Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:44:24.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Report on Excavations at Şar, Comana Cappadociae, in 1967

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Richard P. Harper  and
İnci Bayburtluoğlu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The site of Comana Cappadociae lies, according to Strabo (XII. 2. 3.), in a deep and narrow valley of the Antitaurus, on both banks of the river Sarus. That this description is aptly fitted by the ruins at the village of Şar, in the valley of the Göksu or Sarız çay, in the kaza of Mağara (in 1967 renamed Tufanbeyli), at the northernmost point of the vilayet of Adana, was soon noted by visitors (Plates XLIV a, b, XLV a). The best evidence for the location of Comana is given by the Tabula Peutingeriana and by the Itineraria Antoniniana, both of which show the city to be on the direct route from Caesareia (Kayseri) to Melitene (Eski Malatya). The Tabula Peutingeriana shows that the traveller had to cross a range of mountains as he approached Comana from the west, as now one can approach Şar by the direct route across the Antitaurus. The Itineraria Antoniniana (210.5–211.4) give a distance of 154 Roman miles between Melitene and Comana, while a milestone in the village at Şar, of the great series belonging to that road, bears the number 157. This close correspondence makes it certain that the ruins at Şar are those of the classical Comana, even without the cumulative circumstantial evidence of the inscriptions. The relationship of the Hittite Kummanni, and Kizzuwatna, with Comana is of course another problem which, regrettably, remains unsolved.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 18 , December 1968 , pp. 149 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a list of publications containing information about Şar, chiefly its inscriptions, see Harper, R. P., “Tituli Comanorum Cappadociae”, above, p. 93Google Scholar. The principal topographic account is that in Grothe, H., Meine Vorderasienexpedition 1906 und 1907, Leipzig, 1911, pp. 233–53Google Scholar.

2 Hogarth, D. G., and Munro, J. A. R., Modern and Ancient Roads in Eastern Asia Minor (Royal Geographical Society Supplementary Papers, III, part 5), 1893, p. 691Google Scholar.

3 AS. XIV, 1964, pp. 167–8Google Scholar. Pl. XLII (b), there, shows the setting of the monument before excavation.

4 Grothe, , op. cit., p. 216Google Scholar.

5 Photograph in Rott, H., Kleinasiatische Denkmäler aus Pisidien Pamphylien Kappadokien und Lykien, Leipzig, 1908, p. 171, fig. 56Google Scholar.

6 Photographs in Kähler, H., Rom und Seine Welt, Munich, 1960, Pls. 214 and 215Google Scholar.

7 Hoepfner, W., Herakleia Pontike—Ereğli (Forschung an der Nordküste Kleinasiens, Band II, Teil 1), Vienna, 1966, Pls. 12–19Google Scholar; especially Pl. 12 (a), where Pan is again the subject.