Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:35:05.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing population structure at high levels of differentiation: microsatellite comparisons of bighorn sheep and large carnivores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 1999

Stephen H. Forbes
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
John T. Hogg
Affiliation:
Craighead Wildlife-Wildlands Institute, 5200 Upper Miller Creek Road, Missoula, MT 59803, USA
Get access

Abstract

Use of a new class of molecular marker for evolutionary or conservation studies may promise improved information, but it may also call for reassessment of analytical methods and empirical limitations. We used DNA microsatellites to study population structure in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis) and to test the ability of microsatellites to distinguish bighorn subspecies. Genetic differentiation between bighorn populations was dramatically greater than in comparable studies of brown bears and grey wolves, and these species differences are consistent with known differences in habitat use and dispersal. In bighorn, however, statistical limitations make it difficult to distinguish between moderately and highly divergent populations. As a result, only gene flow estimates greater than about one migrant per generation (OMPG) are informative about true population relatedness. In bears and wolves, apparent differentiation is so low that migration estimates are greater than OMPG continent-wide, but factors other than high gene flow may contribute to these patterns. Despite analytical difficulties at large geographical scales and large genetic divergences, microsatellite data assist management by characterizing historical rates and patterns of dispersal on smaller scales, and by detecting population bottlenecks and regions of particularly high or low historical gene flow.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)