Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:29:42.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MARKET DEVELOPMENT AND POTTERY EXCHANGE UNDER AZTEC AND SPANISH RULE IN CERRO PORTEZUELO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2013

Christopher P. Garraty
Christopher P. Garraty*
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, P.O. Box 2140, Sacaton, Arizona 85247
*
E-mail correspondence to: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) of Middle and Late Postclassic and Early Colonial period decorated and plain ware ceramic sherds from Brainerd's excavation collections at Cerro Portezuelo highlight diachronic changes in commercial pottery exchange prior to and during the Aztec empire and during the first century of Spanish colonial rule. The INAA results show that before the Aztec empire (Middle Postclassic period; a.d. 1150–1350), most pottery used at Cerro Portezuelo was made locally or imported from various sources in the southern Basin of Mexico. After the empire formed (Late Postclassic period; a.d. 1350–1521), local pottery exchange continued, but Tenochtitlan became the primary source of imported pottery in Cerro Portezuelo, despite its location within Texcoco's domain, which was likely attributable to Tenochtitlan merchants' successful exploitation of lake trafficking. After the Spanish Conquest (Early Colonial period; a.d. 1521–1625), Texcoco became the principal supplier of pottery in Cerro Portezuelo. Tenochtitlan persisted as a commercial exporter of pottery after the conquest but on a smaller scale, probably because of the degradation and infilling of the lakes, especially Lake Texcoco.

Type
Special Section: Recent Research at Cerro Portezuelo
Information
Ancient Mesoamerica , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , Spring 2013 , pp. 151 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alva Ixtlilxochitl, Fernando de 1975–1977 Obras Historicas. 2 vols. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E., Neff, Hector, and Bishop, Ronald L. 1991 Aspects of Ceramic Compositional Modeling. American Anthropologist 93:70–90.Google Scholar
Bishop, Ronald L. 1992 Comment on Section III: Applications. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Paste in Archaeology, edited by Neff, Hector, pp. 287–289. Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E. 1972 Prehispanic Settlement Patterns of the Ixtapalapa Penninsula Region, Mexico. Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 6. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E. 1996a A Consideration of Causality in the Growth of Empire: A Comparative Perspective. In Aztec Imperial Strategies, edited by Frances F., Berdan, Blanton, Richard E., Boone, Elizabeth Hill, Hodge, Mary G., Smith, Michael E., and Umberger, Emily, pp. 219–227. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E. 1996b The Basin of Mexico Market System and the Growth of Empire. In Aztec Imperial Strategies, edited by Berdan, Frances F., Blanton, Richard E., Boone, Elizabeth Hill, Hodge, Mary G., Smith, Michael E., and Umberger, Emily, pp. 47–84. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E., and Hodge, Mary G. 1996 Data on Market Activities and Production Specializations of Tlatoani Centers. In Aztec Imperial Strategies, edited by Berdan, Frances F., Blanton, Richard E., Boone, Elizabeth Hill, Hodge, Mary G., Smith, Michael E., and Umberger, Emily, pp. 243–246. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Branstetter-Hardesty, Barbara 1978 The Ceramics of Cerro Portezuelo, Mexico: An Industry in Transition. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Brenner, Anita 1931 The Influence of Technique on the Decorative Style in the Domestic Pottery of Culhuacan. Contributions to Archaeology, Vol. 13. Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. 1980 Specialization, Market Exchange, and the Aztec State: A View from Huexotla. American Anthropologist 21:459–478.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. 1983 Aztec State Making: Ecology, Structure, and the Origin of the State. American Anthropologist 85:261–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. 2004 Meaning by Design: Ceramics, Feasting, and Figured Worlds in Postclassic Mexico. In Mesoamerican Archaeology: Theory and Practice, edited by Hendon, Julia A. and Joyce, Rosemary A., pp. 239–264. Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology No. 1. Blackwell, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. 2005 Ceramic Chronology at Xaltocan. In Production and Power at Postclassic Xaltocan, edited by Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., pp. 117–152. University of Pittsburgh Department of Anthropology and Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Pittsburgh and Mexico City.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro 1999 The Tenochca Empire of Ancient Mexico: The Triple Alliance of Tenochtitlan, Tetzcoco, and Tlacopan. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Charlton, Thomas H. 1968 Post-Conquest Aztec Ceramics: Implications for Archaeological Interpretation. The Florida Anthropologist 21:96–101.Google Scholar
Charlton, Thomas H. 1972 Population Trends in the Teotihuacan Valley, a.d. 1400–1969. World Archaeology 4:106–123.Google Scholar
Charlton, Thomas H. 1996 Early Colonial Period Ceramics: Decorated Red Ware and Orange Ware Types of the Rural Otumba Aztec Ceramic Complex. In Arqueología Mesoamericana: Homenaje a William T Sanders, edited by Mastache, Alba Guadalupe, Parsons, Jeffrey R., Santley, Robert M., and Puche, Mari Carmen Serra, pp. 461–479. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Charlton, Thomas H., Charlton, Cynthia Otis, and García, Patricia Fournier 2005 The Basin of Mexico a.d. 1450–1620: Archaeological Dimensions. In The Postclassic to Spanish-Era Transition in Mesoamerica: Archaeological Perspectives, edited by Kepecs, Susan and Alexander, Rani T., pp. 49–63. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Charlton, Thomas H., Nichols, Deborah L., Charlton, Cynthia Otis, Neff, Hector, and Glascock, Michael D. 2001 INAA Results: Aztec Pottery. In Processes of Aztec State Formation in the Northeastern Basin of Mexico: Materials Analysis, edited by Nichols, Deborah L. and Charlton, Thomas H., pp. 20–36. Final Report Submitted to the National Science Foundation, Grants SBR-9707462 and SBR-9714583, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Christaller, Walter 1966 Central Places in Southern Germany. Translated by Baskin, Carlisle W.. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Originally published in 1933, Gustav Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Cortés, Hernán 1986 [1521–1525] Letters from Mexico. Translated by Pagden, Anthony. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Crider, Destiny 2013 Shifting Alliances: Epiclassic and Early Postclassic Interactions at Cerro Pertezuelo. Ancient Mesoamerica 24:107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz del Castillo, Bernal 1956 The Discovery and Conquest of Mexico, 1517–1521. Edited byGarcía, Genaro. Translated by P. Maudslay, Alfred. Farrar, Straus and Cudahy, New York.Google Scholar
Evans, Susan T. 2001 Aztec-Period Political Organization in the Teotihuacan Valley: Otumba as a City-State. Ancient Mesoamerica 12:89–100.Google Scholar
Feinman, Gary M., and Garraty, Christopher P. 2010 Pre-Industrial Markets and Marketing: Archaeological Perspectives. Annual Review of Anthropology 39:167–191.Google Scholar
Feinman, Gary M., and Nicholas, Linda M. 2010 A Multiscalar Perspective on Market Exchange in the Classic-Period Valley of Oaxaca. In Archaeological Approaches to Market Exchange in Ancient Societies, edited by Garraty, Christopher P. and Stark, Barbara L., pp. 87–98. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Feldman, Lawrence H. 1978 Inside a Mexica Market. In Mesoamerican Communication Routes and Cultural Contact, edited by Lee, Thomas A. Jr. and Navarette, Carlos, pp. 219–222. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation No. 40. Bringham Young University, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
Freeman, G.H., and Halton, J.H. 1951 Note on Exact Treatment of Contingency, Goodness of Fit and Other Problems of Significance. Biometrika 38:141–149.Google Scholar
García Chávez, Raúl 2004 De Tula a Azcatpotzalco: Caracterización arqueológica de los Altepetl de la Cuenca de México, a través del estudio cerámico regional. Tesis de Doctor en Antropología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.Google Scholar
García Chávez, Raul, Hinojosa, José Francisco Hinojosa, and Dávila, Alma Martínez 1999 La cerámica prehispánca de Tenochtitlan. In Excavaciones en la catedral y el sagrario metropolitanos, edited by Moctezuma, Eduardo Matos, pp. 69–85. Programa de Arqueología Urbana, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Garraty, Christopher P. 2006 The Politics of Commerce: Aztec Pottery Production and Exchange in the Basin of Mexico, a.d. 1200–1650. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Garraty, Christopher P. 2007 Intercambio de mercado y consolidación en el corazón del Imperio Azteca. Revista Española de Antropología Americana 37:139–164.Google Scholar
