The iconology of Teotihuacan mirrors

In The Iconography of the Art of Teotihuacán Kubler (Reference Kubler1967:9) took early note of the Teotihuacan iconography of reflectivity in writing: “Saw-tooth rays and eyes represent brilliance.” Teotihuacan artists’ conventional use of these signs to connote reflectivity may be deduced from their contexts of occurrence: zigzagging lines appear around circular disks resembling the sun or on spear points of obsidian (e.g., Kubler Reference Kubler1967:Figure 45), while artists often placed disembodied eyes atop currents of undulating blue/green and red stripes thought to show flows of water and blood (e.g., Kubler Reference Kubler1967:Figure 3). Even as he advanced these and other readings, Kubler acknowledged that many iconic meanings intended by Teotihuacan artists are less accessible. Most consequentially, he recognized that the method of “iconography” as conceived by Panofsky (Reference Panofsky1955) was not, strictly speaking, practicable at Teotihuacan (Kubler Reference Kubler1967:11–12).

In Panofsky's sense, iconography, or the interpretation of the meaning of images, could be accomplished most securely through the study of parallel literary corpuses produced by or widely read within that same culture. “[Iconographical analysis] presupposes a familiarity with specific themes or concepts as transmitted through literary sources, whether acquired by purposeful reading or by oral tradition” (Panofsky Reference Panofsky1955:35). To interpret the meaning of a representational artwork, iconographers needed to familiarize themselves with texts that the artist(s) had read or heard. While many scholars now recognize that Teotihuacanos employed a system of writing, questions of its nature, the language it preserved, and the manner of its reading continue to inspire debate (Cabrera Castro Reference Cabrera Castro and Robb2017; Domenici Reference Domenici, Clemmensen and Helmke2022; Helmke and Nielsen Reference Helmke and Nielsen2021; Nielsen and Helmke Reference Nielsen and Helmke2011, Reference Nielsen and Helmke2014; Taube Reference Taube2000a; Whittaker Reference Whittaker2021). For Kubler, literary sources such as the sixteenth-century Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España, compiled by Sahagún in coordination with indigenous contributors, and Durán's Historia de las Indias de Nueva España, written roughly a millennium after the sixth-century diminishment of Teotihuacan hegemony throughout Mesoamerica, were too chronologically distant from Teotihuacan to reliably afford insight into the meaning of that city's icons (Durán Reference Durán and Garibay1967; Sahagún Reference Sahagún, Anderson and Dibble1950–1982). Moreover, seemingly comparable forms found in the artworks of contemporaries, such as the Early Classic Maya, appeared in substantially different contexts. He therefore advanced his own Iconography with the awareness that any iconographic comprehension of Teotihuacan artworks would necessarily modify the methodology.

Since Kubler's writing, scholars have recognized a considerable, if dynamic and modified, cultural heritage from Teotihuacan that persisted among later central Mexicans (Carrasco et al. Reference Carrasco, Jones and Sessions2000). What is more, shared comprehensions of iconic elements—among other meaningful connections—between Teotihuacanos and other Early Classic Mesoamericans have become well-documented (Braswell Reference Braswell2003; Hirth et al. Reference Hirth, Carballo and Arroyo2020; Lauriers and Murakami Reference Lauriers and Murakami2022). Concurrently, scholars such as Taube (Reference Taube1983, Reference Taube and Berlo1992a, Reference Taube1992b, Reference Taube2000a, Reference Taube, Carrasco, Jones and Sessions2000b), C. Millon (Reference Millon and Berrin1973a, Reference Millon and Berrin1988b), Headrick (Reference Headrick2007), and Paulinyi (Reference Paulinyi2001, Reference Paulinyi, Fash and Luján2009), among others, have made fruitful applications of iconographic analysis to the study of Teotihuacan artworks through reference to later ethnohistorical and contemporaneous etic sources.

While iconographic analysis is well established within Teotihuacan studies, scholars have less often explicitly applied Panofsky's method of “iconology,” which he defined as seeking to determine the “underlying principles which reveal the basic attitude of a nation, a period, a class, a religious or philosophical persuasion,” as consolidated in and qualified by an artwork. Iconologists, “deal with the work of art as a symptom of something else which expresses itself in a countless variety of other symptoms, and we interpret its composition and iconographical features as more particularized evidence of this ‘something else’” (Panofsky Reference Panofsky1955:31). Whereas iconography concerns itself with the identification of motifs and their corresponding narrative contents, iconology aims to identify the prevailing cultural forces that caused, necessitated, or enabled historical changes in the form assumed by and prominence afforded to signs and symbolic objects within a given culture.

Any reading of the Teotihuacan cult of the mirror would necessarily build upon Taube's foundational identification of several iconographic appearances of mirrors at Teotihuacan and its Early Classic contact sites (Taube Reference Taube1983, Reference Taube and Berlo1992a, Reference Taube1992b). He demonstrated the prevalence of the sign in Teotihuacan artworks across a variety of settings and forms, including on the facade of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent, on the lower backs of priestly and warrior figures in Teotihuacan murals and Teotihuacan-related artworks found abroad, and as wide U-shaped forms that depict ritual mirrors viewed in profile. He further linked these appearances of the mirror sign to archaeological mirrors that when scientifically recovered have typically occurred in symbolically ponderous settings, including placed near the lower backs of several of the human sacrifices of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent (Cabrera Castro Reference Cabrera Castro, Berrin and Pasztory1993:Figure 6) and in the tombs of Early Classic Maya rulers and elites (Blainey Reference Blainey2007; Coe Reference Coe, Benson and Griffin1988:227–228; Kidder et al. Reference Kidder, Jennings and Shook1946:126–133). An iconological reading of this cult, which was clearly of great consequence for Teotihuacan elites and other powerful Mesoamericans, would seek to comprehend and describe how it manifested the basic societal attitude of which it was symptomatic. This same underlying attitude would be expected to manifest across a variety of aspects of the Teotihuacan lifeway with a common locus and chronology of articulation.

In Panofskian iconology the sign is not primarily understood as the illustration of a narrative or concept but as a manifestation of cultural forces that also appear elsewhere throughout the society. Nevertheless, Panofsky's contention that a society's iconic artforms may productively be understood through reference to an alternate corpus of that same society's cultural output bears heuristic merit. While scholars cannot point to a legible emic and contemporaneous literary corpus from Teotihuacan, they may refer to a corpus of archaeologically excavated materializations of cultural activity that have been documented in ritual and quotidian settings. While it is crucial to heed the variable degrees and kinds of intentionality expressed by particular archaeological contexts, reference to the findings of archaeologists in the comprehension of iconic dimensions of Teotihuacan artworks, and vice versa, obviates the two potential shortcomings of the application of iconographic analysis to Teotihuacan artworks identified by Kubler. This is owing to the fact that both the icons to be analyzed and the archaeologically documented materializations of cultural activity were produced by those same people in their own time. This study applies iconological theory through the comprehension of one of this city's central religious-political icons and artifact classes, the mirror, not primarily in relation to a body of contemporaneous texts but alongside considerations of key Teotihuacan archaeological contexts that incorporate obsidian, mirrors and mirror iconography, and evidence for expressions of blood sacrifice and the killing of fauna, human and animal. The findings of this analysis indicate that the Panofskian “something else” underlying the second-century codification of the Teotihuacan cult of the mirror related to the initiation of the intensive extraction of obsidian for the purposes of application to warring and other sacralized blood-spilling activities.

Mirrors and obsidian at the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent

The Teotihuacan iconic and archaeological records present compelling evidence that the city's mirror cult alluded in part to the intense reflectivity of obsidian, a significance that was codified at the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent, beginning in the last decades of the second century a.d. (Figure 1). This monument numbered among the costliest structures of Mesoamerican history to build and was erected at around the same time as the Ciudadela, a monumental rectangular compound by which it is enclosed. Initially excavated by Gamio and Marquina between 1918 and 1922 (Gamio Reference Gamio1922:vol. I:LXVI–LXVII, 143–156), the pyramid's expense was owing in part to its facade's incorporation of 300–400 monumental tenoned heads, about two dozen of which survive in situ (Figure 2). These hundreds of monumental sculptures depicted mirrors from which emerged the deity Feathered Serpent, later called Quetzalcoatl among the Nahuatl-speaking Mexica Aztecs. Prior to and during this building's construction, early Teotihuacan elites executed an estimated 200 or more human sacrifices, whom they buried beneath or in immediate proximity to the pyramid (Figure 4; Cabrera Castro Reference Cabrera Castro, Berrin and Pasztory1993; Cabrera Castro et al. Reference Castro, Rubén and Cowgill1991; Dosal Reference Dosal1925:Lamina V; Sugiyama Reference Sugiyama2005). Consideration of the iconic dimensions of this facade's sculptural program may deepen scholarly understanding of the imperial ideology that motivated the conduct of the accompanying sacrifices.

Figure 4. Reconstruction of Grave 5 of the human sacrificial program of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent. Museo Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City. Photo by the author.

Taube demonstrated that slightly more than half of the pyramid facade's tenoned sculptures depicted a Feathered Serpent passing through a mirror. He noted the similarity of the pyramid's design to a more legible image appearing on the Las Colinas bowl, a mold-pressed ceramic work excavated by Linné in Tlaxcala (Figure 5; Linné Reference Linné2003; Taube Reference Taube1992b:55). The relevant passage shows the Feathered Serpent with its tongue extended and curved upward as its neck descends into the face of a circular disk, an oracular “mirror” akin to those appearing often at Teotihuacan in iconographic and archaeological iterations. The serpent's tail emerges from behind the mirror to arc upward and terminate in a geometricized rattle similar in form to those appearing on the facade of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent. Taube argued that the monument comprised what the later Mexica Aztecs called a Tezcacalco, or “House of Mirrors” (Taube Reference Taube1992b). Sahagún recorded details of a specific sort of Tezcacalco, the Tezcacoac Tlacochcalco, translated as, “Spear House of the Mirror Serpent.” The Nahuatl reads, “There was slaying there, only sometimes when there were many captives. And there spears, arrows were guarded. With them there were conquests” (Sahagún Reference Sahagún, Anderson and Dibble1950–1982:II, pp. 183, 193, quoted in Taube Reference Taube1992b:58). Taube argued that the Teotihuacan structure anticipated the later Mexica Aztec edifice, both as a monument adorned with many sculptured mirrors and as the site of a large human sacrificial program.

Figure 5. The Las Colinas bowl. A Feathered Serpent passes through a mirror (right). Photo by the author.

The cited passage's mention of weaponry in relation to mirror serpent symbolism should be underscored. At Teotihuacan, obsidian was that material from which craftspeople formed the overwhelming majority of archaeologically detectable armaments. Cabrera Castro and colleagues (Reference Castro, Rubén and Cowgill1991) and Sugiyama (Reference Sugiyama2005) documented abundant quantities of obsidian blades and projectile points that were deposited among the pyramid's human sacrificial remains. These obsidian weapons’ placement among the burials further indicates the pertinence of the concept of the “House of Mirrors” for the Teotihuacan monument. Additional obsidian of a less explicitly martial character occurs in high quantities on the ground surface near the Ciudadela and in suspected blade core storerooms of the nearby Great Compound (Spence Reference Spence1981:774). The co-occurrence of the mirror icon alongside dense obsidian deposits at the pyramid suggests that the mirror was perceived as conceptually linked in some capacity to obsidian arms at second-century Teotihuacan.

Also present at the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent among its human sacrificial remains were several actual circular archaeological mirrors formed of slate that were found positioned at the lower backs of some victims (Cabrera Castro Reference Cabrera Castro, Berrin and Pasztory1993:Figure 6; Sugiyama Reference Sugiyama2005:159–163). Additionally, more than 200 slate mirror backs have been reported from a man-made cave located beneath the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent (Gazzola et al. Reference Gazzola, Chávez, Calligaro, Gallaga and Blainey2016:114–117). First encountered by Gómez Chávez, this cave is comparable in layout to, if deeper than, a tunnel located beneath the Sun Pyramid that has been known about since 1971 (Gómez Chávez Reference Gómez Chávez, Sugiyama, Kabata, Taniguchi and Niwa2013:11–17, Reference Gómez Chávez and Robb2017; Heyden Reference Heyden1975).

It must be noted that though these ritual reflective surfaces are typically called “mirrors,” they were likely not created primarily to generate a clear looking surface for the purposes of self-viewing. Instead, they served diverse ritual functions, among which self-seeing may have been one facet (Healy and Blainey Reference Healy and Blainey2011; Lunazzi Reference Lunazzi, Gallaga and Blainey2016). The mosaic mirrors that occur frequently at Teotihuacan participated in the pan-Mesoamerican ritual complex that employed reflective surfaces to facilitate supernatural vision and divinatory scrying by elites and to otherwise mark certain persons’ exalted social status (Carlson Reference Carlson and Benson1981:123–125; Coe Reference Coe, Benson and Griffin1988:227–228; Healy and Blainey Reference Healy and Blainey2011:238–241). These objects constituted but one aspect of what Healy and Blainey (Reference Healy and Blainey2011:234) described in the Maya setting as a “reflective surface complex.” Though these disks were certainly prized objects, their desirability stemmed in part from their incorporation of the visual property of reflectivity, which was also to be found in bodies of water, droplets of blood, kernels of corn, quetzal feathers, jade, and obsidian, among other substances regarded by Mesoamericans as potent and sacred.

Most of the published examples of mirrors from the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent were unadorned and small, measuring between 4 and 9 cm in diameter. However, related objects, including many examples recovered abroad, at times featured rich artistic elaboration. Such objects bore martial and lordly connotations in images of Teotihuacanos found beyond central Mexico, such as those worn by the flanking figures portrayed on the sides of Stela 31 from Tikal, Guatemala, which records the suspected regicide by Teotihuacan affiliates of a ruler of that site (Stuart Reference Stuart, Carrasco, Jones and Sessions2000:467–490, Figure 15.2). Indeed, the presence of these mirrors among the burials has been key to the interpretation of the costuming of several of the individuals as that of the Teotihuacan military.

A detail of the facade that has been understudied appears on one of the monument's Feathered Serpent heads. Though the building has been serially attacked and plundered over the nearly two millennia since its construction, one sculpture retains two obsidian disks embedded into the carved sockets of the tenoned head to form the deity's eyes (Figure 2). While there is no conclusive evidence from the pyramid that other tenoned heads of the program incorporated obsidian mirrors for eyes, this possibility is indicated by the sole additional example of programmatic architectural sculpture known to Teotihuacan, the carved pillar reliefs of the patio of the Palace of Quetzalpapalotl, which dates to the later centuries of the city's Early Classic history (Figure 6). The utility of comparing the two structures was first recognized by Sarro (Reference Sarro1991).

Figure 6. (a) The columns of the patio of the Palace of Quetzalpapolotl retain obsidian mirrors in three key details: (1) as the eyes of mythological birds (upper right), (2) as disembodied eye disks (bottom left), and (3) as ornaments on profile mirror bowls, which are compositionally embedded into a portion of a bird's tail (center left; see Figure 6b for a detail of this passage). Photos by the author.

Located a few meters southwest of the Pyramid of the Moon, the Palace of Quetzalpapalotl numbered among Teotihuacan's finest residences or religious and administrative buildings. Its central patio incorporates square-footed columns ornamented on their patio-facing sides with sumptuous, shallow relief carvings that retain several obsidian disk inlays of the same form and iconic significance as those found on the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent. Teotihuacan artists inserted these obsidian mirrors into three passages of the compositions: as the eyes of mythological bird heads, as rows of disembodied eyes that serve as borders, and as ornaments embedded into representations of profile oracular mirrors. The use of obsidian mirrors to describe eyes in these sculptures corroborates Kubler's earlier reading of seriated eyes as Teotihuacan signs for reflectivity.

The depiction of profile mirror bowls in the patio program has been less discussed, perhaps because these iconic mirrors are abstract, conventionalized, and compositionally incorporated into the tails of about half of the birds (Figure 6b). They could therefore be misread as abstracted portions of the tails alone. However, in isolation, they are recognizable as iterations of the extended U-form of profile oracular mirror-bowls, which was initially identified by Taube (Reference Taube and Berlo1992a:189). This style of mirror representation shows a cross-section of a flat, rimmed mirror-bowl disk that is viewed from the side. The artists studded each of these carved depictions of mirrors with three actual obsidian mirrors. In so doing, the sculptors called attention to the reflective quality of obsidian as a material, but also expressed the conceptual linkages between the mirror cult and the reflective glass.

The embedding of the iconic mirrors within the representations of the birds’ tails likely conveys that the mythic birds emerge from the surfaces of the oracular mirrors, much as the Feathered Serpent heads emerge from the mirrors of the facade of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent. The two artworks are therefore related not only insofar as both are comprehensive programs of architectural sculpture, but because they incorporate as key dimensions of their subject matter aspects of the Teotihuacan cult of the mirror and its rich iconography, which portrayed the disks’ face as a portal for supernatural emergences. The comparative evidence from the palace indicates that obsidian disks were the preferred medium for depicting the eyes of supernaturals in architectural sculpture. It is therefore reasonable to deduce that obsidian mirrors formed the eyes of some number of the additional tenoned heads of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent.

When sunlight bounces from the surface of a honed obsidian disk, the material's blackish coloration gives way to glaring white light. Potentially hundreds of mirrors of this sort were originally incorporated into the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent's facade. Towards the end of a clear day, as the sun neared the western horizon, the sculptured heads’ black eyes would have burst aflame with reflected light. The incorporation of these obsidian mirrors into the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent and Quetzalpapalotl sculptural programs indicates that obsidian was especially valued among mirroring substances. The singularity and expense of these architectural contexts suggests that obsidian was imbued with symbolic value by Teotihuacan elites over and above other mirroring substances that were more commonly used to form mirrors at the site, such as the polished pyrite tesserae of wearable oracular disks or the sheets of mica incorporated into sculptures of mirrors found on Teotihuacan incense burners (Figure 7).

Figure 7. A Teotihuacan incense burner, featuring six mirrors inset with reflective mica disks and two circlets. Photo by the author.

Among the most significant developments within Teotihuacan society that occurred contemporaneously with the planning of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent was the advent of substantially increased obsidian mining, importation, and manufacturing, which was first documented by the Teotihuacan Mapping Project (TMP; R. Millon Reference Millon1973b:57; Spence Reference Spence1981:781). The mirror icon, as prominently recorded on the facade of the pyramid, attained preeminence as a hallmark of the Teotihuacan lifeway over the same century that obsidian began to accumulate in the city's archaeological record, with a prevalence and density of distribution found nowhere else in Mesoamerica (Carballo Reference Carballo2007; Hirth et al. Reference Hirth, Carballo, Dennison, Carr, Imfeld and Dyrdahl2019; R. Millon Reference Millon1973b; Pastrana and Dominguez Reference Pastrana and Domínguez2009; Spence Reference Spence1981, Reference Spence and Hirth1984, Reference Spence, de Tapia and Rattray1987; cf. Clark Reference Clark and Barry1986). Scholars such as Pastrana and Athie (Reference Pastrana, Athie, Carballo and Levine2014) have established that later central Mexicans regarded obsidian as a symbolically potent material that was associated with mirrors and deified, in part, because of its unique material properties. Levine (Reference Levine, Carballo and Levine2014) has argued that the voluminous importation and preferential selection of certain obsidian sources at Postclassic Tutupec, Oaxaca, may have been motivated by a combination of trade, political strategy, and the arming of the Tutupec military. He linked developments in the site's obsidian procurement strategies to its imperial ambitions, dynamics that likely had earlier precedents at Teotihuacan.

Because of their novelty, the voluminous scale of Teotihuacan's obsidian exploitation regime and modified mirror cult would have been recognizable to second- through third-century Mesoamericans as material and ideational manifestations of what Pasztory (Reference Pasztory1997) characterized as the Teotihuacan “experiment in living,” that set of unique traits that distinguished Teotihuacan society within the broader Mesoamerican tradition. Over the second century, a greater number of individuals in Teotihuacan society came into more frequent contact with a material, obsidian, that had as a distinguishing physical attribute the property of returning light and, under certain conditions, replicated and inverted images. Increased interactions with obsidian likely helped to focus Teotihuacanos’ collective attention on the optical phenomenon of mirroring. When their elites, in the latter half of the second century, directed the building of hundreds of monumental icons of mirrors, they chose in some instances to incorporate the actual property of mirroring into those icons by embedding them with obsidian disks. The contemporaneity of these two substantial developments within the Teotihuacan lifeway suggest that one “underlying principle” of the codification of the Teotihuacan mirror icon was the new intensity of the city's residents’ interaction with the material of obsidian. Obsidian shaped into weaponry also figured into the actualization of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent's human sacrificial plan, discussed below.

Antecedents for the Teotihuacan cult of the mirror

The Teotihuacan builders of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent did not invent their mirror cult wholly without precedent, but absorbed and meaningfully modified a long-extant tradition that already bore religious and political connotations. Mesoamerican engagements with transportable ritual mirrors formed of stone date to the Middle Formative period (approximately 1500–300 b.c.). Carlson (Reference Carlson and Benson1981) catalogued 24 Formative Olmec monolithic mirrors produced from a range of iron ores. Olmec mirrors were concave and likely formed through a grinding and polishing method. Heizer and Gullberg (Reference Heizer, Gullberg and Benson1981:109–110) excavated a pair of offerings incorporating concave mirrors at La Venta, Tabasco. Each incorporated a pair of drill holes, suggesting that in their pre-interment lives, the reflective stones were perhaps worn as pectorals. Artists depicted such chest ornaments both in Olmec monumental sculptures and as inlays in the chests of smaller objects, including on a jade figurine, 8 cm tall, excavated from a tomb in La Venta's Mound A-2 (Figure 8; Carlson Reference Carlson and Benson1981:141; Heizer and Gullberg Reference Heizer, Gullberg and Benson1981:112).

Figure 8. Olmec jade figurine with inlaid mirror disk in chest, Mound A-2, La Venta, Tabasco. Photo by the author.

A fine Formative period pyrite mosaic mirror that may date to as early as 1000 b.c. was excavated in central Mexico at the site of Las Bocas in western Puebla (Marshack Reference Marshack and Aveni1975). More recently, Oliveros (Reference Oliveros2004) documented 17 such objects within a mortuary context at El Opeño, Michoacan, while Mountjoy (Reference Mountjoy, Gallaga and Blainey2016) reported 49 Formative iron pyrite objects from Mascota, Jalisco. These artifacts show that the display and interment of reflective stones as markers of elite status were Mesoamerican behaviors of deep antiquity.

Iconic co-occurrences of mirrors and obsidian

Additional iconographic articulations of the Teotihuacan mirror cult's associations with obsidian appear in the city's corpus of murals. Painters completed several depictions indicative of the mirror icon's relation to obsidian at the White Patio of the Atetelco apartment compound. In one example, executed around the perimeters of the portal of Portico 3, viewers see circular mirrors ringed by borders formed of trapezoids from the centers of which spring two obsidian knives of the sort classified by Sugiyama as Type B hooked bifacials (Figure 9; Sugiyama Reference Sugiyama2005:Figure 56). The painted knives bear the characteristic zigzagging lines that identify their surfaces as radiant. The placement of the hooked obsidian knives (which have archaeological counterparts at Teotihuacan) within the mirrors’ frames emphasizes the reflectivity common to both obsidian and mirrors through an act of visual substitution—that is, obsidian weapons are shown as being visually analogous to oracular mirrors because of their mutual reflectivity.

Figure 9. Portico 3 of the White Patio, Atetelco Apartment Compound. Hooked obsidian blades spring from oracular mirrors (right); a dancing warrior priest holds a hooked obsidian knife that spears a bloody heart (center). Photo by the author.

A good number of symbolic resonances for ritual mirrors have been identified by scholars of Mesoamerica, including their associations with rulership, supernatural vision, fortune-telling, fire and ignition, the sun, water, and the understanding of their surfaces as sites of emergence (Blainey Reference Blainey2007, Reference Blainey, Gallaga and Blainey2016; Carlson Reference Carlson and Benson1981; Coe Reference Coe, Benson and Griffin1988; Healy and Blainey Reference Healy and Blainey2011; Kovacevich Reference Kovacevich, Gallaga and Blainey2016; Lunazzi Reference Lunazzi, Gallaga and Blainey2016; Taube Reference Taube1983, Reference Taube and Berlo1992a). Not all of these associations have been as well documented at Teotihuacan as in other contexts, but they are not necessarily exclusive of either one another or of the symbolic dimensions of the Teotihuacan mirror cult and its icons as analyzed here. The painters’ placement of these obsidian knife mirrors around the edges of a doorway may allude to the widely held Mesoamerican conception of mirrors as cave-like passageways or portals between quotidian and supernatural realms. A comparable scene showing the conjunction of a mirror with hooked obsidian knives was painted at Portico 2 of Platform 15, located immediately west of the Avenue of the Dead, the city's primary thoroughfare. However, in this example, the Teotihuacan Storm God emerges from the center of the mirror and hooked obsidian knives instead form the mirror's outer perimeter (Miller Reference Miller1973:Figure 85).

An additional compositional format for the co-occurrence of mirror and obsidian symbols features a figure who wears or carries mirrors as part of their costuming, while also clutching or wearing obsidian weapons, such as hooked knives or projectile points. Human figures of this sort appear on the lower walls of the White Patio's Portico 3 on either side of the portal (Figure 9). The figures, who are viewed in profile, hold in one hand a cluster of atlatl darts tipped with obsidian projectile points, and in their other hand lift a hooked obsidian knife that spears an extracted heart.

Portrayals of deities and deity impersonators also feature the co-occurrence of obsidian weaponry and mirrors. A mural from the Tepantitla apartment compound shows a deity/impersonator wearing a complex headdress, at the center of which appears a prominent rimmed mirror, its upper half covered by a row of three disembodied eyes connoting reflectivity (Figure 10). Above these signs for brightness appear three forms known as trilobes, depictions of blood droplets upon the face of the mirror, which are mediated from its face by a sign known as the “Trapeze and Ray” glyph (also called the “Year Sign”). Von Winning (Reference von Winning1982) established that trilobes often appeared at Teotihuacan in contexts related to human sacrifice, and thus commonly denoted blood (cited in Heyden Reference Heyden and Boone1987:121–124). While the term “trilobe” is a misnomer (because more or fewer droplets may be shown), it will be utilized here, owing to its customary usage in the literature. Two additional mirrors, these knotted, appear on each of the being's shoulders. An elongated U shape beneath the deity/impersonator represents a mirror in profile view (Taube Reference Taube and Berlo1992a:189), marked with serrated reflectivity markings. The deity/impersonator clutches in their left hand a pair of obsidian darts. This hand is the figure's sole anthropomorphic aspect, which otherwise consists of a dense constellation of costuming elements. Much like the mirror's face, the obsidian darts here mediate between the viewer's perception of the supernatural and quotidian realms. On the same wall above these frontal deity/impersonator figures appear depictions of warriors carrying obsidian spears as they emerge from mirrors.

Figure 10. Tepantitla apartment compound. A deity or deity impersonator appears upon a mirror bowl marked with zigzags denoting obsidian. A cluster of obsidian spears is held in the extended right hand. At the center of the headdress the painter shows a mirror disk, atop which are superimposed eyes, a sign for reflectivity, and trilobes of blood. Photo by the author.

Archaeological co-occurrences of obsidian and archaeological mirrors

As noted above, hundreds of transportable mirrors are known from Teotihuacan in the form of slate disks encrusted with pyrite. In addition to the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent objects, several mirror disks have been archaeologically recovered from the city's two largest civic ceremonial structures, the Pyramids of the Moon and Sun. Other instances have occasionally been recovered from domestic settings (Heyden Reference Heyden1975:142; Rubín de la Borbolla Reference Rubín de la Borbolla1947; Seler Reference Seler1902–1923:431; Turner Reference Turner and Berlo1992:103). The most typical sort of mirror consisted of a hard backing, commonly formed of slate, though other stones and earthenware were sometimes used (Figures 3a and 3b). A rarer form of mirror consisted of unadorned obsidian disks, like those found on the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent and in the Palace of Quetzalpapalotl patio. To one face of the former type, artists adhered carefully fitted pyrite tesserae that they polished to create a brilliant surface, while the alternate face was occasionally covered with complex imagery that was carved, incised, or painted onto stucco. On the formerly reflective side of these disks, viewers today most often find the rust-like yellow-red powder called limonite that is left by corroded pyrite and other iron ores (Lelgemann Reference Lelgemann, Gallaga and Blainey2016:165).

Later known among the Mexica Aztecs as tezcacuitlapilli—from texcatl, “mirror,” and cuitlapilli, “tail” (Villa-Córdoba et al. Reference Villa-Córdoba, López-Palacios, Jiménez-Reyes and Tenorio2012)—these works exhibited some degree of Teotihuacan formal innovation, for they were neither concave, nor formed from single stones, as had been their Olmec predecessors; and unlike the Formative examples from Puebla and western Mexico mentioned above, the Teotihuacan mirrors employed polygonal rather than rectangular tesserae. They also differed through their wear on the lower back, on the shoulders, and in headdresses, as opposed to primarily on the chest. Given that they became key attributes of warrior costuming, and given that the lower back is difficult to guard for oneself, this positioning may have been apotropaic.

A cache excavated by Carballo (Reference Carballo, Carballo and Levine2014) at the site of La Laguna, Tlaxcala that dates to the middle second century features the co-occurrence of 15 obsidian implements layered atop five slate disks and one rectangular slate pendant. The slate objects were all covered with the powdered residues of oxidized pyrite. Two of the obsidian pieces (Carballo Reference Carballo, Carballo and Levine2014:Figure 7.6) took the form of zoomorphic eccentrics evocative of centipedes, creatures noted in later ethnohistorical sources for their sharp, painful pincers, capable of drawing blood. The archaeologist argued that the cache was formed as part of a termination ritual that marked the depopulation of La Laguna in favor of resettlement at the growing urban centers of Teotihuacan and Cholula, Puebla (Carballo Reference Carballo, Carballo and Levine2014:215). These findings indicate that the mutual appearance of obsidian implements, slate-backed mirrors, and allusions to the drawing of blood figured in the differentiation of the Teotihuacan self-conception from contemporaneous regional identities by the middle second century.

Pareyon-Moreno reported more than 250 disks or fragments thereof from a collection of central Mexican objects that were typologically classified as Teotihuacan mirrors (cited in Villa-Córdoba et al. Reference Villa-Córdoba, López-Palacios, Jiménez-Reyes and Tenorio2012). Though this figure undercounts the total number of Teotihuacan mirror backs, it is the largest sum of such disks known from a single Mesoamerican site. While most of Pareyon-Moreno's sample lacks historical context, one of these disks came from the cave beneath the Pyramid of the Sun (see Heyden Reference Heyden1975:131, Figure 2). The disk shows a standing, full-body male, in profile, wearing a complex headdress and loincloth, and facing left. This design bears some stylistic resemblance to artworks from Classic period Veracruz. Heyden suspected that this and another disk found at the Sun Pyramid may have been introduced to the tunnel long after its construction.

Sugiyama and colleagues (Reference Sugiyama, Sugiyama and Sarabia G.2013:408, 417) more recently excavated several additional complete or partial disks under the Sun Pyramid. These disks ranged in size from about 10 to 45 cm in diameter, the latter being the largest specimen yet discovered in situ at Teotihuacan. The recovery of three disks at the bedrock level from the intact cache of Offering 2 indicates that several disks were deposited in the structure at the time of its construction around a.d. 150–250 (Sugiyama et al. Reference Sugiyama, Sugiyama and Sarabia G.2013:Table 3; cf. Sload Reference Sload2015). Also present in the cache were abundant obsidian weapons, including prismatic blades and projectiles, 11 ceramic Storm God vessels, a whole eagle, and the decapitated heads of a puma, a wolf, and a hawk. This offering demonstrates that early Teotihuacanos observed the mirroring surfaces complex alongside the spilling of blood, here faunal, and in direct association with obsidian implements appropriate for cutting and piercing. It seems possible that the obsidian knives and mirrors were covered with the spilled blood of the decapitated animals during the offering's formation. Future testing for hemoglobin residues, a more archaeological approach that is beyond the scope of this iconological analysis, could help to clarify this potentiality. Burial 2 of the Pyramid of the Moon (Sugiyama and López Luján Reference Sugiyama and Luján2007), discussed below, incorporates a comparable array of symbolic elements.

A few archaeological mirrors were scientifically excavated from Teotihuacan residential contexts. Linné (Reference Linné2003:150–151) recovered the remains of a body, near the skull of which had been placed two obsidian disks. As noted above, obsidian disks are not numerically salient in the city's archaeological record; their cultural significance lies in their application to elite use contexts. Linné documented five additional obsidian disks of this type, along with one slate mirror back, in this same excavation (Linné Reference Linné2003:64–65).

More than 500 Teotihuacan-style mirror backs have been recovered beyond the city (Blainey Reference Blainey2007), including an example suspected to have originated in the Escuintla Department of Guatemala, where great quantities of Teotihuacan-influenced artworks have been reported (Figure 3b; Berlo Reference Berlo1980; Chinchilla Mazariegos Reference Chinchilla Mazariegos2016; Hellmuth Reference Hellmuth1975; Young-Sánchez Reference Young-Sánchez1990). The compositional complexity of the illustrated example, which is stylistically faithful to Teotihuacan canons, shows the importance of these disks as conveyors of the city's cultural precedents from the Ciudadela to outlying regions.

Iconological theory would expect that the meaningfulness of obsidian's relation to the Teotihuacan mirror icon would appear in other dimensions of the society's lifeway. Consideration of the manufacturing context and processes of ritual transportable mirrors is of interest in this respect. The TMP reported a high concentration of pyrite and slate, including many broken slate disks, from a test excavation (TE 5; 6G:N5W1) in a precinct abutting the western side of the Pyramid of the Moon (Turner Reference Turner and Berlo1992:103). These are the key materials required to produce a pyrite encrusted mirror (Gallaga Reference Gallaga, Gallaga and Blainey2016; Melgar et al. Reference Melgar, Gallaga, Solis, Gallaga and Blainey2016). Turner observed that in contrast to the diverse lapidary assemblage found in Teotihuacan's “Lapidary Barrio,” only those materials needed for the manufacture of pyrite disks appeared in this area. She therefore suspected that it may have functioned as a mirror production workshop, controlled by agents of the Teotihuacan state, though further excavation would be required to verify this proposal (Gazzola Reference Gazzola and Calleja2010). More recently, Carballo (Reference Carballo2007) demonstrated more conclusively that this precinct was the site of an obsidian workshop that specialized in weapons manufacturing. The high concentration of pyrite and slate, some of it in disk form, found in proximate spatial relation to an obsidian workshop, lends some credence to Turner's hypothesis. This adjacency of mirror fragment concentrations to a verified obsidian workshop may serve as indication that the mirror cult and obsidian arms were mutually produced within a shared manufacturing context, particularly when those manufacturing activities were overseen by societal elites with links to the state.

This proximity was likely the result of practicality, to some extent, as the lithic working skillsets required to produce the two object types overlapped (Melgar et al. Reference Melgar, Gallaga, Solis, Gallaga and Blainey2016). What is more, the analyses of Melgar and colleagues (Reference Melgar, Gallaga, Solis, Gallaga and Blainey2016:Figure 2.5d) and Gallaga (Reference Gallaga, Gallaga and Blainey2016), applying experimental archaeology, optic microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy techniques, indicate that obsidian blades or flakes were likely used to cut the meticulously fitted and polished pyrite tesserae that formed the resplendent faces of Teotihuacan slate-backed mirrors. Nevertheless, Teotihuacan artisans and artists would have observed the frequent contact of obsidian with the gleaming pyrite from which they formed mirror faces.

This evidence demonstrates that by the late second century, Teotihuacanos began to produce pyrite-encrusted plaques and other oracular mirrors in significant numbers. Ritual mirrors were also apparently accessible to some segment of the city's typical residents. When these objects were deposited within ritual contexts, these offerings were sometimes made as buildings were terminated or new construction begun. These mirrors were regularly placed underneath obsidian objects appropriate for cutting, and in association with actual killed beings or allusions to the act of drawing blood.

Iconographic and archaeological co-occurrences of blood and obsidian/mirrors

The Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent's placement of strong emphasis on mirror iconography occurred in concert with the deposition of a large human sacrificial program (Figure 4). Around 200 sacrificed persons are estimated to have been placed beneath or alongside the pyramid, and 50 or so were buried in an irrigation system that Teotihuacanos terminated prior to the construction of the Ciudadela (Gómez Chávez Reference Gómez Chávez, Sugiyama, Kabata, Taniguchi and Niwa2013:12; Sugiyama Reference Sugiyama2005). The earliest known Mesoamerican sacrifice to incorporate 200 or more individuals, it also numbered among Mesoamerica's most geographically diverse burial programs. Scholars, including Serrano Sánchez and colleagues (Reference Serrano Sánchez, Merlín and Velázquez1997), White and colleagues (Reference White, Spence, Longstaffe, Stuart-Williams and Law2002), and Sugiyama (Reference Sugiyama2005), have found that many of the remains, particularly those concentrated near the center of the monument, exhibit osteological traits indicative of prior extended residence abroad. The extra-regional origins of many of these sacrifices support the view that the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent manifested a martially expansionist and imperialist state ideology. In addition to the complete skeletons, who might be regarded as the program's “primary” sacrifices, Teotihuacanos included four necklaces formed of 36 human jaw bones that were worn by certain burials (Spence et al. Reference Spence, White, Longstaffe and Law2004). These necklaces demonstrate that at least 36 bodies were partially disarticulated to form the complex. While the timing of these dismemberments cannot be precisely placed, they suggest that quantities of blood were spilled prior to the formation of the offering.

By contrast, the specific means through which the primary sacrifices of the program died is not clearly indicated by osteological traits (Sugiyama Reference Sugiyama2005). Rather, the binding, in many cases, of their hands behind their backs, at times in association with fragmentary surviving rope fibers, suggests an involuntary and sacrificial manner of death. In his seminal study of the monument, Sugiyama argued that clues to the cause of death come from the program's accompanying offerings. He made particular note of the deposition of thousands of obsidian blades, projectile points, hooked bifacials, and eccentrics placed over and in association with the burials prior to their interment (Sugiyama Reference Sugiyama2005:124–140). Among these were numerous obsidian objects appropriate for bloodletting and other rites of blood spilling, including human sacrifice (Sugiyama Reference Sugiyama2005:131–135; see also Cabrera Castro et al. Reference Castro, Rubén and Cowgill1991:Figure 8). The prominence of obsidian in Teotihuacan's archaeological record would indicate that bloodletting was carried out with some regularity using this medium at Teotihuacan. The presence of these implements suggested to Sugiyama that bloodletting was at play in the program's formation. It is perhaps notable that the later Mexica Aztecs related that the mandate to spill blood through sacrificial rites was established by the god-man Quetzalcoatl, the Nahuatl name for Feathered Serpent (Klein Reference Klein and Boone1987:350–351). There is therefore ethnohistorical support for the association of the Feathered Serpent with the impetus for blood spilling.

An investigation by Walton (Reference Walton2021) provides the strongest evidence for the use of obsidian implements in bloodletting rituals at Teotihuacan. Operation 18 of the Proyecto Arqueológico Tlajinga Teotihuacan recovered four bloodletters from the Tlajinga District located near the southern terminus of the Avenue of the Dead. Applying the method of high-magnification use-wear analysis, Walton documented surface modifications that accrued to the obsidian objects over their use lives. He also applied the approach of experimental archaeology, which allowed him to differentiate various use-wear markings appearing on obsidian cutting implements. A total of 29 different materials were cut by the author using Teotihuacan-style obsidian replicas. He later compared changes to the implements caused by these piercing activities to Teotihuacan archaeological objects. The physical characteristics of the use-wear patterns of the archaeologically excavated obsidian objects most closely resembled those appearing on Teotihuacan-style obsidian reproductions that the author used to puncture pig skin, which simulated the act of bloodletting (Walton Reference Walton2021:290). Walton also visually identified blood adhered to the archaeological perforators, which helped to confirm their use in bloodletting. The four archaeological implements were excavated from the central patio of an apartment compound alongside an additional obsidian blade, 12.5 cm long, and a neonate burial positioned in a complete ceramic dish. Walton's findings indicate that obsidian implements were used in rites of blood sacrifice and that these implements were associated with human mortality.

Sugiyama argued that the distribution pattern found among the obsidian offerings of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent's sacrificial program, among which were intermixed pieces of greenstone, likely resulted from their deposition via a “scattering” motion, like that through which a farmer might distribute seeds or nurture them by spilling handfuls of water. Scattering hands number among the most common of motifs in Teotihuacan imagery. The scattering theme also appears in Maya dynastic artworks, where, as shown by Stuart (Reference Stuart1984), the act portrayed bloodletting and bore connotations of the sowing of seeds (Figure 11a). Throughout their history, Mesoamericans ritually spilled blood to propitiate the gods, supplicate for rain, and ensure rich agricultural harvests. Millon (Reference Millon and Berrin1988a) argued that bloodletting likely also carried these resonances at Teotihuacan.

Figure 11. (a) A Maya ruler “scatters,” Maya sculptor(s), Stela 22, Tikal, Guatemala. (b) A “scattering” elite wears a lower-back mirror between rows of bloodied maguey spines and beneath a bicephalic serpent, Tlacuilopaxco Apartment Compound. (c) A row of priestly elites “scatter” in procession, Tepantitla Apartment Compound; reflectivity is indicated by the eye sign at the figures' middle torsos. (d) A deity or deity impersonator scatters jades while emerging from a mirror and wearing a headdress bearing a mirror and blood allusions, Tetitla Apartment Compound. (e) Disembodied hands wearing a headdress “scatter” red droplets onto a fringed disk with diagonal stripes, a probable mirror. A blue trilobe speared on a “trapeze and ray” sign appears above another fringed mirror in the upper right of the headdress, Tetitla Apartment Compound. Photos by the author.

The most explicit portrayal of bloodletting from the city is thought to have been originally painted on the walls of the Tlacuilopaxco apartment compound, located east of the Pyramid of the Moon. The mural shows scattering figures beneath bicephalic serpents, not unlike those occurring in Maya dynastic bloodletting scenes (Figure 11b), suggesting that the Maya and Teotihuacan scattering motions held cognate meanings. The figures wear the common costuming attribute of ritual mirrors at their lower backs. Here, bloodletting, depicted as the scattering motion, has apparently been carried out using maguey spines, for these appear on either side of the figures. The scattering persons also hold satchels in the form of serpent rattles and wear feathered animal headdresses, traits that call to mind aspects of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent facade. More commonly, priestly elites, who wear elaborate costumes incorporating mirrors or reflectivity signs at the lower back, scatter droplets from their hands without explicit depictions of a piercing instrument (Figure 11c).

Additionally, portrayals of deities at times drop jades—which Mesoamericans held among the greatest of precious objects—from scattering hands as they emerge from mirrors. Such a scene occurs at the Tetitla apartment compound (Figure 11d), depicting a deity/impersonator that emerges from a mirror, dropping jades from outspread hands. On the deity's head appears a complex headdress featuring a squarish mirror, from which projects towards the viewer the head of a raptorial bird that grasps an insect spine like that of a scorpion or centipede. On either side of the bird's head appear coursing red and blue tubes that at once evoke extracted intestines and currents of blood mixed with water. Above these coursing forms appear yellow hooks topped with blue trilobes, a conjunction that but for the elements’ jewel-like pigmentations would be legible as hooked knives splattered with blood. Zigzags signifying radiance bound the perimeter of the headdress. Though less literal than the Tlacuilopaxco murals, the Tetitla painting shows the scattering motion in a compositional setting shared with reflectivity signs and allusions to bloodletting and sacrifice.

A scene from an adjoining room of the Tetitla compound shows disembodied hands dropping darker red circular objects through streams of pinkish red onto the surface of a fringed disk, an oracular mirror streaked with light (Figure 11e). A headdress “worn” by the mirror and scattering hands features on its right side another mirror, above and below which are shown rows of droplets possibly signifying blood, water, or both. This painting indicates that at Teotihuacan oracular mirrors may, at times, have served as receptacles for droplets of blood produced during bloodletting events. Alternatively, this painting could have been metaphorical, relating that the mirror-like face of obsidian objects was at times covered with blood. The Tetitla paintings occur in and near the apartment's patio. Along with the Tlajinga cache and the murals of the White Patio, there are the outlines of a pattern linking domestic patios to bloodletting.

Teotihuacan artists completed several depictions of obsidian implements piercing hearts or covered by trilobes connoting blood (Figures 9 and 12a–12b; Carballo Reference Carballo2007:182–186; Sugiyama Reference Sugiyama2005:Figure 58). The frequency of this imagery suggests that the meeting of blood and obsidian in blood-spilling rites loomed large in the Teotihuacan imaginary and may well have been commonplace and consequential in the city's civic ceremonial life.

Figure 12. (a) A striding figure holds a bloody heart on an obsidian blade in their right hand and an obsidian spear point in their left. (b) A faunal deity wears a headdress of three obsidian spears with droplets, possibly water or blood. Photos by the author.

The density of water iconography appearing on the facade of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent might also indicate that bloodletting activities occurred there. The facade features conch and mollusk shells and, more subtly, the borders of the inset panels of its tableros incorporate scalloped borders that may allude to lapping waves. The Feathered Serpent, depicted with water gushing from its mouth in later Teotihuacan artworks, was a giver of water in the city. It is therefore notable that the Mexica Aztecs of later central Mexico at times supplicated for water through the conduct of human sacrifices that emphasized the spilling of blood. Following the principles of sympathetic magic, the flow of blood served as earthly purchase for rain, which was given by the gods in exchange.

Bloodletting directed towards water procurement was at times carried out in later central Mexico via the cutting of sacrifices’ throats at the soft tissue of the jugular vein. For example, Toribio de Benavente (or Motolinia) recorded of a ritual of child sacrifice dedicated to “el dios del agua” that, “They did not take out the hearts of these innocent children but slit their throats” (Benavente Reference Benavente and O'Gorman1969:35; “A estos niños inocentes no les sacaban el corazón, sino degollábanlos;” all translations from original Spanish by the author). This mode of sacrifice apparently occurred with some frequency, for Durán recorded of an alternate ritual:

Durán related of another event that the slit throat of a human sacrifice “bathed everything in blood” (Durán Reference Durán and Garibay1967:147; “se bañaba todo en sangre”). It must be stipulated both that these textually recorded events occurred more than a millennium after the dedication of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent, and that this later culture venerated Teotihuacan as an ancestral tradition (Boone Reference Boone, Carrasco, Jones and Sessions2000) from whom they had inherited substantial portions of their worldview. Of interest for consideration of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent sacrificial program, this common mode of sacrifice only rarely left osteological markings, which are absent on the remains (Román Berrelleza Reference Román Berrelleza and Boone1987:139). While these data indicate bloodletting as a candidate of interest for the formation of the sacrificial program, it is not yet possible to determine the extent to which the spilling of blood factored into this program's formation. If the individuals were indeed executed at the pyramid itself and using the associated obsidian objects, future hemoglobin testing of the soils and obsidian implements surrounding the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent remains may clarify these questions. For present considerations, it is sufficient to note that blood-spilling rituals were indicated by aspects of the monument's conception, the realization of which involved the intentional termination of hundreds of human lives. These blood-spilling allusions were advanced within a context rich with obsidian implements, mirror iconography, and many actual mirrors, implying the significance of their co-occurrence.

There is evidence that Teotihuacan artisans at times used the materials of obsidian and slate, of interest because used to form most mirror backs, to portray or evoke acts of blood sacrifice. Most explicitly, numerous eccentric obsidian objects from the city depict a variant, sculptural form of the trilobe design (e.g., Figure 13 top right; Stocker and Spence Reference Stocker and Spence1973). In these works, Teotihuacanos possibly expressed an interest in the reciprocal relationship between blood and obsidian/mirrors in their cosmovisión ; a mirroring substance became blood, and blood a mirroring substance. Relatedly, Taube discussed slate objects carved in the form of droplets and painted red on one side (Taube Reference Taube1983:119). He suspected that these were perhaps cast—one might say “scattered”—in rituals of prognostication. These objects possibly alluded to the meeting of blood and a stone associated with mirrors.

Figure 13. Assorted Teotihuacan obsidian objects: (left and bottom right) spear points; (center) a human figurine; (top right) a trilobe. Photo by the author.

A common type of obsidian eccentric often found in deposits that shows a human torso with stubbed extremities may likewise have used obsidian to imply blood spilling (Figure 13 center). Carballo noted the similarity of these figurines to the posture of the human sacrificial remains from the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent, which were found bound with their arms behind their backs (Carballo Reference Carballo2007:186). These obsidian works may therefore depict the silhouette of a captive human body as it appeared just before sacrifice. This understanding is supported by Sugiyama and López Luján's recovery of several figurines of this type from Burial 2 of the Moon Pyramid (approximately a.d. 200–300), which also incorporated a bound and sacrificed individual foreign to central Mexico and pyrite mirror disks atop which were layered obsidian blades (Sugiyama and López Luján Reference Sugiyama and Luján2007:129). In this burial, each figurine was found with an obsidian knife carefully pointed towards its head as though poised to lance the depicted upper body. Here, the individual artworks were situated within a depository setting whose spatial arrangement possibly connoted for its designers the act of slicing flesh with an obsidian knife. The human remains in this deposit resemble those of the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent sacrifices insofar as the hands were bound behind the individual's back and the victim likely lived for some time beyond the city. A shared means of execution was possibly applied during the two sacrificial acts.

A succinct depiction of the configuration of potent signs and substances—obsidian, the mirror, and blood—identified by this study appeared at later Tula, the most prominent city-state of Early Postclassic (approximately a.d. 900–1200) central Mexico, and one of Teotihuacan's inheritors. Several sculptures from Tula's Pyramid B, the second largest pyramid of that site (López Luján et al. Reference López Luján, Cobean and Mastache1995), show smoking mirror, blood, and obsidian spear compounds (Figure 14). An oval possibly showing a human heart set within a trilobe sits atop the intersection of three bundles of obsidian-darted spears. These elements are superimposed atop a mirror-bowl seen in profile. Viewers find on the rim of the bowl profile earspools (Taube Reference Taube and Berlo1992a:175–176) from which rise whisps of smoke, potentially marking it as a “smoking mirror” of obsidian. The layered elements of this sign cluster are akin to those of elite offerings known from earlier Teotihuacan, such as the Sun Pyramid's Offering 2 and the Moon Pyramid's Burial 2, which likewise incorporated mirror disks placed underneath numerous obsidian blades and in relation to killed beings. The Burial 2 sacrifices included the one human already mentioned, as well as several eagles, three rattlesnakes, two pumas, and one wolf (Sugiyama and, López Luján Reference Sugiyama and Luján2007:127–130). Archaeologists suspect that the pumas and wolf may have been buried alive, though the other sacrifices more probably perished from bloodletting.

Figure 14. A smoking mirror bowl, obsidian spear, and bloody heart trilobe compound from Pyramid B, Tula, Hidalgo. Redrawn from López Luján and colleagues (Reference López Luján, Cobean and Mastache1995:Figure 141:3).

Contextualizing the Teotihuacan mirroring surfaces complex