Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T18:55:43.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The conservation values of Yakutian Cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2011

U. Ovaska  and
K. Soini
U. Ovaska*
Affiliation:
MTT Economic Research, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
K. Soini
Affiliation:
MTT Economic Research, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland and University of Jyväskylä
*
Correspondence to: U. Ovaska, MTT Economic Research, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

The loss of biodiversity has become a major environmental issue during the course of the twentieth century. Numerous indigenous farm animal breeds have been replaced by commercial breeds in agricultural production processes in industrialized countries, sometimes resulting in complete breed loss and at other times placing the breed in an endangered status. Loss of breeds occurs mainly due to the striving for more intensive production, which often means that indigenous farm animal breeds are kept in conventional production only in marginal agricultural areas. One such endangered breed is the Yakutian Cattle, an indigenous Siberian cattle breed that is kept in the Russian Far East. The cattle have a low output but valuable characteristics that confer adaptation to the northern environment. This article addresses the socio-cultural and political context of conservation of the cattle at different levels in society. The conservation of animal genetic resources is embedded in the international agenda, and the Russian Federation has ratified conventions to protect them. The conservation is de facto organized at the republic level. The local communities carry out the conservation in practice by keeping and maintaining the cattle, although the conservation was initiated by the scientific community. We suggest that the conservation of Yakutian Cattle is based on national and local interests, rather than on global conventions on biological or cultural diversity. Furthermore, the reasons for conservation are different at different levels, which constitute both an advantage and a challenge for the future.

Résumé

Au cours du XXèmesiècle, la perte de la diversité biologique est devenue un problème d'environnement majeur. Dans les pays industrialisés, de nombreuses races indigènes d'animaux d’élevage ont été remplacées, dans les processus de production agricole, par des races commerciales. Ce remplacement a entraîné parfois la perte totale de la race et parfois la menace d'extinction. La raison principale de la perte des races est la recherche d'une production plus intensive. Cela signifie souvent que les races indigènes d'animaux d’élevage ne sont maintenues dans la production conventionnelle que dans les zones agricoles marginales. Un exemple de ces races en danger est représenté par les bovins de race yakoute, des bovins indigènes de la Sibérie qui sont élevés dans l'Extrême-Orient russe. Ces bovins ont un rendement faible, mais des caractéristiques précieuses qui les rendent tolérants aux conditions environnementales du nord. Cet article aborde le cadre socio-culturel et politique de la conservation des bovins aux différents niveaux de la société. La conservation des ressources zoogénétiques est inscrite aux programmes des conférences internationales, et la Fédération de Russie a ratifié les conventions qui les protègent. La conservation est de fait organisée au niveau de la république. Elle a été lancée par le milieu scientifique, mais les communautés locales la mettent en pratique, en élevant et en préservant les bovins. Nous suggérons que la conservation des bovins de race yakoute se base sur les intérêts nationaux et locaux, plutôt que sur les conventions mondiales en matière de diversité biologique ou culturelle. En outre, les raisons de la conservation sont distinctes aux différents niveaux, ce qui représente en même temps un avantage et un défi pour l'avenir.

Resumen

La pérdida de la biodiversidad se ha convertido en uno de los problemas medioambientales más importantes del siglo XX. Numerosas razas autóctonas de animales domésticos han sido reemplazadas por razas comerciales en los procesos de producción agrícola de los países industrializados, a veces, dando como resultado una pérdida completa de la misma y, otras, situándola al borde de la desaparición. La principal razón de la pérdida de razas es la lucha por una producción más intensiva, que, a menudo, va unida a una producción convencional con las razas autóctonas de animales domésticos, restringiendo a éstas y su cría a zonas agrícolas marginales. Una de estas razas en peligro de extinción es la raza bovina Yakutian, una raza autóctona de ganado siberiana que se mantiene en la zona más oriental de Rusia. La producción de este tipo de ganado es muy baja; sin embargo, posee características que le confieren una mejor adaptación al medio ambiente del norte. Este trabajo aborda el contexto socio-cultural y político de la conservación del ganado a diferentes niveles de la sociedad. La conservación de los recursos zooognéticos es un tema de calado en la agenda internacional, y la Federación Rusa ha ratificado las convenciones para la protección de los mismos. La conservación es de hecho organizada a nivel de república. Las comunidades locales llevan a cabo, en la práctica, la conservación y el mantenimiento del ganado, aunque la conservación se inició por la comunidad científica. Se apunta que la conservación del ganado de Yakutian se basa más en los intereses nacionales y locales, que en las convenciones mundiales sobre la diversidad biológica o cultural. Por lo tanto, las razones para la conservación son diferentes en los distintos niveles, constituyendo una ventaja y un reto de cara al futuro.

Keywords

animal genetic resourcesbiodiversity conservationcommunity-based managementindigenous breedssustainable community developmentconservation de la diversité biologiquedéveloppement communautaire durablegestion communautaireraces indigènesressources zoogénétiquesconservación de la biodiversidaddesarrollo sostenible de la comunidadgestión basada en la comunidadrazas autóctonasrecursos zoogenéticos
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 49 , December 2011 , pp. 97 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agreement 1995. Agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Sakha [Yakutia] regarding the delimitation of jurisdictional subjects and plenary powers between the State Bodies of the Russian Federation and the State Bodies of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). LEX-FAOC034225, 29th June 1995.Google Scholar
Anhtempelman, K. & Cardellino, R. (eds.) 2007. People and animals. Traditional livestock keepers: guardians of domestic animal diversity. Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
Basharin, G.P. 1962. Istorya zhivotnovodstsva v Yakutii. Yakutsk, Yakutskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. London & Philadelphia, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Collins, H.M. & Evans, R. 2002. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Soc. Stud. Sci., 32(2): 235–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crate, S.A. 2006. Cows, kin, and globalization. An ethnography of sustainability. Lanham, MD, Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment. The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC, Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gandini, G. & Villa, E. 2003. Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: a methodology. J. Anim. Breed., 120: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. 1986. Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Granberg, L. & Kopoteva, I. 2009. Changing the production system. In Granberg, L., Soini, K., & Kantanen, J., eds. Sakha ynaga. Cattle of the Yakuts. Humaniora. Vol. 355. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae.Google Scholar
Interviews in the Eveno-Bytantay district and the city of Yakutsk in April 2005. Interviews 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B.B. 2002. A geographical perspective on ethnogenesis: the case of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia). Austin, The University of Texas.Google Scholar
Kaljonen, M. 2006. Coconstruction of Agency and environmental management. The case of agrievironmental policy implementation at the Finnish farms. J. Rural Stud., 22(2): 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantanen, J., Ammosov, I., Meng-Hua, L., Osva, A. & Popov, R. 2009. A cow of the permafrost. In Granberg, L., Soini, K., & Kantanen, J., eds. Sakha ynaga. Cattle of the Yakuts. Humaniora. Vol. 355. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as governance. London, Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopoteva, I. & Partanen, U. 2009. A historical excursion to northern Sakha. In Granberg, L., Soini, K., Kantanen, J., eds. Sakha ynaga. Cattle of the Yakuts. Humaniora. Vol. 355. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae.Google Scholar
Kunelius, R. 2001. Viestinnän vallassa. Johdatusta joukkoviestinnän kysymyksiin. Juva, WSOY.Google Scholar
Lindner, P. 2006. Localising privatisation, disconnecting locales – mechanisms of disintegration in post-socialist Russia. Geoforum, 38(3): 494–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Materialy XXVI s'ezda KPSS 1981. Moscow, Politizdat.Google Scholar
McQuail, D. 1992. Media performance. Mass communication and the public interest. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Sage.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, R. 2003. The challenge of conserving indigenous domesticated animals. Ecol. Econ., 45: 501–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, F. & Pehkonen, S. 2003. Discursive landscapes of the European North. In Möller, F. & Pehkonen, S., eds. Encountering the North. Ashgate, Cultural Geography, International Relations and Northern Landscapes.Google Scholar
Naukhatsky, V.V. 1996. Agrarnaya politika v SSSR v 1965–1990 godah: problemy, razrabotki i realizatsii. Rostov-na-Donu, Gefest.Google Scholar
Nazarea, V. 1998. Cultural memory and biodiversity. Tuscon, The University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuvostoliiton maatalousuudistus. 1989. NKP:n keskuskomitean täysistunnon 15.-16.3.1989 aineistoa maatalouspolitiikasta. Helsinki, Uutisoimisto Novosti (APN).Google Scholar
