Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:06:44.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trans-Anatolia: Examining Turkey as a bridge between East and West

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Alan M. Greaves
Alan M. Greaves
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article begins by examining the frequently-invoked metaphor of Turkey as a bridge between East and West. The use of this metaphor is questioned because it implies passivity, over-simplifies the complexities of ancient communications and inter-regional exchange, and is based upon the assumption of divides that are culturally constructed. The article then examines two case-studies (the Aegean west coast and the Euphrates valley of the southeast) in order to demonstrate that the existence of different archaeological communities of practice in these regions serves to distort further the perception of differences between eastern and western Anatolia. The conclusion is put forward that a clearer distinction is definable in the practice of these two communities than in the archaeology of the ancient cultures of these two regions. Only if the divide between contemporary archaeological communities is bridged can the existence of divides between ancient communities begin to be examined. The reasons for the differences between these cultures of practice are largely historical but continue to affect the data-sets for these regions and thereby hinder the direct comparison of evidence trans-Anatolia.

Özet

Makale, Türkiye'nin, sıklıkla dile getirildiği gibi Doğu ile Batı arasında bir köprü olduğu söyleminin tartışılması ile başlar. Bu söylem edilgenliği çağrıştırdığı, antik dönem iletişimlerini ve bölgeler arası takası çok basite indirgediği ve tarafların kültürel olarak şekillendirilmiş varsayımlarına dayandığı için sorgulanmaktadır. Ardından, söz konusu bölgelerde farklı uygulamalara sahip arkeolojik toplumların var olmasının Doğu ve Batı Anadolu arasındaki farklılığın algılanmasınının daha da çarpıtılmasına neden olduğunu göstermek üzere iki örnek (Ege'nin batı kıyısı ve Fırat vadisi'nin güneydoğusu) ele alınmıştır. Sonuçta, bu iki bölgenin antik kültürlerinin arkeolojik olarak ayrımının yapılabilmesinden ziyade, bu toplumların uygulamalarındaki belirgin farklılığın tanımlanabilirliği ortaya çıkmaktadır. Eşzamanlı arkeolojik toplumlardaki ayrımlar arasında bir köprü oluştürmak mümkün olursa, ancak o zaman antik toplumlar arasındaki ayrımların varlığı incelenmeye başlanabilir. Bu kültürlerdeki farklılığın nedenleri geniş ölçüde tarihseldir, fakat farklılıklar bölgelerdeki bilgi birikimini etkilemeye devam etmektedir ve bu nedenle de Anadolu boyunca doğrudan kanıt karşılaştırmasını engellemektedir.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 57 , December 2007 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akurgal, E. 1968: The Birth of Greek Art: The Mediterranean and the Near East. LondonGoogle Scholar
Algaze, G. 1989: ‘The Uruk expansion: cross-cultural exchange in early Mesopotamian civilization’ Current Anthropology 30/5: 571–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algaze, G. 1993: The Uruk World System: the Dynamics of Expansion of Early Mesopotamian Civilisation. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Algaze, G., Breuninger, R., Lightfoot, C., Rosenberg, M. 1991: ‘The Tigris-Euphrates Archaeological Reconnaissance Project: a preliminary report of the 1989–1990 seasons’ Anatolica 17: 175–240Google Scholar
Algaze, G., Breuninger, R., Knudstad, J. 1994: ‘The Tigris-Euphrates Archaeological Reconnaissance Project: final report of the Birecik and Carchemish dam survey areas’ Anatolica 20: 1–96Google Scholar
Arimura, M., Balkan-Altı, N., Borell, F., Cruells, W., Duru, G., Erim-Özdoğan, A., Ibañez, J., Maede, O., Mayake, Y., Molist, M., Özbaşaran, M. 2001: ‘Akarçay Tepe excavations 1999’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 309–57Google Scholar
Balkan-Altı, N., Bucak, E., Duru, G., Molist, M. 2003: ‘Akarçay Tepe 2001 yılı Çalışmaları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 24/2: 223–32Google Scholar
Bammer, A., Muss, U. 1996: Das Artemision von Ephesos. MainzGoogle Scholar
Benzi, M. 2005: ‘Mycenaeans at Iasos? A reassessment of Doro Levi's excavations’ in Laffineur, R., Greco, E. (eds), Emporia: Aegeans in the Central and Eastern Mediterranean. Liège: 205–16Google Scholar
Bernal, M. 1987: Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilisation. The Fabrication of Ancient Greece, 1785–1985. New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
Bernal, M. 1991: Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilisation. The Archaeological and Documentary Evidence. New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
Bernal, M. 2006: Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilisation. The Linguistic Evidence. New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
Blaylock, S. 1998: ‘Rescue excavations by the BIAA at Tille Höyük, on the Euphrates, 1979–1990’ in Matthews, R. (ed.), Ancient Anatolia. London: 111–26Google Scholar
Boardman, J. 1989: Athenian Red Figure Vases: The Classical Period. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977: Outline of a Theory of Practice. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, K. 1981: ‘Minoan colonisation’ Annual of the British School at Athens 76: 23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, R.A. 1974: ‘The Mycenaean tholos tomb at Kolophon’ Hesperia 43/2: 264–66Google Scholar
Broodbank, C. 2004: ‘Minoanisation’ Proceeding of the Cambridge Philological Society 50: 46–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canby, J.V., Porada, E., Ridgway, B.S., Stech, T. (eds) 1986: Ancient Anatolia: Aspects of Change and Cultural Development. Essays in Honor of Machteld J. Mellink. MadisonGoogle Scholar
Cook, R.M. 1961: ‘Some sites of the Milesian territory’ Annual of the British School at Athens 56: 90–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumont, F. 1917: Études syriennes. ParisGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J., Tallis, N. (eds) 2005: Forgotten Empire: The World of Ancient Persia. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Darga, M. 2001: ‘Şemsiyetepe excavations in the lower Euphrates basin 1978–1989’ in Belli, O. (ed.), Istanbul University's Contributions to Archaeology in Turkey 1932–2000. Istanbul: 115–20Google Scholar
Dittmann, R. 2003: ‘Excavations at Şavı Höyük 2000–2001’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 24/2: 247–58Google Scholar
Dittmann, R., Grewe, C., Huh, S., Schmidt, C. 2001: ‘Report on a survey at Şavı Höyük 1999’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 233–61Google Scholar
Erkanal, H., Özkan, T. 1997: ‘1995 Bakla Tepe kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 18/1: 261–80Google Scholar
Erkanal, H., Özkan, T. 1998: ‘1996 Bakla Tepe kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 19/1: 399–425Google Scholar
Frangipane, M. 2001a: ‘The transition between two opposing forms of power at Arslantepe (Malatya) at the beginning of the third millennium’ TÜBA-AR 4: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frangipane, M. 2001b: ‘On models and data in Mesopotamia’ Current Anthropology 42/3: 415–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frangipane, M., Bucak, E. 2001: ‘Excavations and research at Zeytinlibahçe Höyük 1999’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 65–131Google Scholar
Frangipane, M., Balossi, F. 2004: ‘The 2002 exploration campaign at Arslantepe-Malatya’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 25/1: 397–404Google Scholar
Frangipane, M. 2006: ‘Excavation and study campaign at Zeytinlibahçe 2004’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 27/2: 391–400Google Scholar
von Gerkan, A. 1925: Milet 1.8: Kalabaktepe, Athenatempel und Umgebung. BerlinGoogle Scholar
von Gerkan, A. 1935: Milet 2.3 Die Stadtmauern. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. LondonGoogle Scholar
Greaves, A.M. 2002: Miletos: A History. LondonGoogle Scholar
Greaves, A.M. forthcoming: The Land of IoniaGoogle Scholar
Greaves, A.M., Helwing, B. 2001: ‘Archaeology in Turkey: the Stone, Bronze and Iron Ages, 1997–1999’ American Journal of Archaeology 105: 463–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, A.M. 2003a: ‘Archaeology in Turkey: the Stone, Bronze and Iron Ages, 2000’ American Journal of Archaeology 107: 71–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, A.M. 2003b: ‘Archaeology in Turkey: the Stone, Bronze and Iron Ages, 2001’ TÜBA-AR 6: 125–57Google Scholar
Greaves, A.M. 2004: ‘Archaeology in Turkey: the Stone, Bronze and Iron Ages, 2002’ TÜBA-AR 7: 225–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gültekin, H., Baran, M. 1964: ‘The Mycenaean grave found at the hill of Ayasuluk’ Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi 13/2: 125–33Google Scholar
Günel, S. 2003: ‘Vorbericht über die Oberflächenbegenungen in den Provinzen Aydın und Muğla’ Anatolia Antiqua 11: 75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günel, S. 2005: ‘The cultural structure of Aydın-İkizdere region in the prehistoric age and its contribution to the archaeology of the Aegean region’ Anatolia Antiqua 13: 29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günel, S. 2006: ‘Çine-Tepecik Höyüğü 2004 yılı kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 27/1: 19–28Google Scholar
Hall, E. 1993: ‘Asia unmanned: images of victory in Classical Athens’ in Rich, J., Shipley, G. (eds), War and Society in the Greek World. London: 108–33Google Scholar
Hauptmann, H. 1988: ‘Nevalı Çori: Architektur’ Anatolica 15: 99–110Google Scholar
Hauptmann, H. 1993: ‘Ein Kultgebäude in Nevalı Çori’ in Frangipane, M., Hauptmann, H., Liverani, M., Matthiae, P., Mellink, M. (eds), Between the Rivers and the Mountains. Rome: 37–69Google Scholar
Hauptmann, H. 1999: ‘The Urfa region’ in Özdoğan, M., Başgelen, N. (eds), Neolithic in Turkey: Cradle of Civilisation. Istanbul: 65–86Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1998: The Archaeological Process: Towards a Reflexive Methodology. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Huber, H., Bichler, M., Musilek, A. 2003: ‘Identification of pumice and volcanic ash from archaeological sites in the eastern Mediterranean using chemical fingerprinting’ Aegypten und Levant/Egypt and the Levant 13: 83–105Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P. 1998: The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order. LondonGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, I. 1992: Archaeologists and Aesthetes: In the Sculpture Galleries of the British Museum 1800–1939. LondonGoogle Scholar
Joukowsky, M.S. 1986: Prehistoric Aphrodisias. Providence, Rhode IslandGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, I. 2005: ‘Minoan Miletus: a view from the kitchen’ in Laffineur, R., Greco, E. (eds), Emporia: Aegeans in the Central and Eastern Mediterranean. Liège: 193–98Google Scholar
Kaiser, I. forthcoming: ‘Miletus IV: the locally produced coarse wares’ in Hallager, E., MacDonald, C., Niemeier, W.D. (eds), The Minoans in the Central, Eastern, and Northern Aegean. AthensGoogle Scholar
Karg, N. 2001: ‘First soundings at Gre Dimse 1999’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 662–93Google Scholar
Karul, N., Ayhan, A., Özdoğan, M. 2001: ‘1999 excavations at Mezraa-Teleilat’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 133–74Google Scholar
Lambrianides, K., Spencer, N. 1996: ‘The Madra Çay Delta Archaeological Project, first preliminary report’ Anatolian Studies 46: 167–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrianides, K., Spencer, N. 1998: ‘Regional studies in the Madra Çay delta: archaeology, environment and cultural history on the Aegean coast of Turkey from the Early Bronze Age to the Ottoman Empire’ in Matthews, R. (ed.), Ancient Anatolia. London: 207–23Google Scholar
de Laporte, L. 1940: Arslantepe I: La Porte des Lions. PariGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S. 1972: Beycesultan 3.1: Late Bronze Age Architecture. LondonGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S., Mellaart, J. 1962: Beycesultan 1: The Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Levels. LondonGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S., Mellaart, J. 1965: Beycesultan 2: Middle Bronze Age Architecture and Pottery. LondonGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, H. 1995: ‘Survey in der Chora von Milet’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 1995: 293–328Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1997: ‘Survey in der Chora von Milet: Vorbericht über die Kampagnen der Jahre 1994 und 1995’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 1997: 285–311Google Scholar
Lohmann, H. 1999: ‘Survey in der Chora von Milet: Vorbericht über die Kampagnen der Jahre 1996 und 1997’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 1999/3: 439–73Google Scholar
Marchese, R.T. 1986: The Lower Maeander Flood Plain (British Archaeological Reports International Series 292). OxfordGoogle Scholar
Marfoe, L. 1987: ‘Cedar forest to silver mountain: social change and the development of long distance trade in early Near Eastern societies’ in Rowlands, M., Larsen, M., Kristiansen, K. (eds), Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World. Cambridge: 25–35Google Scholar
Margomenou, D., Cherry, J.F., Talalay, L.E. 2005: ‘Reflections on the “Aegean” and its prehistory: present routes and future destinations’ in Cherry, J.F., Margomenou, D., Talaly, L.E. (eds), Prehistorians Round the Pond: Reflections on Aegean Prehistory as a Discipline. Ann Arbor: 1–21Google Scholar
Matthews, R. 2002: Secrets of the Dark Mound: Jemdet Nasr 1926–1928. LondonGoogle Scholar
Mee, C. 1978: ‘Aegean trade and settlement in Anatolia in the second millennium BC’ Anatolian Studies 28: 121–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mee, C. 1998: ‘Anatolia and the Aegean in the Late Bronze Age’ in Cline, E.H., Harris-Cline, D. (eds), The Aegean and the Orient in the Second Millennium (18 edition, Aegaeum). Liège: 137–48Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., Murray, A. 1995: Beycesultan 3.2: Late Bronze Age and Phrygian Pottery and Middle and Late Bronze Age Small Objects. LondonGoogle Scholar
Mellink, M. 1966: ‘Anatolia: old and new perspectives’ Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 110/2: 111–29Google Scholar
Mellink, M. 1998: ‘Anatolia and the bridge from east to west in the Early Bronze Age’ TÜBA-AR 1: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellink, M.J., Porada, E., Özgüç, T. 1993: Aspects of Art and Iconography: Anatolia and its Neighbors. Studies in Honor of Nimet Özgüç. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Mergen, Y., Deveci, A. 2001: ‘1999 season excavations at Akarçay Höyük’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 359–79Google Scholar
Meriç, R. 2003: ‘Excavations at Bademgediği Tepe (Puranda) 1999–2002: a preliminary report’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 53: 79–98Google Scholar
Meriç, R., Mountjoy, P.A. 2001: ‘Three Mycenaean vases from Ionia’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 51: 137–41Google Scholar
Meriç, R., Mountjoy, P.A. 2002: ‘Mycenaean pottery from Bademgediği Tepe (Puranda) in Ionia: a preliminary report’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 52: 79–98Google Scholar
Meskell, L. 1999: Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex and Class et cetera in Ancient Egypt. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Miller, M.C. 1997: Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century BC: A Study in Cultural Receptivity. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1998: ‘The Aşvan Project’ in Matthews, R. (ed.), Ancient Anatolia. London: 85–100Google Scholar
Momigliano, N. 2005: ‘Iasos and the Aegean islands before the Santorini eruption’ in Laffineur, R., Greco, E. (eds), Emporia: Aegeans in the Central and Eastern Mediterranean. Liège: 217–25Google Scholar
Momigliano, N. 2006: ‘The relationship between Crete and Caria in the Bronze Age’ in Proceedings of the IX Cretological Congress, Elounda 7–13 October 2001 (Vol. 4). Herakleion: 82–90Google Scholar
Newton, C.T. 1881: Antiquities of Ionia. LondonGoogle Scholar
Niemeier, W.-D. 1998: ‘The Mycenaeans in western Anatolia and the problem of the origins of the Sea Peoples’ in Gitin, S., Mazar, A., Stern, E. (eds), Mediterranean Peoples in Transition. Jerusalem: 17–65Google Scholar
Niemeier, W.-D. 2005: ‘Minoans, Mycenaeans, Hittites and Ionians in western Asia Minor: new excavations in Bronze Age Miletus-Millawanda’ in Villing, A. (ed.), The Greeks in the East. London: 1–36Google Scholar
Niemeier, B., Niemeier, W.-D. 1997: ‘Milet 1994–1995, Projekt “Minoisch-Mykenisches bis Protogeometrisches Milet”: Zielsetzung und Grabungen auf dem Stadionhügel und am Athenatempel’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 1997: 189–248Google Scholar
Oğuz, A., Macit-Tekinalp, V. 2001: ‘Harabebezikan excavation: 1999 season’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 381–411Google Scholar
Ökse, A.T. 2001: ‘Excavations at Gre Virike 1999’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 263–397Google Scholar
Ökse, A.T. 2002: ‘Excavations at Gre Virike 2000’ in Tuna, N., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 2000. Ankara: 241–85Google Scholar
Ökse, A.T. 2004: ‘Excavations at Gre Virike 2001’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 2001. Ankara: 179–226Google Scholar
Ökse, A.T. 2005: ‘Early Bronze Age chamber tomb complexes at Gre Virike (period II A) on the middle Euphrates river’ Bulletin of American Schools of Oriental Research 339: 21–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ökse, A.T. 2006a: ‘Early Bronze Age graves at Gre Virike (period II B): an extraordinary cemetery on the middle Euphrates river’ Journal of Near Eastern Studies 65/1: 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ökse, A.T. 2006b: ‘Gre Virike (period I) – Early Bronze Age ritual facilities on the middle Euphrates river’ Anatolica 32: 1–27Google Scholar
Ökse, A.T., Macit-Tekinalp, V., Engin, A., Uğur Dağ, H., Görmüş, A. 2001: ‘Mezraa Höyük researches in 1999’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 187–232Google Scholar
Özbaşaran, M., Duru, G., Balkan-Altı, N., Molist, M., Bucak, E. 2004: ‘Akarçay Tepe 2002’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 25/1: 303–10Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M. 2001a: ‘Mezraa Teleilat excavation’ in Belli, O. (ed.), Istanbul University's Contributions to Archaeology in Turkey 1932–2000. Istanbul: 25–26Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M. 2001b: ‘Lower Euphrates surface survey’ in Belli, O. (ed.), Istanbul University's Contributions to Archaeology in Turkey 1932–2000. Istanbul: 289–91Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M., Ayhan, A., Demirtaş, A. 1999: ‘Mezraa-Teleilat: Fırat Havzasında Bir Neolitik Çağ Yerleşmesinin Tanıtımı’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1998. Ankara: 1–17Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M., Karul, N., Ayhan, A. 2001: ‘Mezraa-Teleilat 1999 Yılı Çalışmaları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 22/1: 165–80Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M., Karul, N., Özdoğan, E. 2004: ‘Mezraa-Teleilat Höyüğü 4. Dönem Çalışmaları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 25/2: 235–14Google Scholar
Pantazis, V. 2006: ‘OMHPOS KAI TPOIA’ Homer and Troy: Shedding a New Light on the Relationship Between Mythos and Reality. AthensGoogle Scholar
Peschlow-Bindokat, A. 1996: Der Latmos: Eine unbekannte Gebirgslandschaft an der türkischen Westküste. Mainz am RheinGoogle Scholar
Peschlow-Bindokat, 2001: ‘Eine hethitische Grossprinzeninschrift aus dem Latmos. Vorläufiger Bericht’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 2001/3: 363–78Google Scholar
Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. 1999: ‘Fıstıklı Höyük 1998: systematic survey and sounding’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1998. Ankara: 81–95Google Scholar
Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R. 2001: ‘Excavations at Fıstıklı Höyük 1999’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 22/1: 155–64Google Scholar
Pollock, S., Bernbeck, R., Allen, S., Gessner, A.G.C., Costello, R., Costello, S.K., Foree, M., Lepinski, S., Niebuhr, S. 2001: ‘Excavations at Fıstıklı Höyük 1999’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 39–63Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1980: ‘The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: archaeology as anthropology?’ American Journal of Archaeology 84/3: 287–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 2005: ‘Round a bigger pond’ in Cherry, J.F., Margomenou, D., Talaly, L.E. (eds), Prehistorians Round the Pond: Reflections on Aegean Prehistory as a Discipline. Ann Arbor: 151–59Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. 1987: ‘Centre and periphery: a review of a concept’ in Rowlands, M., Larsen, M., Kristiansen, K. (eds), Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World. Cambridge: 1–11Google Scholar
Said, E.W. 1995: Orientalism (Reprint with new afterword). HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
Schattner, T.G. 1992: ‘Didyma, ein Minoisch-Myknischer Fundplatz?’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 1992: 369–72Google Scholar
Schiering, W. 1975: ‘Die minoisch-mykenische Siedlung in Milet vor dem Bau der grossen Mauer’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 25: 9–15Google Scholar
Schiering, W. 1979: ‘Milet: Eine Erweiterung der Grabung östlich des Athenatempels’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 29: 77–108Google Scholar
Schiering, W. 1984: ‘The connections between the oldest settlement at Miletus and Crete’ in Hägg, R., Marinatos, N. (eds), The Minoan Thalassocracy, Myth and Reality. Stockholm: 187–89Google Scholar
Sertok, K., Kulakoğlu, F. 2001: ‘Results of the 1999 season excavations at Şaraga Höyük’ in Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds), Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. Ankara: 453–86Google Scholar
Sertok, K., Kulakoğlu, F. 2002: ‘Şaraga Höyük 1999–2000 Kazıları Sonuçları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 23/1: 107–22Google Scholar
Sertok, K., Kulakoğlu, F., Squadrone, F.F. 2004: ‘2002 Yılı Şaraga Höyük Kurtarma Kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 25/2: 139–54Google Scholar
Shanks, M. 1996: Classical Archaeology of Greece. LondonGoogle Scholar
Sidebottom, H. 2004: Ancient Warfare: A Very Short Introduction. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, A.M. 1985: ‘The new archaeology and the Classical archaeologist’ American Journal of Archaeology 89/1: 31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, G. 1994a: ‘Mesopotamian-Anatolian interaction at Hacinebi, Turkey: preliminary report on the 1992 excavations’ Anatolica 20: 145–89Google Scholar
Stein, G. 1994b: ‘Hacinebi excavations, 1992’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 15: 131–52Google Scholar
Stein, G. 1995: ‘Excavations at Hacinebi Tepe, 1993’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 16: 121–40Google Scholar
Stein, G. 1996: ‘1994 excavations at Hacinebi Tepe’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 17: 108–28Google Scholar
Stein, G. 1997: ‘1995 excavations at Hacinebi Tepe’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 18: 93–120Google Scholar
Stein, G. 1998: ‘1996 excavations at Hacinebi Tepe’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 19: 197–207Google Scholar
Stein, G. 1999: ‘1997 excavations at Hacinebi Tepe’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 20: 183–203Google Scholar
Stein, G., Bernbeck, R., Coursey, C., McMahon, A., Miller, N.F., Mısır, A., Nicola, J., Pittman, H., Pollock, S., Wright, H. 1996: ‘Uruk colonies and Anatolian communities: an interim report on the 1992–1993 excavations at Hacinebi, Turkey’ American Journal of Archaeology 100/2: 205–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, G. 1993: Tille Höyük: The Late Bronze Age and the Iron Age Transition. LondonGoogle Scholar
Tül, S. 1986: ‘Prehistoric settlements on the Maeander plain’ in Joukowsky, M.S. (ed.), Prehistoric Aphrodisias (Vol. 2). Providence, Rhode Island: 713–24Google Scholar
Tuna, N., Öztürk, J. (eds) 1999: Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1998. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds) 2001: Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 1999. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Tuna, N., Öztürk, J., Velibeyoğlu, J. 2004: Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 2001. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Tuna, N., Velibeyoğlu, J. (eds) 2002: Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs, Activities in 2000. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Ünal, A. 1991: ‘Two peoples on both sides of the Aegean Sea: did the Achaeans and the Hittites know each other?’ Bulletin of the Middle Eastern Culture Center in Japan 4: 16–44Google Scholar
Wagner, J. 1976: Seleukeia am Euphrat. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, I. 1974: The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. San DiegoGoogle Scholar
Weickert, C. 1940: ‘Grabungen in Milet 1938’ in Bericht über den 6 internationalen Kongress für Archäologie. Berlin: 325–32Google Scholar
Weickert, C. 1957: ‘Die Ausgrabung am Athena-Tempel in Milet 1955’ Istanbuler Mitteilungenl 7: 102–32Google Scholar
Weickert, C. 1959/1960: ‘Die Ausgrabung Beim Athena-Tempel in Milet 1957’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 9/10: 1–96Google Scholar
Wiegand, T. 1908: Sechster Vorläufiger Bericht über die von den Königlichen Museen in Milet und Didyma Unternommenen Ausgrabungen. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, T. 1929: Milet 2.2: Die milesische Landschaft. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, T., Wilski, P. 1906: Milet 1.1: Karte der Milesischen Halbinsel. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wood, J.T. 1890: Modern Discoveries on the Site of Ancient Ephesus. LondonGoogle Scholar
Yalçıklı, D., Tekinalp, V.M. 2004: ‘Mezraa Höyük 2002 Yılı Kurtarma Kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 25/1: 377–86Google Scholar