Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:12:32.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An aerial Survey of Çevre Kale, Yaraşli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2015

G. D. Summers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

About 1 km. north of the village of Yaraşlı on a natural hill that forms an extension of Karaca Daǧ, is a large and impressively defended site locally called Çevre Kale (Fig. 1). Pottery from the surface is Imperial Hittite and Phrygian in date. There is later material, Hellenistic to Byzantine, beneath and adjacent to the village. Yaraşlı is a large well watered village in the Kulu district (ilce) of Konya province (il). The map reference is 59-Ie on the 1:200,000 sheet for Katrancı (Harita Genel Müdürlüǧü 1945).

The aims of the project were to produce a photographic record of the site from the air, using a helium filled blimp and remote controlled camera, from which plans could be drawn and relationships between the various elements of the site determined. Air photographs revealed outlines of buildings that could not be seen on the ground (Pls XLI–XLV(a)). An overall plan has been drawn (Fig. 3). In some cases it has been possible to draw stone for stone plans (Fig. 5 and Pl. XLIV(b), Fig. 6 and Pl. XLV(a)). The results are much superior to those that could have been achieved by traditional cadastral survey and were obtained in a short time. During the course of the day photographs can be taken in varying light so that changes in shadow highlight different features.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 42 , December 1992 , pp. 179 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Akurgal, E., 1955. Phrygische Kunst. Ankara.Google Scholar
Alkım, H., 1967. “Explorations and Excavations in Turkey, 1964”. Anatolica I: 1–43.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. G. C., 1899. “Exploration in Galatia cis Halym, Part II” JHS XIX: 52–134, 280–318, Pl. IV (map).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, W. M., 1910. “A Journey Round the Proseilemmene”. Klio X: 232–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowfoot, J. W., 1899. “Exploration in Galatia cis Halym, Part I”. JHS XIX: 34–51, Pl. IV (map).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVries, K., 1987. “Phrygian Gordion Before Midas”. In Çilingiroǧlu, A. (ed.) Anadolu Demir Çaǧları: Anatolian Iron Ages: 6–12, Pl. 1, Figs. 1–8. İzmir.Google Scholar
DeVries, K., 1990. “The Gordion Excavation Seasons of 1969–1973 and Subsequent Research”. AJA XCIV: 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, A., 1991. The Bronze Age. (The Gordion Excavations Final Reports Volume III) Philadelphia (University Museum Monograph 73).Google Scholar
Hall, A., 1957. Unpublished report to the Wilson Trustees.Google Scholar
Haspels, C. H. E., 1951. Exploration archéologique de la Phrygie. Vol. III, La Cité de Midas. Céramique et trouvailles diverses. Paris.Google Scholar
Haspels, C. H. E., 1971. The Highlands of Phrygia. Princeton.Google Scholar
Envanter, Köy, 1965. Köy Envanter Etüdlerine Göre. Konya 42. Ankara (Köy İşleri Bakanlıǧı Yayınları 105).Google Scholar
Macqueen, J. G., 1968. “Geography and History in Western Asia Minor in the Second Millennium B.C.” AnatSt XVIII: 169–85.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1955. “Iron Age Pottery from Southern Anatolia”. Belleten XIX: 115–36, Pls. 1–10.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1983. “Yaraşlı Hillfort. A Hittite Stronghold in Galatia?” In Boehmer, R. M. and Hauptmann, H. (eds) Beiträge zur Altertumskunde Kleinasiens. Festschrift für Kurt Bittel 1: 345–8; 2: Pl. 69 nos. 1–9. Mainz.Google Scholar
Mellink, M. J., 1954. “Review of: Exploration archéologique de la Phrygie, Vol. III, La Cité de Midas. Céramique et trouvailles diverses. by C. H. Emile Haspels”. AJA LVIII: 167–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellink, M. J., 1970. “Archaeology in Asia Minor”. AJA LXXIV: 157–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, H., 1972. Fouilles de Xanthos—IV. Paris.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S., 1973. “Yaraşlı”. In Ankara 50: 60–2 (Ankara Türizmi, Eskieserleri ve Müzeleri Sevenler Derneǧi Yayınları 5) Ankara.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S., 1974. The History and Archaeology of Galatia. Oxford Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar
del Monte, G. F. and Tischler, J., 1978. Répertoire Géographique des Textes Cunéiformes 6. Die Orts- und Gewässernamen der hethitischen Texte. Wiesbaden (TAVO Beih.: Reihe B, Geisteswiss.; Nr. 7).Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, A., 1988. Hethitische Töpferei der Oberstadt von Hattuša. (Marburger Studien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte: Band 10) Marburg.Google Scholar
Neve, P., 1982. Büyükkale, die Bauwerke: Grabungen 1954–1966. Berlin (Boǧazköy-Hattuša 12).Google Scholar
Neve, P., 1990. “Die Ausgrabungen in Boǧazköy-Hattuša 1989”. AA: 267–303.Google Scholar
Neve, P., 1991. “Die Ausgrabungen in Boǧazköy-Hattuša 1990”. AA: 299–345.Google Scholar
von der Osten, H. H., 1933. “Gâvur Kale”. In Discoveries in Anatolia 1930–31: 56–90. (Oriental Institute Communications, No. 14) Chicago.Google Scholar
Sams, G. K., 1971. The Phrygian Painted Pottery of Early Iron Age Gordion and its Anatolian Setting. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Sams, G. K., 1979. “Imports at Gordion”. Expedition XXI no. 4: 6–17.Google Scholar
Summers, G. D., Forthcoming. “Grey Ware and the Eastern Limits of Phrygia”. Third Iron Age Colloquium (BIAA Monograph).Google Scholar
Tezcan, B., 1956. “Nallıhan-Beypazarı çevresinden getirilen kaplar hakkında”. Belleten XX: 343–7.Google Scholar