Why Animal Conservation?

Conservation biology is a discipline that has come of age. Over the past ten–fifteen years we have seen it develop, from a topic that many academics saw as peripheral and quirky into mainstream biological science. Conservation biology is now routinely taught on degree level courses, the number of papers published in the specialist academic literature has risen exponentially, and the citation rates of those journals continue to increase.

African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) always live at low population densities relative to sympatric large carnivores. This suggests that there are basic ecological reasons for the wild dog's endangered status. We examined the effects of intraspecific and interspecific competition, infectious diseases, foraging success, genetics and human activities on wild dogs. We present data from wild dogs in the Selous Game Reserve, and make comparisons with other populations to identify the limiting factors that are broadly important. The high density of wild dogs in Selous (40 adults/1000 km2) is associated with weak competition from lions and spotted hyenas. Across ecosystems, population density is negatively related to the intensity of interference competition with larger carnivores. Predation by lions and hyenas accounted for 13% of known-cause deaths in Selous and 33–50% in other populations. Intraspecific competition caused 69% of known-cause deaths in Selous, through infanticide and fights between packs, although most of the victims were juveniles with low reproductive value. Infectious diseases had little apparent impact in Selous (4% of deaths) or Kruger National Park (5%), but did play a role in the extinction of a small population in Serengeti. Infectious diseases and competition will generally interact because competitors harbor and transmit the diseases that affect wild dogs. Human activities caused 12% of deaths in Selous, even though it is large (43 000 km2) and does not border large human or livestock populations. Humans were the major agent of mortality in some populations. Foraging success varied little across ecosystems and was not apparently limiting. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genotypes revealed clinal variation between Selous and distant populations (rather than geographically isolated subspecies, as previously suggested). All wild dog populations have a genetically effective size (Ne) less than 500, so gene flow is necessary to maintain genetic diversity within populations.

The Cape Sable seaside-sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis) has disappeared from its only known breeding areas episodically since its discovery early this century. Systematic surveys across its range in the southern Everglades find the sparrow's range to be fragmented into six subpopulations. The sparrow population decreased by 58% between 1992 and 1995, with the near extinction of the western half of the population and the temporary local extinction of some eastern populations. Other similar grassland sparrows have populations that vary considerably from year to year. Yet the decline in the western subpopulation and the local extinction of some of the peripheral populations cannot be explained by natural variability alone. Hurricane Andrew passed over several subpopulations prior to the particularly poor year of 1993. However, the geographical and temporal patterns of subpopulation decline are not consistent with what would be expected following a hurricane. Frequent fires prevent successful breeding as does flooding during the breeding season. Better management can prevent frequent fires and episodic flooding. However, the long-term survival of the sparrow depends on managing the unanticipated risks that attend its small, fragmented population.

The legally endangered Cape Sable seaside-sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis) is restricted to short-hydroperiod, marl prairies within Florida's Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve. Marl prairies are typified by dense, mixed stands of graminoid species usually below 1 m in height, naturally inundated by freshwater for 3–7 months annually. Water levels affect the birds directly, by flooding their nests, and indirectly by altering the habitat on which they depend. Managed redistribution of water flows flooded nearly half of the sparrow's geographical range during several consecutive breeding seasons starting in 1993. Furthermore, these high water levels rapidly changed plant communities, so jeopardizing the sparrow's survival by reducing the availability of nesting habitat.

As large-bodied mammals become restricted to progressively smaller fragments of former habitat, competitive interactions and interspecies aggression are likely to intensify. Data on the outcomes of 159 encounters between endangered African pachyderms revealed that: (1) female elephants (Loxodonta africana) dominated both sexes of black rhinos (Diceros bicornis); and (2) rhino males but not females displaced elephant bulls. The results of an additional 127 interactions involving pachyderms and 12 additional mammals ranging in size from cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) to giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) indicates that females of either pachyderm deny immediate access to limited resources. Although the evolution of gender-specific asymmetries in interspecific dominance has received little formal study, it may best be explained by understanding patterns of parental investment; however, from a conservation perspective, one consequence of size-related dominance is that with continued containment of elephants and rhinos in managed reserves, the most handicapped species are likely to be the smaller ones.

The Florida panther, Puma concolor coryi, is a subspecies on the verge of extinction. Recent field studies have shown the dwindling population to be suffering from numerous physical problems manifest in their soft tissues. Here we explore the skulls and skeletons of more than 50 P. concolor coryi for corroborative evidence of poor condition such as tooth fracture, arthritis, infection, trauma, and lines of arrested growth (Harris lines). Results are compared with those for an osteological collection of presumed healthy pumas from outside Florida. Although the two samples did not differ significantly in the relative prevalence of most of the pathologies, the Florida cats fractured their teeth more often and exhibited significantly more lines of arrested growth in their long bones. The greater number of teeth broken in life is associated with heavier tooth wear among Florida panthers and a diet depauperate in large prey. The elevated incidence of Harris lines is probably a result of more regular episodes of poor nutrition in the Florida population. Our results demonstrate that the study of osteopathologies is a new tool for the conservation biologist and highlight the value of preserving entire skeletons, as has been done for P. concolor coryi.

A common ‘rule of thumb' in conservation biology is that populations of more than 100 individuals are not threatened by demographic stochasticity alone. However, the effect of demographic stochasticity on population survival may be strengthened if the population has a non-homogeneous demography. A recently developed measure, the demographic effective population size ND, scales population size by taking the differential contribution of individuals into account. We exemplify the estimation of ND with the current population of the Saimaa ringed seal, comprising about 200 individuals. The estimate of ND is shown to be dependent on how independently individuals can be assumed to reproduce. Completely independent reproduction leads to ND ≈ 250, suggesting a safe future for the population. However, when acknowledging the potential of breeding failure due to habitat limitation and difficulties of dispersal among the different subareas of Lake Saimaa, ND lies in an alarming range from six to 30 individuals. The effective means to increase the ND value are limited. Although subdivision itself decreases the value of ND, improving dispersal of individuals is shown to be of limited aid. Instead, the most effective way to enhance future prospects of the Saimaa seal population is to improve pup survival to maturity.

Previous studies have revealed considerable genetic variation, geographic localization, and genealogical depth for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotypes within each of several species of freshwater turtles in the south-eastern United States of America. Here we report a notable exception to such phylogeographic patterns. In control-region sequences of 66 snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) collected from 10 south-eastern states, a single mtDNA haplotype predominated and the two rare variants detected were nearly identical to the common genotype. This pattern of low mtDNA variation and a lack of appreciable geographic population structure is extremely unusual for a widely distributed animal species. For purposes of taxonomy and conservation, these findings suggest the presence of only one ‘evolutionarily significant unit' for C. serpentina in this otherwise phylogeographically rich region of the country. Possible explanations for this phylogeographic pattern in the snapping turtle are considered.

A small blackish muntjac has been discovered in the west Quang Nam province of Vietnam. DNA sequencing of six individuals showed that this is a distinct species. A description is given. The new find is the third new ungulate species to be discovered in Vietnam in five years. The paper predicts that more species remain to be found in the Annamite mountain range and includes DNA analysis from two more undescribed species. The DNA analysis indicates that there has been a radiation of several related muntjac species in the Annamite mountains, also that the new truongson muntjac shows high intraspecific genetic diversity indicative of a large effective population size. The paper discusses the significance of these finds from an evolutionary and conservation viewpoint. The authors urge conservation authorities in the IndoChinese countries to devote special measures to protect this site of dynamic evolution which retains a combination of relict endemics (e.g. Pseudoryx) as well as on-going speciation.

Maintaining genetic variation for future evolutionary change is an important issue for conservation biology. However, there is controversy over the effective population size (Ne) required for endangered species to retain their evolutionary potential, with proposed sizes ranging from 500 to 5000. The highest estimate is based on the assumption that 90% of mutations are deleterious. We review the arguments for an effective size of 5000 and conclude that it assumes effective mutation rates that are too low, and heritabilities that are, in general, very high. We conclude that an Ne of 500–1000 is appropriate at this time.

For practical reasons, managers and policy-makers have to make rapid decisions with limited information on the status of endangered species. Because of its relative ease of acquisition, the most common surrogate used to derive inferences about the risk of extinction is population size. This is not to say that population size is the best indicator of risk; other considerations, such as the recent rate of population decline, are of clear importance (Mace & Lande, 1991). A popular rule of thumb for the critical population size necessary for the maintenance of adequate genetic variance for adaptive evolution in quantitative traits, originally espoused by Franklin (1980) and Soulé (1980), has been an effective population size (Ne) of 500 individuals. More recent assessments, based on both empirical and theoretical developments, suggest that this number should be revised upwards to Ne≃1000–5000 (Lande, 1995a; Lynch, 1995; National Research Council, 1995; Bürger & Lynch, 1997). Here we address the arguments of Franklin & Frankham (1998) that a critical Ne≃500–1000 is adequate for conservation purposes.

Lynch & Lande's (1998) comments on our paper (Franklin & Frankham, 1998) misrepresent our purpose, deal largely with a different issue and do not refute our original criticism. Our paper is a commentary on Lande's (1995) suggestion that an effective size of 5000 is required to maintain evolutionary potential, not whether this size ‘is adequate for conservation purposes'.