Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:49:48.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beef cattle welfare in the USA: identification of priorities for future research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2015

Cassandra B. Tucker ,
Johann F. Coetzee ,
Joseph M. Stookey ,
Daniel U. Thomson ,
Temple Grandin  and
Karen S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein
Cassandra B. Tucker*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA
Johann F. Coetzee
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Joseph M. Stookey
Affiliation:
Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada
Daniel U. Thomson
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
Temple Grandin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Karen S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5304, 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This review identifies priorities for beef cattle welfare research in the USA. Based on our professional expertise and synthesis of existing literature, we identify two themes in intensive aspects of beef production: areas where policy-based actions are needed and those where additional research is required. For some topics, considerable research informs best practice, yet gaps remain between scientific knowledge and implementation. For example, many of the risk factors and management strategies to prevent respiratory disease are understood, but only used by a relatively small portion of the industry. This is an animal health issue that will require leadership and discussion to gain widespread adoption of practices that benefit cattle welfare. There is evidence of success when such actions are taken, as illustrated by the recent improvements in handling at US slaughter facilities. Our highest priorities for additional empirical evidence are: the effect of technologies used to either promote growth or manage cattle in feedlots, identification of management risk factors for disease in feedlots, and management decisions about transport (rest stops, feed/water deprivation, climatic conditions, stocking density). Additional research is needed to inform science-based recommendations about environmental features such as dry lying areas (mounds), shade, water and feed, as well as trailer design.

Keywords

beefcattlecowfeedlotwelfare
Type
Review Article
Information
Animal Health Research Reviews , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , December 2015 , pp. 107 - 124
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, JL and Arave, CW (1997). The Behaviour of Cattle. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amatayakul-Chantler, S, Jackson, JA, Stegner, J, King, V, Rubio, LMS, Howard, R, Lopez, E and Walker, J (2012). Immunocastration of Bos indicus x Brown Swiss bulls in feedlot with gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccine Bopriva provides improved performance and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 90: 3718–3728.Google Scholar
Andersen, HR, Jensen, LR, Munksgaard, L and Ingvartsen, KL (1997). Influence of floor space allowance and access sites to feed trough on the production of calves and young bulls and on the carcass and meat quality of young bulls. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A Animal Science 47: 48–56.Google Scholar
Anil, MH (2012). Religious slaughter: a current controversial animal welfare issue. Animal Frontiers 2: 64–67.Google Scholar
Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act of 1994 (AMDUCA). U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/ActsRulesRegulations/ucm085377.htm. Accessed September 16, 2015.Google Scholar
Armstrong, DV (1994). Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 2044–2050.Google Scholar
Aschenbach, JR, Penner, GB, Stumpff, F and Gäbel, G (2011). Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH. Journal of Animal Science 89: 1092–1107.Google Scholar
AVMA (2009). Welfare Implications of Castration of Cattle. Schaumberg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association.Google Scholar
AVMA (2011). Welfare Implications of Ovariectomy in Cattle. Schaumberg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association.Google Scholar
AVMA (2012a). Welfare Implications of Dehorning and Disbudding of Cattle. Schaumberg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association.Google Scholar
AVMA (2012b). Welfare Implications of Hot-Iron Branding and its Alternatives. Schaumberg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association.Google Scholar
AVMA (2013). AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. Schaumberg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association.Google Scholar
Baker, AM and Gonyou, HW (1986). Effects of zeranol implantation and late castration on sexual, agonistic and handling behavior in male feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 62: 1224–1232.Google Scholar
Baszczak, JA, Grandin, T, Gruber, SL, Engle, TE, Platter, WJ, Laudert, SB, Schroeder, AL and Tatum, JD (2006). Effects of ractopamine supplementation on behavior of British, Continental, and Brahman crossbred steers during routine handling. Journal of Animal Science 84: 3410–3414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaver, JM and Olson, BE (1997). Winter range use by cattle of different ages in southwestern Montana. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, JK, Blackshaw, AW and Mcglone, JJ (1997). Buller steer syndrome review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 97–108.Google Scholar
Boland, HT, Scaglia, G, Swecker, WS and Burke, NC (2008). Effects of alternate weaning methods on behavior, blood metabolites, and performance of beef calves. Professional Animal Scientist 24: 539–551.Google Scholar
Borderas, TF, Pawluczuk, B, De Passillé, AM and Rushen, J (2004). Claw hardness of dairy cows: relationship to water content and claw lesions. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 2085–2093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourguet, C, Deiss, V, Tannugi, CC and Terlouw, EM (2011). Behavioural and physiological reactions of cattle in a commercial abattoir: relationships with organisational aspects of the abattoir and animal characteristics. Meat Science 88: 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyles, SL, Loerch, SC and Lowe, GD (2007). Effects of weaning management strategies on performance and health of calves during feedlot receiving. Professional Animal Scientist 23: 637–641.Google Scholar
Brower, GR and Kiracofe, GH (1978). Factors associated with the buller-steer syndrome. Journal of Animal Science 46: 26–31.Google Scholar
Brown-Brandl, TM, Nienaber, JA, Eigenberg, RA, Hahn, GL and Freetly, H (2003). Thermoregulatory responses of feeder cattle. Journal of Thermal Biology 28: 149–157.Google Scholar
Brown-Brandl, TM, Eigenberg, RA, Hahn, GL, Nienaber, JA, Mader, TL, Spiers, DE and Parkhurst, AM (2005). Analyses of thermoregulatory responses of feeder cattle exposed to simulated heat waves. International Journal of Biometeorology 49: 285–296.Google Scholar
Brown-Brandl, TM, Eigenberg, RA and Nienaber, JA (2006). Heat stress risk factors of feedlot heifers. Livestock Science 105: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, JR, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Pryce, JE, Holmes, CW, Johnson, DL and Garrick, DJ (2007). Environmental sensitivity in New Zealand dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 1538–1547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, TC, Rabe, FM, Bowers, DN, Hutches, DB and Jaragin, JJ (2008). Effects of growth-promoting implant containing tylosin tartrate on performance, buller incidence and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. Bovine Practitioner 42: 128–131.Google Scholar
Burdick, NC, Carroll, JA, Hulbert, LE, Dailey, JW, Willard, ST, Vann, RC, Welsh, TH Jr and Randel, RD (2010). Relationships between temperament and transportation with rectal temperature and serum concentrations of cortisol and epinephrine in bulls. Livestock Science 129: 166–172.Google Scholar
Campbell, CP, Marshall, SA, Mandell, IB and Wilton, JW (1992). Effects of source of dietary neutral detergent fiber on chewing behavior in beef cattle fed pelleted concentrates with or without supplemental roughage. Journal of Animal Science 70: 894–903.Google Scholar
Canadian Agri-Food Research Council (2001). Recommended code of practice for the care and handling of farm animals – transportation [Online]. [Available online at http://www.nfacc.ca/pdf/english/Transportation2001.pdf] [accessed June 2 2009].Google Scholar
Centner, TJ, Alvey, JC and Stelzleni, AM (2014). Beta agonists in livestock feed: status, health concerns, and international trade. Journal of Animal Science 92: 4234–4240.Google Scholar
Cernicchiaro, N, White, BJ, Renter, DG, Babcock, AH, Kelly, L and Slattery, R (2012a). Associations between the distances traveled from sale barns to commercial feedlots in the United States and overall performance, risk of respiratory disease, and cumulative mortality in feeder cattle during 1997 to 2009. Journal of Animal Science 90: 1929–1939.Google Scholar
Cernicchiaro, N, White, BJ, Renter, DG, Babcock, AH, Kelly, L and Slattery, R (2012b). Effects of body weight loss during transit from sale barns to commercial feedlots on health and performance in feeder cattle cohorts arriving to feedlots from 2000 to 2008. Journal of Animal Science 90: 1940–1947.Google Scholar
Chen, JM, Schutz, KE and Tucker, CB (2013). Dairy cows use and prefer feed bunks fitted with sprinklers. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 5035–5045.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF (2011). A review of pain assessment techniques and pharmacological approaches to pain relief after bovine castration: practical implications for cattle production within the United States. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 192–213.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF (2013). A review of analgesic compounds used in food animals in the United States. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 29: 11–28.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF, Lubbers, BV, Toeber, BS, Gehring, R, Thomson, DU, White, BJ and Apley, MD (2008). Plasma concentrations of substance P and cortisol in beef calves after castration or simulated castration. American Journal of Veterinary Research 69: 751–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coetzee, JF, Nutsch, AL, Barbur, LA and Bradburn, RM (2010). A survey of castration methods and associated livestock management practices performed by bovine veterinarians in the United States. BMC Veterinary Research 6: 12.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF, Edwards, LN, Mosher, RA, Bello, NM, O'connor, AM, Wang, B, Kukanich, B and Blasi, DA (2012a). Effect of oral meloxicam on health and performance of beef steers relative to bulls castrated on arrival at the feedlot. Journal of Animal Science 90: 1026–1039.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF, Mosher, RA, Kukanich, B, Gehring, R, Robert, B, Reinbold, J and White, BJ (2012b). Pharmacokinetics and effect of intravenous meloxicam in weaned Holstein calves following scoop dehorning without local anesthesia. BMC Veterinary Research 8: 153.Google Scholar
Cook, NB, Nordlund, KV and Oetzel, GR (2004). Environmental influences on claw horn lesions associated with laminitis and subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87: E36–E46.Google Scholar
Cooke, RF, Arthington, JD, Araujo, DB and Lamb, GC (2009). Effects of acclimation to human interaction on performance, temperament, physiological responses, and pregnancy rates of Brahman-crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science 87: 4125–4132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, RF, Bohnert, DW, Cappellozza, BI, Mueller, CJ and Delcurto, T (2012). Effects of temperament and acclimation to handling on reproductive performance of Bos taurus beef females. Journal of Animal Science 90: 3547–3555.Google Scholar
Currah, JM, Hendrick, SH and Stookey, JM (2009). The behavioral assessment and alleviation of pain associated with castration in beef calves treated with flunixin meglumine and caudal lidocaine epidural anesthesia with epinephrine. Canadian Veterinary Journal 50: 375–382.Google Scholar
Degen, AA and Young, BA (1993). Rate of metabolic heat production and rectal temperature of steers exposed to simulated mud and rain conditions. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 73: 207–210.Google Scholar
Dijkman, JT and Lawrence, PR (1997). The energy expenditure of cattle and buffaloes walking and working in different soil conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 128: 95–103.Google Scholar
Duff, GC and Galyean, ML (2007). Board-invited review: recent advances in management of highly stressed, newly received feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85: 823–840.Google Scholar
Dunn, CS (1990). Stress reactions of cattle undergoing ritual slaughter using two methods of restraint. Veterinary Record 126: 522–525.Google Scholar
Edwards, TA (2010). Control methods for bovine respiratory disease for feedlot cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 26: 273–284.Google Scholar
Eigenberg, RA, Brown-Brandl, TM and Nienaber, JA (2009). Shade material evaluation using a cattle response model and meterological instrumentation. International Journal of Biometeorology 53: 501–507.Google Scholar
Eldridge, GA and Winfield, CG (1988). The behaviour and bruising of cattle during transport at different space allowances. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28: 695–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldridge, GA, Winfield, CG and Cahill, DJ (1988). Responses of cattle to different space allowances, pen sizes and road conditions during transport. Animal Production Science 28: 155–159.Google Scholar
Enemark, J (2008). The monitoring, prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA): a review. Veterinary Journal 176: 32–43.Google Scholar
Enríquez, DH, Ungerfeld, R, Quintans, G, Guidoni, AL and Hötzel, MJ (2010). The effects of alternative weaning methods on behaviour in beef calves. Livestock Science 128: 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, AD, Crowe, MA, De La Varga, MEA and Enright, WJ (1996). Effect of castration method and the provision of local anesthesia on plasma cortisol, scrotal circumference, growth, and feed intake of bull calves. Journal of Animal Science 74: 2336–2343.Google Scholar
Fisher, AD, Knight, TW, Cosgrove, GP, Death, AF, Anderson, CB, Duganzich, DM and Matthews, LR (2001). Effects of surgical or banding castration on stress responses and behaviour of bulls. Australian Veterinary Journal 79: 279–284.Google Scholar
Fisher, AD, Verkerk, GA, Morrow, CJ and Matthews, LR (2002). The effects of feed restriction and lying deprivation on pituitary-adrenal axis regulation in lactating cows. Livestock Production Science 73: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, AD, Stewart, M, Verkerk, GA, Morrow, CJ and Matthews, LR (2003). The effects of surface type on lying behaviour and stress responses of dairy cows during periodic weather-induced removal from pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 1–11.Google Scholar
Fordyce, G (1987). Weaner training. Queensland Agricultural Journal 113: 323–324.Google Scholar
Fox, JT, Thomson, DU, Lindberg, NN and Barling, K (2009). A comparison of two vaccines to reduce liver abscesses in natural-fed beef cattle. Bovine Practitioner 43: 168–174.Google Scholar
Fraser, D (2008). Toward a global perspective on farm animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113: 330–339.Google Scholar
Fregonesi, JA, Veira, DM, Von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM (2007). Effects of bedding quality on lying behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 5468–5472.Google Scholar
Frese, D, Reinhardt, CD, Bartle, SJ, Rethorst, DN, Bawa, B, Thomason, JD, Loneragan, GH and Thomson, DU. Effect of ractopamine hydrochloride and zilpaterol hydrochloride on the cardiac electrophysiology and blood chemistry in finishing steers. Journal of Animal Science, submitted.Google Scholar
Gadberry, S (2011). Feed Additives for Beef Cattle. University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural and Natural Resources. Fayetteville, AR.Google Scholar
Galyean, ML and Rivera, JD (2003). Nutritionally related disorders affecting feedlot cattle. Canadian journal of animal science 83: 13–20.Google Scholar
Galyean, ML, Perino, LJ and Duff, GC (1999). Interaction of cattle health/immunity and nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 77: 1120–1134.Google Scholar
Garcia, LG, Nicholson, KL, Hoffman, TW, Lawrence, TE, Hale, DS, Griffin, DB, Savell, JW, Vanoverbeke, DL, Morgan, JB, Belk, KE, Field, TG, Scanga, JA, Tatum, JD and Smith, GC (2008). National Beef Quality Audit-2005: survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 86: 3533–3543.Google Scholar
Gaughan, JB, Kreikemeier, WM and Mader, TL (2005). Hormonal growth-promotant effects on grain-fed cattle maintained under different environments. International Journal of Biometeorology 49: 396–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaughan, JB, Bonner, S, Loxton, I, Mader, TL, Lisle, A and Lawrence, R (2010). Effect of shade on body temperature and performance of feedlot steers. Journal of Animal Science 88: 4056–4067.Google Scholar
Gibb, DJ, Mcallister, TA, Huisma, C and Wiedmeier, RD (1998). Bunk attendance of feedlot cattle monitored with radio frequency technology. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78: 707–710.Google Scholar
Gibson, TJ, Johnson, CB, Murrell, JC, Hulls, CM, Mitchinson, SL, Stafford, KJ, Johnstone, AC and Mellor, DJ (2009). Electroencephalographic responses of halothane-anaesthetised calves to slaughter by ventral-neck incision without prior stunning. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57: 77–83.Google Scholar
Goad, DW, Goad, CL and Nagaraja, TG (1998). Ruminal microbial and fermentative changes associated with experimentally induced subacute acidosis in steers. Journal of Animal Science 76: 234–241.Google Scholar
Godfrey, RW, Lunstra, DD and Schanbacher, BD (1992). Effect of implanting bull calves with testosterone propionate, dihydrotestosterone propionate or oestradiol-17β prepubertally on the pituitary–testicular axis and on postpubertal social and sexual behaviour. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 94: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldhawk, C, Janzen, E, Gonzalez, LA, Crowe, T, Pajor, E, Kastelic, J and Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS (2011). Predicting internal trailer THI based on space allowance and ambient THI during transport of fall-weaned beef calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 91: 506–506.Google Scholar
Goldhawk, C, Crowe, T, Gonzalez, LA, Janzen, E, Kastelic, J, Pajor, E and Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K (2014a). Comparison of eight logger layouts for monitoring animal-level temperature and humidity during commercial feeder cattle transport. Journal of Animal Science 92: 4161–4171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldhawk, C, Crowe, T, Janzen, E, Gonzalez, LA, Kastelic, J, Pajor, E and Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS (2014b). Trailer microclimate during commercial transportation of feeder cattle and relationship to indicators of cattle welfare. Journal of Animal Science 92: 5155–5165.Google Scholar
Goldhawk, C, Janzen, E, Gonzalez, LA, Crowe, T, Kastelic, J, Kehler, C, Ominski, K, Pajor, E and Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K (2015). Trailer temperature and humidity during winter transport of cattle in Canada and evaluation of indicators used to assess the welfare of cull beef cows before and after transport. Journal of Animal Science 93: 3639–3653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonyou, HW and Stricklin, WR (1981). Orientation of feedlot bulls with respect to the sun during periods of high solar radiation in winter. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61: 809–816.Google Scholar
Gonyou, HW, Christopherson, RJ and Young, BA (1979). Effects of cold temperature and winter conditions on some aspects of behaviour of feedlot cattle. Applied Animal Ethology 5: 113–124.Google Scholar
González, LA, Correa, LB, Ferret, A, Manteca, X, Ruíz-De-la-torre, JL and Calsamiglia, S (2009). Intake, water consumption, ruminal fermentation, and stress response of beef heifers fed after different lengths of delays in the daily feed delivery time. Journal of Animal Science 87: 2709–2718.Google Scholar
González, LA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Caulkett, NA, Janzen, E, Mcallister, TA, Fierheller, E, Schaefer, AL, Haley, DB, Stookey, JM and Hendrick, S (2010). Pain mitigation after band castration of beef calves and its effects on performance, behavior, Escherichia coli, and salivary cortisol. Journal of Animal Science 88: 802–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González, LA, Manteca, X, Calsamiglia, S, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS and Ferret, A (2012a). Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review). Animal Feed Science and Technology 172: 66–79.Google Scholar
González, LA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Bryan, M, Silasi, R and Brown, F (2012b). Benchmarking study of industry practices during commercial long haul transport of cattle in Alberta, Canada. Journal of Animal Science 90: 3606–3617.Google Scholar
González, LA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Bryan, M, Silasi, R and Brown, F (2012c). Factors affecting body weight loss during commercial long haul transport of cattle in North America. Journal of Animal Science 90: 3630–3639.Google Scholar
González, LA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Bryan, M, Silasi, R and Brown, F (2012d). Relationships between transport conditions and welfare outcomes during commercial long haul transport of cattle in North America. Journal of Animal Science 90: 3640–3651.Google Scholar
González, LA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Bryan, M, Silasi, R and Brown, F (2012e). Space allowance during commercial long distance transport of cattle in North America. Journal of Animal Science 90: 3618–3629.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (1992). Observations of cattle restraint devices for stunning and slaughtering. Animal Welfare 1: 85–90.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (1994). Euthanasia and slaughter of livestock. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 209: 1354–1360.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (1997). Assessment of stress during handling and transport. Journal of Animal Science 75: 249–257.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (1998a). The feasibility of using vocalization scoring as an indicator of poor welfare during cattle slaughter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 121–128.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (1998b). Objective scoring of animal handling and stunning practices at slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212: 36–39.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2001a). Cattle vocalizations are associated with handling and equipment problems at beef slaughter plants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71: 191–201.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2001b). Perspectives on transportation issues: the importance of having physically fit cattle and pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79: E201–E207.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2005). Maintenance of good animal welfare standards in beef slaughter plants by use of auditing programs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226: 370–373.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2007). Recommended Animal Handling Guidelines and Audit Guide, 2007 edn. Washington, DC: American Meat Institute Foundation.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2009). Improving livestock, poultry and fish welfare in slaughter plants with auditing programmes. In: Grandin, T (ed.) Improving Animal Welfare: a Practical Approach. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 160–186.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2010). Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants. Meat Science 86: 56–65.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2012a). Developing measures to audit welfare of cattle and pigs at slaughter. Animal Welfare 21: 351–356.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2012b). Recommended Animal Handling Guidelines & Audit Guide: a Systematic Approach to Animal Welfare. Washington, DC: Am. Meat Inst., [Online]. [Available online at http://www.animalhandling.org/ht/a/GetDocumentAction/i/80011] [accessed October 7 2014].Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2013). Making slaughterhouses more humane for cattle, pigs, and sheep. Annual Review of Animal BioSciences 1: 491–512.Google Scholar
Grandin, T (2014). Animal welfare and society concerns finding the missing link. Meat Science 98: 461–469.Google Scholar
Grandin, T and Regenstein, JM (1994). Religious slaughter and animal welfare: a discussion for meat scientists. Meat Focus International 3: 115–123.Google Scholar
Grandin, T, Curtis, SE, Widowski, TM and Thurmon, JC (1986). Electro-immobilization versus mechanical restraint in an avoid-avoid choice test for ewes. Journal of Animal Science 62: 1469–1480.Google Scholar
Graunke, KL, Schuster, T and Lidfors, LM (2011). Influence of weather on the behaviour of outdoor-wintered beef cattle in Scandinavia. Livestock Science 136: 247–255.Google Scholar
Greene, JL and Cowan, T (2012). Table Egg Production and Hen Welfare: The UEP-HSUS Agreement and H.R. 3798 Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Gregory, N, Von Wenzlawowicz, M and Von Holleben, K (2009). Blood in the respiratory tract during slaughter with and without stunning in cattle. Meat Science 82: 13–16.Google Scholar
Gregory, NG and Grandin, T (2007). Animal Welfare and Meat Production. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Gregory, NG, Schuster, P, Mirabito, L, Kolesar, R and Mcmanus, T (2012). Arrested blood flow during false aneurysm formation in the carotid arteries of cattle slaughtered with and without stunning. Meat Science 90: 368–372.Google Scholar
Guarnieri Filho, TA, Cooke, RF, Cappellozza, BI, Reis, MM, Marques, RS and Bohnert, DW (2014). Effects of meloxicam administration on physiological and performance responses of transported feeder cattle. Journal of Animal Science 92: 4137–4144.Google Scholar
Haley, DB, Bailey, DW and Stookey, JM (2005). The effects of weaning beef calves in two stages on their behavior and growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 83: 2205–2214.Google Scholar
Hawkins, EW, Field, RA, Orme, LE, Dyer, RE and Lunt, DK (2005). Impact of castration and zeranol implants on bullocks: I. Behavior, growth and carcass traits. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 4: 366–371.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Rice, M, Karlen, MG, Calleja, L, Barnett, JL, Nash, J and Coleman, GJ (2011). Human–animal interactions at abattoirs: relationships between handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 24–33.Google Scholar
Honeyman, MS, Busby, WD, Lonergan, SM, Johnson, AK, Maxwell, DL, Harmon, JD and Shouse, SC (2010). Performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef cattle managed in a bedded hoop-barn system. Journal of Animal Science 88: 2797–2801.Google Scholar
Irsik, M, Langemeier, M, Schroeder, T, Spire, M and Roder, JD (2006). Estimating the effects of animal health on the performance of feedlot cattle. Bovine Practitioner 40: 65–74.Google Scholar
Irwin, MR, Melendy, DR, Amoss, MS and Hutcheson, DP (1979). Roles of predisposing factors and gonadal hormones in the buller syndrome of feedlot steers. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 174: 367–370.Google Scholar
Jezierski, TA and Podlużny, M (1984). A quantitative analysis of social behaviour of different crossbreds of dairy cattle kept in loose housing and its relationship to productivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 13: 31–40.Google Scholar
Johnson, AK, Lonergan, SM, Busby, WD, Shouse, SC, Maxwell, DL, Harmon, JD and Honeyman, MS (2011). Comparison of steer behavior when housed in a deep-bedded hoop barn versus an open feedlot with shelter. Journal of Animal Science 89: 1893–1898.Google Scholar
Jones, SDM, Schaefer, AL, Robertson, WM and Vincent, BC (1990). The effects of withholding feed and water on carcass shrinkage and meat quality in beef cattle. Meat Science 28: 131–139.Google Scholar
Kasimanickam, R, Asay, M, Firth, P, Whittier, WD and Hall, JB (2012). Artificial insemination at 56 h after intravaginal progesterone device removal improved AI pregnancy rate in beef heifers synchronized with five-day CO-Synch+ controlled internal drug release (CIDR) protocol. Theriogenology 77: 1624–1631.Google Scholar
Kendall, PE, Verkerk, GA, Webster, JR and Tucker, CB (2007). Sprinklers and shade cool cows and reduce insect-avoidance behavior in pasture-based dairy systems. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 3671–3680.Google Scholar
Kondo, S, Sekine, J, Okubo, M and Asahida, Y (1989). The effect of group size and space allowance on the agonistic and spacing behavior of cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 127–135.Google Scholar
Kreikemeier, WM and Mader, TL (2004). Effects of growth-promoting agents and season on yearling feedlot heifer performance. Journal of Animal Science 82: 2481–2488.Google Scholar
Lambooy, E (1985). Electroanaesthesia or electroimmobilisation of calves, sheep and pigs by the Feenix Stockstill. Veterinary Quarterly 7: 120–126.Google Scholar
Lambooy, E and Hulsegge, B (1988). Long-distance transport of pregnant heifers by truck. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 249–258.Google Scholar
Larson, RL (2005). Effect of cattle disease on carcass traits. Journal of Animal Science 83: E37–E43.Google Scholar
Lay, DC, Friend, TH, Bowers, CL, Grissom, KK and Jenkins, OC (1992a). A comparative physiological and behavioral study of freeze and hot-iron branding using dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 70: 1121–1125.Google Scholar
Lay, DC, Friend, TH, Grissom, KK, Bowers, CL and Mal, ME (1992b). Effects of freeze or hot-iron branding of Angus calves on some physiological and behavioral indicators of stress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 137–147.Google Scholar
Lay, DC, Friend, TH, Randel, RD, Bowers, CL, Grissom, KK and Jenkins, OC (1992c). Behavioral and physiological effects of freeze or hot-iron branding on crossbred cattle. Journal of Animal Science 70: 330–336.Google Scholar
Lean, IJ, Thompson, JM and Dunshea, FR (2014). A meta-analysis of zilpaterol and ractopamine effects on fedlot performance, carcass traits and shear strength of meat in cattle. PLoS ONE 9: e115904.Google Scholar
Lee, C, Fisher, AD, Colditz, IG, Lea, JM and Ferguson, DM (2013). Preference of beef cattle for feedlot or pasture environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 145: 53–59.Google Scholar
Lemke, KA and Dawson, SD (2000). Local and regional anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice 30: 839–857.Google Scholar
Lesmeister, JL and Ellington, EF (1977). Effect of steroid implants on sexual behavior of beef calves. Hormones and Behavior 9: 276–280.Google Scholar
Loberg, JM, Hernandez, CE, Thierfelder, T, Jensen, MB, Berg, C and Lidfors, L (2008). Weaning and separation in two steps – a way to decrease stress in dairy calves suckled by foster cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111: 222–234.Google Scholar
Lofgreen, GP, Dunbar, JR, Addis, DG and Clark, JG (1975). Energy level in starting rations for calves subjected to marketing and shipping stress. Journal of Animal Science 41: 1256–1265.Google Scholar
Loneragan, GH and Brashears, MM (2005). Effects of using retention-pond water for dust abatement on performance of feedlot steers and carriage of Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella spp. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226: 1378–1383.Google Scholar
Loneragan, GH, Thomson, DU and Scott, HM (2014). Increased mortality in groups of cattle administered the b-adrenergic agonists ractopamine hydrochloride and zilpaterol hydrochloride. PLoS ONE 9: e91177.Google Scholar
Macías-Cruz, U, Álvarez-Valenzuela, FD, Torrentera-Olivera, NG, Velázquez-Morales, JV, Correa-Calderón, A, Robinson, PH and Avendaño-Reyes, L (2010). Effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of ewe lambs during heat-stress conditions. Animal Production Science 50: 983–989.Google Scholar
Mader, TL and Kreikemeier, WM (2006). Effects of growth-promoting agents and season on blood metabolites and body temperature in heifers. Journal of Animal Science 84: 1030–1037.Google Scholar
Mader, TL, Gaughan, JB, Kreikemeier, WM and Parkhurst, AM (2008). Behavioural effects of yearling grain-finished heifers exposed to differing environmental conditions and growth-promoting agents. Animal Production Science 48: 1155–1160.Google Scholar
Mayes, HF, Asplund, JM and Anderson, ME (1979). Transport Stress Effects on Shrinkage. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.Google Scholar
Mccosker, K, Letchford, P, Petherick, JC, Meyer, D and Mcgowan, M (2010). Morbidity, mortality and body weight gain of surgically spayed, yearling Brahman heifers. Australian Veterinary Journal 88: 497–503.Google Scholar
Mench, JA, Sumner, DA and Rosen-Molina, JT (2011). Sustainability of egg production in the United States – the policy and market context. Poultry Science 90: 229–240.Google Scholar
Mitchell, MA and Kettlewell, PJ (2008). Engineering and design of vehicles for long distance road transport of livestock (ruminants, pigs and poultry). Veterinaria Italiana 44: 201–213.Google Scholar
Mitlöhner, FM, Galyean, ML and Mcglone, JJ (2002). Shade effects on performance, carcass traits, physiology, and behavior of heat-stressed feedlot heifers. Journal of Animal Science 80: 2043–2050.Google Scholar
Mogensen, L, Nielsen, LH, Hindhede, J, Sørensen, JT and Krohn, CC (1997). Effect of space allowance in deep bedding systems on resting behaviour, production, and health of dairy heifers. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A Animal Science 47: 178–186.Google Scholar
Molony, V, Kent, JE and Robertson, IS (1995). Assessment of acute and chronic pain after different methods of castration of calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 33–48.Google Scholar
Morrison, S, Givens, R, Garrett, W and Bond, T (1970). Effects of mud-wind-rain on beef cattle performance in feed lot. California Agriculture 24: 6–7.Google Scholar
Mulliniks, JT, Cox, SH, Kemp, ME, Endecott, RL, Waterman, RC, Vanleeuwen, DM and Petersen, MK (2012). Relationship between body condition score at calving and reproductive performance in young postpartum cows grazing native range. Journal of Animal Science 90: 2811–2817.Google Scholar
Nagaraja, T and Lechtenberg, KF (2007a). Acidosis in feedlot cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 23: 333–350.Google Scholar
Nagaraja, TG and Lechtenberg, KF (2007b). Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 23: 351–369.Google Scholar
Nagaraja, TG and Titgemeyer, EC (2007). Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook. Journal of Dairy Science 90: E17–E38.Google Scholar
National Cattlemen's Beef Association (2012). Pillars of beef chain success–executive summary: The 2011 national beef quality audit [Online]. [Available online at http://www.bqa.org/CMDocs/bqa/NBQA.pdf] [accessed October 7 2014].Google Scholar
National Farm Animal Care Council (2013). Code of practice for the care and handling of beef cattle [Online]. [Available online at http://www.nfacc.ca/pdfs/codes/beef_code_of_practice.pdf] [accessed October 7 2014].Google Scholar
National Milk Producers Federation (2012). National dairy FARM program: Farmers assuring responsible management [Online]. [Available online at http://www.nationaldairyfarm.com] [accessed September 13 2012].Google Scholar
Newman, JA, Tong, AKW, Doornenbal, H, Tennessen, T, Coulter, GH and Mears, GJ (1990). Effects of zeranol implantation on growth, feed conversion, testicular development and behavioral traits of young bulls fed for slaughter. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70: 1005–1016.Google Scholar
Nienaber, JA and Hahn, GL (2007). Livestock production system management responses to thermal challenges. International Journal of Biometeorology 52: 149–157.Google Scholar
Nocek, JE (1997). Bovine acidosis: implications on laminitis. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 1005–1028.Google Scholar
Nordlund, KV, Cook, NB and Oetzel, GR (2004). Investigation strategies for laminitis problem herds. Journal of Dairy Science 87: E27–E35.Google Scholar
North American Compendiums (2010). Compendium of Veterinary Products, 12th edn. Port Huron, MI: North American Compendiums.Google Scholar
NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets (2002). New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program [Online]. [Available online at http://nyschap.vet.cornell.edu] [accessed September 13 2012].Google Scholar
O'lamhna, M and Roche, JF (1983). Effect of repeated implantation with anabolic agents on growth rate, carcase weight, testicular size and behaviour of bulls. Veterinary Record 113: 531–534.Google Scholar
Olson, BE and Wallander, RT (2002). Influence of winter weather and shelter on activity patterns of beef cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82: 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, BE, Wallander, RT and Paterson, JA (2000). Do windbreaks minimize stress on cattle grazing foothill winter range? Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80: 265–272.Google Scholar
Owens, FN, Secrist, DS, Hill, WJ and Gill, DR (1998). Acidosis in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76: 275–286.Google Scholar
Pang, WY, Earley, B, Sweeney, T and Crowe, MA (2006). Effect of carprofen administration during banding or burdizzo castration of bulls on plasma cortisol, in vitro interferon-γ production, acute-phase proteins, feed intake, and growth. Journal of Animal Science 84: 351–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pang, WY, Earley, B, Gath, V and Crowe, MA (2008). Effect of banding or burdizzo castration on plasma testosterone, acute-phase proteins, scrotal circumference, growth, and health of bulls. Livestock Science 117: 79–87.Google Scholar
Pascoe, PJ (1986). Humaneness of an electroimmobilization unit for cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 2252–2256.Google Scholar
Patison, KP, Swain, DL, Bishop-Hurley, GJ, Robins, G, Pattison, P and Reid, DJ (2010). Changes in temporal and spatial associations between pairs of cattle during the process of familiarisation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 128: 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, GB, Steele, MA, Aschenbach, JR and Mcbride, BW (2011). Ruminant nutrition symposium: molecular adaptation of ruminal epithelia to highly fermentable diets. Journal of Animal Science 89: 1108–1119.Google Scholar
Peterson, E, Strohbehn, D, Ladd, G and Willham, R (1989a). The economic viability of preconditioning for cow-calf producers. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1687–1697.Google Scholar
Peterson, EB, Strohbehn, DR, Ladd, GW and Willham, RL (1989b). Effects of preconditioning on performance of beef calves before and after entering the feedlot. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1678–1686.Google Scholar
Petherick, JC (2005). Animal welfare issues associated with extensive livestock production: the northern Australian beef cattle industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92: 211–234.Google Scholar
Petherick, JC, Doogan, VJ, Holroyd, RG, Olsson, P and Venus, BK (2009). Quality of handling and holding yard environment, and beef cattle temperament: 1. Relationships with flight speed and fear of humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120: 18–27.Google Scholar
Petherick, JC, Mccosker, K, Mayer, DG, Letchford, P and Mcgowan, M (2011). Preliminary investigation of some physiological responses of Bos indicus heifers to surgical spaying. Australian Veterinary Journal 89: 131–137.Google Scholar
Petherick, JC, Mccosker, K, Mayer, DG, Letchford, P and Mcgowan, M (2013). Evaluation of the impacts of spaying by either the dropped ovary technique or ovariectomy via flank laparotomy on the welfare of beef heifers and cows. Journal of Animal Science 91: 382–394.Google Scholar
Price, EO (2002). Animal Domestication and Behavior. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Quimby, WF, Sowell, BF, Bowman, JGP, Branine, ME, Hubbert, ME and Sherwood, HW (2001). Application of feeding behaviour to predict morbidity of newly received calves in a commercial feedlot. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81: 315–320.Google Scholar
Reich, LJ, Weary, DM, Veira, DM and Von Keyserlingk, MAG (2010). Effects of sawdust bedding dry matter on lying behavior of dairy cows: a dose-dependent response. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 1561–1565.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, CD, Vahl, CI, Depenbusch, BE, Hutcheson, JP and Thomson, DU (2014). Feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride is associated with decreased dry matter intake shortly after initiation of feeding dependent on season and previous intake. Journal of Animal Science 92: 4751–4760.Google Scholar
Rosen, SD (2004). Physiological insights into Shechita. Veterinary Record 154: 759–765.Google Scholar
Schipper, C, Church, T and Harris, B (1989). A review of the Alberta certified preconditioned feeder program (1980–1987). Canadian Veterinary Journal 30: 736–741.Google Scholar
Schütz, KE, Clark, KV, Cox, NR, Matthews, LR and Tucker, CB (2010). Responses to short-term exposure to simulated rain and wind by dairy cattle: time budgets, shelter use, body temperature and feed intake. Animal Welfare 19: 375–383.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Stookey, JM and Welford, R (1997). Behavior of cattle during hot-iron and freeze branding and the effects on subsequent handling ease. Journal of Animal Science 75: 2064–2072.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Stookey, JM, Crowe, TG and Genswein, BM (1998). Comparison of image analysis, exertion force, and behavior measurements for use in the assessment of beef cattle responses to hot-iron and freeze branding. Journal of Animal Science 76: 972–979.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Beauchemin, KA, Gibb, DJ, Crews, DH, Hickman, DD, Streeter, M and Mcallister, TA (2003). Effect of bunk management on feeding behavior, ruminal acidosis and performance of feedlot cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 81: E149–E158.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Booth-Mclean, ME, Shah, MA, Entz, T, Bach, SJ, Mears, GJ, Schaefer, AL, Cook, N, Church, J and Mcallister, TA (2007). Effects of pre-haul management and transport duration on beef calf performance and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108: 12–30.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Hickman, DD, Shah, MA, Krehbiel, CR, Genswein, BMA, Silasi, R, Gibb, DG, Crews, DH and Mcallister, TA (2011). Relationship between feeding behavior and performance of feedlot steers fed barley-based diets. Journal of Animal Science 89: 1180–1192.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Faucitano, L, Dadgar, S, Shand, P, González, LA and Crowe, TG (2012). Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: a review. Meat Science 92: 227–243.Google Scholar
Smith, GW, Davis, JL, Tell, LA, Webb, AI and Riviere, JE (2008). Extralabel use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 232: 697–701.Google Scholar
Smith, RA (1998). Impact of disease on feedlot performance: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76: 272–274.Google Scholar
Soca, P, Carriquiry, M, Keisler, DH, Claramunt, M, Do Carmo, M, Olivera-Muzante, J, Rodríguez, M and Meikle, A (2013). Reproductive and productive response to suckling restriction and dietary flushing in primiparous grazing beef cows. Animal Production Science 53: 283–291.Google Scholar
Sowell, BF, Branine, ME, Bowman, JG, Hubbert, ME, Sherwood, HE and Quimby, W (1999). Feeding and watering behavior of healthy and morbid steers in a commercial feedlot. Journal of Animal Science 77: 1105–1112.Google Scholar
Spitzer, JC, Morrison, DG, Wettemann, RP and Faulkner, LC (1995). Reproductive responses and calf birth and weaning weights as affected by body condition at parturition and postpartum weight gain in primiparous beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 73: 1251–1257.Google Scholar
Spoormakers, TJ, Donker, SH and Ensink, JM (2004). Diagnostic anaesthesia of the equine lower limb: a comparison of lidocaine and lidocaine with epinephrine. Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde 129: 548–551.Google Scholar
Stackhouse-Lawson, KR, Tucker, CB, Calvo-Lorenzo, MS and Mitloehner, FM (2015). Effects of growth-promoting technology on feedlot cattle behavior in the 21 days before slaughter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 162: 1–8.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ (2005a). Dehorning and disbudding distress and its alleviation in calves. Veterinary Journal 169: 337–349.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ (2005b). The welfare significance of the castration of cattle: a review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 53: 271–278.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ (2011). Addressing the pain associated with disbudding and dehorning in cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 226–231.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ, Mellor, DJ, Todd, SE, Bruce, RA and Ward, RN (2002). Effects of local anaesthesia or local anaesthesia plus a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug on the acute cortisol response of calves to five different methods of castration. Research in Veterinary Science 73: 61–70.Google Scholar
Stanford, K, Bryan, M, Peters, J, Gonzalez, LA, Stephens, TP and Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS (2011). Effects of long-or short-haul transportation of slaughter heifers and cattle liner microclimate on hide contamination with Escherichia coli O157. Journal of Food Protection 74: 1605–1610.Google Scholar
Step, DL, Krehbiel, CR, Depra, HA, Cranston, JJ, Fulton, RW, Kirkpatrick, JG, Gill, DR, Payton, ME, Montelongo, MA and Confer, AW (2008). Effects of commingling beef calves from different sources and weaning protocols during a forty-two-day receiving period on performance and bovine respiratory disease. Journal of Animal Science 86: 3146–3158.Google Scholar
Stewart, L (2013). Implanting Beef Cattle. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. Athens, GA.Google Scholar
Stilwell, G, Lima, MS and Broom, DM (2008). Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on long-term pain in calves castrated by use of an external clamping technique following epidural anesthesia. American Journal of Veterinary Research 69: 744–750.Google Scholar
Stock, ML, Baldridge, SL, Griffin, D and Coetzee, JF (2013). Bovine dehorning: assessing pain and providing analgesic management. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 29: 103–133.Google Scholar
Stricklin, WR, Graves, HB, Wilson, LL and Singh, RK (1980). Social organization among young beef cattle in confinement. Applied Animal Ethology 6: 211–219.Google Scholar
Sullivan, ML, Cawdell-Smith, AJ, Mader, TL and Gaughan, JB (2011). Effect of shade area on performance and welfare of short-fed feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 89: 2911–2925.Google Scholar
Swanson, JC and Morrow-Tesch, JT (2001). Cattle transport: historical, research, and future perspectives. Journal of Animal Science 79: E102–E109.Google Scholar
Tarrant, PV, Kenny, FJ and Harrington, D (1988). The effect of stocking density during 4 hour transport to slaughter on behaviour, blood constituents and carcass bruising in Friesian steers. Meat Science 24: 209–222.Google Scholar
Tarrant, PV, Kenny, FJ, Harrington, D and Murphy, M (1992). Long distance transportation of steers to slaughter: effect of stocking density on physiology, behaviour and carcass quality. Livestock Production Science 30: 223–238.Google Scholar
Taylor, LF, Booker, CW, Jim, GK and Guichon, PT (1997). Epidemiological investigation of the buller steer syndrome (riding behaviour) in a western Canadian feedlot. Australian Veterinary Journal 75: 45–51.Google Scholar
Terrell, SP, Thomson, DU, Stackhouse-Lawson, K, Apley, MD, Larson, C and Reinhardt, CD (2013). Perception of lameness management, education, and welfare implications in the feedlot from consulting nutritionists, veterinarians, and feedlot managers. Bovine Practitioner 48: 53–60.Google Scholar
Theurer, ME, White, BJ, Coetzee, JF, Edwards, LN, Mosher, RA and Cull, CA (2012). Assessment of behavioral changes associated with oral meloxicam administration at time of dehorning in calves using a remote triangulation device and accelerometers. BMC Veterinary Research 8: 48.Google Scholar
Thomson, DU, Loneragan, GH, Henningson, JN, Ensley, S and Bawa, B (2015). Description of a novel fatigue syndrome of finished feedlot cattle following transportation. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 247: 66–72.Google Scholar
Thurmon, JC, Tranquilli, WJ and Benson, GJ (1996). Preanesthetics and anesthetic adjuncts. In: Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 183–209.Google Scholar
Tucker, CB, Rogers, AR, Verkerk, GA, Kendall, PE, Webster, JR and Matthews, LR (2007). Effects of shelter and body condition on the behaviour and physiology of dairy cattle in winter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 105: 1–13.Google Scholar
Tucker, CB, Mintline, EM, Banuelos, J, Walker, KA, Hoar, B, Drake, D and Weary, DM (2014a). Effect of a cooling gel on pain sensitivity and healing of hot-iron cattle brands. Journal of Animal Science 92: 5674–5682.Google Scholar
Tucker, CB, Mintline, EM, Banuelos, J, Walker, KA, Hoar, B, Varga, A, Drake, D and Weary, DM (2014b). Pain sensitivity and healing of hot-iron cattle brands. Journal of Animal Science 92: 5674–5682.Google Scholar
Unruh, JA, Gray, DG and Dikeman, ME (1986). Implanting young bulls with zeranol from birth to four slaughter ages: I. Live measurements, behavior, masculinity and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 62: 279–289.Google Scholar
USDA (1999). Cattle and Swine Trucking Guide for Exporters. Agricultural Marketing Services. [Online] [Available online at http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS18102] [accessed September 18 2015].Google Scholar
USDA (2000). Feedlot 1999, Part III: Health Management and Biosecurity in US Feedlots, 1999. Fort Collins, CO: USDA-APHIS National Health Monitoring System.Google Scholar
USDA (2007a). Beef 2007–08, Part I: Reference of Beef Cow-Calf Management Practices in the United States. Fort Collins, CO: USDA-APHIS National Health Monitoring System.Google Scholar
USDA (2007b). Beef 2007–08, Part III: Changes in the US Beef Cow-Calf Industry, 1993–2008. Fort Collins, CO: USDA-APHIS National Health Monitoring System.Google Scholar
USDA (2010). Dairy 2007, Facility Characteristics and Cow Comfort on US Dairy Operations. Fort Collins, CO: USDA-APHIS National Health Monitoring System.Google Scholar
USDA (2011a). Cattle and Calves Nonpredator Death Loss in the United States, 2010. Fort Collins, CO: USDA-APHIS National Health Monitoring System.Google Scholar
USDA (2011b). Feedlot 2011, Part I: Management Practices on US Feedlots with a Capacity of 1,000 or More Head. Fort Collins, CO: USDA-APHIS National Health Monitoring System.Google Scholar
US Department of Transportation (2015). Hours of Service of Drivers. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. [Online] [Available online at https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/sites/fmcsa.dot.gov/files/docs/Drivers%20Guide%20to%20HOS%202015_508.pdf] [accessed September 18 2015].Google Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration (2012). Guidance for industry #209: The judicious use of medically important antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals [Online]. [Available online at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM216936.pdf] [accessed July 22 2015].Google Scholar
Valdus Ventures LLC (2012). [Available online at http://www.validusservices.com] [accessed September 13 2012].Google Scholar
Vandenheede, M, Nicks, B, Shehi, R, Canart, B, Dufrasne, I, Biston, R and Lecomte, P (1995). Use of a shelter by grazing fattening bulls: effect of climatic factors. Animal Science 60: 81–85.Google Scholar
Vanderwert, W, Berger, LL, Mckeith, FK, Baker, AM, Gonyou, HW and Bechtel, PJ (1985). Influence of zeranol implants on growth, behavior and carcass traits in Angus and Limousin bulls and steers. Journal of Animal Science 61: 310–319.Google Scholar
Van Engen, NK, Stock, ML, Engelken, T, Vann, RC, Wulf, LW, Karriker, LA, Busby, WD, Lakritz, J, Carpenter, AJ, Bradford, BJ, Hsu, WH, Wang, C and Coetzee, JF (2014). Impact of oral meloxicam on circulating physiological biomarkers of stress and inflammation in beef steers after long-distance transportation. Journal of Animal Science 92: 498–510.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, JT and Galyean, ML (2007). Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting nutritionists: the 2007 Texas Tech University survey. Journal of Animal Science 85: 2772–2781.Google Scholar
Voyles, BL, Brown, MS, Swingle, RS and Karr, KJ (2004). Case study: effects of implant programs on buller incidence, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristics of yearling steers. Professional Animal Scientist 20: 344–352.Google Scholar
Warren, LA, Mandell, IB and Bateman, KG (2010). Road transport conditions of slaughter cattle: effects on the prevalence of dark, firm and dry beef. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 90: 471–482.Google Scholar
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Knowles, TG, Kestin, SC, Edwards, JE, Dolan, SK and Phillips, AJ (1995). Effects on cattle of transport by road for up to 15 hours. Veterinary Record 136: 319–323.Google Scholar
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM (1999). Effects of restraint and branding on rates and acoustic parameters of vocalization in beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 125–135.Google Scholar
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM (2000). Vocal behaviour in cattle: the animal's commentary on its biological processes and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 15–33.Google Scholar
Weary, DM, Jasper, J and Hötzel, MJ (2008). Understanding weaning distress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110: 24–41.Google Scholar
Weary, DM, Huzzey, JM and Von Keyserlingk, MAG (2009). Board-invited review: using behavior to predict and identify ill health in animals. Journal of Animal Science 87: 770–777.Google Scholar
Webster, JR, Stewart, M, Rogers, AR and Verkerk, GA (2008). Assessment of welfare from physiological and behavioural responses of New Zealand dairy cows exposed to cold and wet conditions. Animal Welfare 17: 19–26.Google Scholar
Welfare Quality® (2009). Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Cattle. Lelystad, Netherlands: Welfare Quality® Consortium.Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Waterman, AE, Webster, AJF and O'brien, JK (1998). The influence of lesion type on the duration of hyperalgesia associated with hindlimb lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Journal 156: 23–29.Google Scholar
White, BJ and Renter, DG (2009). Bayesian estimation of the performance of using clinical observations and harvest lung lesions for diagnosing bovine respiratory disease in post-weaned beef calves. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 21: 446–453.Google Scholar
White, BJ, Coetzee, JF, Renter, DG, Babcock, AH, Thomson, DU and Andresen, D (2008). Evaluation of two-dimensional accelerometers to monitor behavior of beef calves after castration. American Journal of Veterinary Research 69: 105–1012.Google Scholar
Widowski, TM (2001). Shade-seeking behavior of rotationally-grazed cows and calves in a moderate climate. In: Stowell, R, Bucklin, R and Bottcher, R (eds) Livestock Environment VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium. Louisville, Kentucky, USA: ASAE, pp. 632–639.Google Scholar
Wikner, I, Gebresenbet, G and Nilsson, C (2003). Assessment of air quality in a commercial cattle transport vehicle in Swedish summer and winter conditions. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 110: 100–104.Google Scholar
Wileman, BW, Thomson, DU, Reinhardt, CD and Renter, DG (2009). Analysis of modern technologies commonly used in beef cattle production: conventional beef production versus nonconventional production using meta-analysis. Journal of Animal Science 87: 3418–3426.Google Scholar
Wilson, SC, Fell, LR, Colditz, IG and Collins, DP (2002). An examination of some physiological variables for assessing the welfare of beef cattle in feedlots. Animal Welfare 11: 305–316.Google Scholar
World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (2012). Terrestrial Animal Health Code: Transport of Animals By Land. Paris, FR: OIE.Google Scholar
Yang, W and Beauchemin, K (2007). Altering physically effective fiber intake through forage proportion and particle length: chewing and ruminal pH. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 2826–2838.Google Scholar
Yang, WZ and Beauchemin, KA (2006). Physically effective fiber: method of determination and effects on chewing, ruminal acidosis, and digestion by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 2618–2633.Google Scholar
Zavy, MT, Juniewicz, PE, Phillips, WA and Vontungeln, DL (1992). Effect of initial restraint, weaning, and transport stress on baseline and ACTH-stimulated cortisol responses in beef calves of different genotypes. American Journal of Veterinary Research 53: 551–557.Google Scholar
Zobel, G, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Genswein, BMA and Von Keyserlingk, MAG (2011). Impact of agonistic interactions on feeding behaviours when beef heifers are fed in a competitive feeding environment. Livestock Science 137: 1–9.Google Scholar