Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:13:05.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current status and phenotypic characteristics of Bulgarian poultry genetic resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2015

A. Teneva ,
V. Gerzilov ,
M. Lalev ,
H. Lukanov ,
N. Mincheva ,
M. Oblakova ,
P. Petrov ,
P. Hristakieva ,
I. Dimitrova  and
K. Periasamy
A. Teneva*
Affiliation:
University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria
V. Gerzilov
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
M. Lalev
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
H. Lukanov
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Thrakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
N. Mincheva
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
M. Oblakova
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
P. Petrov
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
P. Hristakieva
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
I. Dimitrova
Affiliation:
University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria
K. Periasamy
Affiliation:
Animal Production and Health Laboratory, Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/International Atomic Energy Agency Division, Vienna, Austria
*
Correspondence to: A. Teneva, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

Poultry biodiversity conservation is a great challenge for many countries. Within the last several years, the number of endangered local breeds has increased, leading to a considerable loss of genetic resources. A similar trend was observed among the poultry breeds, including chicken, local turkey and goose breeds/lines established in Bulgaria, part of which is definitely lost. Currently these breeds/lines are at risk and/or threatened with extinction. The information obtained by phenotypic characterization of these breeds is the first step for planning the management of poultry genetic resources through setting up improved selection schemes and conservation strategies. In this paper, we reviewed the current state of knowledge regarding the morphological and phenotypic diversity of local poultry breeds and some old productive poultry lines in Bulgaria.

Résumé

La conservation de la biodiversité avicole s'avère un grand défi pour beaucoup de pays. Au cours des dernières années le nombre de races locales menacées a augmenté, ce qui a entraîné une perte considérable de ressources génétiques. Une tendance similaire a été observée parmi les races de volailles (races et lignées locales de poules, dindons et oies) établies en Bulgarie, dont certaines ont été perdues à jamais. De nos jours ces races ou lignées sont menacées et/ou en voie de disparition. Obtenir de l'information par le biais de la caractérisation phénotypique de ces races représente le premier pas pour planifier une gestion des ressources génétiques avicoles basée sur la mise en place de schémas de sélection et de stratégies de conservation. Cet article cherche à évaluer l’état actuel des connaissances sur la diversité morphologique et phénotypique des races avicoles locales et de certaines lignées anciennes en Bulgarie.

Resumen

La conservación de la biodiversidad avícola supone un gran reto para muchos países. En los últimos años ha aumentado el número de razas locales amenazadas, lo cual ha traído aparejada una pérdida considerable de recursos genéticos. Se ha observado una tendencia similar entre las razas de aves de corral (razas y líneas locales de gallinas, pavos y gansos) establecidas en Bulgaria, parte de las cuales se han perdido ya definitivamente. Actualmente estas razas o líneas están amenazadas y/o en peligro de extinción. La obtención de información mediante la caracterización fenotípica de estas razas constituye el primer paso para la planificación de una gestión de los recursos genéticos avícolas basada en el establecimiento de esquemas de selección y estrategias de conservación. En este artículo se evalúan los conocimientos actuales en relación con la diversidad morfológica y fenotípica de razas avícolas locales y de algunas antiguas líneas productivas en Bulgaria.