Garraty, Christopher P. 2009 Attribute-Based Seriation of Postclassic and Early Colonial Sherd Collections from the Basin of Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 30:153–170.Google Scholar
Gibson, Charles 1964 The Aztecs Under Spanish Rule: A History of the Indians of the Valley of Mexico, 1519–1810. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D. 1992 Characterization of Archaeological Ceramics at MURR by Neutron Activation Analysis and Multivariate Statistics. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by Neff, Hector, pp. 11–26. Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B., and Espejo, Antonieta 1947 La alfarería correspondiente al último período de ocupación Nahua del Valle de México: I. Tlatelolco a Través de los Tiempos 9:10–26.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B., and Espejo, Antonieta 1950 La alfarería correspondiente al último período de ocupación Nahua del Valle de México: II. Tlatelolco a Través de los Tiempos 11:15–66.Google Scholar
Hare, Timothy S., and Smith, Michael E. 1996 A New Postclassic Chronology for Yautepec, Morelos. Ancient Mesoamerica 7:281–297.Google Scholar
Hassig, Ross 1985 Trade, Tribute, and Transportation: The Sixteenth Century Political Economy of the Valley of Mexico. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederic 1982 Tetzcoco in the Early 16th Century: The State, the City, and the Calpolli. American Ethnologist 9:230–249.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederic 1984 Rotational Labor and Urban Development in Prehispanic Tetzcoco. In Explorations in Ethnohistory: Indians of Central Mexico in the Sixteenth Century, edited by Harvey, Herbert R. and Prem, Hans J., pp. 147–174. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederic 1987 First Steps Toward a Market-Integrated Economy in Aztec Mexico. In Early State Dynamics, edited by Claessen, Henri and Velde, Peter van de, pp. 91–107. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederic 1994 Cloth in the Political Economy of the Aztec State. In Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, edited by Hodge, Mary G. and Smith, Michael E., pp. 89–111. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederic 2013 The Architectural Features of Cerro Portezuelo. Ancient Mesoamerica 24:73–85.Google Scholar
Hirth, Kenneth G. 1998 The Distributional Approach: A New Way to Identify Marketplace Exchange in the Archaeological Record. Current Anthropology 39:451–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirth, Kenneth G. 2009 Craft Production in the Mesoamerican Marketplace. Ancient Mesoamerica 20:89–102.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G. 1984 Aztec City-States. Memoirs No. 18. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G. 1992 The Geographical Structure of Aztec Imperial-Period Market Systems. National Geographic Research and Exploration 8:428–445.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G. 1993 Los motivos decorativos de la cerámica y los sistemas de intercambio en la sociedad azteca. In Entre lagos y volcanes: Chalco-Amecameca, pasado y presente, edited by Villaseñor, Alejandro Tortolero, pp. 73–102. El Colegio Mexiquense, Toluca.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G. 1996 Political Organization of the Central Provinces. In Aztec Imperial Strategies, edited by Berdan, Frances F., Blanton, Richard E., Boone, Elizabeth Hill, Hodge, Mary G., Smith, Michael E., and Umberger, Emily, pp. 47–84. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G. 1998 Archaeological Views of Aztec Culture. Journal of Archaeological Research 6:197–238.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G. 2008 Place of Jade: State and Economy in Ancient Chalco. University of Pittsburgh Department of Anthropology and Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Pittsburgh and Mexico City.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., and Blanton, Richard E. 1996 Data on Political Organization of the Aztec Empire's Central Provinces. In Aztec Imperial Strategies, edited by Berdan, Frances F., Blanton, Richard E., Boone, Elizabeth Hill, Hodge, Mary G., Smith, Michael E., and Umberger, Emily, pp. 229–241. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., and Minc, Leah D. 1990 The Spatial Patterning of Aztec Ceramics: Implications for Prehispanic Exchange Systems in the Valley of Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 17:415–437.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., and Minc, Leah D. 1991 Aztec-Period Ceramic Distribution and Exchange Systems. Final report submitted to the National Science Foundation, Grant BSM-8704177, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., and Neff, Hector 2005 Xaltocan in the Economy of the Basin of Mexico: A View from Ceramic Tradewares. In La producción local y el poder en el Xaltocan posclásico/Production and Power at Postclassic Xaltocan, edited by Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., pp. 320–348. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Anthropology and Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Pittsburgh and Mexico City.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., Neff, Hector, Blackman, M. James, and Minc, Leah D. 1992 A Compositional Perspective on Ceramic Production in the Aztec Empire. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by Neff, Hector, pp. 203–220. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 7. Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., Neff, Hector, Blackman, M. James, and Minc, Leah D. 1993 Black-on-Orange Ceramic Production in the Aztec Empire's Heartland. Latin American Antiquity 4:130–157.Google Scholar
Linné, Sigvald 1948 El Valle y la Ciudad de México en 1550: Relación histórica fundada sobre un mapa geográphica, que se conserva en la biblioteca de la Universidad de Uppsala, Suecia. New Series Publication No. 9. The Ethnographical Museum of Sweden, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lockhart, James 1992 The Nahuas after the Conquest: A Social and Cultural History of the Indians of Central Mexico, Sixteenth through Eighteenth Centuries. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Ma, Marina K.S. 2003 Examining Prehispanic Ceramic Exchange in the Basin of Mexico: A Chemical Source Analysis from Azcatpotzalco. B.A. honors thesis, Department of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
Miesle, Jennifer Renee 2000 Trends of the State: Plainware Ceramics of Xaltocan. B.A. honors thesis, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Albion College, Albion, MI.Google Scholar
Minc, Leah D. 1994 Political Economy and Market Economy Under Aztec Rule: A Regional Perspective Based on Decorated Ceramic Production and Distribution Systems in the Valley of Mexico. 2 volumes. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Minc, Leah D. 2006 Monitoring Regional Market Systems in Prehistory: Models, Methods, and Metrics. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25:82–116.Google Scholar
Minc, Leah D. 2009 Style and Substance: Evidence for Regionalization within the Aztec Market System. Latin American Antiquity 20:343–374.Google Scholar
Minc, Leah D., Hodge, Mary G., and Blackman, M. James 1994 Stylistic and Spatial Variability in Early Aztec Ceramics: Insights into Pre-Imperial Exchange Systems. In Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, edited by Hodge, Mary G. and Smith, Michael E., pp. 133–175. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Neff, Hector 2009 Patterning in Ceramic Compositional Data from Cerro Portezuelo, Mexico. Unpublished manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach.Google Scholar
Neff, Hector, and Glascock, Michael D. 2001 Aztec Ceramic Composition Groups. In Processes of Aztec State Formation in the Northeastern Basin of Mexico: Materials Analysis, edited by Nichols, Deborah L. and Charlton, Thomas H., pp. 9–18. Final Report Submitted to the National Science Foundation for Grants SBR-9707462 and SBR-9714583, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Neff, Hector, Glascock, Michael D., Charlton, Thomas H., Charlton, Cynthia Otis, and Nichols, Deborah L. 2000 Provenience Investigations of Ceramics and Obsidian from Otumba. Ancient Mesoamerica 11:307–321.Google Scholar
Neff, Hector, and Glowacki, Donna M. 2002 Ceramic Source Determination by Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis in the American Southwest. In Ceramic Production and Circulation in the Greater Southwest: Source Determination by INAA and Complementary Mineralogical Investigations, edited by Glowacki, Donna M. and Neff, Hector, pp. 1–14. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Neff, Hector, and Hodge, Mary G. 2008 Serving Vessel Production at Chalco: Evidence from Neutron Activation Analysis. In Place of Jade: Society and Economy in Ancient Chalco, edited by Hodge, Mary G., pp. 187–226. Latin American Archaeology Report. Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh and Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Pittsburgh and Mexico City.Google Scholar
Nichols, Deborah L., Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., Neff, Hector, Hodge, Mary G., Charlton, Thomas H., and Glascock, Michael D. 2002 Neutrons, Markets, Cities, and Empires: A 1000-Year Perspective on Ceramic Production and Distribution in the Postclassic Basin of Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21:25–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Deborah L., and Charlton, Thomas H. 1996 The Postclassic Occupation of Otumba: A Chronological Assessment. Ancient Mesoamerica 7:231–244.Google Scholar
Nichols, Deborah L., Elson, Christina, Cecil, Leslie G., Estrada, Nina Neivens de, Glascock, Michael D., and Mikkelson, Paula 2009 Chiconautla, Mexico: A Crossroads of Aztec Trade and Politics. Latin American Antiquity 20:443–472.Google Scholar
Nichols, Deborah, Neff, Hector, and Cowgill, George 2013 Cerro Portezuelo: States and Hinterlands in the Pre-Hispanic Basin of Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 24:47–71.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Henry B., and Hicks, Frederic 1961 A Brief Progress Report on the Excavations at Cerro Portezuelo, Valley of Mexico. American Antiquity 27:106–108.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R. 1966 The Aztec Ceramic Sequence in the Teotihuacan Valley, Mexico. 2 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R. 1971 Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Texcoco Region, Mexico. Memoirs No. 3. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R. 2006 The Last Pescadores of Chimalhuacan, Mexico: An Archaeological Ethnography. Anthropological Papers of the Museum of Anthropology, Vol. 96. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R. 2011 Is Aztec IV Black/Orange Pottery Late Postclassic, or Early Colonial, or Both, and Does It Matter? Paper presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R., Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., and Hodge, Mary G. 1996 Developmental Implications of Earlier Dates for Early Aztec in the Basin of Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 7:217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R., Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., Parsons, Mary H., and Wilson, David J. 1982 Prehispanic Settlement Patterns in the Southern Valley of Mexico: The Chalco-Xochimilco Region. Memoirs No. 14. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paso y Troncoso, Francisco del (editor) 1905–1906 Papeles de Nueva España: Geografía y estadística. Segunda serie, Vol. 6. Tipográfico Sucesores de Rivandeneyra, Mexico.Google Scholar
Rice, Prudence M. 1996 Recent Ceramic Analysis 2: Composition, Production, and Theory. Journal of Archaeological Research 4:165–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Alegría, Enrique 2005 Consumption and the Varied Ideologies of Domination on Colonial Mexico City. In The Postclassic to Spanish-Era Transition in Mesoamerica: Archaeological Perspectives, edited by Kepecs, Susan and Alexander, Rani T., pp. 35–48. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Alegría, Enrique, Neff, Hector, and Glascock, Michael D. 2003 Indigenous Ware or Spanish Import? The Case of Indígena Ware and Approaches to Power in Colonial Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 14:67–81.Google Scholar
Sahagún, Fray Bernardino de 1950–1982 Florentine Codex: General History of the Things of New Spain. 12 vols. Translated by Anderson, Arthur J.O. and Dibble, Charles E.. School of American Research, Santa Fe, NM, and University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Santamarina Novillo, Carlos 2007 Azcapotzalco antes que Tenochtitlan: reflexiones en torno a un modelo azteca de imperio. Revista Española de Antropología Americana 37:99–118.Google Scholar
Sejourné, Laurette 1983 Arqueología e historia del valle de Mexico: De Xochimilco a Amecameca. Siglo Veintiuno, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael E. 1979 The Aztec Marketing System and Settlement Pattern in the Valley of Mexico: A Central Place Analysis. American Antiquity 44:110–125.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael E. 2003 Comercio durante el posclàsico de la ceràmica decorada: Malinalco, Toluca, Guerrero, y Morelos. Arqueología 29:63–84.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael E. 2010 Regional and local market systems in Aztec period Morelos. In Archaeological Approaches to Market Exchange in Ancient Societies, edited by Garraty, Christopher P. and Stark, Barbara L., pp. 161–82. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara L., and Garraty, Christopher P. 2010 Detecting Marketplace Exchange in Archaeology: A Methodological Review. In Archaeological Approaches to Market Exchange in Ancient Societies, edited by Garraty, Christopher P. and Stark, Barbara L., pp. 33–61. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar