Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:03:50.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenotypic characterization of the Nigerian Muscovy Ducks (Cairina moschata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2014

A.O. Oguntunji  and
K.L. Ayorinde
A.O. Oguntunji*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Fisheries Management, Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria
K.L. Ayorinde
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
*
Correspondence to: A.O. Oguntunji, Department of Animal Science and Fisheries Management, Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

Phenotypic description helps in assessing the physical attributes of species and is also an indicator of the relevance and importance attached to such attributes in their natural environments. This study was conducted to describe patterns and distribution of phenotypic diversity in Nigerian Muscovy ducks. One thousand and twenty (1 020) adult male and female Muscovy ducks reared extensively were randomly drawn from the Rain Forest, Derived Savanna and Guinea Savanna agro-ecological zones/ecotypes and were visually appraised and scored for plumage, skin, shank, feet/web, bill, bean and caruncle colours. Data on qualitative traits were analysed with descriptive statistics (percentages) while fixed effect model was used to investigate relationship between plumage and skin colours and body weight. Results revealed variations in qualitative traits; however, across ecotypes, the predominant plumage, skin, shank, feet, bill, bean and caruncle colours were mottled (45 percent), white (88 percent), yellow (50 percent), yellow (60 percent), black (58 percent), black (69 percent) and red (84 percent), respectively. Besides, significant (P < 0.05) association was observed between plumage and skin colours and body weight. The reported variations in phenotypic traits of Nigerian Muscovy ducks indicate diversity in their genome, absence of selection and the need for their selection and improvement.

Résumé

La description phenotypique donne l'evaluation rapide des attributs physiques des species; elle aussi est l'indicatrice de la pertinence et l'imprtance qu'on donnet a tells attributs dans les environs naturels. Cet ‘etude a ete fait pour decrier la modele et la distribution de la diversite phenotypique des canards Muscovy Nigerians. On a e'leve mille vingt (1 020) adultes canards muscovys (males et femelles extensivement et its ont ete pris par hazard des zones de la Foret, de la Savanne derive et de la Savanne guinea agro-ecologique et its out ete evalue a travers les ailes, la peau, la cuisse, la patte, le bec, le bejauna et la couleur caruncle. Les donnes sur les traits de la qualite ont ete analyse aves les statistiques descriptive (les pourcentages) tandis que la modele e ‘fix effect’ a ete employe pour determiner les effets de la plume et les couleurs de la peau sur le poids du corps. Les resultants nous revelent les variations dans les traits de la qualite. A travers les ecotypes, les plume predominantes, la peau, la cuisse la patte, le bec, le bejaune et les couleurs caruncle ont ete tachete (45%), le blanc (88%), le jaune (50%), le jaune (60%), le noir (58), le noir (69%) et la rouge (84%) respectivement. Neanmoins, la plume et la couler de peau a vraiment (P < 0.05) touché le poids du corps. La diversite phenotypique observe dans les canards Muscovy Nigerians montre l'absence de la selection et l'aiguillage pour l'ametioration de leur genetique.

Resumen

La descripción fenotípica sirve para definir las características físicas de las especies, siendo a la vez una indicación de la relevancia o importancia acordada a tales características en su entorno natural. Este estudio fue llevado a cabo para describir los patrones y la distribución de la diversidad fenotípica en patos mudos nigerianos. Mil veinte (1020) patos mudos adultos, machos y hembras, manejados de manera extensiva fueron tomados al azar de las zonas/ecotipos agroecológicos Selva, Sabana Derivada y Sabana de Guinea. Dichos patos fueron examinados de manera visual, anotándose para cada uno de ellos el color del plumaje, de la piel, de los tarsos, de los pies/membrana, del pico, del gancho de la punta del pico y de las carúnculas. Los datos de los rasgos cualitativos fueron analizados con estadísticos descriptivos (porcentajes) mientras que se usó un modelo de efectos fijos para investigar la relación entre el color del plumaje y el de la piel y el peso vivo. Los resultados sacaron a la luz la existencia de cierta variabilidad en los rasgos cualitativos. Sin embargo, el color predominante del plumaje, de la piel, de los tarsos, de los pies, del pico, del gancho de la punta del pico y de las carúnculas fue moteado (45 por ciento), blanco (88 por ciento), amarillo (50 por ciento), amarillo (60 por ciento), negro (58 por ciento), negro (69 por ciento) y rojo (84 por ciento), respectivamente, con independencia de los ecotipos. Asimismo, se detectó una relación significativa (P < 0,05) entre los colores del plumaje y la piel y el peso vivo. Las variaciones detectadas en los rasgos fenotípicos de los patos mudos nigerianos reflejan una diversidad en su genoma, la falta de selección y la necesidad de su selección y mejora.

Keywords

agro-ecological zone/ecotypeMuscovy ducksphenotypeplumageLa zone agro-ecologique/Ecotypeles canards muscovysla phenotypela plumezona/ecotipo agroecológicopatos mudosfenotipoplumaje
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 56 , June 2015 , pp. 37 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayeni, J.S.O. 1980. The Biology and utilization of the helmet guinea fowl, Numida meleagris galeata Pallas, in Nigeria. University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria (PhD Thesis).Google Scholar
Barnejee, S. 2013. Morphological traits of duck and geese breeds of West Bengal, India. Anim. Genet. Resour., 52: 1–16.Google Scholar
Chia, S.S. & Momoh, O. 2012. Some physical and reproductive characteristics of Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) under free range management system in two locations in Benue State of Nigeria. In Proceedings 37th Annual Conference of Nigerian Society for Animal Production, pp. 20–22.Google Scholar
Coyne, J.A., Kay, E.H. & Pruett-Jones, S. 2007. The genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 62(1): 214–219.Google Scholar
Dana, N., Dessie, T., Liesbeth, H., Waaij, V. & Van Arendonk, J.A.M. 2010. Morphological features of indigenous chicken populations of Ethiopia. Anim. Genet. Resour., 46, 11–23.Google Scholar
Duchev, Z. & Groeneveld, E. 2006. Improving the monitoring of animal genetic resources on National and International level. Arch. Anim. Breed., 49: 532–544.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organisation). 2009a. Characterization of domestic duck production systems in Cambodia. Prepared by Dinesh, M.T., Geerlings, E., Sölkner, J., Thea, S., Thieme, O. and Wurzinger, M.. AHBL – Promoting strategies for prevention and control of HPAI. Rome.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organisation). 2009b. Characterization of domestic chicken and duck production systems in Egypt. Prepared by Yakout, Haitham M., Kosba, Mohamed and Thieme, Olaf. AHBL – Promoting strategies for prevention and control of HPAI. Rome.Google Scholar
Gueye, E.F. 1998. Village egg and fowl meat production in Africa. World's Poult. Sci. J., 54: 73–86.Google Scholar
Hassan, W.A. & Mohammed, M.S. 2003. Ecotypes of the muscovy duck in the Northwest of Nigeria: variation in body weight and beak length. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria (ASAN) 16th–18th September, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
Hutt, F.B. 1949. Genetics of the fowl. New York, McGraw Hill Book Company Inc.Google Scholar
Ikeobi, C.O.N., Ozoje, M.O., Adebambo, O.A. & Adenowo, J.A. 2001. Frequencies of feet feathering and comb type genes in the Nigerian local chicken. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci., 24(2): 147–150.Google Scholar
Khan, M.S., Khan, M.A. & Mahmood, S. 2008. Genetic resources and diversity in Pakistani goats. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 10(2): 227–231.Google Scholar
Kimball, R.T. 2006. Hormonal control of coloration. In Hill, G. E. & McGraw, K. J., eds. Bird coloration. I. Mechanisms and measurements, pp. 431–468. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesson, S. & Walsh, T. 2004. Feathering in commercial poultry. II. Factors influencing feather growth and feather loss. World's Poult. Sci. J., 60(1): 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leulseged, Y. 1998. A study on the production system of the indigenous and improved poultry in rural areas of Northern Wollo. Alemaya University, Ethiopia, pp. 103. (MSc Thesis).Google Scholar
Mancha, Y.P., Mbap, S.T. & Abdul, S.D. 2006a. Incidence and frequencies of some qualitative traits in the local chicken population on the Jos Plateau. Trop. J. Anim. Sci., 9(1): 39–46.Google Scholar
Mancha, Y.P., Mbap, S.T. & Abdul, S.D. 2006b. Phenotypic characterization of local chickens in the northern region of Jos Plateau. Trop. J. Anim. Sci., 9(1): 47–55.Google Scholar
Manuel, L. C. 2008. Pictorial guidance for phenotypic characterization of chickens and ducks. FAO. GCP/RAS/228/GER Working Paper No. 15. Rome. 26 pp.Google Scholar
McManus, C., Louvandini, H., Gugel, R., Sasaki, L.C.B., Bianchini, E., Bernal, F.E.M., Paiva, S.R. & Paim, T.P. 2011. Skin and coat traits in sheep in Brazil and their relation with heat tolerance. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 43: 121–126.Google Scholar
Mwalusanya, N.A., Katule, A.M., Mutayoba, S.K. & Mtambo, M.M.A. 2002. Productivity of local chickens under village management conditions. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 34: 405–416.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A.W. 1970. Inheritance of shank and plumage color in the Fayoumi breed. Poult. Sci., 49: 1735–1737.Google Scholar
Ogah, D.M. & Ari, M.M. 2012. Evaluating inbreeding rate in population of local Muscovy duck. Egypt. J. Poult. Sci. 32(1): 217–220.Google Scholar
Ogah, D.M., Momoh, M.O. & Dim, N.I. 2011. Application of canonical discriminant analysis for assessment of genetic variation in Muscovy duck ecotypes in Nigeria. Egypt. Poult. Sci., 31(11): 429–436.Google Scholar
Oguntunji, A.O. 2013. Phenotypic and biochemical characterization of the Nigerian Muscovy ducks. Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria. pp. 371 (PhD Dissertation).Google Scholar
Oguntunji, A.O. & Ayorinde, K.L. 2014. Multivariate analysis of morphological traits of the Nigerian Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) Multivariate analysis of Muscovy ducks. Archivos de Zootecnia: Accepted. Vol. 63.Google Scholar
Owens, I.P.F. & Short, R.V. 1995. Hormonal basis of sexual dimorphism in birds: Implications for new theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol., 10: 44–47.Google Scholar
Ozoje, M.O. & Kadri, O.A. 2001. Effects of coat colour and wattle genes on body measurement traits in the West African Dwarf sheep. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad), 78: 118–122.Google Scholar
Raji, O., Igwebuike, J.U. & Usman, M.T. 2009. Zoometrical body measurements and their relation with live weight in matured local Muscovy ducks in Borno State, Nigeria. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 4(3): 58–62.Google Scholar
Ruane, J. 1999. A critical review of genetic distance studies in breed conservation. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 116: 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, R.G., La Scala Junior, N. & Tonhati, H. 2003. Radiative properties of the skin and hair coat of cattle and other animals. Trans. ASAE, 46: 913–918.Google Scholar
Smyth, J.R. 1990. Genetics of plumage, skin and eye pigmentation in chickens. In Crawford, R.D., ed. Poultry breeding and genetics, pp. 109–168. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
SPSS. 2001. Statistical package for social sciences. Chicago, SPSS Inc., 444 Michigan Avenue, IL60611, USA.Google Scholar
Yakubu, A. 2011. Discriminant analysis of sexual dimorphism in morphological traits of African Muscovy ducks. Archivos De. Zootecnia, 60: 1–8.Google Scholar
Zarate, A.V. 1996. Breeding strategies for marginal regions in the tropics and subtropics. Anim. Res. Dev. 43: 99–118.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Oguntunji and Ayorinde Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Oguntunji and Ayorinde Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 1.3 MB