Notter, D.R. 1999. The importance of genetic diversity in livestock populations of the future. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 61–69. lCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldenbroek, K. (ed.) 2007. Utilisation and conservation of farm animal genetic resources. Wageningen, Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pääkkönen, E. 2009. The kaleidoscope of village life. In Granberg, L., Soini, K. & Kantanen, J., eds. Sakha ynaga. Cattle of the Yakuts. Humaniora. Vol. 355. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae.Google Scholar
Plan plemennoy raboty c krupnym rogatym skotom v sovkhoze ‘Leninsky’ na 1981–1985 i na period do 1990 goda. 1981. Yakutsk-Leningrad-Batagay-Alyta, MSH, YGU, VNIIRGZ.Google Scholar
Pretty, J. 2003. Social Capital and Connectedness. Issues and Implications for Agriculture, Rural development and natural resources management in the ACP countries. Review paper for the CTA. CTA Working Document Number 8032. Available in internet: www.cta.int/pbs/wd8032/WD8032.pdfGoogle Scholar
Prodovol'stvennaya programma SSSR 1982. Prodovol'stvennaya programma SSSR na period do 1990 goda i mery po ee realizatsii. Materialy Mayskogo plenuma TSK KPSS 1982 goda. Moscow, Politizdat. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. 1972. Available in Internet: www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97Google Scholar
Romanov, P.A. 1959. Yakutsky skot Sakkyryrskogo rayona. Yakutsk, Yakutskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo.Google Scholar
Romanov, P.A. 1984. Okhrana i ispol'zovanie genofonda Yakutskogo skota. Yakutsk, Yakutskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo.Google Scholar
Silfverberg, P., Piispa, P., Silvennoinen, S. & Furman, V. 2004. Study on the Institutional and Legislative Framework of Environmental Management in the Russian Federation and in the City of St. Petersburg. Helsinki, Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
Smith, J.L. 2006. The Soviet Farm Complex: industrial agriculture in a socialist context, 1945–1965. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Soini, K. 2007a. Maatiaiseläinten monet arvot. In Karja, M. & Lilja, T., eds. Maatiaiseläinten säilyttämisen taloudelliset, sosiaaliset ja kulttuuriset lähtökohdat. Jokioinen, Maa-ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus.Google Scholar
Soini, K. 2007b. Beyond the hot spots. Understanding the locals’ perceptions of biodiversity of agricultural landscapes. Acta Universitates Turkuensis A II, 206, 102.Google Scholar
Soini, K. & Partanen, U. 2009. The golden stock. In Granberg, L., Soini, K. & Kantanen, J., eds. Sakha ynaga. Cattle of the Yakuts. Humaniora. Vol. 355. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae.Google Scholar
Speth, J.G. & Haas, P.M. 2006. Global environmental governance. Washington DC, Island Press.Google Scholar
Tamminen, S. 2010. Calculating life. Nation, Nature, and the Nativisation of Nonhuman Genetics. Social Psychological Studies. Vol. 24. Helsinki, Yliopistopaino.Google Scholar
Tapio, I., Tapio, M., Li, M.-H., Popov, R., Ivanova, Z. & Kantanen, J. 2010. Estimation of relatedness among non-pedigreed Yakutian cryo-bank bulls using molecular data: implications for conservation and breed management. Genet. Sel. Eval., 42: 28.Google ScholarPubMed
Verrier, E., Tixier-Boichard, M., Bernigaud, R. & Naves, M. 2005. Conservation and value of local livestock breeds: usefulness of niche products and/or adaptation to specific environments. FAO, Animal genetic resources information, 36.Google Scholar
Vesala, K.M. & Rantanen, T. 2007. Laadullinen asennetutkimus: lähtökohtia, periaatteita, mahdollisuuksia. In Vesala, K.M. & Rantanen, T., eds. Argumentaatio ja tulkinta. Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa, pp. 11–61. Heisinki, Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. (ed.) 1989. Animal genetic resources. A global programme for sustainable development. In Proc. of an FAO Expert Consultation, Rome, Italy, September 1989 FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 80.Google Scholar
Zakon ot 7 iyunya 2001 goda 3 No 291 – II. Ob okhrane i ispol'zovany genofonda Yakutskogo skota.Google Scholar
Zassoursky, Y.N. 2001. Media and the Public Interest: Balancing between the State, Business and the Public Sphere. In Nordenstreng, K., Vartanova, E. & Zassoursky, Y., eds. Russian media challenge, pp. 155–188. Helsinki, Kikimora Publications.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K.S. 2006. Globalization & new geographies of conservation. Chicago & London, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar