Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:44:04.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A land dispute from the Lycian borderland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Hüseyin Köktürk
Affiliation:
Fethiye Museum
N.P. Milner
Affiliation:
Institute of Classical Studies, University of London

Abstract

An inscription from a private collection in Fethiye tells part of a court case concerning the illegal sale of land to ‘foreigners’, who are identified as Lycians. It is argued that the land belonged to Rhodes' mainland possessions bordering on Lycia, and some of the individuals named in the inscription may be identified with members of a prominent second century AD Rhodian family. Possible locations for the land at Daidala or on the island of Meis/Castellorizo are discussed.

Özet

Fethiye'deki özel bir koleksiyonda yer alan bir yazıt, Likyalılar olarak tarif edilen yabancılara yapılan gayri meşru bir arazi satışı ile ilgili olan mahkeme davasının bir bölümünden bahsetmektedir. İddia edildiǧine göre arazi Rodos'a ait olup Likya sınırındaki ana kıta arazilerini içermektedir. Yazıtta adı geçen bazı kisiler de İ.S. ikinci yüzyılda yaşamış olan önemli bir Rodos ailesinin fertleri olabilirler. Daidala'da ya da Meis/Castellorizo adasında arazinin bulunabileceǧi yer ile ilgili yapılan saptamalar tartışılmaktadır.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkwright, W 1895: ‘The frontier of Lycia and CariaJournal of Hellenic Studies 15: 93–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinkenberg, C 1941: Lindos: Fouilles de l'Acropolis 1902–1914: II. Inscriptions, Volume i (nos 1–281), Volume ii (nos 282–710). Berlin, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Bresson, A 1991: Recueil des inscriptions de la Pérée rhodienne. ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresson, A 1999: ‘Rhodes and Lycia in Hellenistic times’ in Gabrielsen, V et al. (eds), Hellenistic Rhodes: Politics, Culture and Society. Aarhus: 98131Google Scholar
Ferrary, J-L, Rousset, D 1998: ‘Un lotissement de terres à Delphes au IIe siècle après J-CBulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 122: 277342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, P M, Bean, G E 1954: The Rhodian Peraea and Islands. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Gignac, F T 1976: A Grammar of the Greek Papyri of the Roman and Byzantine Periods: Volume I. Phonology. MilanGoogle Scholar
Grenfell, B P, Hunt, A S 1906: The Hibeh Papyri Volume I. LondonGoogle Scholar
Kokkinia, C 2000: Die Opramoas-Inschrift von Rhodiapolis (Antiquitas 3.40). BonnGoogle Scholar
LGPN 1987–: Fraser, P M, Matthews, E (eds), A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names Volumes I–. OxfordGoogle Scholar
LSJ 1940: Liddell, H G, Scott, R, Jones, H S, A Greek-English Lexicon. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Mason, H J 1974: Greek Terms for Roman Institutions. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Momigliano, A 1951: ‘Review of C Wirszubski 1950: Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the late Republic and early Principate. CambridgeJournal of Roman Studies 41: 146–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preisigke, F 1925: Wörterbuch der griechischen Papyrusurkunden I. BerlinGoogle Scholar
RE 1894–: Wissowa, G, Kroll, W et al. (eds), Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der klassichem Altertumswissenschaft. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Robert, L 1937: Études Anatoliennes. ParisGoogle Scholar
Robert, L 1937: Études Anatoliennes. ParisGoogle Scholar
Robert, L 1969: Opera Minora Selecta III. 1399–1401. Amsterdam. Reprinting, Robert, L 1969: ‘Hellenica 26 Pierres errantes, 6. Inscriptions du Musée d'Avignon. — ARevue de Philologie 1944: 33–5Google Scholar
Schmitt, H H 1957: Rom und Rhodos (Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsgeschichte 40). MunichGoogle Scholar
Susini, G 19521954: ‘Iscrizioni greche di Megiste e della Licia al Museo di MitileneAnnuario della Scuola Archeologica Italiana di Atene 30–2: 341–55Google Scholar