Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:36:15.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Criteria for the recognition and prioritisation of breeds of special genetic importance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

L. Alderson
Affiliation:
Countrywide Livestock Ltd, 6 Harnage, Shrewsbury, Shropshire SY5 6EJ, United Kingdom
Get access

Summary

The State of the World survey of animal genetic resources (SoWAnGR) has highlighted the necessity to reconcile the varying systems applied by different organisations for the identification and categorisation of endangered breeds of livestock. Currently, many of these systems are irreconcilable. In particular, there is a need to interpret national breed populations in the context of their international population. Rare Breeds International has developed and applied a system which overcomes these problems, and which coincides with criteria applied by FAO. The system utilises three criteria, namely distinctiveness, local adaptation, and numerical scarcity. Numerical scarcity is measured preferentially by the number of annual female registrations rather than the number of breeding females. The system embodies simplicity, accuracy and effectiveness, based on global data, and will enable more effective interpretation of SoWAnGR reports.

Résumé

L'enquête sur la Situation mondiale des ressources génétiques animales (SoW) a souligné le besoin de standardiser les systèmes appliqués par les différentes organisations pour l'identification et la classification des races domestiques en danger. Souvent, certains de ces systèmes ne peuvent pas être standardisés. En particulier, il existe le besoin d'interpréter les populations de races locales dans leur contexte international. Rare Breeds International a développé et appliqué un système qui surmonte ces problèmes, et qui coïncide avec les critères appliqués par la FAO. Le système utilise trois critères: la distinction, l'adaptation locale, et la scarcité numérique; cette dernière est mesurée de préférence par le nombre de femelles enregistrées chaque année plutôt que par le nombre de femelles croisées. Le système est simple, précis et effectif, et se base sur des données globales, ce qui permet une interprétation plus efficace des rapports SoW.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, L., 1992; A system to maximise the maintenance of genetic variability in small populations. In Alderson, L. & Bodo, I. (Eds) Genetic Conservation of Domestic Livestock (Volume 2). CABI, Wallingford, 1829.Google Scholar
Alderson, L., 1994; The Chance to Survive. Pilkington Press Ltd. Yelvertoft.Google Scholar
Alderson, L., 1995; The value of global information for better estimating the vulnerable status of endangered breeds. In Crawford, R.D., Lister, E.E. & Buckley, J.T. (Eds.) Conservation of Domestic Animal Genetic Resources. RBI, Rome, 6673.Google Scholar
Christman, C.J., Sponenberg, D.P. & Bixby, D.E., 1997; A Rare Breeds Album of American Livestock. ALBC, Pittsboro.Google Scholar
European Association for Animal Production, (Commission of Animal Genetics). 2001/2001; Animal Genetic Data Bank. Website www.tiho-hannover.deGoogle Scholar
European Association for Animal Production (Genetic Resources Committee). 2001/2002; A proposal of EAAP for selection criteria in the rural development measures of EC regulation 1257/99 and 1750/99.Google Scholar
Rege, J.E.O., 2001; Personal communication.Google Scholar
Scherf, B.D. (Ed.), 2000; World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Simon, D.L., 1995; Factors for defining the status of endangeredness of a breed. In Crawford, R.D., Lister, E.E. & Buckley, J.T. (Eds.) Conservation of Domestic Animal Genetic Resources. RBI, Rome, 6673.Google Scholar