Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:08:04.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategies for future success: Remembering the Hittites during the Iron Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Lynn Swartz Dodd
Lynn Swartz Dodd
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Maraş and Sakçagözü valley surveys on the east side of the Amanus mountains provide new data regarding patterns of Hittite territorial management and administration. Sites dating to the Late Bronze Age II period were identified by the presence of burnished pottery, drab ware and, occasionally, by animal-shaped ceramic vessel fragments. The standardised drab ware pottery is emblematic of mass production and rigid control of labour sources and raw materials through systems designed to support the economic and political strategies of the Hittite court and to serve its interests. The settlement pattern is linked to Hittite regional needs for agricultural production, raw materials and territorial security. The distinct site location pattern indicates a strategic, restrained use of space by the Hittites. This left room for beneficial integrative features that local élites might emphasise for their own purposes, which comprise a foundation for the prestige later accorded to the Hittite legacy.

Özet

Amanos dağlarının doğusunda uzanan Maraş ve Sakçagözü vadisinde yapılan yüzey araştırmaları, Hitit topraklarının organizasyonu ve yönetim yapısına ilişkin yeni veriler edinmemize olanak sağlamıştır. Geç Bronz II dönemine tarihlenen yerleşmeler, perdahlı kapların, bezemesiz malların ve arada bir bulunan hayvan biçimli kaplara ait pançaların varlığı ile belirlenmiştir. Standartlaşmış bezemesiz mallar, Hitit sarayının ekonomik ve politik stratejilerini desteklemek ve onun çıkarlarına hizmet etmek üzere tasarlanmiş bir seri üretimin, sıkı bir iş gücü kaynakları ve hammadde denetiminin göstergesidir. Yerleşim dokusu Hititlerin tarımsal üretim, hammade kaynakları ve toprak güvenliği bakımından bölgesel gereksinimleri ile bağlantılıdır. Farklı bir yerleşim konumu Hititlerin statejik ve amaca yönelik bir seçim yaptiğını gösterir. Bu, yerli seçkin zümrenin kendi amaçları için ön planda tutabilecekleri yararlı, tamamlayıcı özelliklerin seçimine de olanak vermiştir. Bu Hititlerin daha sonraki ünlerine bir temel oluşturmuştur.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 57 , December 2007 , pp. 203 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkım, U. 1969: ‘The Amanus region’ Archaeology 22/4: 280Google Scholar
Alkım, U., Alkım, H. 1966: ‘Gedikli kazısı Birinci ÖnRapor (Excavations at Gedikli [Karahüyük] first preliminary report)’ Türk Tarih Kurumu Belleten 30/117: 27–58Google Scholar
Adamthwaite, M. 2001: Late Hittite Emar: The Chronology, Synchronisms and Socio-Political Aspects of a Late Bronze Age Fortress Town. LouvainGoogle Scholar
Akkermans, P., Limpens, J., Spoor, R.H. 1993: ‘On the frontier of Assyria: excavations at Tell Sabi Abyad, 1991’ Akkadica 84–85: 1–52Google Scholar
Balkan, K. 1957: ‘Letter of King Anum-hirbi of Mama to King Warshama of Kanish’ Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınlarından 7/31aGoogle Scholar
Beckman, G. 1992: ‘Hittite administration in Syria in the light of the texts from Hattuša, Ugarit and Emar’ in Chavalas, M., Hayes, J. (eds), New Horizons in the Study of Ancient Syria. Malibu: 41–49Google Scholar
Beckman, G. 1995: ‘Hittite provincial administration in Anatolia and Syria: the view from Masat and Emar’ in Carruba, O., Geiorgieri, M., Mora, C. (eds), Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Hittitologia. Pavia: 19–38Google Scholar
Beckman, G. 1999: Hittite Diplomatic Texts. AtlantaGoogle Scholar
Bonatz, D. 2000: Das syro-hethitische Grabdenkmal: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung einer neuen Bildgattung in der Eisenzeit im nordsyrischsüdostanatolischen Raum. MainzGoogle Scholar
Brown, G.H. 1967: ‘Prehistoric pottery in the Antitaurus’ Anatolian Studies 17: 123–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, T. 2005: The Kingdom of the Hittites. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S., Carter, E., Healey, E., Anderson, S., Kennedy, A., Whitcher, S. 1999: ‘Emerging complexity on the Kahramanmaraş plain, Turkey: The Domuztepe Project, 1995–1997’ American Journal of Archaeology 103: 395–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, E. 1994: ‘Report on the Kahramanmaraş Archaeological Survey 1992’ Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 11: 237–42Google Scholar
Carter, E. 1995: ‘Report on the Kahramanmaraş Archaeological Survey Project from 24/9/93 to 11/11/93’ Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 12: 331–41Google Scholar
Carter, E. 1996: ‘The Kahramanmaraş Archaeological Survey Project: a preliminary report on the 1994 season’ Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 13: 289–306Google Scholar
Carter, E. 1997: ‘Report on the archaeological work in Domuztepe and its environs in 1995’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 18: 173–87Google Scholar
Carter, E., Campbell, S., Snead, J. 1996: ‘Excavations and survey at Domuztepe’ Anatolia Antiqua 7: 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, E., Eissenstat, C., Hill, C., Swartz, L. 1999: ‘The Kahramanmaraş Archaeological Project Survey 1997’ Kazı Sonuçlari Toplantısı 16: 569–76Google Scholar
del Monte, G.F., Tischler, J. 1978: Die Orts- und Gewässernamen der hethitischen Texte (RGTC 6/1). WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
del Monte, G.F. 1992: Die Orts- und Gewdssernamen der hethitischen Texte (RGTC 6/2). WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Delaporte, L. 1934: ‘Malatya: céramique du Hittite récent’ Révue hittite et asianique 2/16: 257–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinçol, A., Dinçol, B. 2002: ‘Große, Prinnzen, Herren. Die Spitzen der Reichsadministration im Spiegel ihrer Seigel’ in Willinghöfer, H. with Hasekamp, U. (eds) and Baykal-Seeher, Ayşe (Turkish ed.), Die Hethiter und ihr Reich. Das Volk der 1000 Götter. Stuttgart: 82–87Google Scholar
Dodd, L.S. 2002: The Ancient Past in the Ancient Present: Cultural Identity in Gurgum during the Late Bronze Age-Early Iron Age Transition in North Syria. PhD thesis, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
Dodd, L.S. 2003: ‘Chronology and continuity in the Early Iron Age: the northeastern side of the Amanus’ in Fischer, B. et al. , (eds), Identifying Changes: The Transition from Bronze to Iron Ages in Anatolia and its Neighbouring Regions. Istanbul: 127–36Google Scholar
Dodd, L.S. 2005: ‘Territory, legacy and wealth in Iron Age Anatolia’ in Parker, B., Rodseth, L. (eds), Untaming the Frontier: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Frontier Studies. Tucson: 238–60Google Scholar
du Plat Taylor, J.M.-V., Seton-Williams, J., Waechter, J. 1950: ‘Excavations at Sakçe Gözü’ Iraq 12: 53–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faist, B., Finkbeiner, U. 2002: ‘Emar. Eine syrische Stadt unter hethitischer Herrschaft’ Die Hethiter und ihr Reich. Das Volk der 1000 Götter Bonn: 190–95Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 1963: Die Hethitische Keramik von Boghazköy. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Forlanini, M. 1995: ‘The Kings of Karriš’ in Carruba, O., Giorgieri, M.Mora, C. (eds), Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Hittitologia. Pavia: 123–32Google Scholar
Franken, H.J. 1969: Excavations at Tell Deir 'Alla. A Stratigraphical and Analytical Study of the Early Iron Age Pottery. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Gates, M.-H. 2001: ‘Potmarks at Kinet Höyük and the Hittite ceramic industry’ in Jean, É.Dinçol, A.M., Durugönül, S. (eds), La Cilicie: espaces et pouvoirs locaux (2e millénaire avant J-C. – 4e siècle ap. J-C). Actes de la Table ronde Internationale d'Istanbul, 2–5 novembre 1999. Institut Français d'Études Anatoliennes Georges Dumézil, Istanbul. Paris: 137–58Google Scholar
Garrard, A., Conolly, J., Moloney, N., Wright, K. 1996: ‘The early prehistory of the Sakçagözü region, north Levantine rift valley: report on the 1995 survey season’ Anatolian Studies 46: 53–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garstang, J. 1908: ‘Excavations at Sakçe Geuzi in north Syria: preliminary reports for 1908’ Liverpool Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 1: 97–110Google Scholar
Garstang, J. 1912: ‘Second interim report on the excavations at Sakçe Guezi in north Syria, 1911’ Liverpool Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 5: 63–72Google Scholar
Garstang, J. 1937: ‘Third report on the excavations at Sakçe Guezi 1908–1911’ Liverpool Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 24: 119–40Google Scholar
Genz, H. 2005: ‘Thoughts on the origin of the Iron Age pottery traditions in central Anatolia’ in Çilingiroğlu, A., Darbyshire, G. (eds), Anatolian Iron Ages. Proceedings of the Fifth Anatolian Iron Ages Colloquium Held at Van, 4–8 August 2001. London: 47–64Google Scholar
Goetze, A. 1940: Kizzuwatna and the Problem of Hittite Geography. New HavenGoogle Scholar
Goldman, H. 1956: Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus, II. From the Neolithic through the Bronze Age. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Gorny, R. 1995: ‘Hittite imperialism and anti-imperial resistance as viewed from Alisar Höyük’ Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 299: 65–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffen, E.E. 1980: ‘The Middle and Late Bronze Age Pottery’ in van Loon, M. (ed.), Korucutepe. Final Report on the Excavations of the Universities of Chicago, California (Los Angeles) and Amsterdam in the Keban Reservoir, Eastern Anatolia 1968–1970, Vol. 3. New York: 3–76Google Scholar
Gurney, O.R. 1992: ‘Hittite geography: thirty years on’ in Otten, H., Ertem, H.Akurgal, E., Süel, A. (eds), Hittite and Other Anatolian and Near Eastern Studies in Honour of Sedat Alp. Ankara: 213–21Google Scholar
Hansen, C.K., Postgate, J.N. 1999: ‘The Bronze Age to Iron Age transition at Kilise Tepe’ Anatolian Studies 49: 111–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrak, A. 1987: Assyria and Hanigalbat. A Historical Reconstruction of Bilateral Relations from the Middle of the Fourteenth to the End of the Twelfth Centuries BC. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. 1988 ‘Kuzi Tešub and the “Great Kings” of Karkamiš’ Anatolian Studies 38: 99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. 1998: ‘Hittites and Assyrians at Melid (Malatya)’ in Erkanal, H., Donbaz, V., Uğuroğlu, A. (eds), XXXIV. Uluslararası Assiriyoloji Kongresi (XXXIV. International Assyriology Congress) 6–10/VII/1987, Istanbul. Ankara: 63–78Google Scholar
Hecker, K. 1992: ‘Zur Herkunft der hethitischen Keilschrift’ Uluslararası 1. Hititoloji Kongresi Bildirileri (19–21 Temmuz 1990) Çorum. Ankara: 53–60Google Scholar
Hutter, M. 2003: ‘Aspects of Luwian religion’ in Melchert, C. (ed.), The Luwians. Leiden: 211–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izre'el, S., Singer, I. 1990: The General's Letter from Ugarit: A Linguistic and Historical Reevaluation of RS 20.33. Tel AvivGoogle Scholar
Jasink, A.M. 1991: ‘Hittite and Assyrian routes to Cilicia’ De Anatolia Antiqua 1: 253–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klengel, H. 1999: Geschichte des Hethitischen Reiches. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Korbel, G. 1987: Materialheft spätbronzezietliche Keramik Tarsus (Grabung Hetty Goldman). HannoverGoogle Scholar
Korbel, G. 1985: Die Spätbronzezeitliche Keramik von Norsuntepe. HannoverGoogle Scholar
Margueron, J.-Cl. 1980: ‘Emar: un exemple d'imlantation hittite en terre syrienne’ in Margueron, J.-Cl. (ed.), Le Moyen Euphrate: zone de contacts et d'echanges. Leiden: 285–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthers, J. (ed.) 1981: The River Qoueiq, North Syria, and its Catchment. Studies Arising from the Tell Rifa'at Survey. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. 2004: ‘Landscapes of terror and control: imperial impacts in Paphlagonia’ Near Eastern Archaeology 67: 200–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiae, P. 1962: ‘Das Hethitische Malatya, Ausgrabungen einer italienischen Mission, 1961/62’ Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte und Archäologie, Basel-Zürich (Raggi Verlag) 4/2: 15–26Google Scholar
Mellink, M.J. 1956: A Hittite Cemetery at Gordion. PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
Müller-Karpe, A. 1988: Hethitische Töpferei der Oberstadt von Hattuša. MarburgGoogle Scholar
Nashef, K. 1991: Die Orts- und Gewässernamen der altassyrischen Zeit. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Özgen, E.Helwing, B. 2003: ‘On the shifting border between Mesopotamia and the West: seven seasons of joint Turkish-German excavations at Oylum Höyük’ Anatolica 29: 61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgüç, T. 1982: Masat Höyük II: Boğazköy'ün Kuzeydoğusunda Bir Hitit Merkezi / A Hittite Center Northeast of Bogazköy. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Pecorella, P.E. 1975: Malatya III. Rapporto Preliminare delle Campagne 1963–1968. Il Livello Eteo Imperiale e Quelli Neoetei. RomaGoogle Scholar
Postgate, J.N. 1998: ‘Between the plateau and the sea: Kilise Tepe 1994–97’ in Matthews, R. (ed), Ancient Anatolia: Fifty Years' Work by the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara. Ankara: 127–41Google Scholar
Schoop, U.-D. 2003: ‘Pottery traditions of the late Hittite Empire: problems of definition’ in Fischer, B., Genz, H., Jean, É., Köroğlu, K. (eds), Identifying Changes: The Transition from Bronze to Iron Ages in Anatolia and its Neighbouring Regions. Proceedings of the International Workshop Istanbul, November 8–9, 2002. Istanbul: 167–77Google Scholar
Slane, D. 1987: Middle and Late Bronze Age Architecture and Pottery in Gözlü Kale, Tarsus: A New Analysis. PhD thesis, Bryn Mawr CollegeGoogle Scholar
Summers, G.D. 1993: Tille Höyük 4: The Late Bronze Age and the Iron Age Transition. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Symington, D. 2001: ‘Hittites at Kilise Tepe’ in Jean, É., Dinçol, A., Durugönül, S. (eds), La Cilicie: espaces et pouvoirs locaux (2e millénaire avant J-C. – 4e siècle ap. J-C). Actes de la Table ronde Internationale d'Istanbul, 2–5 novembre 1999. Institut Français d'Études Anatoliennes Georges Dumézil, Istanbul. Paris: 167–84Google Scholar
Voigt, M., Hendrickson, R. 2000: ‘The Early Iron Age at Gordion: the evidence from the Yassihöyük Stratigraphic Sequence’ in Oren, E. (ed.), The Sea Peoples and Their World: A Reassessment. Philadelphia: 327–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, M. 2006: ‘The Hittite administration in Emar: the aspect of direct control’ Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 96/2: 222–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidner, E.F. 1922: Politische Dokumente aus Kleinasien, Die Staatsverträge in akkadisher Sprache aus demArchiv von Boghazköi. LeipzigGoogle Scholar