Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:45:23.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Origin and characteristics of the Maltese Black-Bronze Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

J.G. Mallia
J.G. Mallia
Affiliation:
Institute of Agriculture, University of Malta, Msida MSD 06, Malta
Get access

Summary

The Maltese Black-Bronze Turkey is a previously undescribed, rustic breed of turkey raised exclusively in backyard conditions. The broad-breasting trait (prevalence, P=100 percent), “bronzing” on the rump and tail (P=100 percent) and “wild type” wing markings (P=78 percent) were present. The average weight (AW) and standard error (SE) and weight range (WR) of turkeys (N=50) at 12 weeks, 20 weeks and 24 weeks of age was of 3.34 ± 0.04 kg and WR = 2.80–3.80 kg, 8.14 ± 0.09 kg and WR = 7.10–9.10 kg, 10.37 ± 0.10 kg and WR = 9.40–11.70 kg, respectively.

The AW ± SE and WR of a skinned, excised breast muscle (P. major and P. profundus combined) and of a skinned leg of turkey at 24 weeks was of 1.37±0.08 kg and WR=1.05±1.65 kg and 0.98±0.08 kg and WR=0.9-1.10 kg, respectively. There were no mortalities during the study (P=0 percent) and no birds were condemned at slaughter (P=0 percent) at 24 weeks. Although growth rates were not as fast as commercial strains raised in industrial conditions, carcass quality and conformation were good. Persons (N=2) visually assessing meat colour found only 2 percent breast muscle to be darker than that of industrially-raised turkey. However, poor intra-rater agreement and inter-rater agreement for darkness of breast muscle indicated that it was indistinguishable from the breast muscle of industrially raised birds. When only feed costs were included, the price per kg live weight was of US$ 0.99, US$ 0.74 and US$ 0.98 for 12, 20 and 24 weeks of age, respectively. Raising this breed of turkey for 20 weeks appears to be the most profitable age for marketing under small-scale semi-intensive conditions, but it is slower growing than industrial birds as the latter reach 8–16 kg at 14–20 weeks. A questionnaire based on 322 respondents identified that there was a high, but unsatisfied demand for slower growing turkeys raised in “more natural” backyard conditions (P=89 percent). The Maltese Black-Bronze Turkey had the necessary characteristics to fill this niche market.

Resumen

El pavo Maltese Black-Bronze pertenece a una raza rústica no descrita hasta la fecha que se cría únicamente en condiciones de corral. Encontramos la característica de pecho amplio (normalmente P=100%) y de “tipo silvestre” de alas (P=78%). El peso medio (PM) y la desviación estándar (DE) así como el ranking de peso (RP) de esta raza (N=50) a 12, 20 y 24 semanas es de 3,34±0,04 y RP=2,80–3,80 kg, 8,14+0,09 kg y RP=7,10–9,10 kg, 10,37+0,10 kg y RP=9,40–11,70 kg, respectivamente. El PM±DE y RP de tallo de músculo de pecho sin piel (P. major y P. profundus combinados) y de una pata sin piel de pavo de 24 semanas fue de 1.37±0,08 kg y el RP=1,05±1,65 kg y 0,98±0,08 kg y RP=0,9–1,10 kg, respectivamente. No hubo mortalidad durante el estudio (P=0%) y no fue necesario llevar ningún animal al matadero (P=0%) con 24 semanas. A pesar de que la media de crecimiento no fue tan alta como para las razas comerciales criadas en condiciones industriales, la calidad de la canal y la conformación fueron buenas. Las personas (N=2) que controlaron visualmente el color de la carne encontraron sólo un 2% de músculo del pecho más oscuro que en los pavos criados industrialmente. Sin embargo.

Keywords

Meleagris gallopavo mexicanaMeleagris gallopavo silvestrisCarcass characteristicsCarcass dispositionCost analysisRoman and Maltese roosterDoondyan
Type
Research Articles
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 29 , April 2001 , pp. 79 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon, , 1971. British poultry standards, 3rd Edn. Butterworth & Co (Publishers) Ltd., Oxford; 298 pp.Google Scholar
Anon, , 1987. Guide to farm practice in Saskatchewan: poultry factsheets No. 6, turkeys. <http://eru.usask.ca/saf_corp/ livestok/poultry/turkeyhtm> Saskatchewan Agriculture and The University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.Google Scholar
Attard, L. E. 1989. Man and means: the great exodus (1918–1939). Publishers Enterprises Group (PEG) Ltd., Marsa, Malta, pp. 23–29.Google Scholar
Brown, E. 1906. Races of domestic poultry. Edward Arnold, London, pp. 136–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. 1960. A co-efficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, R. D. 1990. Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 1123.Google Scholar
Grey, P. 1989. Turkey meat texture. In Nixey, C. & Grey, TC. (Ed.), Recent advances in turkey science, Butterworths, London, England, pp. 241–245.Google Scholar
Landis, J. & Koch, G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33: 159–174.Google Scholar
Mallia, J. G. 1998a. Indigenous domestic turkeys of Oaxaca and Quintana Roo, Mexico. Animal Genetic Resources Information, 23: 69–78.Google Scholar
Mallia, J. G. 1998b. Epidemiological studies of cyanosis in poultry in southern Ontario. PhD thesis, Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada, pp. 173.Google Scholar
Mallia, J. G. 1999a. Observations on smallholder “family poultry” units in parts of Central America and sustainable development opportunities. First INFPD/FAO Electronic Conference on Family Poultry: 7 December 1998–5 March 1999. Theme: “The Scope and Effect of Family Poultry Research and Development”. <http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGA/AGAP/lps/fampo/Intropap.htm>, FAO, Rome.,+FAO,+Rome.>Google Scholar
Mallia, J. G. 1999b. The Black Maltese: a Mediterranean, light breed of poultry. Animal Genetic Resources Information, 24: 41–48.Google Scholar
Mallia, J. G. 1999c. In-Situ conservation of the Black Maltese and performance evaluation under a small-scale intensive system. First INFPD/FAO Electronic Conference on Family Poultry: 7 December 1998–1995 March 1999. Theme: “The Scope and Effect of Family Poultry Research and Development”. <http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGA/AGAP/lps/fampo/Intropap.htm>, FAO, Rome.,+FAO,+Rome.>Google Scholar
Schorger, A. 1964. The wild turkey. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma, pp. 625.Google Scholar
Shoukri, M. M. & Edge, V. L. 1996. Statistical methods for health sciences. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 258.Google Scholar
Siller, W. G. 1985. Deep pectoral myopathy: a penalty of successful selection for muscle growth. Poultry Sci. 64: 1591–1595.Google Scholar
Sonaiya, E. B., Branckaert, R. D. S. & Guèye, E. F. 1999. Research and development options for family poultry. First INFPD/FAO Electronic Conference on Family Poultry: 7 December 1998–1995 March 1999. Theme: “The Scope and Effect of Family Poultry Research and Development”. <http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGA/AGAP/lps/fampo/Intropap.htm>, FAO, Rome.,+FAO,+Rome.>Google Scholar
Sponenberg, D. P., Hawes, R. O., Johnson, P. & Christman, C. J. 2000. Turkey conservation in the United States. Animal Genetic Resources Information, 27: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swatland, H. J., 1990. A note on the growth of connective tissues binding turkey muscle fibres together. Can. Inst. Technol. J. 23: 239–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traoré, A., 1999. Requirements for family poultry development. First INFPD/ FAO Electronic Conference on Family Poultry: 7 December 1998–5 March 1999. Theme: “The Scope and Effect of Family Poultry Research and Development”. <http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGA/AGAP/lps/fampo/Intropap.htm>, FAO, Rome.,+FAO,+Rome.>Google Scholar
Wilson, B. W., Nieberg, P. S. & Buhr, R. J. 1990. Turkey Muscle Growth and Focal Myopathy. Poultry Sci. 69: 1553–1562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiskus, K. J., Addis, P. B. & Ma, R.T-I. 1976. Distribution of beta-red, alpha-red and alpha-white fibres in turkey muscles. Poultry Sci. 55: 562–572.Google Scholar