Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:27:05.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glimpses of the Dark Side of the Petexbatun Project: The Petexbatun Regional Cave Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

James E. Brady ,
Ann Scott ,
Allan Cobb ,
Irma Rodas ,
John Fogarty  and
Monica Urquizú Sánchez
James E. Brady
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
Ann Scott
Affiliation:
Prewitt & Associates, 7701 Lemar, Suite 104, Austin, TX 78752, USA
Allan Cobb
Affiliation:
116 Hollybluff Street, Austin, TX 78753, USA
Irma Rodas
Affiliation:
12 Av. 7-49, Zona 2, Guatemala
John Fogarty
Affiliation:
5208 Hedgewood Drive, Austin, TX 78745, USA
Monica Urquizú Sánchez
Affiliation:
3 Calle 11-16, Zona 2, Guatemala
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Petexbatun Regional Cave Survey (PRCS) is the first large cave study to be undertaken as part of a major archaeological expedition. The survey's primary objective was assessing the extent to which surface architecture at Dos Pilas was configured by features in the sacred landscape. All three of the major architectural complexes at the site had a direct relation to caves, and a number of important secondary buildings and even residential units were deliberately laid out to incorporate caves. Excavation revealed evidence of Preclassic utilization of all of the major caves, indicating that their status as sacred landmarks had been established long before the eighth century florescence of the site. The importance of the caves in site configuration was mirrored in the artifact assemblage. Despite the survey's much smaller size, the cave investigations recovered 20–50% more of the overall assemblage at Dos Pilas in an array of artifact categories. A review of the archaeological literature suggests that the importance ascribed to caves at Dos Pilas in both site configuration and local economy can be found elsewhere and probably reflects a much wider pattern of utilization.

Type
Special Section: The Vanderbilt Petexbatun Archaeological Project, 1989–1994
Information
Ancient Mesoamerica , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Fall 1997 , pp. 353 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benson, Elizabeth P. 1985 Arcaphor. In Fifth Palenque Round Table, 1983, edited by Robertson, Merle Greene and Fields, Virginia M., pp. 183–188. Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Bonor, Villarejo, Luis, Juan 1987 Exploraciones en las grutas de Calcehtok y Oxkintok, Yucatán, México. Mayab 3: 24–31.Google Scholar
Bonor, Villarejo, Luis, Juan 1989 Las cuevas de Oxkintok: Informe preliminar. In Memorias del Segando Coloquio Internacional de Mayanistas, pp. 303–309. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico. Mexico.Google Scholar
Brady, James E. 1990 Investigaciones en la Cueva de Sangre y otras cuevas de la Region Petexbatun. In Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Petexbatun, Informe Preliminar #2, Segunda Temporada, edited by Demarest, Arthur A. and Houston, Stephen D., pp. 438–567. Instituto de Antropología e Historia, Guatemala, and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Brady, James E. 1994 El impacto del ritual en la economía maya. In VII Simposio de Arqueología Guatemalteca, pp. 87–91. Instituto de Antropología e Historia, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Brady, James E. 1997 Settlement Configuration and Cosmology: The Role of Caves at Dos Pilas. American Anthropologist 99: 602–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, James E., and Rodas, Irma 1992 Hallazgos recientes y nuevas interpretaciones de la Cueva de El Duende. In V Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, pp. 185–194. Ministerio de Cultura y Deportes, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Brady, James E., Rodas, Irma, Wright, Lori, Emery, Katherine, López, Nora María, Stiver, Laura, and Chatham, Robert 1991 Proyecto Arqueológico Regional de Cuevas Petexbatun. In Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Petexbatun, Informe Preliminar #3, Tercera Temporada, edited by Demarest, Arthur A., Inomata, Takeshi, Escobedo, Héctor, and Palka, Joel, pp. 652–748. Instituto de Antropología e Historia, Guatemala, and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Brady, James E., and Schwegman, Ann Scott 1993 Nuevos métodos para la investigación de cuevas mayas. In Proyecto Arqueológco Regional Petexbatun, Informe #5, Quinta Temporada, edited by edited by Valdés, Juan Antonio, Foias, Antonia, Inomata, Takeshi, Escobedo, Héctor, and Demarest, Arthur A., pp. 137–141. Instituto de Antropología e Historia, Guatemala, and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Brady, James E., and Scott, Ann 1997 Excavations in Buried Cave Deposits: Implications for Interpretation. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 59: 15–21.Google Scholar
Brady, James E., Scott, Ann, Neff, Hector, and Glascock, Michael 1997 Speleothem Breakage, Movement, Removal and Caching: An Unreported Aspect of Ancient Maya Cave Utilization. Geoarchaeology 12: 725–750.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, James E., and Stone, Andrea 1986 Naj Tunich: Entrance to the Maya Underworld. Archaeology 39(6):18–25.Google Scholar
Brady, James E., Veni, George, Stone, Andrea, and Cobb, Allan B. 1992 Explorations in the New Branch of Naj Tunich: Implications for Interpretations. Mexicon 16(4):74–81.Google Scholar
Campbell, Joseph 1956 The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Meridian Books, New York.Google Scholar
Chowning, Ann 1955 Excavations in the Itzmal Ch'en Ceremonial Group at Mayapan. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 54: 280–383. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Foias, Antonia E. 1992 Análisis preliminar de la cerámica del Petexbatun. In Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Petexbatun: Informe Preliminar #4, Cuarta Temporada, edited by Demarest, Arthur A., Inomata, Takeshi, and Escobedo, Héctor, pp. 250–285. Instituto de Antropología e Historia, Guatemala, and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Foias, Antonia E. 1996 Changing Ceramic Production and Exchange Systems and the Classic Maya Collapse in the Petexbatun Region. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Grove, David C. 1989 Chalcatzingo and Its Olmec Connection. In Regional Perspectives on the Olmec, edited by Robert J. Sharer and David C. Grove, pp. 122–147. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gruning, E.L. 1930 Report on the British Museum Expedition to British Honduras, 1930. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 60: 477–483.Google Scholar
Gurnee, Russell H. 1965 Seamay Cave (Caves of the Grand Staircase) Senahu, Alta Verapaz, Guatemala, C.A. National Speleological Society News 23(8): 114–117.Google Scholar
Hammond, Norman 1982 Ancient Maya Civilization. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Heyden, Doris 1973 ¿Un Chicomostoc en Teotihuacan? La cueva bajo de la Pirámide del Sol. Boletín del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia 6: 3–18.Google Scholar
Heyden, Doris 1975 An Interpretation of the Cave Underneath the Pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacan, Mexico. American Antiquity 40: 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyden, Doris 1981 Caves, Gods and Myths: World-View and Planning in Teotihuacan. In Mesoamerican Sites and World Views, edited by Benson, Elizabeth P., pp. 1–39. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Joyce, T.A. 1929 Report on the British Museum Expedition to British Honduras, 1929. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 59: 439–459.Google Scholar
Joyce, T.A., Gann, T., Gruning, E.L., and Long, R.C.E. 1928 Report on the British Museum Expedition to British Honduras, 1928. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 58: 323–349.Google Scholar
Pendergast, David M. 1971 Excavations at Eduardo Quiroz Cave, British Honduras (Belize). Art and Archaeology Occasional Paper No. 21. Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto.Google Scholar
Pollock, H.E.D., and Ray, Clayton E. 1957 Notes on Vertebrate Animal Remains from Mayapan. Department of Archaeology, Current Reports No. 41. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pope, Kevin O., and Sibberensen, Malcolm B. 1981 In Search of Tzultacaj: Cave Explorations in the Maya Lowlands of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. Journal of New World Archaeology 4(3):16–54.Google Scholar
Price, Barbara J. 1974 The Burden of the Cargo: Ethnographic Models and Archaeological Inference. In Mesoamerican Archaeology: New Approaches, edited by Hammond, Norman, pp. 445–465. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, Tatiana 1962a Civic and Religious Structure of Mayapan. In Mayapan, Yucatan, Mexico, edited by Pollock, H.E.D., Roys, Ralph L., Proskouriakoff, T., and Smith, A. Ledyard, pp. 87–164. Publication No. 619. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, Tatiana 1962b The Artifacts of Mayapan. In Mayapan, Yucatan, Mexico, edited by Pollock, H.E.D., Roys, Ralph L., Proskouriakoff, T., and Smith, A. Ledyard, pp. 321–442. Publication No. 619. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ravicz, Robert, and Romney, A. Kimball 1969 The Mixtec. In Ethnology, Pt. 1, edited by Vogt, Evon Z., pp. 367–399. Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 7, Robert Wauchope, general editor. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Reeder, Philip, Alt, Edward, Nichols, Brian, Reynolds, William, and Webster, James. 1995 Annual Report on Multidisciplinary Research Activities on the Northern Vaca Plateau. Submitted to the Department of Archaeology, Belmopan, Belize.Google Scholar
Schavelzon, Daniel 1980 Temples, Caves, or Monsters? Notes on Zoomorphic Facades in Pre-Hispanic Architecture. In Third Palenque Round Table, 1978, Pt. 2, edited by Robertson, Merle Greene, pp. 151–162. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Shook, Edwin M. 1952 The Great Wall and Other Features of Mayapan. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 51: 247–251. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Shook, Edwin M. 1955 Yucatan and Chiapas. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 54: 289–295.Google Scholar
Smith, A. Ledyard 1962 Residential and Associated Structures at Mayapan. In Mayapan, Yucatan, Mexico, by Pollock, H.E.D., Roys, Ralph L., Proskouriakoff, T., and Smith, A. Ledyard, pp. 165–319. Publication No. 619. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip E. 1954 Excavation in Ceremonial Structures at Mayapan. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 53: 273–276. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip E. 1955 Excavations in Three Ceremonial Structures at Mayapan. Current Reports 21: 109–126. Department of Archaeology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert E. 1952 Pottery at Mayapan. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 51: 251–256. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert E. 1953a Pottery of Mayapan and Vicinity. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 52: 279–282. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert E. 1953b Cenote X-Coton at Mayapan. Current Reports 5: 67–81. Department of Archaeology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert E. 1954 Cenote Exploration at Mayapan and Telchaquillo. Current Reports 12: 222–233. Department of Archaeology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert E. 1956 Ceramic Studies in Yucatan. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 55: 338–339.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert E. 1971 The Pottery of Mayapan: Including Studies of Ceramic Material from Uxmal, Kabah, and Chichen Itza. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 66. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Stone, Andrea J. 1995 Images from the Underworld: Naj Tunich and the Tradition of Maya Cave Painting. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Strómsvik, Gustav 1953 Exploration, Excavation, and Reconstruction in Mayapan and Vicinity. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 52: 276–279. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Strómsvik, Gustav 1955 Exploration and Reconstruction in Mayapan and Vicinity. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 54: 284–285. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Strómsvik, Gustav 1956 Exploration of the Cave of Dzab-Na, Tecoh, Yucatan. Current Reports 35: 463–470. Department of Archaeology, Carnegie Institu tion of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stuart, David, and Houston, Stephen 1994 Classic Maya Place Names. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology No. 33. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Tedlock, Barbara 1982 Time and the Highland Maya. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Urquizú Sánchez, Mónica Claudina 1996 Una aplicación metodológica para la recuperatión e interpretation de rasgos culturales en cuevas. Unpublished Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad de San Carlos, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Vogt, Evon Z. 1964 Ancient Maya and Contemporary Tzotzil Cosmology: A Comment on Some Methodological Problems. American Antiquity 30: 192–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Gary Rex 1988 Maya Ceremonial Caves Project, 1988, Belize, Central America. Triad Research Services, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1966 Peasants. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar