Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:48:28.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Adıyaman Survey: an interim report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

S. R. Blaylock ,
D. H. French  and
G. D. Summers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some preliminary conclusions and individual discoveries from the first four seasons of a survey in the province of Adıyaman are presented here. Initial inspiration for this project grew out of the Institute's excavations at Tille Höyük and the realization that Tille and other excavations in the Lower Euphrates Rescue Project were beginning to provide the kind of precise ceramic sequence which had not hitherto existed for the region. An element of urgency was introduced by the imminence of flooding up to the 550 m. contour by the creation of a huge reservoir above the Atatürk Dam. Consequently a permit to carry out a survey of all archaeological remains in the province was applied for and granted by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism.

During the four seasons, 1985–1988, which have taken place so far, our effort has been very largely directed towards a detailed investigation of that area on the west bank of the Euphrates which will be flooded (Fig. 1). At least one further season is required to complete this examination. To this end, part of the Euphrates valley and one tributary system were the focus of attention in the 1985–1987 seasons (Fig. 2).

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 40 , December 1990 , pp. 81 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Algaze, G., in press. Town and Country in Southeastern Anatolia, Vol. 2: The Stratigraphic Sequence at Kurban Höyük. Chicago: Chicago University Press (OIP).Google Scholar
Algaze, G., 1986 Kurban Höyük and the Late Chalcolithic Period in the Northwest Mesopotamian Periphery: A preliminary Assessment. In Finkbinder, U. and Röllig, W. (eds.), ǧamdat Naşr-Period or Regional Style?: 274–315. Wiesbaden: Reichert (TAVO Reihe B, Nr. 62).Google Scholar
Alp, S., 1987. Ancoz Excavations, 1979. In Aşağı Fırat Projesi 1978–1979 Çalışmaları: 61–70, pls. 15–18. Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (Aşağı Fırat Projesi Yayınları, Seri 1, No. 3). Lower Euphrates Project 1978–1979 Activities: 61–70, Pls. 15–18. Ankara: Middle East Technical University (Lower Euphrates Project Publications, Series 1, No. 3).Google Scholar
Astour, M., 1979. The Arena of Tiglath-pileser III's Campaign Against Sarduri II (743 B.C.) Assur 2: 69–91.Google Scholar
Bartl, K., 1989. Zur Datierung der altmonochromen Ware von Tell Halaf. In Haex, O. M. C., Curvers, H. H. and Akkermans, P. M. M. G. (eds.) To the Euphrates and Beyond: Archaeological studies in honour of Maurits N. van Loon: 257–274. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Behm-Blancke, M. R., 1983. Hassek Höyük. Die Grabungen 1981. Türk Ark Derg 26(2):65–78.Google Scholar
Behm-Blancke, M. R., 1984 Hassek Höyük. Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in den Jahren 1981–1983. Ist Mitt 34: 31–65.Google Scholar
Brown, G. H., 1967. Prehistoric Pottery from the Antitaurus. Anat St 17: 123–164.Google Scholar
Darga, M., 1986. Şemsiyetepe İlk Tunç Çağı Boyalı Çömleği. In 9 Türk Tarih Kongresi; Ankara, 21–25 Eylül 1981: 73–80 and Pls. 37–42. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar
Darga, M., 1987 Şemsiyetepe Kazıları: Şemsiyetepe Excavations, 1978–1979. In Aşağı Fırat Projesi 1978–1979 Çalışmaları: 291–298 and Pls. 179–188. Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (Aşağı Fırat Projesi Yayınları, Seri 1, No. 3).Google Scholar
Lower Euphrates Project 1978–1979 Activities: 291–298 and Pls. 179–188. Ankara: Middle East Technical University (Lower Euphrates Project Publications, Series 1, No. 3).Google Scholar
