Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:36:05.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zygosity Testing: Laboratory and the Investigator's Judgment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Nancy L. Segal
Nancy L. Segal*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
*
University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The immediate global impressions of zygosity (based upon physical similarity) were recorded by the investigator at initial meetings with 105 pairs of twins. The accuracy of these ratings, as well as classifications provided by two objective procedures (physical resemblance questionnaire; dermatoglyphic analyses) and two subjective procedures (parental impressions; physician's impressions), were evaluated by comparison with results from bloodtyping for 53 pairs. The judgments of the investigator furnished the most accurate indication of zygosity (94-96% accuracy). Laboratory tests were repeated for five pairs when the results proved incompatible with the investigator's ratings. In all five cases, the investigator's judgments were confirmed, indicating that a laboratory error had occurred. It appears that the opinion of a skilled observer of twins can provide a convenient and highly effective alternative to bloodtyping.

Keywords

ZygosityTwinsPhysical resemblanceDermatoglyphicsBlood typing
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , July 1984 , pp. 515 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Carter-Saltzman, L, Scan, S (1977): MZ of DZ? Only your blood grouping laboratory knows for sure. Behav Genet 7:273–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Cavalli-Sforza, L, Bodmer, W (1971): The Genetics of Human Populations. San Francisco: WH Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
3.Cronin, DG, Hunter, WS (1980): Craniomorphology in twins discordant for cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate J 17:116–126.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Cummins, H, Midlo, C (1976): Fingerprints. Palms and Soles. Massachusetts: Research Publishing Co.Google Scholar
5.Essen-Möller, E (1941): Empirische Ahnlichkeitdiagnose bei Zwillingen. Hereditas 27:1–50. Cited in Torgersen 1979 [16].Google Scholar
6.Matheny, AP, Wilson, RS, Dolan, AB (1976): Relations between twin's similarity of appearance and behavioral similarity: Testing an assumption. Behav Genet 6:343–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Nichols, RC, Bilbro, WC Jr, (1966): The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet Stat Med 16:265–275.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Plomin, R, DeFries, JC, McClearn, GE (1980): Behavioral Genetics (A Primer). San Francisco: WH Freeman & Co, p 293.Google Scholar
9.Race, RR, Sanger, R (1975): Blood Groups in Man. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
10.Reed, T, Sprague, FW, Kang, KW, Nance, WE (1975): Genetic analysis of dermatoglyphic patterns in twins. Hum Hered 25:263–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Reed, T, Norton, JA Jr, Christian, JC (1977): Sources of information for discriminating MZ and DZ twins by dermatoglyphic patterns. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 26:83–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Scan, S (1968): Environmental bias in twin studies. In Manosevitz, M.Lindzey, G.Thiessen, DD (eds) (1969): Behavioral Genetics: Methods and Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
13.Shields, J (1962): Monozygotic Twins. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
14.Smith, R (1965): A comparison of socioenvtronmental factors in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: Testing an assumption. In Vandenberg, SG (ed): Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genetics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
15.Smith, SM, Penrose, LS (1955): Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann Hum Genet 19: 173–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Torgensen, S (1979): The determination of twin zygosity by means of a mailed questionnaire. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:225–236.Google Scholar
17.Vogel, F, Motulsky, AG (1979): Human Genetics. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
18.Wilson, RS (1970): Bloodtyping and twin zygosity. Hum Hered 20:30–56.Google Scholar