Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:36:37.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Poltava chicken breed of Ukraine: its history, characterization and conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

I.G. Moiseyeva ,
M.N. Romanov ,
A.T. Kovalenko ,
T.V. Mosyakina ,
Yu.V. Bondarenko ,
P.I. Kutnyuk ,
A.P. Podstreshny  and
A.A. Nikiforov
I.G. Moiseyeva
Affiliation:
N.I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics (RAS), Moscow 119991, Russia
M.N. Romanov
Affiliation:
Conservation and Research for Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center for Conservation Research, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Road, Escondido, CA 92027–7000, USA
A.T. Kovalenko
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Institute (UAAS), Borky, Zmiiv District, Kharkiv Region 63421, Ukraine
T.V. Mosyakina
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Institute (UAAS), Borky, Zmiiv District, Kharkiv Region 63421, Ukraine
Yu.V. Bondarenko
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Institute (UAAS), Borky, Zmiiv District, Kharkiv Region 63421, Ukraine
P.I. Kutnyuk
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Institute (UAAS), Borky, Zmiiv District, Kharkiv Region 63421, Ukraine
A.P. Podstreshny
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Institute (UAAS), Borky, Zmiiv District, Kharkiv Region 63421, Ukraine
A.A. Nikiforov
Affiliation:
N.I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics (RAS), Moscow 119991, Russia
Get access

Summary

Poltava chickens are native to Ukraine, with a remarkable history, genetics and economic traits. They include three varieties: Clay, Cuckoo and Black. The Poltava Clay variety exemplifies what can be achieved by thorough selection in transforming a local, low production chicken population into an established breed with high performance characteristics and selected line structure. Two other varieties, the Cuckoo and Black, are extinct but plans for their restoration are underway.

Resumen

Las aves Poltava son originarias de Ucrania y poseen unos rasgos genéticos y económicos y una historia importante. Incluyen tres líneas: Clay, Cuckoo y Black. La línea Poltava Clay es un ejemplo de lo que se puede conseguir a través de la selección transformando una población local de aves de baja producción en una línea estable con características de alto rendimiento y estructura selecta. Las otras dos variedades, Cuckoo y Black, se han extinguido pero existen planes actualmente para su recuperación.

Keywords

CharacterizationChickenConservationHistoryPoltavaUkraine
Type
Research Articles
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 40 , April 2007 , pp. 71 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 0000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

AVIANDIV. 2001. Final Report. Development of Strategy and Application of Molecular Tools to Asses Biodiversity in Chicken Genetic Resources (AVIANDIV). Contract numberBIO4–98–0342.Google Scholar
Bondarenko, Yu.V. 1976. Genetic Polymorphism of Egg White and Serum Proteins in Chickens with Relation to Selection Direction and Productivity Level. Author's Abstract of Candidate of Biological Sciences Thesis, Kharkov, USSR, (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Bondarenko, Yu.V. 1995. Genetic Basis of Breeding and Utilisation of Autosexing Poultry. Author's Abstract of D.Sc. in Biology Thesis, Kharkiv, Ukraine, (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Bozhko, P.Yu. & Dakhnovs'ky, M.V. (Eds). 1955. PoultryFarming. Derzhavne vydavnytstvo sil'skogospodars'koy literatury, Kyiv, USSR. (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
FAO. 1996. Domestic Animal Diversity Information System, www.fao.org/dad-is/, FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Ferdinandov, V.V. 1948. Thirty years of the Soviet poultry farming. In V.I.Korol'kov (Ed.), Transactions of Voronezh Zootechnical Institute, Voronezh, USSR, Vol. 11, 81–94. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Gintovt, V.E., Karimov, K.K., Mashurov, A.M., Paronyan, I.A. & Berendyaeva, Z.I.. 1984. A study of the gene pool of poultry by means of immunogenetic analysis. II. Estimation of interbreed differences. Soviet Genetics 20, 274–280. (Translated from Genetika 20, 337-344.)Google Scholar
lofe, N. 1968. On conservation and utilization of poultry gene pool in the USSR. Ptitsevodstvo, No. 4, 31–33. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Ivanova, T. & Kovalenko, G.. 2003. Poltava Clay chickens. Propozitsiya, No. 6, 74–75; no. 7, 84-86. (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Kovalenko, A.T. & Stolyarenko, V.P.. 1982. Resistance to neoplasms in Leghorns and Poltava Clay chickens. Ptakhivnytstvo, 33, 6–8. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Len', T.S. 1959. Poltava chickens of the Ukrainian Poultry Experiment Station. Scientific Transactions of Ukrainian Poultry Experiment Station, Vol. 7, 114–123. (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Len', T.S. 1961. Comparative study on Poltava chickens. Ptakhivnytstvo, 1, 22–29. (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Lukyanova, V.D. & Kovalenko, A.T.. 1979. Prospects for gene pool utilisation in selection. Ptitsevodstvo, no. 10, 26–29, (In Russian).Google Scholar
Moiseyeva, I.G., Semyonova, S.K., Gorbacheva, N.S., Paronyan, I.A.Volokhovich, V.A., Karimov, K.K. & Sakhatsky, N.I.. 1989. Studies on chicken breeds at the USSR collection farms. In Dubinin, N.P. (Ed.), Advances in Current Genetics, Vol. 16, 45–70. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Mosyakina, T.V., Kovalenko, G.T., Ryabokon', Yu.O., Stepanenko, I.A., Katerinich, O.O., Nalivaiko, V.P. & Lunina, L.A.. 2005. Poltava Clay Chickens (Recommendations for Breeding). Poultry Research Institute (UAAS), State Enterprise ‘Experimental Farm Borky’, Borky, Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distances between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikiforov, A.A., Moiseyeva, I.G. & Zakharov, I.A.. 1998. Position of Russian chicken breeds in the diversity of Eurasian fowl. Russian Journal of Genetics 34, 702–703. (Translated from Genetika 34, 850–851.)Google Scholar
Penionzhkevich, E.E. 1962. Exterior and breeds of poultry. In Penionzhkevich, E.E. (Ed.), Poultry, Izdatel'stvo sel'skokhozyaystvennoy literatury, zhurnalov i plakatov, Moscow, USSR, Vol. 1, 200–262. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Podstreshny, A.P. 1980. Study on Blood Groups in Laying Hens in Association with Line Origin and Performance Level. Author's Abstract of Candidate of Biological Sciences Thesis, Institute of General Genetics, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, USSR. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Romanov, M.N. & Weigend, S.. 2001. Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers. Poultry Science 80, 1057–1063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romanov, M.N. & Bondarenko, Yu.V.. 1994. Introducing the Ukrainian indigenous poultry - the Poltava chickens. Fancy Fowl 14, No. 2, 8–9.Google Scholar
Romanov, M.N., Wezyk, S.. Cywa-Benko, K. & Sakhatsky, N.I.. 1996. Poultry genetic resources in the countries of Eastern Europe - history and current state. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews 7, 1–29.Google Scholar
Savelyev, I.K. 1953. Chicken Breeds. Sel'khozgiz, Moscow, USSR. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Scherf, B.D. (Ed.). 1995. World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity. 2nd Edition, FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Scherf, B.D. (Ed.). 2000. World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity. 3rd Edition, FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Solodky, M.M. 1956. Poltava chicken breed groups. Ptitsevodstvo, No. 1, 27. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Stolyatneko, V.P. 1970. Comparative estimation of chick embryo susceptibility to Rous sarcoma virus in different lines and breeds. In Collection of Young Scientists' Papers, All-Union Poultry Research and Technological Institute, Zagorsk, USSR, no. 11, 497. (In Russian).Google Scholar