Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:29:24.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using genetics to estimate the size of wild populations: many methods, much potential, uncertain utility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1999

Michael K. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Wildlife Biology Department, University of Montana, Missoula MT 59812, USA
David A. Tallmon
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula MT 59812, USA
Gordon Luikart
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie des Populations d'Altitude, CNRS UMR 5553, Université Joseph Fourier, BP 53, F-38041 Grenoble, France
Get access

Abstract

In 1998 we wrote a paper describing DNA-based methods for estimating and monitoring both census (Nc) and effective (Ne) population sizes in natural populations (Schwartz, Tallmon & Luikart, 1998). The purposes of this paper were: (i) to review some relatively unexplored, but promising ways that multi-locus genetic data can be used to monitor and detect population declines, (ii) to encourage further development and validation of recent DNA-based Nc and Ne estimators. These approaches are urgently needed to help detect natural population declines in their early stages, so that management actions can be taken to avoid population endangerment and subsequent extinction. Crandall, Posada & Vasco (1999) have criticized the Ne portion of our review claiming that we: (i) excluded phylogenetic estimators of Ne that employ coalescent theory, (ii) did not distinguish between historical and current estimates of Ne, (iii) did not define which Ne we were estimating.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)