with a small ovarian reserve (Karl et al., Reference Karl2022).

According to the study carried out by Daly et al. (Reference Daly2020), in bovines, the plasma AMH concentrations prior to treatment with gonadotropins are positively correlated with the number of oocytes and embryos produced. It has also been proven that heifers with a high AMH produce more viable and transferable embryos (Daly et al., Reference Daly2020). However, Batista et al. (Reference Batista2020), in their study on Cebú cows, obtained that the heifers of this species on presenting a lower AMH concentration had larger follicles towards the end of the synchronization protocol and higher responses to ovulation. Whereas when they had higher concentrations of AMH, the latter were not related to the success of conception (Batista et al., Reference Batista2020).

With regard to mares, no bibliography relating AMH to superovulation treatment or embryo production was found.

Relationship between AMH and reproductive system diseases

The recent discovery of the relationship of the AMH with the ovarian function has opened up a broad and completely new spectrum on the use of this hormone (Bedenk et al., Reference Bedenk, Vrtačnik-Bokal and Virant-Klun2019). It has begun to be used in gynaecology, applying its study in IVF programmes and in the diagnosis of different ovarian diseases and cancer. It could also start to be used as a tool to estimate secondary amenorrhoea, the level of damage to the ovaries after an operation or for cancer treatment and the status of the granulosa cells after tumour removal (Bedenk et al., Reference Bedenk, Vrtačnik-Bokal and Virant-Klun2019; Peluso et al., Reference Peluso2014).

Polycystic ovary syndrome

The PCOS is the most common endocrine disorder in women of a reproductive age, with a prevalence of 10–15% worldwide (Moolhuijsen and Visser, Reference Moolhuijsen and Visser2020) and with a highly hereditary component (Barbotin et al., Reference Barbotin2019). Furthermore, it is a very heterogeneous disease, whose exact physiopathological mechanisms are unknown (Moolhuijsen and Visser, Reference Moolhuijsen and Visser2020).

PCOS is associated with high AMH levels since the women who suffer from it present a follicle density that is six times greater than normal ovaries. Women with PCOS have a mean concentration of AMH of between 3.14 and 4.45 ng/ml, although on some occasions it can be higher (Bedenk et al., Reference Bedenk, Vrtačnik-Bokal and Virant-Klun2019). This is proven in various studies such as the one carried out by Butt et al. (Reference Butt2022), in which they obtained a mean serum AMH level of 7.23 ± 4.67 ng/ml in women with PCOS and normal sex hormone levels. In this study, a significant difference in ovarian morphology was also observed between women with PCOS and women without PCOS (Butt et al., Reference Butt2022). Similarly, Muharam et al. (Reference Muharam2022) found that the median AMH level was significantly higher in the PCOS group (7.59 ± 4.61 ng/ml) (Muharam et al., Reference Muharam2022). Likewise, Liu et al. (Reference Liu2022) show that AMH levels were related to the severity of PCOS and the status of the menstrual cycle (Liu et al., Reference Liu2022). Variations in serum AMH levels are not only caused by differences in the number of follicles but also by genetic factors (Moolhuijsen et al., Reference Moolhuijsen2022). This could be due to the fact that in women with PCOS, the transcriptional regulation of AMH and its principal receptor AMHR2 is altered, triggering a prolongation and increase in their expression pattern (Moolhuijsen and Visser, Reference Moolhuijsen and Visser2020).

According to the knowledge obtained up to now on the relationship between AMH and PCOS, some authors assume that it is too early to use the serum levels of this hormone as a diagnosis criterion of PCOS (Moolhuijsen and Visser, Reference Moolhuijsen and Visser2020). However, other authors state that an elevated serum AMH level can be used as a predictor to reflect with certainty the diagnosis of PCOS among women of reproductive age, when studied together with the Rotterdam criteria (Butt et al., Reference Butt2022). Besides, the extragonadal effects of AMH recently discovered suggest that there could be crosstalk between the ovary, the placenta, and the brain, and that the contribution of AMH to the physiopathology of POS could be even more elaborate than was thought (Moolhuijsen and Visser, Reference Moolhuijsen and Visser2020). However, PCOS is a syndrome and, as such, no single diagnostic criteria are sufficient for clinical diagnosis (Butt et al., Reference Butt2022).

Tumours

Several studies carried out, both on women and on mares, have demonstrated that AMH is a good tumour biomarker, in addition to the inhibin B of granulosa cell tumours (GCT) (Bedenk et al., Reference Bedenk, Vrtačnik-Bokal and Virant-Klun2019). In both species, an increase in AMH serum concentrations has been observed, due to the enlargement of the granulosa cells that release into the bloodstream large amounts of this hormone (Bedenk et al., Reference Bedenk, Vrtačnik-Bokal and Virant-Klun2019). In women, the AMH serum concentrations increase to between 76% and 96% (Ball et al., Reference Ball2008; La Marca and Volpe, Reference La Marca and Volpe2007). In mares, the AMH concentrations rise until reaching a mean of 1,901.4–1,144.6 ng/mL (Claes and Ball, Reference Claes and Ball2016). Since the increase in the AMH concentration occurs in over 90% of GCT in women and mares, the measurement of this hormone is becoming the best GCT biomarker in both species (Ball et al., Reference Ball2008).

In mares, GCT are the most frequent type of tumour in ovaries (Almeida et al., Reference Almeida2011), representing 2.5% of all equine tumours (Behrendt et al., Reference Behrendt2021). They cause a prolonged anoestrus, stallion-like behaviour, or a persistent oestrus (Gharagozlou et al., Reference Gharagozlou2013) as well as a suppression of follicular activity. The latter triggers a diminution of the FSH concentration, thus producing atrophy of the oocytes during follicular development (Almeida et al., Reference Almeida2011) and an increase in LH concentration (Ball et al., Reference Ball2008). In the study carried out by Ball et al. (Reference Ball2008), they could see that, in addition to the increase in their AMH, 87% of the mares with GCT showed an increase in inhibin greater than 0.7 ng/ml. Also, 67% of them also gave an increase in testosterone greater than 0.045 ng/ml. Similar results were obtained in the study carried out by Almeida et al. (Reference Almeida2011), who obtained that 73% of the mares with GCT showed an increase in inhibin, and 45% of them also exhibited an increase in testosterone. Therefore, the diagnosis of GCT is more certain if AMH, testosterone, and inhibin levels are markedly increased and an abnormally enlarged ovary is present (Renaudin et al., Reference Renaudin2021). In addition, recently, increased levels of these hormones have been linked to stallion-like behaviour. However, no relationship has been found between these increases and other signs associated with GCT, such as aggression or persistent oestrus (Huggins et al., Reference Huggins2024). In fact, certain behavioural abnormalities can also occur in mares with healthy ovaries, although these could be due to early, clinically undetectable neoplastic changes in the ovaries (Wolf et al., Reference Wolf2024).

In the case of other types of cancer, it has been demonstrated that, for instance, women with lymphoma and leukaemia have a reduced concentration of AMH but it is not known whether their follicle density is also reduced (Liebenthron et al., Reference Liebenthron2019). In the recent work by Yoon et al. (Reference Yoon2020), they study the effect of endometrioma on the serum levels of AMH, in comparison with benign ovary cysts. They conclude that the amount of AMH does not present any statistically significant differences between the group of women with endometrioma and the group with cysts. However, the level of AMH in serum tended to show a positive relationship with the size of the endometrioma (Yoon et al., Reference Yoon2020). They also concluded that the impact on the physiological level of AMH of a benign ovarian cyst is a clinical problem with an indefinite conclusion (Yoon et al., Reference Yoon2020).

It has also been noted that, although cancer does not affect the reproductive system, treatment for it does affect reproductive life. Su et al. (Reference Su2020) showed that the AMH levels begin to decrease as the gonadotoxicity of the treatment increases (Su et al., Reference Su2020). They also reported that, during the first 2–3 years after the end of the treatment, the ovarian function recovers, although this may vary according to the age and the gonadotoxicity of the treatment (Su et al., Reference Su2020).

Conclusions

Stemming from the increasing interest in AMH in the last 15 years, the knowledge that we had of it has been considerably broadened.

It has been possible to prove that there is a direct correlation between AMH, the ovarian reserve and the AFC in the three mammalian species studied, especially in cows. Furthermore, the AMH concentration seems to be related to the individual’s age, given that as the latter increases, the former decreases.

With respect to fertility, both in cows and mares, high AMH levels appear to be linked to an optimal reproductive life. A lower AMH concentration in cows has been related to lower pregnancy rates and a higher foetal mortality.

With regard to hormones, there is an inverse relationship between AMH and FSH, with the expression of AMH being reduced at FSH-dependent follicle development stages. Between AMH and E2, the same results were not obtained in the species analysed.

AMH has been seen to be a tumour marker in the granulosa cells in women and mares, and a possible tool for the diagnosis of PCOS in women, due to the increase in AMH concentrations.

Finally, it has been demonstrated that both AMH and AMHR2 are expressed in extragonadal areas, stimulating the GnRH neurons, and controlling the secretion of gonadotropins. Also, AMH and AMHR2 are expressed in most GnRH neurons in the preoptic area, arched nucleus, and median eminence.

In general, despite the large amount of bibliography on AMH, it would be necessary to make more studies to complete the information that we have on it, and to uncover the unknown elements in its action mechanisms.

References

Akbarinejad, V et al. (2018) Nulliparous and primiparous cows produce less fertile female offspring with lesser concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as compared with multiparous cows. Animal Reproduction Science 197, 222230. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.08.032.Google Scholar
Almeida, J et al. (2011) Biological and clinical significance of anti-Müllerian hormone determination in blood serum of the mare. Theriogenology 76(8), 13931403. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.06.008.Google Scholar
Arouche, N et al. (2015) The BOC ELISA, a ruminant-specific AMH immunoassay, improves the determination of plasma AMH concentration and its correlation with embryo production in cattle. Theriogenology 84(8), 13971404. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.026.Google Scholar
Baarends, WM et al. (1995) Anti-Müllerian hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone type II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in rat ovaries during postnatal development, the estrous cycle, and gonadotropin-induced follicle growth. Endocrinology 136(11), 49514962. doi:10.1210/ENDO.136.11.7588229.Google Scholar
Baldrighi, J et al. (2014) Anti-Mullerian hormone concentration and antral ovarian follicle population in Murrah heifers compared to Holstein and Gyr kept under the same management. Reproduction in Domestic Animals = Zuchthygiene 49(6), 10151020. doi:10.1111/RDA.12430.Google Scholar
Ball, BA et al. (2008) Expression of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in equine granulosa-cell tumors and in normal equine ovaries. Theriogenology 70(6), 968977. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.05.059.Google Scholar
Ball, BA et al. (2019) Relationship between anti-Müllerian hormone and fertility in the mare. Theriogenology 125, 335341. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.11.005.Google Scholar
Barbotin, A-L et al. (2019) Emerging roles of anti-Müllerian hormone in hypothalamic-pituitary function. Neuroendocrinology 109(3), 218229. doi:10.1159/000500689.Google Scholar
Batista, EOS et al. (2020) Anti-Mullerian hormone and its relationship to ovulation response and fertility in timed AI Bos indicus heifers. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 55(6), 753758. doi:10.1111/rda.13677.Google Scholar
Bedenk, J, Vrtačnik-Bokal, E and Virant-Klun, I (2019) The role of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in ovarian disease and infertility. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 37(1), 89100. doi:10.1007/s10815-019-01622-7.Google Scholar
Behrendt, D et al. (2021) Active immunisation against GnRH as treatment for unilateral granulosa theca cell tumour in mares. Equine Veterinary Journal 53(4), 740745. doi:10.1111/EVJ.13352.Google Scholar
Broer, SL et al. (2011) Anti-Mullerian hormone predicts menopause: A long-term follow-up study in normoovulatory women. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 96(8), 25322539. doi:10.1210/JC.2010-2776.Google Scholar
Butt, MS et al. (2022) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of polycystic ovarian syndrome among women of reproductive age. BMC Women’s Health 22(1), . doi:10.1186/S12905-022-01782-2.Google Scholar
Capecce, E et al. (2016) La hormona antimülleriana como marcador de función ovárica. Revista Argentina de Endocrinologia y Metabolismo 53(3), 106113. doi:10.1016/j.raem.2016.06.003.Google Scholar
Carter, AS et al. (2016) Systemic and local anti-Mullerian hormone reflects differences in the reproduction potential of Zebu and European type cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 167, 5158. doi:10.1016/J.ANIREPROSCI.2016.02.003.Google Scholar
Claes, A et al. (2015) The interrelationship between anti-Müllerian hormone, ovarian follicular populations and age in mares. Equine Veterinary Journal 47(5), 537541. doi:10.1111/evj.12328.Google Scholar
Claes, ANJ and Ball, BA (2016) Biological functions and clinical applications of anti-Müllerian hormone in stallions and mares. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Equine Practice 32(3), 451464. doi:10.1016/j.cveq.2016.07.004.Google Scholar
Daly, J et al. (2020) Towards improving the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies of cattle and sheep, with particular focus on recipient management. Animals 10(2), 115. doi:10.3390/ani10020293.Google Scholar
Dewailly, D et al. (2014) The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women. Human Reproduction Update. 20(3), 370385. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt062.Google Scholar
D’Occhio, MJ, Campanile, G and Baruselli, PS (2020) Transforming growth factor-β superfamily and interferon-τ in ovarian function and embryo development in female cattle: Review of biology and application. Reproduction Fertility & Development 32(6), 539552. doi:10.1071/RD19123.Google Scholar
Durlinger, ALL et al. (2002) Anti-Müllerian hormone inhibits initiation of primordial follicle growth in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 143(3), 10761084. doi:10.1210/ENDO.143.3.8691.Google Scholar
Eskew, AM et al. (2022) Dietary patterns are associated with improved ovarian reserve in overweight and obese women: A cross-sectional study of the lifestyle and ovarian reserve (LORe) cohort. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology: RB&E 20(1), . doi:10.1186/S12958-022-00907-4.Google Scholar
Ferdousy, RN, Kereilwe, O and Kadokawa, H (2020) Anti-Müllerian hormone receptor type 2 (AMHR2) expression in bovine oviducts and endometria: comparison of AMHR2 mRNA and protein abundance between old Holstein and young and old Wagyu females. Reproduction Fertility & Development 32(8), 783791. doi:10.1071/RD19121.Google Scholar
Fushimi, Y et al. (2020) Efficacy of a single blood anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration measurement for the selection of Japanese black heifer embryo donors in herd breeding programs. Journal of Reproduction and Development 66(6), 593598. doi:10.1262/JRD.2020-069.Google Scholar
Gharagozlou, F et al. (2013) Elevated serum anti-Müllerian hormone in an Arabian mare with granulosa cell tumor. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 33(8), 645648. doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2012.09.003.Google Scholar
Gobikrushanth, M et al. (2019) Anti-Müllerian hormone in grazing dairy cows: Identification of factors affecting plasma concentration, relationship with phenotypic fertility, and genome-wide associations. Journal of Dairy Science 102(12), 1162211635. doi:10.3168/jds.2019-16979.Google Scholar
Gouvea, TM, Cota, E, Souza, LA and Lima, AA (2022) Correlation of serum anti-Mullerian hormone with hormonal and environmental parameters in Brazilian climacteric women. Scientific Reports 12(1), 19. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15429-7.Google Scholar
Grady, ST et al. (2019) Effect of intra-ovarian injection of mesenchymal stem cells in aged mares. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 36(3), . doi:10.1007/S10815-018-1371-6.Google Scholar
Gruijters, MJG et al. (2003) Anti-Müllerian hormone and its role in ovarian function. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 211(1–2), 8590. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2003.09.024.Google Scholar
Guerreiro, BM et al. (2014) Plasma anti-Mullerian hormone: An endocrine marker for in vitro embryo production from Bos taurus and Bos indicus donors. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 49(1), 96104. doi:10.1016/J.DOMANIEND.2014.07.002.Google Scholar
Hafez, ESE and Hafez, B (2004) Reprodução Animal. 7th Manole, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Han, Z et al. (2024) Exposure to ambient particulate matter and ovarian reserve impairment among reproductive age women in China. Journal of Hazardous Materials 480, . doi:10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2024.136212.Google Scholar
Hinck, AP, Mueller, TD and Springer, TA (2016) Structural biology and evolution of the TGF-β family. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 8(12), . doi:10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A022103.Google Scholar
Hirobe, S et al. (1992) Mullerian inhibiting substance messenger ribonucleic acid expression in granulosa and sertoli cells coincides with their mitotic activity. Endocrinology 131(2), 854862. doi:10.1210/endo.131.2.1639028.Google Scholar
Howard, JA, Hart, KN and Thompson, TB (2022) Molecular mechanisms of AMH signaling. Frontiers in Endocrinology 13, doi:10.3389/FENDO.2022.927824.Google Scholar
Huggins, L et al. (2024) Abnormal mare behaviour is rarely associated with changes in hormonal markers of granulosa cell tumours: A retrospective study. Equine Veterinary Journal 56(4), 759767. doi:10.1111/evj.13967.Google Scholar
Ireland, JJ et al. (2009) Variation in the ovarian reserve is linked to alterations in intrafollicular estradiol production and ovarian biomarkers of follicular differentiation and oocyte quality in cattle1. Biology of Reproduction 80(5), 954964. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.108.073791.Google Scholar
Ireland, JJ et al. (2011) Does size matter in females? An overview of the impact of the high variation in the ovarian reserve on ovarian function and fertility, utility of anti-Müllerian hormone as a diagnostic marker for fertility and causes of variation in the ovarian reserve in cattle. Reproduction Fertility & Development 23(1), 114. doi:10.1071/RD10226.Google Scholar
Ishii, R et al. (2019) Different anti-Műllerian hormone (AMH) levels respond to distinct ovarian stimulation methods in assisted reproductive technology (ART): Clues to better ART outcomes. Reproductive Medicine and Biology 18(3), 263272. doi:10.1002/rmb2.12270.Google Scholar
Ji, M et al. (2022) Age group-specific reference intervals for the Elecsys anti-Müllerian hormone assay in healthy Korean women: A nationwide population-based study. Annals of Laboratory Medicine. 42(6), 621629. doi:10.3343/ALM.2022.42.6.621.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Krassel, F et al. (2015) Concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone in dairy heifers is positively associated with productive herd life. Journal of Dairy Science 98(5), 30363045. doi:10.3168/JDS.2014-8130.Google Scholar
Joonè, CJ et al. (2018) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone dynamics in mares following immunocontraception with anti-zona pellucida or -GnRH vaccines. Theriogenology 106, 214220. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.004.Google Scholar
Joonè, CJ et al. (2019) Researching immunocontraceptive vaccines with mares (Equus caballus) as both a target and model for African elephant (Loxodonta africana) cows: A review. Animal Reproduction Science 207, 146152. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.06.002.Google Scholar
Josso, N et al. (1993) Anti-Müllerian hormone: The Jost factor. Recent Progress in Hormone Research 48, 159. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-571148-7.50005-1.Google Scholar
Josso, N et al. (2006) Testicular anti-Müllerian hormone: History, genetics, regulation and clinical applications. Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews 3(4), 347358.Google Scholar
Karl, KR et al. (2022) Limitations in use of ovarian reserve biomarkers to predict the superovulation response in small ovarian reserve heifers. Theriogenology 182, 5362. doi:10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2022.01.033.Google Scholar
Kereilwe, O et al. (2018) Anti-Müllerian hormone receptor type 2 is expressed in gonadotrophs of postpubertal heifers to control gonadotrophin secretion. Reproduction Fertility & Development 30(9), . doi:10.1071/RD17377.Google Scholar
Kereilwe, O and Kadokawa, H (2020a) Anti-Müllerian hormone and its receptor are detected in most gonadotropin-releasing-hormone cell bodies and fibers in heifer brains. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 72,.10.1016/j.domaniend.2019.106432.Google Scholar
Kereilwe, O and Kadokawa, H (2020b) Decreased anti-Müllerian hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone receptor type 2 in hypothalami of old Japanese Black cows. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 82(8), 11131117. doi:10.1292/jvms.20-0159.Google Scholar
Khodavirdilou, R et al. (2022) Does anti-Müllerian hormone vary during a menstrual cycle? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Ovarian Research 15(1), . doi:10.1186/S13048-022-01006-Z.Google Scholar
Krause, ART et al. (2022) Predictors of the ovarian superstimulatory response and oocyte collection in prepubertal heifers. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 81, . doi:10.1016/J.DOMANIEND.2022.106729.Google Scholar
Lahoz, B et al. (2012) Anti-Müllerian hormone plasma concentration in prepubertal ewe lambs as a predictor of their fertility at a young age. BMC Veterinary Research 8, . doi:10.1186/1746-6148-8-118.Google Scholar
Lainé, AL et al. (2019) A bovine-specific FSH enzyme immunoassay and its application to study the role of FSH in ovarian follicle development during the postnatal period. Animal 13(8), 16661675. doi:10.1017/S1751731118003233.Google Scholar
La Marca, A and Volpe, A (2007) The anti-Mullerian hormone and ovarian cancer. Human Reproduction Update. 13(3), 265273. doi:10.1093/humupd/dml060.Google Scholar
Łebkowska, A et al. (2024) The association of thyroid autoimmunity with ovarian reserve in women with type 1 diabetes with and without polycystic ovary syndrome. Scientific Reports 14(1), . doi:10.1038/s41598-024-63741-1.Google Scholar
Liebenthron, J et al. (2019) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration and follicle density throughout reproductive life and in different diseases - Implications in fertility preservation. Human Reproduction 34(12), 25132522. doi:10.1093/humrep/dez215.Google Scholar
Lima, AG et al. (2015) Does clinical treatment with phenylbutazone and meloxicam in the pre-ovulatory period influence the ovulation rate in mares? Reproduction in Domestic Animals 50(5), 771775. doi:10.1111/rda.12586.Google Scholar
Liu, S et al. (2022) Association of antimüllerian hormone with polycystic ovarian syndrome phenotypes and pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization cycles with fresh embryo transfer. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 22(1), . doi:10.1186/S12884-022-04518-0.Google Scholar
Liu, X et al. (2022) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels are associated with early miscarriage in the IVF/ICSI fresh cycle. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 22(1), . doi:10.1186/S12884-022-04591-5.Google Scholar
Maculan, R et al. (2018) Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), external morphometrics and fertility in Tabapuã cows. Animal Reproduction Science 189, 8492. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.12.011Google Scholar
Massarotti, C et al. (2020) Influence of age on response to controlled ovarian stimulation in women with low levels of serum anti-Müllerian hormone. Gynecological Endocrinology 36(12), 10741078. doi:10.1080/09513590.2020.1737668.Google Scholar
McNatty, KP et al. (1995) Development of the sheep ovary during fetal and early neonatal life and the effect of fecundity genes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement 49, 123135. doi:10.1530/biosciprocs.3.010.Google Scholar
Monniaux, D et al. (2011) Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictive endocrine marker for embryo production in the goat. Reproduction 142(6), 845854. doi:10.1530/REP-11-0211.Google Scholar
Monniaux, D et al. (2013) Regulation of anti-Mllerian hormone production in domestic animals. Reproduction Fertility & Development 25(1), 116. doi:10.1071/RD12270.Google Scholar
Monniaux, D et al. (2014) The ovarian reserve of primordial follicles and the dynamic reserve of antral growing follicles: What is the link? Biology of Reproduction 90(4), . doi:10.1095/BIOLREPROD.113.117077.Google Scholar
Moolhuijsen, LME et al. (2022) Association between an AMH promoter polymorphism and serum AMH levels in PCOS patients. Human Reproduction 37(7), 15441556. doi:10.1093/HUMREP/DEAC082.Google Scholar
Moolhuijsen, LME and Visser, JA (2020) AMH in PCOS: Controlling the ovary, placenta, or brain? Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research 12,9197.10.1016/j.coemr.2020.04.006.Google Scholar
Mossa, F et al. (2017) Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and fertility management in agricultural species. Reproduction 154(1), R1R11. doi:10.1530/REP-17-0104.Google Scholar
Mossa, F and Ireland, JJ (2019) Physiology and endocrinology symposium: Anti-Müllerian hormone: A biomarker for the ovarian reserve, ovarian function, and fertility in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 97(4), 14461455. doi:10.1093/jas/skz022.Google Scholar
Muharam, R et al. (2022) IVF outcome with a high level of AMH: A focus on PCOS versus non-PCOS. BMC Women’s Health 22(1), . doi:10.1186/S12905-022-01756-4.Google Scholar
Nabenishi, H et al. (2017) Relationship between plasma anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations during the rearing period and subsequent embryo productivity in Japanese black cattle. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 60, 1924. doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2017.01.002.Google Scholar
Nawaz, MY et al. (2018) Genomic heritability and genome-wide association analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone in Holstein dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 101(9), 80638075. doi:10.3168/jds.2018-14798.Google Scholar
Nolan, MB et al. (2018) Ovarian function following immunocontraceptive vaccination of mares using native porcine and recombinant zona pellucida vaccines formulated with a non-Freund’s adjuvant and anti-GnRH vaccines. Theriogenology 120, 111116. doi:10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2018.07.044.Google Scholar
Peluso, C et al. (2014) AMH: An ovarian reserve biomarker in assisted reproduction. Clinica Chimica Acta 437, 175182. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2014.07.029.Google Scholar
Qasemi, M, Mahdian, R and Amidi, F (2021) Cell-free DNA discoveries in human reproductive medicine: Providing a new tool for biomarker and genetic assays in ART. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 38(2), 277288. doi:10.1007/S10815-020-02038-4.Google Scholar
Racoubian, E et al. (2020) Age-dependent changes in anti-Müllerian hormone levels in Lebanese females: Correlation with basal FSH and LH levels and LH/FSH ratio: A cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health 20(1), 16. doi:10.1186/s12905-020-00998-4.Google Scholar
Ramesha, KP et al. (2022) Anti-Müllerian hormone as an endocrine biomarker of reproductive longevity and assessment of single nucleotide polymorphisms in AMH gene of Bos indicus breeds of cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals = Zuchthygiene 57(11), 14501464. doi:10.1111/RDA.14222.Google Scholar
Renaudin, CD et al. (2021) Equine granulosa cell tumours among other ovarian conditions: Diagnostic challenges. Equine Veterinary Journal 53(1), 6070. doi:10.1111/EVJ.13279.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, ES et al. (2014) Plasma anti-Müllerian hormone in adult dairy cows and associations with fertility. Journal of Dairy Science 97(11), 68886900. doi:10.3168/jds.2014-7908.Google Scholar
Robertson, DM, Lee, CH and Baerwald, A (2020) Interactions between serum FSH, inhibin B and antral follicle count in the decline of serum AMH during the menstrual cycle in late reproductive age. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism. 4(2), . doi:10.1002/edm2.172.Google Scholar
Roosa, KA, Zysling, DA and Place, NJ (2015) An assessment of anti-Müllerian hormone in predicting mating outcomes in female hamsters that have undergone natural and chemically-accelerated reproductive aging. General and Comparative Endocrinology 214, 5661.10.1016/J.YGCEN.2015.03.007.Google Scholar
Sakaguchi, K et al. (2019) Relationships between the antral follicle count, steroidogenesis, and secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone during follicular growth in cattle. Reproductive Biology & Endocrinology 17(1), 113. doi:10.1186/s12958-019-0534-3.Google Scholar
Saleh, AC et al. (2021) BPA and BPS affect the expression of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and its receptor during bovine oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology: RB&E 19(1), . doi:10.1186/S12958-021-00773-6.Google Scholar
Scarlet, D et al. (2018) Anti-Müllerian hormone profiling in prepubertal horses and its relationship with gonadal function. Theriogenology 117, 7277. doi:10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2018.05.012.Google Scholar
Scarlet, D et al. (2021) Sexual differentiation and primordial germ cell distribution in the early horse fetus. Animals 11(8), . doi:10.3390/ANI11082422.Google Scholar
Showell, M et al. (2020) Antioxidants for female subfertility. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 8(8), . doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007807.PUB4.Google Scholar
Sowers, MR et al. (2009) Anti-Müllerian hormone and lnhibin B in the definition of ovarian aging and the menopause transition. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 93(9), 34783483. doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000345380.74110.a6.Google Scholar
Steel, A, Athorn, RZ and Grupen, CG (2018) Anti-Müllerian hormone and oestradiol as markers of future reproductive success in juvenile gilts. Animal Reproduction Science 195, 197206.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.05.024.Google Scholar
Su, HI et al. (2020) Modeling variation in the reproductive lifespan of female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors using AMH. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 105(8), 27402751. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa172.Google Scholar
Succu, S et al. (2020) Exposure of dairy cows to high environmental temperatures and their lactation status impairs establishment of the ovarian reserve in their offspring. Journal of Dairy Science 103(12), 1195711969. doi:10.3168/JDS.2020-18678.Google Scholar
Şükür, YE et al. (2024) Inter-cycle variability of anti-Müllerian hormone: Implications for predicting controlled ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes. Journal of Ovarian Research 17(1), . doi:10.1186/S13048-024-01517-X.Google Scholar
Taketo, T et al. (1993) Müllerian inhibiting substance production associated with loss of oocytes and testicular differentiation in the transplanted mouse XX gonadal primordium1ʹ. Biology of Reproduction 49(1), 1323. doi:10.1095/biolreprod49.1.13.Google Scholar
Tarasconi, B et al. (2017) Serum antimüllerian hormone levels are independently related to miscarriage rates after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertility & Sterility 108(3), 518524. doi:10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2017.07.001.Google Scholar
Te Velde, ER and Pearson, PL (2002) The variability of female reproductive ageing. Human Reproduction Update. 8(2), 141154. doi:10.1093/humupd/8.2.141.Google Scholar
Torres-Simental, JF et al. (2021) Predictive markers for superovulation response and embryo production in beef cattle managed in northwest Mexico are influenced by climate. Livestock Science 250, . doi:10.1016/J.LIVSCI.2021.104590.Google Scholar
Traversari, J et al. (2019) Relationships between antral follicle count, blood serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone and fertility in mares. Schweizer Archiv Fur Tierheilkunde 161(10), 627638. doi:10.17236/SAT00225.Google Scholar
Uliani, RC et al. (2019) Anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian aging in mares. The Journal of Endocrinology 240(2), 147156. doi:10.1530/JOE-18-0391.Google Scholar
Umer, S et al. (2019) AMH: Could it be used as a biomarker for fertility and superovulation in domestic animals? Genes 10(12), . doi:10.3390/GENES10121009.Google Scholar
Widodo, OS et al. (2022) Relationship between ovary size and anti-Müllerian hormone levels in Holstein–Friesian cows. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9, . doi:10.3389/FVETS.2022.828123.Google Scholar
Wolf, N et al. (2024) Pathohistological findings after bilateral ovariectomy in mares with behavioral problems. Animals 14(19), . doi:10.3390/ani14192899.Google Scholar
Yoon, H et al. (2020) The relationship of ovarian endometrioma and its size to the preoperative serum anti-Mullerian hormone level. Ginekologia Polska 91(6), 313319. doi:10.5603/GP.2020.0060.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Studies that have analysed the concentration of AMH (Mean ± SD) in women, mare, and cow (dairy and beef cows)

Figure 1

Table 2. AMH concentration in different breeds of dairy cows, obtained in the study carried out by Gobikrushanth et al. (2019)

Figure 2

Figure 1. Human chromosome in which the gene of AMHR2 is found. An image obtained from the NCB1 database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?db=gene&cmd=detailssearch&term=269).

Figure 3

Table 3. Variation in the ovarian reserve. Differences in the woman’s, cow’s, and mare’s ovarian reserve at birth and as from 1 year