Feissel, D., 1982. Remarques de toponymie syrienne d'après des inscriptions grecques chrétiennes trouvées hors de Syria. Syria 59: 319–343.Google Scholar
Frangipane, M., and Palmieri, A. (eds.), 1983. Perspectives on Proto-urbanization in Eastern Anatolia: Arslantepe (Malatya). An Interim Report on 1975–1983 Campaigns. Origini 12, 2.Google Scholar
French, D. H., 1987. Tille. 8 Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 1, Ankara 26–30 May 1986: 205–212. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
French, D. H., 1988: Tille Arkeoloji Kazısı. 9 Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 1, Ankara 6–10 Nisan 1987: 335–344. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
French, D. H., 1990. Gaziantep ve Hatay Müzelerinde Bulunan Sakçagözü ve Tell esh-Sheik Kazıları Malzemesi. 7. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 1. Antalya 18–23 Mayıs 1989: 435–441. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
French, D. H. in press.Google Scholar
French, D. H., Moore, J. and Russell, H. F., 1982. Excavations at Tille 1979–1982: An Interim Report. AnatSt 32: 161–187.Google Scholar
French, D. H. and Summers, G. D., 1988. Sakçagözü Material in the Gaziantep Museum. AnatSt 38: 71–84.Google Scholar
Garelli, P., 1963. Les Assyriens en Cappadoce. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Harper, R. P., 1980. Athis–Neocaesareia–Qasrin–Dibsi Faraj. In Margueron, J. Cl. (ed.) Le Moyen Euphrate zone de contacts et d'échanges. Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg 1977: 327–348. Strasbourg: Université des Sciences Humanes de Strasbourg (Travaux du Centre de Recherche sur le Proche-Orient et la Grèce Antiques 5).Google Scholar
Hartmann, R., 1950. Al-Hadat al Hamra. In Kleinasien und Byzanz: 40–50, Pls. 10–11. Berlin: de Gruyter (Istanbuler Forschungen 17).Google Scholar
Hauptmann, H., 1983. Lidar Höyük 1981. TürkArkDerg 26(2): 93–110.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., 1970. Hieroglyphic Hittite Inscriptions of Commagene. AnatSt 20: 69–110.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., 1975. Von Kummuh nach Kommagene. AntW 5 (Sondernummer): 5–10.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., 1983. Kummuh. Reallexikon der Assyriologie 6: 338–340.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., 1988. Kuzi-Tešub and the “Great Kings” of Karkamiš. AnatSt 38: 99–108.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., forthcoming, The Hieroglyphic Luvian Inscriptions of the Iron Age. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hoh, M. R., 1981. Die Keramik von Hassek Höyük. IstMitt 31: 31–82.Google Scholar
Kalaç, M. and Hawkins, J. D., 1989. The Hieroglyphic Luwian Rock-Inscription of Malpınar. AnatSt 39: 107–112.Google Scholar
Korbel, G., 1985. Die spätbronzezeitliche Keramik von Norşuntepe. Hannover: Institut für Bauen und Planen in Entwicklungsländern (Mitteilungen 4).Google Scholar
Kühne, H., 1987. Siedlungsmuster im İncesu-Tal. In Aşağı Fırat Projesi 1978–1979 Çalışmaları: 47–51, pls. 7–12. Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (Aşağı Fırat Projesi Yayınları, Seri 1, No. 3) Lower Euphrates Project 1978–1979 Activities: 47–51, Pls. 7–12. Ankara: Middle East Technical University (Lower Euphrates Project Publications, Series 1, No. 3).Google Scholar
Marfoe, L., 1988. Kurbanhöyük Excavations, 1984. TürkArkDerg 27: 15–27.Google Scholar
Marfoe, L. et al. , 1986. The Chicago Euphrates Archaeological Project 1980–1984: an Interim Report. Anatolica 13: 37–148.Google Scholar
Mısır, A., 1985. Çavi Tarlası 1984 Yılı Kazısı. Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Bülteni 2: (17–20)(pages not numbered). Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
Le Mière, M., 1989. Les débuts de la céramique sur le Moyen-Euphrate (6500–5500 B.C.) In Haex, O. M. C., Curvers, H. H. and Akkermans, P. M. M. G. (eds.), To the Euphrates and Beyond: Archaeological studies in honour of Maurits N. van Loon: 53–64. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Moore, J., forthcoming. Tille Höyük 1.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M., 1977. Lower Euphrates Basin 1977 Survey. İstanbul: Middle East Technical University (Lower Euphrates Publications, Series 1, No. 2).Google Scholar
Özgüç, N., 1986. Two Seal Impressions from Kültepe and the Kırık Bayır Relief. In Kelly-Buccellati, M. (ed.), Insight Through Images Studies in Honor of Edith Porada: 197–200. Malibu: Undena (Bibliotheca Mesopotamia 21).Google Scholar
Palmieri, A., 1985. Eastern Anatolia and early Mesopotamian urbanization: remarks changing relations. In Liverani, M., Palmieri, A. and Peroni, R. (eds.), Studi di Palentologia in Onore di Salvatore M. Puglisi: 191–213. Rome: Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.Google Scholar
Redford, S., 1986. Excavations at Gritille (1982–1984): The Medieval Period. A Preliminary Report. AnatSt 36: 103–136.Google Scholar
Roodenberg, J. J. (ed.), 1988. Special issue on the Aceramic Neolithic in S. E. Turkey: Anatolica 15.Google Scholar
Roodenberg, J. J., Wilkinson, T. J. and Bayrı-Baykan, S., 1984. Surveys and soundings at Kumartepe: an Interim Report. Anatolica 11: 1–16.Google Scholar
Russell, H. F., 1980. Pre-Classical Pottery of Eastern Anatolia. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 85).Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. M., 1988. Excavation at Karatut Mevkii and Perspectives on the Uruk/Jemdet Nasr Expansion, Akkadica 56: 1–41.Google Scholar
Serdaroğlu, Ü., 1977. Aşağı Fırat Havzasında Araştırmalar 1975: Surveys in the Lower Euphrates Basin. Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi. (Aşağı Fırat Projesi Yayınları Seri 1, No. 1).Google Scholar
Stein, G., 1988. Pastoral Production in Complex Societies: Mid-Late Third Millennium B.C. and Medieval Faunal Remains from Gritille Höyük in the Karababa Basin, Southeast Turkey. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Sucu, M., 1985. Adıyaman İli ve İlçeleri. Adana: Önder Matbaası.Google Scholar
Summers, G. D., 1990. 1988 Tille Höyük Kazısı. 11 Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 1, Antalya 18–23 Mayıs 1989: 305–316. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
Sürenhagen, D., 1978. Keramik Produktion in Habuba Kabira-Süd. Berlin: Hessling.Google Scholar
Sürenhagen, D., 1986a. The Dry Farming Belt: The Uruk Period and Subsequent Developments. In Weiss, H. (ed.), The Origins of Cities in Dry-Farming Syria and Mesopotamia in the Third Millennium B.C.: 7–43. Connecticut: Four Quarters.Google Scholar
Sürenhagen, D., 1986b, Discussion. In Finkbinder, U. and Röllig, W. (eds.), ǧamdat Nasar-Period or Regional Style?: 313. Wiesbaden: Reichert (TAVO Reihe B, Nr. 62).Google Scholar
Thissen, L. C., 1985. The Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Pottery from Hayaz Höyük. Anatolica 12: 75–130.Google Scholar
Voigt, M. M., 1985. Village on the Euphrates: Excavations at Neolithic Gritille in Turkey. Expedition 27(1): 10–24.Google Scholar
Voigt, M. M., 1988 Excavations at Neolithic Gritille. Anatolica 15: 215–232.Google Scholar
Waagé, F. O. (ed.), 1948. Antioch On-The-Orontes 4, Part 1. Ceramics and Islamic Coins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, J., 1976. Seleukeia am Euphrat/Zeugma. Wiesbaden: Reichert (TAVO Reihe B, Nr. 10).Google Scholar
Wagner, J., 1985 Die Römer am Euphrat und Tigris. Antike Welt Sondernummer 1985.Google Scholar
Von Wickede, A., 1984. Çavi Tarlası: Bericht über den Survey auf dem Çavi Tarlası 1982. IstMitt 34: 112–133.Google Scholar
Von Wickede, A. and Mısır, A., 1986. Çavi Tarlası 1984 Kazı Kampanyası. 7 Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, Ankara 20–24 Mayıs 1985: 103–109. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.Google Scholar