Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T06:43:27.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2004

Simon Thirgood
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania
Anna Mosser
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA
Sebastian Tham
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania
Grant Hopcraft
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania
Ephraim Mwangomo
Affiliation:
Tanzania National Parks, PO Box 3434, Arusha, Tanzania
Titus Mlengeya
Affiliation:
Tanzania National Parks, PO Box 3434, Arusha, Tanzania
Morris Kilewo
Affiliation:
Tanzania National Parks, PO Box 3434, Arusha, Tanzania
John Fryxell
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
A. R. E. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada
Markus Borner
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania
Get access

Abstract

The conservation of migratory species can be problematic because of their requirements for large protected areas. We investigated this issue by examining the annual movements of the migratory wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, in the 25000 km2 Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem of Tanzania and Kenya. We used Global Positioning System telemetry to track eight wildebeest during 1999–2000 in relation to protected area status in different parts of the ecosystem. The collared wildebeest spent 90% of their time within well-protected core areas. However, two sections of the wildebeest migration route – the Ikoma Open Area and the Mara Group Ranches – currently receive limited protection and are threatened by poaching or agriculture. Comparison of current wildebeest migration routes to those recorded during 1971–73 indicates that the western buffer zones appear to be used more extensively than in the past. This tentative conclusion has important repercussions for management and needs further study. The current development of community-run Wildlife Management Areas as additional buffer zones around the Serengeti represents an important step in the conservation of this UNESCO World Heritage Site. This study demonstrates that detailed knowledge of movement of migratory species is required to plan effective conservation action.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)