Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:17:37.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field results from Whisper® stethoscope studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2014

Tom Noffsinger*
Affiliation:
34122 Hwy 24, Benkelman, Nebraska, USA
Kurt Brattain
Affiliation:
Geissler Corporation, 14505 21st Avenue N, Suite 202, Plymouth, Minnesota, USA
Greg Quakenbush
Affiliation:
Geissler Corporation, 14505 21st Avenue N, Suite 202, Plymouth, Minnesota, USA
Garrett Taylor
Affiliation:
Geissler Corporation, 14505 21st Avenue N, Suite 202, Plymouth, Minnesota, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

One area where the feedlot industry has been historically weak is the area of BRD “case definition” or diagnosis. Numerous studies demonstrate a weak correlation between lung lesions at harvest and treatment history. This poor track record is due in part to lack of specific chute side diagnostic tools. To analyze the effectiveness of current diagnostic tools (temperature, manual lung scores, and Whisper® lung scores), two data sets were collected. The first evaluated the correlation between rectal temperature, manual lung scores, and case fatality rate in feedlot cattle pulled for BRD. The second evaluated the relative accuracy of Whisper® scores and rectal temperature. Fever was defined as a rectal temperature of 104.5° F or greater. Manual lung scores better correlated with case fatality rate than fever. When fever and Whisper® scores were compared, a Whisper® score of 1 or less better predicted survival than a temperature of less than 104.5° F. The combination of no fever and Whisper® score of 1 or less best predicted survival. The determination of Whisper® score along with rectal temperature in cattle identified with signs of acute BRD can improve case definition, improve risk assessment, and allow more targeted use of antibiotics.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryant, LK, Perino, LJ, Griffin, DD, Doster, AR and Wittum, TE (1999). A method for recording pulmonary lesions of beef calves at slaughter, and the association of lesions with average daily gain. Bovine Practitioner 33:163173.Google Scholar