Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:46:37.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors that influence producer decisions to implement management strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Thomas G. Field
Thomas G. Field*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, 103K Miller Hall, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cow–calf enterprises in the USA are widely divergent in size, locale, resource availability, management skill, and market focus. Furthermore, variation exists in dependence on the cow–calf enterprise as a primary source of income, perception about the utility of a particular management practice or technology, and assessment of cost: benefit resulting from implementation impact decisions. Enterprises with larger cow inventories, greater dependence on income from the cattle enterprise, and that retain ownership further into the supply chain beyond the cow–calf operation are more likely to institute management protocols such as vaccination programs, defined calving seasons, and reproductive technologies. Successful cow–calf managers place the highest priority on herd nutrition, pasture and range management, herd health, financial management marketing, production management, and genetics. Management practices are more likely to be adopted when they align with a manager's perception of the utility, labor availability, favorable cost: benefit outcomes and profit motivation.

Keywords

cow–calf operationsmanagementproducerstechnology
Type
Review Article
Information
Animal Health Research Reviews , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , December 2014 , pp. 189 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Field, TG (2000). Balancing the economic and social importance of ruminants with their environmental impact. In XXI World Buiatrics Congress, December 4–8, Punta del Este, Uruguay.Google Scholar
Field, TG (2006). Priorities First – Identifying Management Priorities in the Commercial Cow-Calf Business. American Angus Association, St. Joseph, MO, pp. 1–28. Available online at: http://www.angus.org/pub/prioritiesfirstfinal.pdf (Last accessed June 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
Field, TG (2010). Raising beef in a first world country: science, media and politics. In Proceedings of the Beef Improvement Federation Annual Research Conference, June 28–July 1, Columbia, MO, pp. 39–45. Available online at: http://www.bifconference.com/bif2010/documents/05_field_tom.pdf (Last accessed June 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
Field, TG, Lemenager, RP, Long, B, Suttee, H and Gardiner, H (2007). The future of information dissemination to the beef cattle industry. In Proceedings of the Western Section of the American Society of Animal Science, June 20–22, Moscow, ID. 58:176–182.Google Scholar
Lawrence, JD and Minert, JR (2011). Fundamental forces affecting livestock producers. Choices Magazine. Vol. 26. Available online at: http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/article.php?article=165 (Last accessed June 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
McBride, WD and Mathews, K (2011). The diverse structure and organization of U.S. beef cow-calf farms. EIB-73. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Econ. Res. Serv. Available online at: https://www.motherjones.com/files/eib73.pdf (Last accessed September 20, 2014.)Google Scholar
USDA (2009a). Beef 2007–08, Part II: Reference of beef cow-calf management practices in the United States, 2007–08. USDA:APHIS:VS, CEAH, Fort Collins, CO #N512.0209.Google Scholar
USDA (2009b). Beef 2007–08, Part IV: Reference of beef cow-calf management practices in the United States, 2007–08. USDA:APHIS:VS, CEAH, Fort Collins, CO #523.0210.Google Scholar
USDA (2010). Vaccination of calves for respiratory disease on U.S. beef cow-calf operations. USDA:APHIS:VS:CEAH, Fort Collins, CO #564.1209.Google Scholar
USDA (2011). Small-scale U.S. Cow-calf operations. USDA:APHIS:VS, CEAH, Fort Collins, CO #596.0411.Google Scholar
USDA (2013). Agricultural statistics annual. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Available online at: http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Ag_Statistics/2013/index.asp (Last accessed June 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
Ward, CE, Vestal, MK, Dye, DG and Lalman, DL (2008). Factors affecting adoption of cow-calf production practices in Oklahoma. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40: 851–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar