Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:04:17.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Typical features, characterization and breeding objectives of Begait sheep in Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

B. Amare*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Technology, Bhair Dar University, PO Box 2145, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
A. Kefyalew
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Technology, Bhair Dar University, PO Box 2145, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
M. Zeleke
Affiliation:
Debre Tabore Univerity, Debre Tabore, Ethiopia
*
Correspondence to: B. Amare, Department of Animal Production and Technology, Bahir Dar University, PO. Box 2145, Ethiopia. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

Typical features, breeding objectives and morphological as well as biometrical characters of Begait sheep breed were studied in two districts (Setit Humera and Kafta Humera) of Ethiopia. Semi-structured questionnaires, recording body weight, linear body measurements and field observations were employed. Begait sheep breed is described as long and thin tailed (up to 50-cm long), with muscular body, short and smooth hair and polled for both male and female sexes. As reported by the respondents’ growth rate (0.21), tail length (0.20), appearance/conformation (0.19) and coat colour (0.18) were the most important traits in selecting breeding rams. For breeding ewes’ body size (0.27), age at first service (0.15), growth rate (0.14) and coat colour and tail (0.13) were their first, second, third and fourth traits, respectively. Sites and age had significant (P < 0.01) effect on body weight and most linear body measurements. Relatively, Kafta Humera had lower values in body weight and most of the linear body measurements than Setit Humera. The overall mean body weight and body length of female Begait sheep were 31.4 ± 0.4 kg and 62.5 ± 0.5 cm, respectively. The corresponding values for male Begait sheep were 34.5 ± 0.5 kg and 66.1 ± 0.5 cm, respectively. The existing traditional herding, breeding practices and trait preferences are the key breeding components that need improvement at smallholder farmers’ in Ethiopia.

Résumé

Les caractéristiques, les objectifs de sélection et les caractères morphologiques et biométriques des moutons Begayit ont été étudiés dans deux districts (Setit Humera et Kafta Humera) de l’Éthiopie en utilisant des questionnaires semi-structurés, l'enregistrement du poids corporel et des mensurations du corps et des observations sur le terrain. Les moutons Begayit possèdent une queue longue et mince (jusqu’à 50 cm de longueur), un corps musclé, des poils courts et lisses et, les mâles autant que les femelles, n'ont pas de cornes. Les interviewés ont signalé que le taux de croissance (0.21), la longueur de la queue (0.20), l'aspect/conformation (0.19) et la couleur de la robe (0.18) représentaient les caractères les plus importants dans la sélection des béliers reproducteurs. Pour ce qui concerne les brebis reproductrices, la taille du corps (0.27), l’âge à la première mise bas (0.15), le taux de croissance (0.14) et la robe et la queue (0.13) étaient respectivement le premier, le deuxième, le troisième et le quatrième caractère d'importance. L'emplacement et l’âge influencent (P < 0.01) le poids et la plupart des mensurations du corps. Les moutons du district Kafta Humera présentaient des valeurs concernant le poids et les mensurations du corps relativement plus faibles que les moutons du district de Setit Humera. Les moyennes générales du poids et de la longueur du corps des femelles Begayit étaient respectivement de 31.4 ± 0.4 kg et de 62.5 ± 0.5 cm. Les valeurs correspondantes pour les mâles des moutons Begayit étaient respectivement de 34.5 ± 0.5 kg et de 66.1 ± 0.5 cm. Les pratiques traditionnelles existantes d’élevage et de sélection et les préférences de caractères sont les composantes principales de sélection qu'il faut améliorer chez les petits exploitants de l’Éthiopie.

Resumen

Se estudiaron las características típicas, los objetivos de cría y los caracteres tanto morfológicos como biométricos de la raza ovina Begait en dos distritos de Etiopía (Setit Humera y Kafta Humera). Se utilizaron cuestionarios semi-estructurados con registro del peso y medidas lineales del cuerpo y de observaciones de campo. La descripción de la raza Begait es: cola larga y delgada (hasta 50 cm de largo), cuerpo musculoso, pelo corto y liso, y desprovistos de cuernos en ambos sexos masculino y femenino. Según las respuestas de los encuestados, la tasa de crecimiento (0.21), la longitud de la cola (0.20), la apariencia/conformación (0.19) y el color del pelaje (0.18) fueron las características más importantes en la selección de los carneros de reproducción. Para la cría de hembras el tamaño corporal (0.27), la edad de la primera cubrición (0.15), la tasa de crecimiento (0.14) y el color del pelaje y de la cola (0.13) fueron las primeras cuatro características, en ese orden. El emplazamiento y la edad tuvieron un efecto significativo (P < 0.01) en el peso corporal y en la mayoría de las medidas corporales lineales. Los ejemplares de Kafta Humera mostraron en términos relativos valores más bajos de peso corporal y de la mayoría de las medidas corporales lineales que los de Setit Humera. En conjunto, el peso corporal medio y la longitud corporal media de las hembras Begait fueron respectivamente 31.4 ± 0.4 kg y 62.5 ± 0.5 cm. Los valores correspondientes para los machos Begait fueron 34.5 ± 0.5 kg y 66.1 ± 0.5 cm, respectivamente. Las prácticas tradicionales existentes de manejo del rebaño y cría y las preferencias por determinados caracteres son los componentes de la cría más importantes que requieren mejoras en la ganadería a pequeña escala de Etiopía.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abebe, M. 1999. Husbandry practice and productivity of sheep in Lalo-mama Midir woreda of central Ethiopia. School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University of Agriculture, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. 99p. (M.Sc. thesis).Google Scholar
Afolayan, R., Adeyinka, A.I.A. & Lakpini, C.A.M. 2006. The estimation of live weight from body measurements in Yankasa sheep. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 51(8): 343348.Google Scholar
Ayalew, A., Getahun, E., Tibbo, M., Mamo, Y. & Rege, J.E.O. 2004. Current state of knowledge on characterization of farm animal genetic resources in Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of Ethiopian Society for Animal Prodroduction, 122. Addiss Ababa, Ethiopia: ESAP.Google Scholar
Central Statistic Authority. 2010/11. Agricultural Sample Survey, 2016-2011 (2003 E.C). (Statistical Bulletin 505), Volume II, February 2011. Addiss Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Getachew, T., Haile, A., Tibbo, M., Sharma, A. K., Sölkner, J. & Wurzinger, M. 2010. Pastoral system Herd management and breeding practices of sheep owners in a mixed crop–livestock and a pastoral. System of Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 5(8): 685691.Google Scholar
Kassahun, A. 2000. Comparative performance evaluation of Horro and Menz sheep of Ethiopia under grazing and intensive feeding condition. Humboldt University. 129 p. (Ph.D. dissertation).Google Scholar
Khan, H., Muhammd, F., Ahmed, R., Nawaz, G., Rahimullah & Zibair, M. 2006. Relationship of body weight with linear body measurements in goats. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 1, 3.Google Scholar
Kosgey, I.S., Baker, R.L., Udo, H.M.J. & Var Arendonk, J.A.M. 2006. Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programs in the tropics: a review. Small Rumin. Res., 61: 1328.Google Scholar
Mengistie, T. 2008. On-farm performances of Washera sheep at Yilmanadensa and Quarit districts of the Amhara National Regional State. Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Awassa College of Agriculture, School of Graduate Studies, Hawassa University, Awassa, Ethiopia. 117 p. (Msc Thesis).Google Scholar
Solomon, G. 2008. Sheep resources of Ethiopia: genetic diversity and breeding strategy. Wageningen University, The Netherlands (Ph.D. thesis).Google Scholar
Solomon, G., Van Arendonk, J.A.M., Komen, H., Windig, J.J. & Hanotte, O. 2007a. Population structure, genetic variation and morphological diversity in indigenous sheep of Ethiopia. Anim. Genet., 38: 621628.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System. 2008. SAS for windows, Release 9.2. User's Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Statistical Package for Social Sciences. 2007. Version 16.0. SPSS Inc., USA.Google Scholar
Tesfaye, G. 2008. Characterization of Menz and Afar indigenous sheep breeds of small holders and pastoralistis for designing community-based breeding strategies in Ethiopia. School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University of Agriculture, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. 115 p. (M.Sc. thesis).Google Scholar
Thiruvenkadan, A.K. 2005. Determination of best-fitted regression model for estimation of body weight in Kanni Adu Kids under farmer's management system. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 17: 111.Google Scholar
Tibbo, M., Philipsson, J. & Workneh, A. 2006. Sustainable sheep breeding programmes in the tropics: a frame work for Ethiopia. Poster presented at Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, University of Bonn, 11–13 October, 2006, Bonn, Germany (available at: http://www.tropentag.de/2006/abstracts/posters/442.pdf).Google Scholar
Zewdu, E. 2008. Characterization of Bonga and Horro indigenous sheep breeds of smallholders for designing community based breeding strategies in Ethiopia. Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. (M.Sc. thesis).Google Scholar