Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:34:32.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence-based approach to improving immunity to manage cattle health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2014

D. L. Step  and
Clint Krehbiel
D. L. Step*
Affiliation:
Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA
Clint Krehbiel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) involves interactions between respiratory pathogens and stressors. Marketing beef cattle in North America frequently involves commingling of cattle from different backgrounds along with various stressors. Veterinarians are faced with unique challenges when designing preventive health care protocols. Research at Oklahoma State University has generated information to assist the practitioner to make more informed recommendations regarding the value of a single vaccination or revaccination in high-risk cattle, and the benefits of management programs at the farm or ranch of origins, particularly in regard to the impact of commingling of cattle from different origins.

Keywords

bovine respiratory diseaseimmunityhealthvaccines
Type
Review Article
Information
Animal Health Research Reviews , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , December 2014 , pp. 178 - 179
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Step, DL, Krehbiel, CR, DePra, HA, Cranston, JJ, Fulton, RW, Kirkpatrick, JG, Gill, DR, Payton, ME, Montelongo, AM and Confer, AW (2008). Effects of commingling beef calves from different sources and weaning protocols during a forty-two-day receiving period on performance and bovine respiratory disease. Journal of Animal Science 86: 3146–3158.Google Scholar
Step, DL, Krehbiel, CR, Burciaga-Robles, LO, Holland, BP, Fulton, RW, Confer, AW, Bechtol, DT, Brister, DL, Hutcheson, JP and Newcomb, HL (2009). Comparison of single vaccination versus revaccination with a modified-live virus vaccine containing bovine herpesvirus-1, bovine viral diarrhea virus (type 1a and 2a), parainfluenza type 3 virus, and bovine respiratory syncytial virus in the prevention of bovine respiratory disease in cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 235: 580–587.Google Scholar