Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:43:48.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twin Pair Analysis of Some Palm Indexes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Walter Pinto Jr.  and
Bernardo Beiguelman
Walter Pinto Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Genetics, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
Bernardo Beiguelman*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Genetics, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
*
Department of Medical Genetics, State University of Campinas, CP. 1170, Campinas S.P., Brazil
Department of Medical Genetics, State University of Campinas, CP. 1170, Campinas S.P., Brazil

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The heritability of two main line indexes (DLI and TLI), a palm crease index (API), and an ulnarity index (UI) were investigated by using twin pair methodology for quantitative traits.

The analyses of the data allow to conclude that both DLI and API, which have been used to evaluate the obliquity of the main lines and the distal crease of the palm, should not be considered as depending upon an important genetic component. Otherwise, data on TLI and UI, while showing inconsistencies with the theoretical expectations, may be considered as genetic traits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 1971 , pp. 295 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1971

References

Beiguelman, B. (1970). Métodos estatísticos de estudo de caracteres quantitativos em gêmeos. Ciência e Cultura, 22: 299–321.Google Scholar
Clark, P. J. (1955). The heritability of certain anthropometric characters as ascertained from measurements of twins. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 8: 49–54.Google Scholar
Cummins, H., Midlo, C. (1961). Finger Prints, Palms and Soles. An Introduction to Dermatoglyphics. Dover Publ. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Giroux, J., Miller, J. R. (1967). Dermatoglyphics of the broad thumb and great toe syndrome. Amer. J. Dis. Child., 113: 207–209.Google ScholarPubMed
Holt, S. B. (1961). Palm-prints and their uses in medical biology. Cereb. Palsy Bull., 3: 333–347.Google ScholarPubMed
Holzinger, K. J. (1929). The relative effect of nature and nurture influences on twin difference. J. Educ. Psychol., 20: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempthorne, O., Osborne, R. H. (1961). The interpretation of twin data. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 13: 320–339.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. R., Giroux, J. (1966). Dermatoglyphics in pediatric practice. J. Pediat., 69: 302–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penrose, L. S. (1963). Finger-prints, palms and chromosomes. Nature (London), 197: 933–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, J. (1961a). An evaluation of the usefulness of dermatoglyphics in research. Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. Hum. Genet. Ed. 1st. Mendel, Rome 1963.Google Scholar
Pons, J. (1961b). Genetics of bilateral asymmetry in palmar main line transverseness. Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. Hum. Genet. Ed. 1st. Mendel, Rome 1963.Google Scholar
Saldanha, P. H. (1968). Dermatoglifos em genética médica. Rev. Paul. Med., 72: 173–204.Google Scholar
Uchida, I. A., Soltan, H. C. (1963) Evaluation of dermatoglyphics in medical genetics. Pediat. Clin. N. Amer., 10: 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar