Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:58:15.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Palaeoecology of South Central Anatolia at the end of the Pleistocene and the beginning of the Holocene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Harold R. Cohen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The origins of agriculture and domestication have long been identified, in theory, with the beginning of permanent settlements; the beginning of the Early Neolithic Period is known, in fact, to be synchronous with the ending of the Last Ice Age. To some scholars, fact and theory have suggested that this synchronism implies a causal relationship between certain assumed climatic changes and the beginnings of food production; for others, this synchronism is not more than a misleading coincidence. It is not the purpose of the writer to discuss the validity of these assumptions except to indicate that opinion seems to be hardening that food production may have had a more complicated and lengthy history than these assumptions suggest. There has grown up over the last 25 years a considerable body of literature expressing the most varied opinion about the causes for the origins of food production, and its variety has not narrowed with the emergence of new evidence. In my opinion, the basis for the solution of this problem will be derived essentially from palaeoecological analyses of selected areas and regions in various parts of the world, and not only in the Near East. This paper is intended to open such a study for the region of south central Anatolia. As might be expected in an ecological study, the evidence derives from a number of disciplines, and, accordingly, several colleagues have contributed to the formulation of the suggested ecological pattern. That pattern itself, however, is the responsibility of the writer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 20 , December 1970 , pp. 119 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Braidwood, R. J., and Howe, B., Prehistoric Investigations in Iraqi Kurdistan, 1960, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Butzer, K. W., “Physical Conditions in Eastern Europe, Western Asia and Egypt before the Period of Agriculture and Urban Settlement”, Fascicle 33, Cambridge Ancient History Revised Edition.Google Scholar
Butzer, K. W., Environment and Archaeology, 1964.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. R., Neolithic Cultures in Anatolia in Relation to their Natural Environments, M.A. Thesis, University of Manchester, 1968.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. R., and Erol, O., “Aspects of the Palaeogeography of Central Anatolia”, Journal of the Royal Geographical Society, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driessen, P. M., and de Meester, T., Soils of the Çumra Area, Turkey, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1969.Google Scholar
FAO, Turkey, Country Report, Rome, 1959.Google Scholar
Farrand, W. R., “Geology and physiography of the Beyşehir-Suğla depression, Western Taurus lake district, Turkey”, Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi, Sayı: XIII–I, 1964.Google Scholar
Groneman, A. F., The soils of the wind erosion control camp area, Karapınar, Turkey, Agricultural Univesity, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1968.Google Scholar
Helbaek, H., “First Impressions of the Çatal Hüyük Plant Husbandry”, Anatolian Studies, XIV, 1964.Google Scholar
Higgs, E., “Some Pleistocene Faunas of the Mediterranean Coastal Areas”, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, XXVII, 1961.Google Scholar
Hole, F., and Flannery, K., “Excavations at Ali Kosh”, Iranica Antiqua, II, 1962.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T., and Adams, R., “Salt and Silt in Ancient Mesopotamian Agriculture”, Science, 1958.Google Scholar
Kansu, S. A., “Anadoluda mezolitik kültür buluntuları”, Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fak., Vol. II, No. 5, 1944.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, D., “Five Seasons at the Pre-pottery Neolithic Village of Beidha in Jordan”, PEQ, January–June 1966.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, D., “Beidha”, Antiquity, Vol. 42, December 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Konya-Çumra Projesi Ovası Drenaj Raporu”, Devlet Su Isleri Genel Müdürlügü, Ankara, 1966, Etud Raporları, No. 17–308, Proje No. (1605).Google Scholar
Lloyd, S., and Safar, F., “Tell Hassuna”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, IV, 1945.Google Scholar
Louis, H., “Eiszeitliche Seen in Anatolien”, Zeitschrift Gesellschaft Erdkunde Berlin, 1938.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., “Excavations at Hacılar”, Anatolian Studies, XI, 1961.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük”, Anatolian Studies, XII, 1962.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük”, Anatolian Studies, XIII, 1963.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük”, Anatolian Studies, XIV, 1964.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük”, Anatolian Studies, XVI, 1966.Google Scholar
Renfrew, J. M., “The archaeological evidence for the domestication of plants: methods and problems”, The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, Editors Ucko, P. and Dimbleby, G., 1969.Google Scholar
Ridder, N. A. de, “Sediments of the Konya Basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey”, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1965.Google Scholar
Solecki, P., “An Archaeological Reconnaissance in the Beyşehir-Suğla Area of South-western Turkey”, Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi, Sayı, XIII–I, 1964.Google Scholar
Water Management Studies in the Çumra Irrigation Area, Final Report, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1965.Google Scholar
STRABO, Geography.Google Scholar
Van Zeist, W., “Reflections on prehistoric environments in the Near East”, The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, Editors Ucko, P. and Dimbleby, G., 1969.Google Scholar