Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:17:28.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenotypic characterization of the Guajolote (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

M.A. Camacho-Escobar ,
L. Ramírez-Cancino ,
I. Lira-Torres  and
V. Hernández-Sánchez
M.A. Camacho-Escobar
Affiliation:
Universidad del Mar, Campus Puerto Escondido, Ciudad Universitaria, Puerto Escondido, Mixtepec, Oaxaca, CP 71980 México
L. Ramírez-Cancino
Affiliation:
Universidad del Mar, Campus Puerto Escondido, Ciudad Universitaria, Puerto Escondido, Mixtepec, Oaxaca, CP 71980 México
I. Lira-Torres
Affiliation:
Universidad del Mar, Campus Puerto Escondido, Ciudad Universitaria, Puerto Escondido, Mixtepec, Oaxaca, CP 71980 México
V. Hernández-Sánchez
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco, Calzada del Hueso 1100 Col. Villa Quietud, Coyoacán, CP 04960 México
Get access

Summary

The study was conducted to investigate the phenotypic diversity of Guajolote present in small backyard poultry operations. From September 2004 to July 2006, in 54 municipalities in the coastal region of Oaxaca, Mexico 768 “guajalotes” growers were visited. Eleven different phenotypes of Guajolote, previously described as turkey varieties, have been identified. The phenotypes identified and their frequency are: Bronze (30.1%), Black (29.0%), Royal Palm (13.4%), Auburn (5.3%), Bourbon Red (5.2%), Narragancet (2.6%), Spotted (2.4%), Brown (2.2%), Slate (1.7%), White (1.5%) and Imperfect Albino (0.2%). The remainder (6.4%) were not identified as a phenotype previously described. This is the first report about the phenotypic differentiation of Guajolote in Mexico.

Résumé

Une étude a été mise en place pour connaître la diversité phénotypique des “guajalotes” (une espèce de dinde) dans les petites exploitations avicoles de basse cour. De septembre 2004 à juillet 2006 on a visité 768 producteurs dans 54 municipalités de la côte de la région de Oaxaca (Mexique). On a identifié 11 phénotypes différents de “guajalotes” qui avaient été décrits précédemment comme étant des variétés de dinde. Les phénotypes identifiés avec leur présences respectives sont: Bronze (30,1%); Black (29%); Royal Plan (13,4%); Auburn (5,3%); Bourbon Red (5,2%); Narragancet (2,6%); Spotting (2,4%); Brown (2,2%); Slate (1,7%); White (1,5%); et Albinisme imparfait (0,2%), le reste de l'échantillon n'a pas été identifié parmi les phénotypes indiqués ci-dessus. Il s'agit du premier rapport sur la différence phénotypique des “guajalotes” au Mexique.

Resumen

Se elaboró un estudio para conocer la diversidad genética de los Guajolotes presentes en las pequeñas explotaciones avícolas de traspatio. De Septiembre de 2004 a Julio de 2006 en 54 municipios de la región costa de Oaxaca, México; se visitaron 768 productores. Hasta el momento se han identificado 11 fenotipos diferentes de Guajolotes descritos anteriormente. Los fenotipos identificados y su frecuencia son: Bronze (30.10%), Black (29.01%), Royal Palm (13.36%), Auburn (5.27%), Bourbon Red (5.24%), Narragancet (2.62%), Spotting (2.41%), Brown (2.19%), Slate (1.74%), White (1.53%) y Albinismo imperfecto (0.21%), el resto de la muestra no fue identificado como algún fenotipo descrito anteriormente. Este es el primer reporte sobre diferenciación fenotípica de Guajolotes para México.

Keywords

Backyard poultryColor of featherGeneticsTurkeyVariety.
Type
Research Articles
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 43 , April 2008 , pp. 59 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

American Livestock Breeds Conservancy. 2006. Turkeys, <www.albc-usa.org/wtchlist.htmt#turkeys> Pittsboro, North Carolina. Retrieved May 11, 2006.+Pittsboro,+North+Carolina.+Retrieved+May+11,+2006.>Google Scholar
Aquino, R.E., Arroyo, A., Glafiro, T.H., Riestra, D.D.Gallardo, F.L. & López, B.A.. 2003. El Guajolote Criollo (Meleagris gallopavo L.) y la Ganadería Familiar en la Zona Centro del Estado de Veracruz. Tec. Pec. Méx. 41(2): 165–173.Google Scholar
Asmundson, V.S. 1945. A triple-allele series and plumage in turkeys. Genetics 30: 305–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asmundson, V.S. 1950. Sex-linkage in the turkey. J. Hered. 41: 205–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asmundson, V.S. 1955. Inheritance of spotting in the plumage of turkeys. J. Hered. 46: 285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, R.D. 1990. Poultry genetic resources: evolution, diversity, and conservation. In: Crawford, R.D. (Ed.), Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
Díaz, G.A. 1976. Programa Nacional de meleagricultura. In: Memoria de la 2a Reunión Anual. SAG. Dirección General de Avicultura y especies menores. México, DF.Google Scholar
FAO. 2006. Domestic Animal Diversity Information System <www.fao.org/dad-is> FAO, Rome, Italy. Retrieved May 11, 2006.+FAO,+Rome,+Italy.+Retrieved+May+11,+2006.>Google Scholar
Hale, E.B., Schleidt, W.M. & Schein, M.W.. 1962. The behaviour of turkeys. In Hafez, E.S.E. (Ed.), The behaviour of domestic animals. Baillière, Tindall & Cassell, London, pp. 554–592.Google Scholar
Henson, E.L. 1992. In situ conservation of livestock and poultry. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Hutt, F.B. & Mueller, C.D.. 1942. Sex-linked albinism in the turkey Meleagris gallopavo. Hered. 33: 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerez, M.P., Herrera, J.G. & Vásquez, M.A.. 1994. La Gallina Criolla en los valles centrales de Oaxaca. ITAO - CIGA, Oaxaca, México.Google Scholar
Marsden, S.J. & Martin, J.H.. 1945. Turkey Management, 3rd Ed.The Interstate Press, Danville, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Nestor, K.E. & Renner, P.A.. 1979. Genetics of growth and reproduction in turkey. 6. Influence of plumage patter color genes on mortality, body weight, and egg and semen production. Poultry Sci. 58: 1137–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, F.L. 1925. All Breeds of Poultry, Origin: History: Description, Mating and Characteristics. American Poultry Journal. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Robertson, W.R.B. 1929. Revised terminology for the chief color factors concerned in crosses among the breeds of the turkey. Anat. Rec. 44 (Abstract) 289.Google Scholar
Robertson, W.R.B., Bohren, B.B. & Warren, D.C.. 1943. The inheritance of plumage color in the turkey. J. Hered. 34: 246–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saucedo, M.P. 1984. Historia de la Ganadería en México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF.Google Scholar
Savage, T.F. 1990. Mutations and major variants in turkeys. In: Crawford, R.D. (Ed.), Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp. 317–331.Google Scholar
Savage, T.F. & Attamangkune, S.. 1990. Interaction between the B and E plumage loci in turkeys. Poultry Sci. 69: (Suppl 1) 118.Google Scholar
Savage, T.F. & Zakrzewska, EI. 2006. Single Gene Traits of the Turkey. <http://oregonstate.edu/dept/animal-sciences/poultry/tc.html>. Oregon State University. Corvallis, Oregon. Retrieved May 11, 2006.Google Scholar
Schorger, A.W. 1966. The wild turkey. Its history and domestication. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. 2003. Informe Sobre la Situación de los Recursos Genéticos Pecuarios (RGP) en México. <www.sagarpa.gob.mx/Dgg/FTP/infofao.pdf>. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación; México, DF. Retrieved May 12, 2006..+Secretaría+de+Agricultura,+Ganadería,+Desarrollo+Rural,+Pesca+y+Alimentación;+México,+DF.+Retrieved+May+12,+2006.>Google Scholar
Sponenberg, D.P., Bender, M., Johnson, P., Smith, E., Gogal, R., Pierson, F.W. & Gomez, M.A. 2005. La conservación del pavo en los Estados Unidos. Archivos de Zootecnia 54: 177–183.Google Scholar
Sponenberg, D.P., Hawes, R.O., Johnson, P. & Christman, C.J.. 2000. Turkey conservation in the United States. AGRI 27: 59–66.Google Scholar
Starker, L. 1985. Fauna Silvestre en México. Edit. Pax-México, México, DF.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. & Dickey, D.A. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics a biometrical approach. Third edition. MCGraw-Hill. NY, USA.Google Scholar
Torres-Colin, R. 2004. Tipos de vegetación. In: García-Mendoza, A.J., Ordoñez, M.J. & Briones-Salas, M. (Eds), Biodiversidad de Oaxaca. Instituto de Biología, UNAM - Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza - Word Wildlife Fund, México, pp. 105–117.Google Scholar
Trejo, I. 2004. Clima. In: García-Mendoza, A.J., Ordoñez, M.J. & Briones-Salas, M. (Eds), Biodiversidad de Oaxaca. Instituto de Biología, UNAM - Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza -Word Wildlife Fund, México, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar