Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:54:39.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some New Assyrian Rock-Reliefs in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

O. Aytuğ Taşyürek
Affiliation:
Director of the Adana Regional Museum

Extract

Of the Assyrian rock-reliefs in Turkey, only two long-known groups, those of the Cudi Dağ and Bırklin (“the Tigris Tunnel”) have been fully published. These groups are both accompanied by inscriptions and present no problems of dating. A further relief at Eğil has been known for some time but is somewhat inaccessible, to the extent that it is still unclear whether or not it is inscribed. It has been the subject of a recent study.

It is the purpose of the present article to make known some further Assyrian rock-reliefs, a single one from Cilicia, and a group from the Hatay. These reliefs were located by the author during surveys and travels, 1973–74. That these reliefs have remained undiscovered up to the present is a curious coincidence, and they may now take their place alongside those of the Cudi Dağ and Bırklin, as well as the rather few other reliefs discovered outside Assyria proper such as those of the Nahr el Kelb; we shall also see that they offer parallels to some of the native Assyrian reliefs such as those of the Maltai. In the absence of any identifying inscriptions the new reliefs present greater problems of dating.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lehmann-Haupt, C. F., Armenien Einst und Jetzt (Berlin, 1910), vol. I, ch. 12, “Der Tigris-Tunnel”Google Scholar; also id., Materialien zür älteren Geschichte Armeniens und Mesopotamiens (Berlin, 1907), nos. 7 and 20–23, pp. 16–18, 31–44; King, L. W., PSBA 35 (1913), 66 ffGoogle Scholar.

2 Tigr. 1: Tiglath-pileser I (third Nairi campaign, c. 1100 B.C.); Tigr. 2–5: Shalmaneser III (2 + 4: year 15, 844 B.C.; 5 + 3: year 7, 852 B.C.).

3 Wäfler, M., “Eğil; das neuassyrische Relief”, in Archäologischer Anzeiger 1975 (1976)Google Scholar.

4 Already reported, TAD 22/1 (1975), 118 fGoogle Scholar.; A.S. 24 (1974), 26 ffGoogle Scholar.

5 See Bachmann, W., Felsreliefs in Assyrien, (WVDOG 52: Leipzig, 1927)Google Scholar.

6 Postgate, J. N., Iraq 35 (1973), 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 On information given in the Adana District Museum by Ali Tok of Çatbaşı village, preliminary investigations took place at Karabur in December 1974. Early in 1975 more detailed research was carried out together with Y. Karalar and M. Bilici, archaeologists, and N. Doğru, technician, assistants at Adana Museum. Here we are pleased to record our gratitude to these assistants and to Ali Tok.

8 Andrae, W., Coloured Ceramics from Ashur (London, 1925), Pl. 10Google Scholar; Loud, G. and Altman, C. B., Khorsabad II (OIP 40; Chicago, 1938) Pl. 89Google Scholar.

9 Unger, E., Die Stele des Bel-Harran-Beli-Ussur (Istanbul, 1917), Pl. 1Google Scholar.

10 RIA I, (Berlin-Leipzig, 1925)Google Scholar, s. v. Anaz, and Tafel 14.

11 Orations, XI, 59 (ed. Foerster, Vol. I, Fasc. II, p. 455).

12 I am indebted to J. D. Hawkins for this information, and also for help with the English in writing this article.

13 For the possible appearance of , see Rende, J. E., Iraq 34 (1972), 89 and 93 fGoogle Scholar.