Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:02:43.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

R.E.C.A.M. Notes and Studies No. 4 Latin Inscriptions from Ladik and Sinop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

D. H. French
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This short note is here presented as an illustration not only of the material which will be published in the final volumes but also of the aims and methods of the R.E.C.A.M. work.

Four inscriptions form the core of this article. Two are from the area of Ladik (now renamed Halicı), the ancient Laodiceia Combusta; both are unpublished. The remaining two are from Sinop, the ancient Sinope; one has been published previously, the other is a new, unpublished fragment of a known inscription. The full text of these two Sinop documents can now be significantly revised. Of the two Ladik inscriptions, one was seen in the course of my researches on the milestones of Asia Minor (CIL XVII fasc. 5); the other came to light amongst the papers left to the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara by Professor W. M. Calder.

I am grateful to the Ministry of Culture, General-Directorate of Antiquities and Museums for permission to publish this material.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 28 , December 1978 , pp. 175 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For an exposition of the aims and methods of the MAMA revision project, retitled R.E.C.A.M., see French, and Hall, , “R.E.C.A.M.: An Institute Research Programme”, in Anat. St. XXVII (1977), 19–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 For other inscriptions recorded at this same place:

(1)(a) Heberdey, and Wilhelm, , Reisen in Kilikien und Süd-Phrygien (Denkschr. d. Kais. Akad. in Wien XLIV (1896) Abh. VI), 161 no. 268Google Scholar “in Mektubsche- oder Hadschbunarkhan”.

(b) Cousin, , Kyros le Jeune en Asie Mineure (Nancy 1904), 434 no. 6βGoogle Scholar “Khan-Khayvé”

(c) MAMẠ I, 35 no. 59Google Scholar “Tashpınar”

(2) Cousin, op. cit. 434 no. 6α “Khan-Khayvé”

(3) Cousin, op. cit. 434 no. 6γ “Khan-Khayvé”

(4) Cousin, op. cit. 434 no. 6δ “Khan-Khayvé”

The han mentioned by Heberdey and Wilhelm and by Cousin has been dismantled. Only the foundations now survive. The han is not listed in Özergin, , Tarih Dergisi XV–20 (1965) 167Google Scholar or in İlter, , Tarihi Türk Hanlan (Karayollan Gn. Med., Ankara 1969)Google Scholar. The place is named “Hosh pinar” on Kiepert, , Karte von Kleınasien (2nd ed., 1912)Google Scholar.

3 Bibliography: (1) CIL III. 1. 238Google Scholar; (2) CIL III. Suppl. 1. 6977Google Scholar; (3) CIL III. Suppl. 2. 12219Google Scholar; (4) ‘Rottiers, , Itin. (1829) p. 238, 284Google Scholar’ (quoted in CIL. III. 1. 238Google Scholar and Suppl. 1. 6977), not seen by me; (5) Hamilton, , Researches in Asia Minor, Pontus and Armenia I (London 1842), 309 nos. 53–55Google Scholar; (6) de Hell, Hommaire, Voyage en Turquie et Perse IV (Paris 1860), 345 and 349Google Scholar and plates XI no. 3 and XII no. 1; (7) Le Bas, and Waddington, , Inscriptions Grècques et Latines (Voyages archéologiques en Grèce et en Asie Mineure, III) (Paris 1870), 428 no. 1809 and 1811Google Scholar; (8) Mordtmann, , Ὁ ἐν Κωνσταντινουπόλει Фιλολγικὸς Σύλλογος 15 (1880–1881)Google Scholar, Παραρτ., 48 no. 11; (9) Doublet, , BCH 13 (1889), 303 no. 6Google Scholar; (10) Eph. IV, no. 42.