Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:30:19.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dodecanese and W. Anatolia in Prehistory: Interrelationships, Ethnicity and Political Geography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

E. M. Melas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The islands of the Dodecanese enjoy a favourable geographical position. They lie at one of the busiest and most important cross-roads of the eastern Mediterranean, and are readily accessible from all directions, including Asia Minor. In considering contacts with the latter, one has to take into account geographical factors such as distance, the nature of the terrain, and prevailing winds and surface currents. Geologically the Dodecanese form an extension of S.W. Asia Minor, known as Caria in historical times. This region is more or less cut off by mountains from the interior of the mainland, and land routes are either non-existent or very poor. The only direct route is provided by the port of call of Miletus which lies at the mouth of the Maeander (Grant 1969, 93). It is thus only natural for Caria to look towards the Aegean and the Dodecanese rather than elsewhere. Similarly, one should expect the Dodecanese to be in constant intercourse with the opposite coast. Indeed, the archaeological evidence seems to agree. The two areas appear to have shared a more or less common culture in prehistory (Dodecanese III, 178; Mee 1975).

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 38 , December 1988 , pp. 109 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aspripetra. Levi, Doro, “La grotta di Aspripetra a Coo”, AS Atene 8–9 (1925–1926) 235–312.Google Scholar
Beycesultan. Lloyd, S. and Mellaart, J., Beycesultan. London 1962–.Google Scholar
Buchholz, H.G., 1973. “Grey Trojan ware in Cyprus and northern Syria”, in Crossland, R. and Birchall, A. (eds), Bronze Age Migrations in the Aegean, London, pp. 179–87.Google Scholar
Courtois, J.-C., 1971. “Sur divers groupes de vases Mycéniens en Méditerrannée orientale (1250–1150 Av. J. -C.”, in The Mycenaeans in the eastern mediterranean, Nicosia, pp. 137–65.Google Scholar
Craik, E., 1980. The Dorian Aegean. London.Google Scholar
Dodecanese I-III. Simpson, R. Hope and Lazenby, J., “Notes from the Dodecanese I-III”, BSA 57 (1962) 154–75, 65 (1970)47–77, 68(1973)47–77, 68(1973)127–79.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. and Bean, G. E., 1954. The Rhodian Peraea and the Islands. OUP.Google Scholar
French, D., 1968. Anatolia and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C. Ph.D. thesis, St. Catherines. Cambridge.Google Scholar
French, E. and Wardle, K. A. (eds), 1988. Problems in Greek Prehistory, proceedings of the 1986 Manchester conference. Bristol.Google Scholar
Furness, A., 1956. “Some early pottery from Samos, Kalymnos and Chios”, PPS 22 173–212.Google Scholar
Furtwängler, A. and Löschke, G., 1886. Mykenische Vasen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Grant, M. 1969. The ancient Mediterranean. London.Google Scholar
Green, S. W. and Perlman, S. M., 1985. The Archaeology of Frontiers and Boundaries. Orlando Ac. Press.Google Scholar
Grouvel, J. H., 1972. “Mycenaean pictorial pottery in Holland”, Bulletin Antike Beschaving 47, 14–30.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1977. “The distribution of material culture items in the Baringo district, Kenya”, Man 12, 239–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1981. “Society, economy and culture: an ethnographic study among the Lozi, West Zambia”, in Hodder, I., Isaak, G. and Hammond, N. (eds) Pattern of the Past, CUP pp. 67–95.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1987 (ed). The archaeology of Contextual Meanings. CUP.Google Scholar
Huot, J. L., 1982. Les céramiques monochromes lissées en Anatolie à l'époque du bronze ancient, vol. 2. Paris.Google Scholar
Iasos. Pecorella, P. E., La cultura preistorica di Iasos in Caria. Roma 1984.Google Scholar
ICAP II, VI. Acta of International Conference on Aegean Prehistory, Athens 1972 and 1987.Google Scholar
Immerwaht, S., 1987. “Mycenaeans and Hittites: cultural connections”, in ICAP VI.Google Scholar
Jackson, L., 1986. Sociocultural and ethnohistoric influences on genetic diversity in Liberia. Amer. Anthropologist 88, 825–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laviosa, C., 1973. “Les fouilles de Iasos”, in The Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of Classical Archaeology, Ankara, pp. 1093–99.Google Scholar
Laviosa, C., 1984, “The Minoan Thalassocracy, Iasos and the Carian coast”, in Häg, R. and Marinatos, N. (eds), The Minoan Thalassocracy: Myth and reality, Stockholm, pp. 183–5.Google Scholar
Levi, D., 1961–1962. “Le due prime campagne di scavi a Iasos 1960–61”, AS Atene 23–4, 505–571.Google Scholar
Levi, D., 1965–1966. “Le campagne 1962–4 a Iasos”, AS Atene 27–8, 401–546.Google Scholar
Levi, D., 1969–1970. “Iasos. Le campagne di scavi 1969–70”, AS Atene 31–2, 461–532.Google Scholar
Lorimer, H., 1950. Homer and the monuments. London.Google Scholar
Macqueen, J. G., 1972. “The first arrival of Indo-european elements in Greece. Some observations from Anatolia”, in ICAP II, 142–5.Google Scholar
Mee, C., 1975. The Dodecanese in the Bronze Age, Ph.D. thesis Univ. of London.Google Scholar
Mee, C., 1978. “Aegean trade and settlement in Anatolia in the second millennium B.C.,” AS 28, 121–56.Google Scholar
Mee, C., 1982. Rhodes in the Bronze Age. Warminster.Google Scholar
Melas, E. M., 1985. The islands of Karpathos, Saros and Kasos in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. SIMA 68.Google Scholar
Melas, E. M., 1988. “Exploration in the Dodecanese: New prehistoric and Mycenaean finds”, BSA 83 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1966. The Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Ages in the Near East and Anatolia. Beyrut.Google Scholar
Merrillees, R. S., 1979. “Cyprus, the Cyclades and Crete in the Early and Middle Bronze Ages”, in The Relations between Cyprus and Crete c. 2000–500 B.C., Nicosia, pp. 8–55.Google Scholar
Müskebi. Boysal, Y., Katalog der Vasen im Museum in Bodrum: Mykenisch-Proto-geometrisch. Ankara.Google Scholar
Myres, J. L., 1949. “The geographical background of the Greek civilisation”, Archiv Orientalni 17, 196–204.Google Scholar
O'Brien, J., 1986. “Toward a reconstitution of ethnicity: Capitalist expansion and cultural dynamics in Sudan”, Amer. Anthropologist 88, 898–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgünel, C., 1983. “Batı Anadolu ve içerlerinde Miken Etkinlikleri”, Belleten 47, 697–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrot, G. and Chipiez, C., 1894. Histoire de l'art dans l'antiquité VI. Paris.Google Scholar
Rao, S. V., 1987. “A comparative study of the material culture of Neolithic Greece and West Asia”, in ICAP VI.Google Scholar
Sampson, A., 1979. “Neolithic finds from Rhodes (in Greek)”, AAA 12, 24–39.Google Scholar
Sampson, A., 1984. “The Neolithic of the Dodecanese and Aegean Neolithic culture”, BSA 79, 239–49.Google Scholar
Sampson, A., 1985. “The S.E. Aegean in the Neolithic times (in Greek)”, AE 1983, publ. 1985, appendix, 5–13.Google Scholar
Sperling, J., 1976. “Kum Tepe in the Troad: Trial excavation”, Hesperia 45, 305–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trianda. Monaco, G., “Scavi nella zona Micenea di Ialiso (1933–6)”, Clara Rhodos 10, 41–183.Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 1984. “Archaeology at the cross-roads: What's new?”, Annual Review of Anthropology 13, 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tritsch, F. J., 1972. “Minyans and Luvians”, in ICAP II, 43–5.Google Scholar
Vermeule, E., 1964. “The Early Bronze Age in Caria”, Archaeology 17, 244–49.Google Scholar
Voigtländer, W., 1982. “Funde aus der Insula westlich des Buleuterion in Milet”, IstMitt 32, 30–173.Google Scholar
Voigtländer, W., 1987. “Die Karer, Mittler zwischen Ost und West in prähistorischer Zeit”, in ICAP VI.Google Scholar
Volonakis, M., 1922. The Island of Roses and her Eleven Sisters. London.Google Scholar
Weickert, C., 1940. “Grabungen in Milet 1938”, in Bericht über den VI. Inter. Kongress für Archäologie (Berlin), 325–32.Google Scholar
Wobst, H. M., 1977. “Stylistic behaviour and information exchange”, Univ. of Michigan Mus. of Anthrop. Anthrop. paper, 61, 317–42.Google Scholar