Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:34:19.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Similarity in General Cognitive Ability, Creativity, and Cognitive Style in a Sample of Adolescent Russian Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

E.L. Grigorenko ,
M.C. LaBuda  and
A.S. Carter
E.L. Grigorenko
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
M.C. LaBuda*
Affiliation:
Department of Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
A.S. Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Department of Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
*
Yale Child Study Center, 230 S. Frontage Road, New Haven, CT 06510, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Data on five tests of general and specific cognitive abilities, cognitive styles, and creativity, obtained from members of 60 identical and 63 fraternal Russian adolescent twin pairs, are presented. All tests are adaptations of standardized instruments widely used outside of the Soviet Union. Identical and fraternal twin correlations for general cognitive ability yielded a lower estimate of heritability (0.29) than generally found in other countries worldwide (0.52) although the twin correlations themselves are fairly comparable to figures from other countries and cultures — 0.83 and 0.69 for Russian identical and fraternal twin pairs, respectively, vs 0.86 and 0.60 for non-Russian identical, and fraternal twin pairs. Twin correlations for other cognitive-related abilities assessed were also comparable to correlations obtained outside the Soviet Union with the exception of creativity which yielded higher within-pair resemblance than reported in previous twin studies.

Keywords

CreativityCognitive abilitiesTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 65 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Akimova, MK, Borisova, EM, Kozlova, VT, Loginova, GP (1984): Characteristics of mental development of adolescents (in Russian). Psihologicheskie Problemy Povedeniy Kachestva Obuheniya i Vospitaniya, Moscow.Google Scholar
2.Amthauer, R (1955): Intelligens Structur Test, Gattindgen: Verl. fur Psychologien.Google Scholar
3.Baranova, LA, Dvoryash, MD (1976): Intelligence and its application (in Russian). Psihologicheskie Metody v Kompelksnom Issledovanii Studentov, Leningrad.Google Scholar
4.Bouchard, TJ, McGue, M (1981): Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science 212: 1055–1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Canter, S (1973): Personality traits in twins. In Claridge, G, Canter, S, Hume, WI (eds): Personality Differences and Biological Variations. New York: Pergamon Press, pp 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Cohen, DJ, Dibble, E, Grawe, JM, Pollin, W (1973): Separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch Gen Psychiatry 29: 465–469.Google Scholar
7.Egorova, MS (in press); Cognitive development of preschool twins: A longitudinal study (in Russian).Google Scholar
8.Egorova, MS (1987): Genetic factors in interpersonal variance of file dependence/independence indicators. Act Nerv Super 29: 19–22.Google Scholar
9.Fuller, JL, Thompson, WR (1978): Foundations of Behavior Genetics. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.Google Scholar
10.Halperin, SL, Rao, DC, Morton, NE (1975): A twin study of intelligence in Russia. Behav Genet 5: 83–86.Google Scholar
11.Husen, T (1959): Psychological Twin Research. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
12.Grigorenko, EL (1990): Hypothesis-making process in the structure of cognitive activity (in Russian). Moscow State University and Moscow Institute of Developmental Psychology of the Academy of Pedogogical Science of the USSR, unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
13.Lynn, R, Hattori, K (1990): The heritability of intelligence in Japan. Behav Genet 20: 545–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Nathan, M, Guttman, R (1984): Similarities in test scores and profiles of Kibbutz twins and singletons. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33: 213–218.Google Scholar
15.Nichols, RC (1978): Twin studies of ability, personality, and interests. Homo 29: 158–173.Google Scholar
16.Plomin, R, De Fries, JC, McClearn, GE (1990): Behavioral Genetics: A Primer (2nd ed). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
17.Ravich-Scherbo, IV (1989): The Role of Heredity and Environment in the Formation of Individuality of Man (in Russian) Moscow: Pedagogika.Google Scholar
18.Salkind, NJ (1979): The development of norms for the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
19.Smith, H (1990): The New Russians. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
20.Sundet, JM, Tambs, K, Magnus, P, Berg, K (1988): On the question of secular trends in the heritability of intelligence scores: A study of Norwegian twins. Intelligence 12: 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Torrance, EP (1974): Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.Google Scholar
22.Wechsler, D (1974): Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Manual.Google Scholar
23.Witkin, HA, Oltman, PK, Raskin, E, Karp, SA (1971): A Manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.Google Scholar