Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T21:05:28.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Short Note on the Birth Order, Parental Age and the Incidence of Oral Clefts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

A. Bardhan
A. Bardhan*
Affiliation:
Dep. of Anthropology, Delhi University, Delhi

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A study of 6375 births from the records of two hospitals of Delhi reveals that the incidence of oral clefts is more or less constant in both males and females. Evidence indicates that plural births are more associated with the harelip, cleft palate and cleft lip, than single births. In the same way, there is a positive association between oral clefts and higher age groups of parents. For this fact it can be mentioned that the incidence of oral clefts is lower in lower birth ranks and higher in higher birth ranks, which is again indirectly influenced by the higher age group of parents.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1967 , pp. 101 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1967

References

Literature

Douglas, B. (1958). The role of environmental factors in the etiology of so-called congenital malformations. Plastic Reconstr. Surg., 22: 94–108, 214–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malpas, P. (1937). The incidence of human malformations and the significances of changes in the maternal environment in their causation. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp., 44: 434–454.Google Scholar
Metrakos, J. D. et al. (1958). Cleft of the lip and palate in twins. Plastic Reconstr. Surg., 22: 109–122.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. P. (1947). Congenital Malformations. J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. E. (1951). The relationship of birth order, maternal age to congenital oral cleft occurrence. Thesis, Univ. of Michigan. Cit. by Richard F. D., 1965.Google Scholar
Phair, Gretchen M. (1947). The Wisconsin cleft palate programme. J. Speech Dis., 12: 288–293.Google Scholar
Richard, F. D. (1965). Birth variables and the incidence of cleft palate. I. The Cleft Palate J., 2: 282–290.Google Scholar
Steigler, E. J., Berry, M. F. (1958). A new look at the etiology of cleft palate based on a study of 164 family histories. Plastic Reconstr. Surg., 21: 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voughan, H. S. (1940). Congenital Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate and Associated Nasal Deformations. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar