¹ The county is deemed to be that prior to the 1974 local government reorganization which deprived it of the areas assigned to Humberside.

² Ekwall, E., ‘Tribal Names in English Place-Names’, Namn och Bygd 41 (1954), 129–77, at 148Google Scholar; Brooks, N., ‘The Formation of the Mercian Kingdom’, The Origins of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, ed. Bassett, S. (Leicester, 1989), pp. 159–70, at 161.Google Scholar

³ The Lincolnshire Domesday and The Lindsey Survey, ed. Foster, C. W. and Longley, T., Lincoln Record Soc. 19 (Lincoln, 1924).Google Scholar

⁴ Smith, A. H., English Place-Name Elements, pt 1, EPNS 25 (Cambridge, 1956), 58–62.Google Scholar

⁵ Ibid. p. 62.

⁶ Dumville, D., ‘The Tribal Hidage: an Introduction to its Texts and their History’, The Origins of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, ed. Bassett, , pp. 225–30, at 226–7.Google Scholar

⁷ Margary, I. D., Roman Roads in Britain (London, 1955, rev. ed. 1967), pp. 189–94.Google Scholar

⁸ Eagles, B., ‘Lindsey’, The Origins of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, ed. Bassett, , pp. 202–12, at 204–5.Google Scholar

⁹ Cameron, K., The Place-Names of Lincolnshire, pt 2, EPNS 64–5 (Nottingham, 1991), 142, 269 and 278.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Whitwell, J. B., Roman Lincolnshire (Lincoln, 1970), pp. 51–2Google Scholar. Name forms from the Ingoldmells Court Rolls which refer in part to land in Skegness date between 1345 and 1422.

¹¹ Leahy, K., ‘The Anglo-Saxon Settlement of Lindsey’, Pre- Viking Lindsey, ed. Vince, A. (Lincoln, 1993), pp. 29–44, at 39.Google Scholar

¹² Eagles, , ‘Lindsey’, p. 210.Google Scholar

¹³ Everson, P., ‘Pre-Viking Settlement in Lindsey’, Pre-Viking Lindsey, ed. Vince, , pp. 91–100, at 95–7.Google Scholar

¹⁴ This point was made by Alan Binns, an experienced Humber and Trent sailor, in a paper on early Trent navigation read at the Flixborough seminar, University of Nottingham, 8 May 1992. The staithes are recorded as Flixburghstather in 1299, Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem (Public Record Office), in progress. Compare neighbouring Burton upon Stather whose affix is also Scand. stϱðvar, the plural of stϱð ‘a landing place, a staithe’.

¹⁵ I am very grateful to Professor Kenneth Cameron for access to unpublished materials in his place-names collection for Lincolnshire.

¹⁶ Simmons, B. B., ‘Iron Age and Roman Coasts around The Wash’, Archaeology and Coastal Change, ed. Thompson, F. H., Soc. of Antiquaries Occasional Paper, ns 1 (1980), 56–73.Google Scholar

¹⁷ The Earliest Lincolnshire Assize Rolls, A. D. 1202–1209, ed. Stenton, D. M., Lincoln Record Soc. 22 (Lincoln, 1926), 107.Google Scholar

¹⁸ London, British Library, Cotton Vespasian E. xviii (Kirkstead Abbey Cartulary), fols. 154 and 158.

¹⁹ Oliver, G., The Monumental Antiquities of Great Grimsby (Hull, 1825), frontispiece.Google Scholar

²⁰ Cameron, K., The Place-Names of Lincolnshire, pt 3, EPNS 66 (Nottingham, 1992), 150–1 and 156Google Scholar. In the discussion of Thoresway, Cameron quotes Dr John Insley's suggestion of an ODan *Þorswœ¯, ‘the shrine dedicated to Thor’, as the source of this place-name, an interpretation it should be observed based only on the Domesday Book spelling. The body of the evidence, however, indicates that the generic of the name is OE weg, ‘a trackway, a road’, with possibly a Scandinavian masculine personal name Þórir having replaced the original Old English first element. The here-pæð evidently had an earlier English name, now lost. If it maintained its military associations after the Scandinavian settlements, it is conceivable that the Norse replacement of the first element of the name of this long-distance English military trackway was the name of the god Thor, the most popular deity of Viking warriors. Such continuity of strategic organization seems doubtful, however, and the personal name Þórir is much likelier in a name created for what most probably had become simply a local route; cf. Þórir, a local landowner of nearby (North) Thoresby.

²¹ Cameron, , Place-Names of Lincolnshire, pt 2, p. 45.Google Scholar

²² Boehler, M., Die altenglischen Frauennamen (Berlin, 1930).Google Scholar

²³ Havelok, ed. Smithers, G. V. (Oxford, 1987), pp. lxix–lxxGoogle Scholar; Reaney, P. H., A Dictionary of British Surnames (London, 1958), p. 138, s.n. Goldburg.Google Scholar

²⁴ Smith, A. H., The Place-Names of the North Riding of Yorkshire, EPNS 5 (Cambridge, 1928), 137.Google Scholar

²⁵ Rodwell, W. J. and Rodwell, K., ‘St Peter's Church, Barton-upon-Humber: Excavation and Structural Study’, AntJ 62 (1982), 283–315, at 289–90 and 307–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Two bronze hanging bowls and a disc with interlace which closely resembles that on the great gold buckle from Sutton Hoo were among the items excavated from the pagan cemetery. Rodwell and Rodwell note that ‘the Barton cemetery contains some of the richest material from late pagan graves in northern England and may be compared with Taplow, Bucks., and Broomfield, Essex’. Such finds may well indicate the importance of the burh.

²⁶ Cameron, , Place-Names of Lincolnshire, pt 2, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar

²⁷ Ibid. p. 30–1.

²⁸ Everson, P. and Knowles, G. C., ‘The Anglo-Saxon Bounds of Æt Bearuwe’, Jnl of the EPNS 25 (1992–1993), 19–37.Google Scholar

²⁹ The Rolls and Register of Bishop Oliver Sutton, ed. Hill, R. M. T., 8 vols., Lincoln Record Soc. 39 (Lincoln, 1948–1986) I, 108 and 223Google Scholar, and Lincoln Record Soc. 60 (1965) V, 186.

³⁰ The 1341 Royal Inquest in Lincolnshire, ed. McLane, B. W., Lincoln Record Soc. 78 (Lincoln, 1988), 112.Google Scholar

³¹ The Registrum Antiquissimum of the Cathedral Church of Lincoln, ed. Foster, C. W., 10 vols., Lincoln Record Soc. 27 (Lincoln, 1931–1973) I, 127.Google Scholar

³² Some Sessions of the Peace in Lincolnshire, 1360–1375, ed. Sillem, R., Lincoln Record Soc. 30 (Lincoln, 1937), 178.Google Scholar

³³ Smith, , Place-Names of the North Riding of Yorkshire, p. 137Google Scholar. The only other Goldsborough (near Harrogate) has a different etymology and development: for which see Smith, A. H., The Place-Names of the West Riding of Yorkshire, pt 5, EPNS 34 (Cambridge, 1961), 15–16.Google Scholar

³⁴ The Parish Registers of Boston, 1557–1599, ed. Foster, C. W., Lincoln Record Soc., Parish Register Section 1 (Lincoln, 1914), 23, 38, 42 and 45Google Scholar; Calendars of Administrations in the Consistory Court of Lincoln, A.D. 1540–1659, ed. Foster, C. W., Lincoln Record Soc. 16 (Lincoln, 1921), 239.Google Scholar

³⁵ The limited range of the migrations of English families in the Middle Ages and early modern period is illustrated in neighbouring Rutland where some twenty-five per cent of the county's village names are compounded as surnames in field-names alone within the county, but away from their locations of origin by the last quarter of the seventeenth century. See Cox, B., The Place-Names of Rutland, EPNS 67–9 (Nottingham, 1994), 445Google Scholar. The Wrawby and Glanford Brigg instances are: Lincoln, Lincolnshire Archives Office, Bishop's Transcripts MF4/310, Will 1674/140 and Inventory 176/151. I am grateful to Dr. J.A. Mitson for drawing these Lincoln records to my attention.

³⁶ Cameron, , Place-Names of Lincolnshire, pt 2, p. 100.Google Scholar

³⁷ Cameron, K., The Place-Names of Lincolnshire, pt 1, EPNS 58 (Nottingham, 1985), 1–2.Google Scholar

³⁸ Gilmour, B., ‘The Anglo-Saxon Church at St Paul-in-the-Bail, Lincoln’, MA 23 (1979), 214–17Google Scholar; Hall, R. A., ‘The Five Boroughs of the Danelaw’, ASE 18 (1989), 149–206, at 173–5Google Scholar; Jones, M. J., ‘The Latter Days of Roman Lincoln’, Pre-Viking Lindsey. ed. Vince, , pp. 14–28, at 25–7Google Scholar; K. Steane and A. Vince, ‘Post-Roman Lincoln: Archaeological Evidence for Activity in Lincoln from the 5th to the 9th Centuries’, ibid. pp. 71–9, at 72 and 74.

³⁹ Bede, Historia ecclesiastica II.16 (Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People, ed. Colgrave, B. and Mynors, R. A. B. (Oxford, 1969), pp. 190–2).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Dumville, D., ‘The Anglian Collection of Royal Genealogies and Regnal Lists’, ASE 5 (1976), 23–50, at 31, 33 and 37.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Sandred, K. I., ‘Ingham in East Anglia: a new Interpretation’, Leeds Stud. in Eng. ns 18 (1987), 231–40.Google Scholar

⁴² Speake, G., Anglo-Saxon Animal Art and its Germanic Background (Oxford, 1980), pp. 39 and 42Google Scholar; Everson, , ‘Pre-Viking Settlement in Lindsey’, pp. 94–7Google Scholar. The burial contained silver foil fragments with the motif of dancing figures with horned head-dresses comparable with those found in the royal ship-burial at Sutton Hoo and on the gilt buckle-plate from the high status grave at Finglesham, Kent (OE *Þengeles-hām ‘the prince's estate’); see Hawkes, S. C., Davidson, H. R. E. and Hawkes, C., ‘The Finglesham Man’, Antiquity 39 (1965), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴³ Taylor, H. M. and Taylor, J., Anglo-Saxon Architecture, 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1965–1978) II, 584–93.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Stocker, D., ‘The Early Church in Lincolnshire’, Pre- Viking Lindsey, ed. Vince, , pp. 101–22, at 116–17.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Liber Eliensis, ed. Blake, E. O., Camden 3rd ser. 92 (London, 1962), 29–30Google Scholar. Stow is simply OE stōw in its sense ‘a holy place’, here presumably naming a Christian site rather than an earlier pagan shrine. Indeed, it is likely that in many place-names which date from before the Scandinavian incursions, stōw was used for locations with which saints were physically associated in some way; see Gelling, M., ‘Some Meanings of stōw’, The Early Church in Western Britain and Ireland, ed. Pearce, S. M., BAR 102 (Oxford, 1982), 187–96.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Bruce-Mitford, R., ‘Late Celtic Hanging-Bowls in Lincolnshire and South Humberside’, Pre-Viking Lindsey, ed. Vince, , pp. 45–70, at 51–3 and 65Google Scholar. The Barton upon Humber (? Goldburgh) hanging-bowls are described at 48–9 and 64.

⁴⁷ MA 35 (1991), 168–9Google Scholar; Whitwell, B., ‘Flixborough’, CA 126 (1991), 244–7.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Hall, , ‘The Five Boroughs of the Danelaw’, pp. 176–8.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Steane, and Vince, , ‘Post-Roman Lincoln’, p. 77.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Morris, R., Churches in the landscape (London, 1989), pp. 217–19.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Cox, , Place-Names of Rutland, p. 127.Google Scholar

⁵² To date, no archaeological evidence for a wīc at Lincoln in the sense ‘trading settlement, commercial centre’ has been discovered. Steane and Vince observe: ‘Lincoln has often been put forward as a candidate for a wic site, although the continuing absence of archaeological evidence makes this less and less likely’ (‘Post-Roman Lincoln’, p. 78). Vince notes that ‘the distribution of pottery does not suggest that Lincoln, or a ‘-wic’ in its immediate area, played an integral part in Lindsey's trading network’, and ‘our current views about the topographic development of Wigford are that secular settlement did not start again in this area until the early to mid 10th century’ (Vince, A., ‘Approaches to the Study of Lincoln and Lindsey before the Vikings’, Pre-Viking Lindsey, ed. Vince, , pp. 1–5, at 4–5). The place-name Wigford certainly contains as its first element OE wīc. It can hardly have referred to the old colonia as a whole, since, when early used of Roman sites, wīc specified the smallest unit of Roman administration, the vicus ‘small town’. The later meaning ‘trading settlement, commercial centre’ is much more likely here. Whether such a centre developed north of the river within the walls of the lower town or to its south in the suburb of Wigford still awaits the good fortune of an excavation in the correct area, as happened at York's Fishergate site.Google Scholar

⁵³ Brooks, , ‘The Formation of the Mercian Kingdom’, pp. 159 and 168Google Scholar; Davies, W. and Vierk, H., ‘The Contexts of Tribal Hidage: Social Aggregates and Settlement Patterns’, FS 8 (1974), 223–93Google Scholar; Hart, C., ‘The Tribal Hidage’, TRHS 5th ser. 21 (1971), 133–57Google Scholar. For the suggestion that The Tribal Hidage is a Mercian revision of a late sixth-century Kentish document, see Russell, J. C., ‘The Tribal Hidage’, Traditio 5 (1947), 192–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁴ Dodgson, J. McN., ‘The Significance of the Distribution of the English Place-Name in -ingas,-inga- in South-East England’, MA 10 (1966), 1–29Google Scholar; rptd in Place-Name Evidence for the Anglo- Saxon Invasion and Scandinavian Settlements: Eight Studies, ed. Cameron, K. (Nottingham, 1975), pp. 27–50.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Cox, B., ‘The Significance of the Distribution of English Place-Names in -hām in the Midlands and East Anglia’, Jnl of the EPNS 5 (1972–1973), 15–73, esp. map 3, p. 65Google Scholar; rptd in Place-Name Evidence for the Anglo-Saxon Invasion and Scandinavian Settlements, ed. Cameron, , pp. 55–98 (map 3, p. 90).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Blackburn, M., ‘Coin Finds and Coin Circulation in Lindsey, c. 600–900’, Pre- Viking Lindsey, ed. Vince, , pp. 80–90, at 83–7.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Cameron, , Place-Names of Lincolnshire, pt 2, pp. 268–9.Google Scholar Cameron leans towards Ekwal's reconstruction Stælingas because of recurring single -l– spellings in a notable proportion of surviving early forms; see Ekwall, E., The Oxford Dictionary of English Place-Names, 4th ed. (Oxford, 1960)Google Scholar, s.n. One must question, however, whether the distinction between a single or double -l– would be meaningful after some five hundred years. Stallingborough is not recorded before 1086.

⁵⁸ Cox, , Place-Names of Rutland, pp. xxxiii–xxxvii.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Smith, A. H., The Place-Names of the West Riding of Yorkshire, pt 1, EPNS 30 (Cambridge, 1961), s.n.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Cox, B., ‘The Place-Names of the Earliest English Records’, jnl of the EPNS 8 (1975–1976), 12–66, at 46.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Bassett, S., ‘Lincoln and the Anglo-Saxon See of Lindsey’, ASE 18 (1989), 1–32, at 6–18.Google Scholar

⁶² Gelling, M., Place-Names in the Landscape (London, 1984), pp. 34–40.Google Scholar

⁶³ Scatterings of Romano-British material are also known at the site of the fortified enclosure at the problematical Alkborough (pers. comm. K. Leahy) and at that of the supposed Goldburgh in Barton upon Humber; see Rodwell, and Rodwell, , ‘St Peter's Church, Barton-upon-Humber’, p. 289.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Cox, , ‘Place-Names of the Earliest English Records’, pp. 29–39Google Scholar, s.n. See also Campbell, J., ‘Bede's Words for Places’, Names, Words, and Graves: Early Medieval Settlement, ed. Sawyer, P. H. (Leeds, 1979), pp. 34–54, at 36Google Scholar, who questions the identification of Cnobheresburg with Burgh Castle.

⁶⁵ Aldfrith can no longer be tied to Offa's confirmation of the 772 × 787 charter of Eadwulf, dux Suthsaxonum, granting land to the church of St Peter, Selsey, as proposed by Stenton, F. M., ‘Lindsey and its Kings’, Essays in History presented to Reginald Lane Poole, ed. Davis, H. W. C. (Oxford, 1927), pp. 136–50, at 140–3Google Scholar; rptd in Preparatory to Anglo-Saxon England, ed. Stenton, D. M. (Oxford, 1970), pp. 127–35, at 129–31.Google Scholar It is possible that he was reigning in 679 when Æthelred of Mercia gained permanent overlordship of Lindsey following the battle on the Trent in that year; see Foot, S., ‘The Kingdom of Lindsey’, Pre- Viking Lindsey, ed. Vince, , pp. 128–40, at 133–5.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ This is not to imply that OE ēg in place-names was used to describe a water-enclosed area of the extent of the supposed territory of the Lindisfaran. The origin and interpretation of the name Lindsey are fraught with difficulties; see Cameron, , Place-Names of Lincolnshire, pt 2, pp. 2–7Google Scholar, and Gelling, M., ‘The Name Lindsey’, ASE 18 (1989), 31–2.Google Scholar The present writer inclines to the early view of W. H. Stevenson, that the name Lindsey is the outcome of the analogical reformation of the as yet unexplained archaic name-form Lindissi to an OE *Lindesīg/ *Lindesēg; see Aster's Life of King Alfred, ed. Stevenson, W. H. (Oxford, 1904), p. 242.Google Scholar