Keywords

Bulgarian poultry breedsconservationphenotypic characterizationproduction performanceraces avicoles bulgaresperformances productivescaractérisation phénotypiqueconservationrazas avícolas búlgarasrendimientos productivoscaracterización fenotípicaconservación
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 56 , June 2015 , pp. 19 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaumont, C., Bihan-Le Duval, E. & Magdelain, P. 2004. Productive et quality du poulet de chair. INRA Prod. Anim., 17: 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, H.D. 2006. The national animal germplasm program: challenges and opportunities for poultry genetic resources. Poult. Sci., 85: 210–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delany, M.E. 2003. Genetic diversity and conservation of poultry. In Muir, W.M. & Aggrey, S.E., eds. Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, pp. 257–282. Wallingford, UK, CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donchev, R., Kaytazov, G., Kabakchiev, M. & Aleksieva, D., 1997. Poultry Breeding. Agropres, Sofia, 285pp. (BG).Google Scholar
FAO. 1998. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans. Management of small populations at risk. Rome (available at http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/lead/toolbox/Indust/sml-popn.pdf).Google Scholar
FAO. 2007. The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by Rischkowsky, Barbara and Pilling, Dafydd. Rome (available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1250e/a1250e00.htm).Google Scholar
FAO. 2012a. FAO animal production and health guidelines. Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. No 11. Rome (available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2686e/i2686e00.pdf).Google Scholar
FAO. 2012b. FAO animal production and health guidelines. Cryoconservation of animal genetic resources. No 12. Rome (available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3017e/i3017e00.pdf).Google Scholar
Fulton, J.E. 2006. Avian genetic stock preservation: an industry perspective. Poult. Sci., 85: 227–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulton, J.E. & Delany, M.E. 2003. Poultry genetic resources – Operation rescue needed. Science, 300: 1667–1668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandini, G.C. & Villa, E. 2003. Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: a methodology. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 120: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerzilov, V., Nikolov, A., Petrov, P., Bozakova, N., Penchev, G. & Bochukov, A. 2013. Effect of a dietary herbal mixture supplement on the growth performance, egg production and health status in chickens. In 8th International Conference on The role of animal production in rural development in the region of Central and Eastern Europe, 20–22 November 2013, Nitra, Slovakia. JCEA (in press).Google Scholar
Hillel, J., Groenen, M., Boichard, A.M., Korol, A.B., David, L., Kirzhner, V.M., Burke, T., Dirie, A.B., Crooijmans, R.P.M.A., Elo, K., Feldman, M.W., Freidlin, P.J., Maki- Tanila, A., Oortwijn, M., Thomson, P., Vignal, A., Kuhnlein, U., Aggrey, S.E. & Zadworny, D. 2003. Progress and prospects in resistance to disease. In Muir, W.M. & Aggrey, S.E., eds. Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, pp. 283–292. Wallingford, UK, CABI.Google Scholar
Ivanov, I. & Shishkov, N. 1968. Turkeys breeding. Zemizdat, Sofia, 212pp. (BG).Google Scholar
Julian, R. 2005. Production and growth related disorders and other metabolic diseases of poultry – a review. Veter. J., 169: 350–369.Google ScholarPubMed
Lalev, M., Oblakova, М., Mincheva, N., Hristakieva, P. & Ivanova, I. 2011. Ability for using genetic resources to create new parent lines of broilers and egg-laying hens. Agric. Sci., 6: 119–129 (BG).Google Scholar
Lukanov, H. 2011. Bulgarian poultry breeds (Part II). Aviculture Europe (available at http://www.aviculture-europe.nl/nummers/11E03A03.pdf).Google Scholar
Lukanov, H. 2013. Balkan chicken breeds and breed groups (Part I and II). Aviculture Europe (available at http://www.aviculture-europe.nl/nummers/12E06A07.pdf).Google Scholar
Lukanov, H. & Aleksieva, D. 2013. Trends in battery cage husbandry systems for laying hens. Enriched cages for laying hens – a review. Agric. Sci. Technol., 5: 143–152.Google Scholar
Lukanov, H. & Genchev, A. 2013. Fibromelanosis in domestic chickens. Agric. Sci. Technol., 5: 239–246.Google Scholar
Mincheva, N. 2006. Study the feasibility of establishing populations of chickens with colored plumage based on available lines of germplasm . Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora, p. 149 (BG). (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Nikolov, A. & Gerzilov, V. 2011. Productivity of a newly selected AN heavy chicken line. Agric. Sci., 6: 99–104 (BG).Google Scholar
Nozhchev, S. & Tsonkov, W. 1969. Starozagorska Red. BAS, Sofia, 99pp. (BG).Google Scholar
Permin, A. & Pedersen, G. 2000. Problems related to poultry production at Village level. Possibilities. Proc. of smallholder poultry projects in Eastern and Southern Africa, 22-25; May 2000, Morogoro, Tanzania.Google Scholar
Petrov, P., Lukanov, H. & Gerzilov, V. 2011. Black Shumen chicken – current status and egg productivity. Agric. Sci., 6: 135–140 (BG).Google Scholar
Pisenti, J.M., Delany, M.E., Taylor, R.L., Abbott, U.K. Jr., Abplanalp, H., Arthur, J.A., Bakst, M.R., Baxter-Jones, C., Bitgood, J.J., Bradley, F.A., Cheng, K.M., Dietert, R.R., Dodgson, J.B., Donoghue, A.M., Emsley, A.B., Etches, R.J., Frahm, R.R., Gerrits, R.J., Goetinck, P.F., Grunder, A.A., Harry, D.E., Lamont, S.J., Martin, G.R., McGuire, P.E., Moberg, G.P., Pierro, L.J., Qualset, C.O., Qureshi, M., Schultz, F. & Wilson, B.W. 1999. Avian genetic resources at risk: an assessment and proposal for conservation of genetic stocks in the USA and Canada. Rep. No. 20. Univ. California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Genetic Resources Conservation Program, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
Rangelov, A. & Ivanov, I. 1987. Production of Livers from Geese and Ducks. Zemizdat, Sofia, 224pp. (BG).Google Scholar
Sørensen, P. 2005. Breeding strategies and genetic adaptation of meat type and layers type birds used for organic production. In Proceedings of the XVII Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat and XI European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Production, 23–26 May 2005, Dooorwerth, Netherlands, pp. 66–72.Google Scholar
Trostle, R., Marti, D., Rosen, S. & Wasrcott, P. 2011. Why Have Food Commodity Prices Risen Again? A Report from the Economic Research Service. USDA, WRS-1103.Google Scholar