Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T07:26:30.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Twins: II. Typhoid favours Cotwins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

H. K. Goswami
H. K. Goswami*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Botany, Govt. Science College, Gwalior
*
c/o Shri L. K. Goswami, Holipura, Datia M.P. (India)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The fact that controls as are maintained in most biological experiments, could even be studied ebulliently in human population, by observing a MZ pair, a member of which is exposed to a certain anomaly and the other acts as control, becomes more vivid and recommended from the present studies. For, they can be directly related to human health and welfare.

Permanent changes due to typhoid incidence in physical, mental and anthropometric traits of a member of MZ twin pair may be suggestive of some “beneficial interaction of typhoid bacillus with certain intricate mechanisms like RNA and protein synthesis, as has been envisaged earlier.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1968 , pp. 402 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1968

References

Dencker, S.J. (1958). A follow up study of 128 closed head injuries in twins using cotwins as controls, Acta Psychiat., Suppl. 123.Google Scholar
De Grouchy, J. (1958). L'Hérédité Moléculaire. Istituto Mendel, Rome.Google Scholar
Friberg, L. et al (1959). Smoking habits of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Brit. Med. J., 1: 1090–1092.Google Scholar
Gedda, L. (1960). Sports and genetics. A study on twins (351 pairs). A.Ge.Me.Ge., 11: 387–406.Google Scholar
Gedda, L. (1961). Genetica clinica. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 10: 389–405.Google Scholar
Gedda, L. (1962). For a cotwin control method in the study of ionizing radiations. (Preliminary Report). Proceed.IIIrd Internat. Congr. Hyg., Vienna.Google Scholar
Goswami, H.K. (1967). Studies on twins. I. Typhoid favours cotwins. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 16: 402.Google Scholar
Henry, E.R. (1901). Classification and Uses of Finger Prints. London.Google Scholar
Hyden, H., Egyhazi, E. (1964). Changes in RNA content and base composition in cortical neurons of rats in a learning experiment involving transfer of handedness. Proc. N.A.S., 52: 1030–1035.Google Scholar
Inouye, E. (1956). A review on the zygosity diagnosis of twins. Jap. J. Hum. Genet., 1: 24–31.Google Scholar
Kaij, L. (1956). Drinking habits in twins. Acta. Genet. Basel, 7: 437.Google Scholar
Newman, H.H., Freeman, F.H., Holzinger, K. J. (1937). A Study of Heredity and Environment. Chicago.Google Scholar
Penrose, L.S. (1954). The distal triradius t on the hands of parents and sibs of mongol imbeciles. Ann. Hum. Genet. London, 11: 10.Google Scholar
Race, R.R., Sanger, R. (1962). Blood Groups in Man. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stern, C. (1960). Principles of Human Genetics. University of California, N. Y. Google Scholar
Smith, S.M., Penrose, L.S. (1955). Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann. Hum. Genet. London, 11: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
W.H.O. (1966). The use of twins in epidemiological studies. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 15: 109–128.Google Scholar