Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:35:36.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Late Bronze Age Monuments of Eflatun Pınar and Fasıllar near Beyşehir

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

James Mellaart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this short article is to draw attention to a number of features presented by these well known monuments near Beyşehir which are in need of further clarification, and to offer yet another suggestion about its original appearance.

During the last decade, a number of articles from the pen of Professors H. G. Güterbock, K. Bittel, R. Naumann and E. Laroche have been devoted to the sanctuary of Eflatun Pınar and it might be thought that there is little to add. That this is not so, I trust this article will show. These remarks are the result of three visits to these monuments in 1952, 1955 and 1957.

The Fasıllar statue (7·40 m. in height) lies in the Roman stadium of a classical site above the village of that name. Its rough condition suggests, as Güterbock has already pointed out, that it may have been unfinished and locally quarried, roughed out for transport and for some reason left there. The material is trachyte, which occurs locally. Güterbock comments on the lack of “Hittite” sherds at Fasıllar. One can go further; there is no site there earlier than the Classical one. The nearest Late Bronze Age sites are Karahisar, Evreği and Kızılviran Hüyüks. The latter site is the largest, but it is difficult to see why anyone should want to quarry a statue at Fasıllar, 50 km. away, if the statue was meant to be erected at this site, which is surrounded by trachyte rocks within a few kilometres.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 12 , December 1962 , pp. 111 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Güterbock, H. G., “Alte und neue hethitische Denkmäler”, in Halil Edhem Hatıra Kitabı, I, 1947, p. 59 ffGoogle Scholar.

Bittel, K., Bibliotheca Orientalis, 10, 1953, pp. 2–5Google Scholar.

Naumann, R., Architektur Kleinasiens, 1955, p. 187 f., 382Google Scholar.

Laroche, E., Anatolia, III, 1958, p. 43 ffGoogle Scholar.

2 Güterbock, H. G., op. cit., p. 63Google Scholar.

3 ibid., p. 62.

4 Brandenstein, , Hethitische Götter nach Bildbeschreibungen, 1943Google Scholar, passim.

5 Güterbock, H. G., AS. VI, 1956, p. 53 f.Google Scholar, Pl. III.

6 First noticed in 1952, by the writer.

7 e.g. Naumann, op. cit., p. 188.

8 Laroche, op. cit., p. 46.

9 Bittel, op. cit., p. 4.

10 AS. IX, 1959, p. 178 fGoogle Scholar.

11 Laroche, op. cit., pp. 44–6.

12 See note 10.

13 Laroche, op. cit., p. 45.

14 Otten, H., Zur Grammatikalischen und Lexikalischen Bestimmung des Luvischen, pp. 110–11Google Scholar.

15 AS. VIII, 1958, pp. 104–111Google Scholar.

16 H. G. Güterbock, op. cit., Fig. 6.

17 K. Bittel, op. cit., p. 4; Naumann, op. cit., p. 188.

18 See note 5.

19 Güterbock, op. cit., Fig. 5.

20 Naumann, op. cit., p. 188, quotes Forrer's, E. article in MDOG. 65, 1927, p. 42Google Scholar, about an alleged irrigation system along the Çarsamba Çay in the Konya Plain. While resurveying that area in 1958 it was established that the whole area with irrigation ditches was devoid of prehistoric settlement. The only sites found here, and they are quite numerous, are of Roman date. It can therefore be reasonably inferred that the irrigation system with which they are associated is not of earlier date.

21 Naumann, op. cit., p. 70.