We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Type
Special Section: Breaking and Entering The Ecosystem—Remembering Elizabeth M. Brumfiel
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Berdan, Frances F.2016Featherworking in the Provinces: A Dispersed Luxury Craft under Aztec Hegemony. Ancient Mesoamerica27:209–219.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.1976Regional Growth in the Eastern Valley of Mexico: A Test of the “Population Pressure” Hypothesis. In The Early Mesoamerican Village, edited by Flannery, Kent V., pp. 234–249. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.1983Aztec State Making: Ecology, Structure, and the Origins of the State. American Anthropologist85:261–284.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.1991Weaving and Cooking: Women's Production in Aztec Mexico. In Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, edited by Gero, Joan M. and Conkey, Margaret W., pp. 224–251. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.1992Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem—Gender, Class, and Faction Steal the Show. American Anthropologist94:551–567.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.1994Ethnic Groups and Political Development in Ancient Mexico. In Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, edited by Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. and Fox, John W., pp. 89–102. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.1996The Quality of Tribute Cloth: The Place of Evidence in Archaeological Argument. American Antiquity61:453–462.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.1998Huitzilopochtli's Conquest: Aztec Ideology in the Archaeological Record. Cambridge Archaeological Journal8:3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.2006Methods in Feminist and Gender Archaeology: A Feeling for Difference – and Likeness. In Handbook of Gender in Archaeology, edited by Nelson, Sarah M., pp. 31–58. AltaMira Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.2008Aztec Women: Capable Partners and Cosmic Enemies. In The Aztec World, edited by Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. and Feinman, Gary M., pp. 87–104. Abrams, New York.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M.2013The Archaeology of Gender in Mesoamerica: Moving Beyond Gender Complementarity. In A Companion to Gender Prehistory, edited by Bolger, Diane, pp. 564–584. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden.Google Scholar
Nichols, Deborah L.2016Rethinking Huitzilopochtli's Conquest: Elizabeth M. Brumfiel, Social Theory, and the Aztecs of Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica27:153–162.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B.1984Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History26:126–166.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R., and Nichols, Deborah L.2012Obituary. Elizabeth M. Brumfiel (1945–2012). American Anthropologist114:713–716.Google Scholar
Robin, Cynthia2014In Memoriam. Elizabeth Brumfiel, 1945–2012. Ancient Mesoamerica25:1–4.Google Scholar
Robin, Cynthia2016Neither Dopes Nor Dupes: Maya Farmers and Ideology. Ancient Mesoamerica27:221–230.Google Scholar